Why does the first diminished 7th in this progression not resolve?Why does this progression sound good, even if it not resolve to the root?Why does this progression alternating between major and minor chords sound right?“The intervals considered dissonant have changed since the 'Middle Ages'”; How so?The sudden switch from C major to C minor in Wake me up when September ends and a Solo Acoustic versionWhy does VII have dominant function in natural minorAm I right in that it is a diminished triad without the third?How to overcome emotional tension with this Beethoven rondoChord progression conveniency depending on the harmonic rhythmWhy does this modulation sequence work?Chromatic 7th chords going upwards in Beethoven

Personalization conditions switching doesn`t work in Experience Editor (9.1.0, Initial Release)

How to split a string in two substrings of same length using bash?

Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?

In this example, which path would a monster affected by the Dissonant Whispers spell take?

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?

When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?

Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?

Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?

What are they doing to this poor rocket?

How to make thick Asian sauces?

Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?

Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"

Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?

Responsibility for visa checking

Do I include animal companions when calculating difficulty of an encounter?

Comma Code - Ch. 4 Automate the Boring Stuff

The ring of global sections of a regular scheme

What is the history of the check mark / tick mark?

Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?

PhD student with mental health issues and bad performance

correct term describing the action of sending a brand-new ship out into its first seafaring trip

Credit card offering 0.5 miles for every cent rounded up. Too good to be true?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?



Why does the first diminished 7th in this progression not resolve?


Why does this progression sound good, even if it not resolve to the root?Why does this progression alternating between major and minor chords sound right?“The intervals considered dissonant have changed since the 'Middle Ages'”; How so?The sudden switch from C major to C minor in Wake me up when September ends and a Solo Acoustic versionWhy does VII have dominant function in natural minorAm I right in that it is a diminished triad without the third?How to overcome emotional tension with this Beethoven rondoChord progression conveniency depending on the harmonic rhythmWhy does this modulation sequence work?Chromatic 7th chords going upwards in Beethoven













2















So, I wrote this pastoral piece and it sounds good to me. One thing I am curious about though is why the first diminished 7th here builds up tension and more specifically why the restatement of C minor the first time does not feel like a resolution. I know why the F minor sounds dissonant here(or at least more dissonant than it would have if I put an F there instead of an Ab). It is because I am doubling the chordal third in the melody and the chordal third is minor. Here is the section I am talking about so that you can see the harmonic and melodic framework off of which I built the C minor section of my pastoral piece:



X:
T: Country Day
T: C minor Section
C: Cheyanna Marie Ward
M: 4/4
L: 1/4
Q: 1/4=140
%%score (pian) (pian2)
K: C minor
V:pian name="Piano Right Hand" clef=treble
V:pian2 name="Piano Left Hand" clef=bass
%
%
[V:pian] G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 F1 z1 | G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 =B2 | [C4E4G4c4] ||
s: !ff!
[V:pian2] [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,1F,,1A,,1=B,,1] z1 | [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,2F,,2A,,2=B,,2] | [C,,4E,,4G,,4C,4] ||


So why does the first diminished 7th not really resolve despite me restating C minor(which as a D dim7, it would normally resolve to)? Does it have to do with the rest before the C minor is restated? And yes, that is an enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.










share|improve this question


























    2















    So, I wrote this pastoral piece and it sounds good to me. One thing I am curious about though is why the first diminished 7th here builds up tension and more specifically why the restatement of C minor the first time does not feel like a resolution. I know why the F minor sounds dissonant here(or at least more dissonant than it would have if I put an F there instead of an Ab). It is because I am doubling the chordal third in the melody and the chordal third is minor. Here is the section I am talking about so that you can see the harmonic and melodic framework off of which I built the C minor section of my pastoral piece:



    X:
    T: Country Day
    T: C minor Section
    C: Cheyanna Marie Ward
    M: 4/4
    L: 1/4
    Q: 1/4=140
    %%score (pian) (pian2)
    K: C minor
    V:pian name="Piano Right Hand" clef=treble
    V:pian2 name="Piano Left Hand" clef=bass
    %
    %
    [V:pian] G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 F1 z1 | G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 =B2 | [C4E4G4c4] ||
    s: !ff!
    [V:pian2] [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,1F,,1A,,1=B,,1] z1 | [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,2F,,2A,,2=B,,2] | [C,,4E,,4G,,4C,4] ||


    So why does the first diminished 7th not really resolve despite me restating C minor(which as a D dim7, it would normally resolve to)? Does it have to do with the rest before the C minor is restated? And yes, that is an enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      So, I wrote this pastoral piece and it sounds good to me. One thing I am curious about though is why the first diminished 7th here builds up tension and more specifically why the restatement of C minor the first time does not feel like a resolution. I know why the F minor sounds dissonant here(or at least more dissonant than it would have if I put an F there instead of an Ab). It is because I am doubling the chordal third in the melody and the chordal third is minor. Here is the section I am talking about so that you can see the harmonic and melodic framework off of which I built the C minor section of my pastoral piece:



      X:
      T: Country Day
      T: C minor Section
      C: Cheyanna Marie Ward
      M: 4/4
      L: 1/4
      Q: 1/4=140
      %%score (pian) (pian2)
      K: C minor
      V:pian name="Piano Right Hand" clef=treble
      V:pian2 name="Piano Left Hand" clef=bass
      %
      %
      [V:pian] G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 F1 z1 | G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 =B2 | [C4E4G4c4] ||
      s: !ff!
      [V:pian2] [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,1F,,1A,,1=B,,1] z1 | [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,2F,,2A,,2=B,,2] | [C,,4E,,4G,,4C,4] ||


      So why does the first diminished 7th not really resolve despite me restating C minor(which as a D dim7, it would normally resolve to)? Does it have to do with the rest before the C minor is restated? And yes, that is an enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.










      share|improve this question














      So, I wrote this pastoral piece and it sounds good to me. One thing I am curious about though is why the first diminished 7th here builds up tension and more specifically why the restatement of C minor the first time does not feel like a resolution. I know why the F minor sounds dissonant here(or at least more dissonant than it would have if I put an F there instead of an Ab). It is because I am doubling the chordal third in the melody and the chordal third is minor. Here is the section I am talking about so that you can see the harmonic and melodic framework off of which I built the C minor section of my pastoral piece:



      X:
      T: Country Day
      T: C minor Section
      C: Cheyanna Marie Ward
      M: 4/4
      L: 1/4
      Q: 1/4=140
      %%score (pian) (pian2)
      K: C minor
      V:pian name="Piano Right Hand" clef=treble
      V:pian2 name="Piano Left Hand" clef=bass
      %
      %
      [V:pian] G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 F1 z1 | G1 E1/2C1/2 C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 | A1 z1 G1 E1/2C1/2 | C1 D1/4E1/4F1/4G1/4 =B2 | [C4E4G4c4] ||
      s: !ff!
      [V:pian2] [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,1F,,1A,,1=B,,1] z1 | [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] [C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 |[F,,1A,,1C,1F,1] z1 [C,,1E,,1G,,1C,1] [E,,1G,,1C,1E,1] |[C,1E,1G,1C1] D,,1/4D,,1/4D,,1/4E,,1/4 [D,,2F,,2A,,2=B,,2] | [C,,4E,,4G,,4C,4] ||


      So why does the first diminished 7th not really resolve despite me restating C minor(which as a D dim7, it would normally resolve to)? Does it have to do with the rest before the C minor is restated? And yes, that is an enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.







      harmony chord-progressions sevenths






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      CatersCaters

      1,36911125




      1,36911125




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          ...enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.




          I don't follow your meaning. That chord is probably best described as viio6/5 tones `D F Ab B♮).



          enter image description here



          As far as resolution goes, I think what you have in the bass clef is the standard thing: viio in first inversion with the leading tone and supertonic moving in contrary motion to the tonic, TI up to DO and RE down to DO or B♮ to C and D to C. (Green lines.) FA to ME or F to Eb would be the typical way for that voice to resolve.



          The only thing I imagine sounds unresolved to you is the treble part FA to SOL or F up to G. (Blue line.) That moves in the opposite direction of FA's tendency to move down to MI.



          The isn't necessarily a problem. (Maybe you did that so the double FAs didn't move in parallel octaves?) But, if that motion upward FA to SOL is the problem, you could try to revoice the chord. Perhaps cut the F in the bass, then have the F in the treble move down to Eb. Of course that will change the line, but it may address your sense that the chord isn't resolving.






          share|improve this answer























          • Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago











          • @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

            – Michael Curtis
            5 hours ago












          • And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "240"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85403%2fwhy-does-the-first-diminished-7th-in-this-progression-not-resolve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4















          ...enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.




          I don't follow your meaning. That chord is probably best described as viio6/5 tones `D F Ab B♮).



          enter image description here



          As far as resolution goes, I think what you have in the bass clef is the standard thing: viio in first inversion with the leading tone and supertonic moving in contrary motion to the tonic, TI up to DO and RE down to DO or B♮ to C and D to C. (Green lines.) FA to ME or F to Eb would be the typical way for that voice to resolve.



          The only thing I imagine sounds unresolved to you is the treble part FA to SOL or F up to G. (Blue line.) That moves in the opposite direction of FA's tendency to move down to MI.



          The isn't necessarily a problem. (Maybe you did that so the double FAs didn't move in parallel octaves?) But, if that motion upward FA to SOL is the problem, you could try to revoice the chord. Perhaps cut the F in the bass, then have the F in the treble move down to Eb. Of course that will change the line, but it may address your sense that the chord isn't resolving.






          share|improve this answer























          • Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago











          • @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

            – Michael Curtis
            5 hours ago












          • And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago
















          4















          ...enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.




          I don't follow your meaning. That chord is probably best described as viio6/5 tones `D F Ab B♮).



          enter image description here



          As far as resolution goes, I think what you have in the bass clef is the standard thing: viio in first inversion with the leading tone and supertonic moving in contrary motion to the tonic, TI up to DO and RE down to DO or B♮ to C and D to C. (Green lines.) FA to ME or F to Eb would be the typical way for that voice to resolve.



          The only thing I imagine sounds unresolved to you is the treble part FA to SOL or F up to G. (Blue line.) That moves in the opposite direction of FA's tendency to move down to MI.



          The isn't necessarily a problem. (Maybe you did that so the double FAs didn't move in parallel octaves?) But, if that motion upward FA to SOL is the problem, you could try to revoice the chord. Perhaps cut the F in the bass, then have the F in the treble move down to Eb. Of course that will change the line, but it may address your sense that the chord isn't resolving.






          share|improve this answer























          • Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago











          • @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

            – Michael Curtis
            5 hours ago












          • And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago














          4












          4








          4








          ...enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.




          I don't follow your meaning. That chord is probably best described as viio6/5 tones `D F Ab B♮).



          enter image description here



          As far as resolution goes, I think what you have in the bass clef is the standard thing: viio in first inversion with the leading tone and supertonic moving in contrary motion to the tonic, TI up to DO and RE down to DO or B♮ to C and D to C. (Green lines.) FA to ME or F to Eb would be the typical way for that voice to resolve.



          The only thing I imagine sounds unresolved to you is the treble part FA to SOL or F up to G. (Blue line.) That moves in the opposite direction of FA's tendency to move down to MI.



          The isn't necessarily a problem. (Maybe you did that so the double FAs didn't move in parallel octaves?) But, if that motion upward FA to SOL is the problem, you could try to revoice the chord. Perhaps cut the F in the bass, then have the F in the treble move down to Eb. Of course that will change the line, but it may address your sense that the chord isn't resolving.






          share|improve this answer














          ...enharmonic respelling of D dim7 to fit better with the key of C minor.




          I don't follow your meaning. That chord is probably best described as viio6/5 tones `D F Ab B♮).



          enter image description here



          As far as resolution goes, I think what you have in the bass clef is the standard thing: viio in first inversion with the leading tone and supertonic moving in contrary motion to the tonic, TI up to DO and RE down to DO or B♮ to C and D to C. (Green lines.) FA to ME or F to Eb would be the typical way for that voice to resolve.



          The only thing I imagine sounds unresolved to you is the treble part FA to SOL or F up to G. (Blue line.) That moves in the opposite direction of FA's tendency to move down to MI.



          The isn't necessarily a problem. (Maybe you did that so the double FAs didn't move in parallel octaves?) But, if that motion upward FA to SOL is the problem, you could try to revoice the chord. Perhaps cut the F in the bass, then have the F in the treble move down to Eb. Of course that will change the line, but it may address your sense that the chord isn't resolving.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

          14.3k1051




          14.3k1051












          • Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago











          • @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

            – Michael Curtis
            5 hours ago












          • And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago


















          • Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago











          • @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

            – Michael Curtis
            5 hours ago












          • And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

            – Caters
            5 hours ago

















          Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

          – Caters
          5 hours ago





          Yes, I was subconsciously trying to avoid parallel octaves in my voice leading while still having full chords which as it just so happens made me able to restate the melody with just a few tweaks to the end of it. I'm not saying that it is a problem in my piece having F move up to G, giving a sense that the tension of the diminished 7th has been left unresolved for the repeat of the phrase, I was just asking why that is that despite the bass motion and the restatement of the tonic, it feels unresolved.

          – Caters
          5 hours ago













          @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

          – Michael Curtis
          5 hours ago






          @Caters, right, not a problem, but that motion opposite of tendency is probably the reason for the unresolved feel. Sort of like an imperfect cadence. Even though both have dominant to tonic harmony, the top voice doesn't end on the tonic and therefore feels 'incomplete' if your ear is very sensitive to that style of harmony.

          – Michael Curtis
          5 hours ago














          And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

          – Caters
          5 hours ago






          And so after the melody repeats and I tweak it a little, instead of stepping down to F like previously, I have it leap up to the leading tone. Same bass motion but because the repeat of the melody moves up to the leading tone which resolves naturally to C instead of having the melody move down to F, the final diminished 7th feels like it has truly resolved to tonic.

          – Caters
          5 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f85403%2fwhy-does-the-first-diminished-7th-in-this-progression-not-resolve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單