Why is c4 bad when playing the London against a King's Indian?

What do we gain with higher order logics?

Avoiding cliches when writing gods

Traffic law UK, pedestrians

Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access

Is it possible for people to live in the eye of a permanent hypercane?

In this example, which path would a monster affected by the Dissonant Whispers spell take?

Is there any word or phrase for negative bearing?

What flavor of zksnark in tezos

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?

Can Green-Flame Blade be cast twice with the Hunter ranger's Horde Breaker ability?

How could a possessed body begin to rot and decay while it is still alive?

How much water is needed to create a Katana capable of cutting flesh, bones and wood?

When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?

Explain Ant-Man's "not it" scene from Avengers: Endgame

Poisson distribution: why does time between events follow an exponential distribution?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

Count down from 0 to 5 seconds and repeat

Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?

Linux tr to convert vertical text to horizontal

Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

Why don't B747s start takeoffs with full throttle?

If Boris Johnson were prosecuted and convicted of lying about Brexit, can that be used to cancel Brexit?



Why is c4 bad when playing the London against a King's Indian?














5















Recently I (rated ~1900 "classical" on Lichess) played the following opening:
1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.Nf3 O-O 5.Nbd2 d6 6.c4
Upon playing c4, the stockfish analysis goes from a score of 0 to a wopping -1.1, as if I've already blundered a pawn. I've noticed this in a lot of my games - when black avoids developing his queenside and putting pawns in the center, I'm tempted to play c4, planning Nc3, castling kingside, taking up space on the queenside and if black is passive, perhaps pushing for a central pawn break with c5. But in these situations stockfish usually strongly dislikes c4.



Why? Stockfish's response is usually suggesting black play c5 pretty quickly, but this allows d5 giving me a lot of kingside space instead, and I can imagine a nice eventual pawn break with e5. I'm perhaps not at a level where I should be focusing on the opening so much, but I feel like I'm missing a big strategic idea here.










share|improve this question







New contributor



aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    5















    Recently I (rated ~1900 "classical" on Lichess) played the following opening:
    1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.Nf3 O-O 5.Nbd2 d6 6.c4
    Upon playing c4, the stockfish analysis goes from a score of 0 to a wopping -1.1, as if I've already blundered a pawn. I've noticed this in a lot of my games - when black avoids developing his queenside and putting pawns in the center, I'm tempted to play c4, planning Nc3, castling kingside, taking up space on the queenside and if black is passive, perhaps pushing for a central pawn break with c5. But in these situations stockfish usually strongly dislikes c4.



    Why? Stockfish's response is usually suggesting black play c5 pretty quickly, but this allows d5 giving me a lot of kingside space instead, and I can imagine a nice eventual pawn break with e5. I'm perhaps not at a level where I should be focusing on the opening so much, but I feel like I'm missing a big strategic idea here.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor



    aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      5












      5








      5








      Recently I (rated ~1900 "classical" on Lichess) played the following opening:
      1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.Nf3 O-O 5.Nbd2 d6 6.c4
      Upon playing c4, the stockfish analysis goes from a score of 0 to a wopping -1.1, as if I've already blundered a pawn. I've noticed this in a lot of my games - when black avoids developing his queenside and putting pawns in the center, I'm tempted to play c4, planning Nc3, castling kingside, taking up space on the queenside and if black is passive, perhaps pushing for a central pawn break with c5. But in these situations stockfish usually strongly dislikes c4.



      Why? Stockfish's response is usually suggesting black play c5 pretty quickly, but this allows d5 giving me a lot of kingside space instead, and I can imagine a nice eventual pawn break with e5. I'm perhaps not at a level where I should be focusing on the opening so much, but I feel like I'm missing a big strategic idea here.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Recently I (rated ~1900 "classical" on Lichess) played the following opening:
      1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 g6 3.e3 Bg7 4.Nf3 O-O 5.Nbd2 d6 6.c4
      Upon playing c4, the stockfish analysis goes from a score of 0 to a wopping -1.1, as if I've already blundered a pawn. I've noticed this in a lot of my games - when black avoids developing his queenside and putting pawns in the center, I'm tempted to play c4, planning Nc3, castling kingside, taking up space on the queenside and if black is passive, perhaps pushing for a central pawn break with c5. But in these situations stockfish usually strongly dislikes c4.



      Why? Stockfish's response is usually suggesting black play c5 pretty quickly, but this allows d5 giving me a lot of kingside space instead, and I can imagine a nice eventual pawn break with e5. I'm perhaps not at a level where I should be focusing on the opening so much, but I feel like I'm missing a big strategic idea here.







      opening strategy kings-indian london-system






      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor



      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      aquirdturtleaquirdturtle

      1292




      1292




      New contributor



      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      aquirdturtle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          It may be to the fact that you are making his bad Bishop into a Monster.
          After 6...c5, 7. d5 Nh5! and the dark square bishop is free to roam.



          [FEN "rnbq1rk1/pp2ppbp/3p2p1/2pP3n/2P2B2/4PN2/PP1N1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 1 8"]





          share|improve this answer

























          • That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago











          • @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

            – gtgaxiola
            5 hours ago












          • The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago


















          0














          If you want to play c4 against the King's Indian, it's better to go "all in" by having your e-pawn on e4 (so playing a main line against the KID). With the pawn on e3 you're sort of dipping your toe in the water with c4. It's not nearly as effective.



          There's also an important tactical reason for why c4 is bad (probably why Stockfish gave -1). After 6...c5, if you push 7.d5 then Black has 7...Nh5, attacking your f4-bishop and the hanging b2-pawn. You'll have to give up the pawn or settle for Black playing ...Nxf4 and giving you doubled pawns. You could avoid pushing d5 but then after ...Nh5 (again) your d-pawn is under heavy fire since it doesn't have any support from your c-pawn.



          If your c-pawn were on c3 then the d4-pawn would have more support, and there would never be any issues with the b2-pawn hanging.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "435"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            aquirdturtle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24617%2fwhy-is-c4-bad-when-playing-the-london-against-a-kings-indian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            It may be to the fact that you are making his bad Bishop into a Monster.
            After 6...c5, 7. d5 Nh5! and the dark square bishop is free to roam.



            [FEN "rnbq1rk1/pp2ppbp/3p2p1/2pP3n/2P2B2/4PN2/PP1N1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 1 8"]





            share|improve this answer

























            • That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago











            • @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

              – gtgaxiola
              5 hours ago












            • The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago















            3














            It may be to the fact that you are making his bad Bishop into a Monster.
            After 6...c5, 7. d5 Nh5! and the dark square bishop is free to roam.



            [FEN "rnbq1rk1/pp2ppbp/3p2p1/2pP3n/2P2B2/4PN2/PP1N1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 1 8"]





            share|improve this answer

























            • That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago











            • @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

              – gtgaxiola
              5 hours ago












            • The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago













            3












            3








            3







            It may be to the fact that you are making his bad Bishop into a Monster.
            After 6...c5, 7. d5 Nh5! and the dark square bishop is free to roam.



            [FEN "rnbq1rk1/pp2ppbp/3p2p1/2pP3n/2P2B2/4PN2/PP1N1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 1 8"]





            share|improve this answer















            It may be to the fact that you are making his bad Bishop into a Monster.
            After 6...c5, 7. d5 Nh5! and the dark square bishop is free to roam.



            [FEN "rnbq1rk1/pp2ppbp/3p2p1/2pP3n/2P2B2/4PN2/PP1N1PPP/R2QKB1R w KQ - 1 8"]






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            gtgaxiolagtgaxiola

            1759




            1759












            • That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago











            • @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

              – gtgaxiola
              5 hours ago












            • The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago

















            • That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago











            • @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

              – gtgaxiola
              5 hours ago












            • The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

              – Inertial Ignorance
              5 hours ago
















            That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago





            That's not the main reason. In the diagram you posted Black wins the b2-pawn or gets to play ...Nxf4.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago













            @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

            – gtgaxiola
            5 hours ago






            @InertialIgnorance The Main Reason is because the dark square Bishop has the a1-h8 diagonal at its disposal (the main drawback of playing the KID is gone in this position!) Which allows winning the b2 pawn once White decides what to do about his Dark square bishop.

            – gtgaxiola
            5 hours ago














            The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago





            The bishop having access to the long diagonal is not a sufficient reason for the winning the pawn on its own. In the Benoni the bishop enjoys this throughout the whole game. Black wins a pawn in the diagram because of a specific tactic involving White's f4-bishop and the loose pawn.

            – Inertial Ignorance
            5 hours ago











            0














            If you want to play c4 against the King's Indian, it's better to go "all in" by having your e-pawn on e4 (so playing a main line against the KID). With the pawn on e3 you're sort of dipping your toe in the water with c4. It's not nearly as effective.



            There's also an important tactical reason for why c4 is bad (probably why Stockfish gave -1). After 6...c5, if you push 7.d5 then Black has 7...Nh5, attacking your f4-bishop and the hanging b2-pawn. You'll have to give up the pawn or settle for Black playing ...Nxf4 and giving you doubled pawns. You could avoid pushing d5 but then after ...Nh5 (again) your d-pawn is under heavy fire since it doesn't have any support from your c-pawn.



            If your c-pawn were on c3 then the d4-pawn would have more support, and there would never be any issues with the b2-pawn hanging.






            share|improve this answer





























              0














              If you want to play c4 against the King's Indian, it's better to go "all in" by having your e-pawn on e4 (so playing a main line against the KID). With the pawn on e3 you're sort of dipping your toe in the water with c4. It's not nearly as effective.



              There's also an important tactical reason for why c4 is bad (probably why Stockfish gave -1). After 6...c5, if you push 7.d5 then Black has 7...Nh5, attacking your f4-bishop and the hanging b2-pawn. You'll have to give up the pawn or settle for Black playing ...Nxf4 and giving you doubled pawns. You could avoid pushing d5 but then after ...Nh5 (again) your d-pawn is under heavy fire since it doesn't have any support from your c-pawn.



              If your c-pawn were on c3 then the d4-pawn would have more support, and there would never be any issues with the b2-pawn hanging.






              share|improve this answer



























                0












                0








                0







                If you want to play c4 against the King's Indian, it's better to go "all in" by having your e-pawn on e4 (so playing a main line against the KID). With the pawn on e3 you're sort of dipping your toe in the water with c4. It's not nearly as effective.



                There's also an important tactical reason for why c4 is bad (probably why Stockfish gave -1). After 6...c5, if you push 7.d5 then Black has 7...Nh5, attacking your f4-bishop and the hanging b2-pawn. You'll have to give up the pawn or settle for Black playing ...Nxf4 and giving you doubled pawns. You could avoid pushing d5 but then after ...Nh5 (again) your d-pawn is under heavy fire since it doesn't have any support from your c-pawn.



                If your c-pawn were on c3 then the d4-pawn would have more support, and there would never be any issues with the b2-pawn hanging.






                share|improve this answer















                If you want to play c4 against the King's Indian, it's better to go "all in" by having your e-pawn on e4 (so playing a main line against the KID). With the pawn on e3 you're sort of dipping your toe in the water with c4. It's not nearly as effective.



                There's also an important tactical reason for why c4 is bad (probably why Stockfish gave -1). After 6...c5, if you push 7.d5 then Black has 7...Nh5, attacking your f4-bishop and the hanging b2-pawn. You'll have to give up the pawn or settle for Black playing ...Nxf4 and giving you doubled pawns. You could avoid pushing d5 but then after ...Nh5 (again) your d-pawn is under heavy fire since it doesn't have any support from your c-pawn.



                If your c-pawn were on c3 then the d4-pawn would have more support, and there would never be any issues with the b2-pawn hanging.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 4 hours ago









                Brian Towers

                18k33179




                18k33179










                answered 5 hours ago









                Inertial IgnoranceInertial Ignorance

                5,811513




                5,811513




















                    aquirdturtle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    aquirdturtle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    aquirdturtle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    aquirdturtle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24617%2fwhy-is-c4-bad-when-playing-the-london-against-a-kings-indian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單