Who's at fault for crashes while changing lanes if the driver who isn't changing lanes speeds-up beforehand?
Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?
Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?
Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?
What flavor of zksnark in tezos
How to make thick Asian sauces?
The ring of global sections of a regular scheme
What's the correct term for a waitress in the Middle Ages?
What is the history of the check mark / tick mark?
Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?
Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?
Accidentally cashed a check twice
What happened to all the nuclear material being smuggled after the fall of the USSR?
Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"
Is it OK to bring delicacies from hometown as tokens of gratitude for an out-of-town interview?
Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?
What was the point of getting this item into the Quantum Tunnel?
Responsibility for visa checking
Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"
What are they doing to this poor rocket?
How to pass a regex when finding a directory path in bash?
I wrote a scene that the majority of my readers loved. How do I get back to that place while writing my new book?
what is triplication on fpga?
What happens to foam insulation board after you pour concrete slab?
Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access
Who's at fault for crashes while changing lanes if the driver who isn't changing lanes speeds-up beforehand?
I have only had my Driver's License for about a year now, and I recently had a bad experience. I was moving into a turn lane, and someone revved their engine, sped up, and cut me off before I was able to move into it. If I hadn't been watching carefully, it could have been a crash.
I think normally the one who is at fault in these situations is the person who's changing lanes, but the special circumstance confuses me.
I am glad that nothing else happened. However, if we had crashed, who would've been legally at fault? Would it have mattered if I could've provided evidence that they sped up, or that I had my turn-signal on? What other factors may be considered?
driving speeding
add a comment |
I have only had my Driver's License for about a year now, and I recently had a bad experience. I was moving into a turn lane, and someone revved their engine, sped up, and cut me off before I was able to move into it. If I hadn't been watching carefully, it could have been a crash.
I think normally the one who is at fault in these situations is the person who's changing lanes, but the special circumstance confuses me.
I am glad that nothing else happened. However, if we had crashed, who would've been legally at fault? Would it have mattered if I could've provided evidence that they sped up, or that I had my turn-signal on? What other factors may be considered?
driving speeding
add a comment |
I have only had my Driver's License for about a year now, and I recently had a bad experience. I was moving into a turn lane, and someone revved their engine, sped up, and cut me off before I was able to move into it. If I hadn't been watching carefully, it could have been a crash.
I think normally the one who is at fault in these situations is the person who's changing lanes, but the special circumstance confuses me.
I am glad that nothing else happened. However, if we had crashed, who would've been legally at fault? Would it have mattered if I could've provided evidence that they sped up, or that I had my turn-signal on? What other factors may be considered?
driving speeding
I have only had my Driver's License for about a year now, and I recently had a bad experience. I was moving into a turn lane, and someone revved their engine, sped up, and cut me off before I was able to move into it. If I hadn't been watching carefully, it could have been a crash.
I think normally the one who is at fault in these situations is the person who's changing lanes, but the special circumstance confuses me.
I am glad that nothing else happened. However, if we had crashed, who would've been legally at fault? Would it have mattered if I could've provided evidence that they sped up, or that I had my turn-signal on? What other factors may be considered?
driving speeding
driving speeding
asked 8 hours ago
LuminousNutriaLuminousNutria
1116
1116
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The person who is changing lanes has the responsibility to make sure that they have space to move into. Suppose there was a person in front of you in the destination lane who hit the brakes suddenly - if you change lanes and rear-end them, that's your fault, because you failed to leave enough distance. I don't see how it's any different in this case, where the person is behind you and accelerates suddenly. A turn signal doesn't give you the right to change lanes at will, you are responsible for making the maneuver safely. It's poor driving etiquette for the other guy to cut you off like that, but it's up to you to ensure there's space as you move over.
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41609%2fwhos-at-fault-for-crashes-while-changing-lanes-if-the-driver-who-isnt-changing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The person who is changing lanes has the responsibility to make sure that they have space to move into. Suppose there was a person in front of you in the destination lane who hit the brakes suddenly - if you change lanes and rear-end them, that's your fault, because you failed to leave enough distance. I don't see how it's any different in this case, where the person is behind you and accelerates suddenly. A turn signal doesn't give you the right to change lanes at will, you are responsible for making the maneuver safely. It's poor driving etiquette for the other guy to cut you off like that, but it's up to you to ensure there's space as you move over.
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
add a comment |
The person who is changing lanes has the responsibility to make sure that they have space to move into. Suppose there was a person in front of you in the destination lane who hit the brakes suddenly - if you change lanes and rear-end them, that's your fault, because you failed to leave enough distance. I don't see how it's any different in this case, where the person is behind you and accelerates suddenly. A turn signal doesn't give you the right to change lanes at will, you are responsible for making the maneuver safely. It's poor driving etiquette for the other guy to cut you off like that, but it's up to you to ensure there's space as you move over.
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
add a comment |
The person who is changing lanes has the responsibility to make sure that they have space to move into. Suppose there was a person in front of you in the destination lane who hit the brakes suddenly - if you change lanes and rear-end them, that's your fault, because you failed to leave enough distance. I don't see how it's any different in this case, where the person is behind you and accelerates suddenly. A turn signal doesn't give you the right to change lanes at will, you are responsible for making the maneuver safely. It's poor driving etiquette for the other guy to cut you off like that, but it's up to you to ensure there's space as you move over.
The person who is changing lanes has the responsibility to make sure that they have space to move into. Suppose there was a person in front of you in the destination lane who hit the brakes suddenly - if you change lanes and rear-end them, that's your fault, because you failed to leave enough distance. I don't see how it's any different in this case, where the person is behind you and accelerates suddenly. A turn signal doesn't give you the right to change lanes at will, you are responsible for making the maneuver safely. It's poor driving etiquette for the other guy to cut you off like that, but it's up to you to ensure there's space as you move over.
answered 8 hours ago
Nuclear WangNuclear Wang
1,52779
1,52779
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
Alright, I was only curious. Thank you.
– LuminousNutria
8 hours ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
I wouldn't agree that it is so clear cut. There is a responsibility not to try to hit other drivers as well. It used to be called the "last clear chance" doctrine although now it doesn't have such a well defined name. If there was a crash, a jury could easily go either way.
– ohwilleke
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41609%2fwhos-at-fault-for-crashes-while-changing-lanes-if-the-driver-who-isnt-changing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown