Is there a need for better software for writers?Is there a special software for writers?Do You Use Any Version Controlling Software/Methods As Writers?Are there any free programs for screen writersSoftware for analyzing a manuscript?Is there any good time-line software out there?Is there a good project management software for writers?Software for instructional bookAre there tools/software for planning your story using nested mindmaps and references to characters?Mariner Software for writersIs there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?

Are wands in any sort of book going to be too much like Harry Potter?

What should I use to get rid of some kind of weed in my onions

What's the difference between "ricochet" and "bounce"?

How to explain intravenous drug abuse to a 6-year-old?

Names of the Six Tastes

Is the tensor product (of vector spaces) commutative?

Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy

Is it possible to do moon sighting in advance for 5 years with 100% accuracy?

What are these pads?

Do oversize pulley wheels increase derailleur capacity?

As a small race with a heavy weapon, does enlage remove the disadvantage?

Program for finding longest run of zeros from a list of 100 random integers which are either 0 or 1

The unknown and unexplained in science fiction

What is the oldest instrument ever?

What happens when the drag force exceeds the weight of an object falling into earth?

Exactly which act of bravery are Luke and Han awarded a medal for?

How to append code verbatim to .bashrc?

How could a civilization detect tachyons?

Steganography in Latex

How do I politely tell my players to shut up about their backstory?

Add elements inside Array conditionally in JavaScript

Why is it wrong to *implement* myself a known, published, widely believed to be secure crypto algorithm?

How can I test a shell script in a "safe environment" to avoid harm to my computer?



Is there a need for better software for writers?


Is there a special software for writers?Do You Use Any Version Controlling Software/Methods As Writers?Are there any free programs for screen writersSoftware for analyzing a manuscript?Is there any good time-line software out there?Is there a good project management software for writers?Software for instructional bookAre there tools/software for planning your story using nested mindmaps and references to characters?Mariner Software for writersIs there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?













5















Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.



Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?



Full disclosure:

I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.










share|improve this question









New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 4





    I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

    – Henry Taylor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

    – Alexander
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

    – DPT
    4 hours ago











  • Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

    – Ray
    17 mins ago
















5















Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.



Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?



Full disclosure:

I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.










share|improve this question









New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 4





    I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

    – Henry Taylor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

    – Alexander
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

    – DPT
    4 hours ago











  • Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

    – Ray
    17 mins ago














5












5








5








Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.



Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?



Full disclosure:

I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.










share|improve this question









New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.



Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?



Full disclosure:

I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.







software






share|improve this question









New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Cyn

20.5k14496




20.5k14496






New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 5 hours ago









maulerosmauleros

292




292




New contributor



mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




mauleros is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 4





    I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

    – Henry Taylor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

    – Alexander
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

    – DPT
    4 hours ago











  • Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

    – Ray
    17 mins ago













  • 4





    I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

    – Henry Taylor
    5 hours ago






  • 1





    IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

    – Alexander
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

    – DPT
    4 hours ago











  • Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

    – Ray
    17 mins ago








4




4





I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago





I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.

– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago




1




1





IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

– Alexander
4 hours ago





IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.

– Alexander
4 hours ago




2




2





FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

– DPT
4 hours ago





FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.

– DPT
4 hours ago













Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

– Ray
17 mins ago






Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.

– Ray
17 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.



Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.



(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)






share|improve this answer























  • * shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    59 mins ago












  • On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    57 mins ago











  • @RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

    – Monica Cellio
    55 mins ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45035%2fis-there-a-need-for-better-software-for-writers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.



Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.



(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)






share|improve this answer























  • * shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    59 mins ago












  • On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    57 mins ago











  • @RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

    – Monica Cellio
    55 mins ago
















6














IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.



Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.



(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)






share|improve this answer























  • * shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    59 mins ago












  • On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    57 mins ago











  • @RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

    – Monica Cellio
    55 mins ago














6












6








6







IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.



Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.



(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)






share|improve this answer













IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.



Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.



(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









Monica CellioMonica Cellio

17.7k24195




17.7k24195












  • * shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    59 mins ago












  • On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    57 mins ago











  • @RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

    – Monica Cellio
    55 mins ago


















  • * shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    59 mins ago












  • On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

    – Roddy of the Frozen Peas
    57 mins ago











  • @RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

    – Monica Cellio
    55 mins ago

















* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago






* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(

– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago














On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago





On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)

– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago













@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

– Monica Cellio
55 mins ago






@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)

– Monica Cellio
55 mins ago











mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45035%2fis-there-a-need-for-better-software-for-writers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її