Is there a need for better software for writers?Is there a special software for writers?Do You Use Any Version Controlling Software/Methods As Writers?Are there any free programs for screen writersSoftware for analyzing a manuscript?Is there any good time-line software out there?Is there a good project management software for writers?Software for instructional bookAre there tools/software for planning your story using nested mindmaps and references to characters?Mariner Software for writersIs there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
Are wands in any sort of book going to be too much like Harry Potter?
What should I use to get rid of some kind of weed in my onions
What's the difference between "ricochet" and "bounce"?
How to explain intravenous drug abuse to a 6-year-old?
Names of the Six Tastes
Is the tensor product (of vector spaces) commutative?
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
Is it possible to do moon sighting in advance for 5 years with 100% accuracy?
What are these pads?
Do oversize pulley wheels increase derailleur capacity?
As a small race with a heavy weapon, does enlage remove the disadvantage?
Program for finding longest run of zeros from a list of 100 random integers which are either 0 or 1
The unknown and unexplained in science fiction
What is the oldest instrument ever?
What happens when the drag force exceeds the weight of an object falling into earth?
Exactly which act of bravery are Luke and Han awarded a medal for?
How to append code verbatim to .bashrc?
How could a civilization detect tachyons?
Steganography in Latex
How do I politely tell my players to shut up about their backstory?
Add elements inside Array conditionally in JavaScript
Why is it wrong to *implement* myself a known, published, widely believed to be secure crypto algorithm?
How can I test a shell script in a "safe environment" to avoid harm to my computer?
Is there a need for better software for writers?
Is there a special software for writers?Do You Use Any Version Controlling Software/Methods As Writers?Are there any free programs for screen writersSoftware for analyzing a manuscript?Is there any good time-line software out there?Is there a good project management software for writers?Software for instructional bookAre there tools/software for planning your story using nested mindmaps and references to characters?Mariner Software for writersIs there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.
Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?
Full disclosure:
I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.
software
New contributor
add a comment |
Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.
Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?
Full disclosure:
I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.
software
New contributor
4
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
1
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
2
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.
Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?
Full disclosure:
I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.
software
New contributor
Software developers don't ever work in text editors, instead they use IDEs (integrated development environments) full of code assistance tools, etc.
Why don't writers use similarly advanced writing environments full of writing assistance tools, text analysis, and functions for improving their productivity? Is that because there is no actual need for that or is it a product opportunity here?
Full disclosure:
I'm a software developer looking for opportunities across different fields and I also tried to write a book several times in the past. I always ended up realizing that I'm not good at writing, though it would be great if I could provide some value to good writers (unlike me) and help them be more productive.
software
software
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
Cyn
20.5k14496
20.5k14496
New contributor
asked 5 hours ago
maulerosmauleros
292
292
New contributor
New contributor
4
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
1
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
2
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
4
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
1
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
2
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago
4
4
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
1
1
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
2
2
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.
Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.
(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45035%2fis-there-a-need-for-better-software-for-writers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.
Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.
(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
add a comment |
IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.
Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.
(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
add a comment |
IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.
Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.
(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)
IDE-like tools exist for writers. Scrivener is a powerful general-purpose tool (also with questions here). Madcap Flare, aimed at technical writers, has good support for updating links, defining "snippets" (xinclude blocks, essentially), variables, conditionalization, advanced build options, and more. Arbortext Epic is another tool in that vein. There are XML editors like Oxygen and Notepad++ that you are probably already familiar with as a programmer. That's just a sampling.
Many writers prefer to just write and find that too much tooling gets in the way. Some of them use tools for planning separate from writing. Maybe fiction doesn't need to be refactored as often as code (though it does need to be refactored sometimes, and doing that in an editor using search is a pain). There are a lot of different kinds of writing and writers, and generalizations like "writers don't (or do) X" don't always stand up to scrutiny. Some do, some don't, some would if they didn't cost so much, and some do sometimes, depending on the task at hand.
(Psst. Some software developers still use emacs or vim...)
answered 2 hours ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
17.7k24195
17.7k24195
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
add a comment |
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
* shamefully raises hand * I use vim to program. I also wrote my novel with pen and paper. :(
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
59 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
On a more serious note, this is a very good answer. I would also point out that other forms of writing (screenplays, graphic novels, etc.) have an even larger collection of specialized software to support the particular needs of those media (specialized formatting, asset management, etc.)
– Roddy of the Frozen Peas
57 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
@RoddyoftheFrozenPeas good point -- I've always assumed that screenwriting, for example, has specialized tools oriented around the format's special needs, but I don't have personal knowledge there. (And back when I was still a programmer I used emacs, only using an IDE to orchestrate large refactorings.)
– Monica Cellio♦
55 mins ago
add a comment |
mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mauleros is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45035%2fis-there-a-need-for-better-software-for-writers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
I'm also a software developer and had the same idea a while back. Someone suggested that I take a look at Scrivener before investing time in writing something. I not only gave up on the coding project, I bought both of their products. They have free trial downloads, so give it a try.
– Henry Taylor
5 hours ago
1
IMHO modern AI is advancing to the level that it can give a useful critique to the writer and perform human-level editing. I expect to see significant advances in that area in the next 5-10 years.
– Alexander
4 hours ago
2
FWIW I find the software-driven model of 'writing' to be rather depressing. I know a gent who recently discovered grammerly and while it 'improves' his writing, it decimated his voice.
– DPT
4 hours ago
Even when programming, there are plenty who don't consider the code assistance tools (and rather rudimentary editing abilities) of an IDE to be preferable to using at text editor that lets one edit text efficiently. When writing non-code text, this is even more true.
– Ray
17 mins ago