Convert camelCase and PascalCase to Title Case
Bent spoke design wheels — feasible?
PhD student with mental health issues and bad performance
Is there any word or phrase for negative bearing?
Past participle agreement with the subject in the case of pronominal verbs
What's the most polite way to tell a manager "shut up and let me work"?
Pros and cons of writing a book review?
What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?
What do we gain with higher order logics?
Is it a problem that pull requests are approved without any comments
Anatomically Correct Swarm of Rodents
Movie where a boy is transported into the future by an alien spaceship
Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?
Explain Ant-Man's "not it" scene from Avengers: Endgame
Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?
What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?
I wrote a scene that the majority of my readers loved. How do I get back to that place while writing my new book?
Does any lore text explain why the planes of Acheron, Gehenna, and Carceri are the alignment they are?
The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public
How bad would a partial hash leak be, realistically?
When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?
Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?
Align text within align
3 as a Sum of 3 Pan Digital Expressions
Word for a small burst of laughter that can't be held back
Convert camelCase and PascalCase to Title Case
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm trying to take camelCase and PascalCase strings into a function and spit them out as Title Case. This function also needs to be able to handle odd PascalCase strings with capitalized abbreviations such as "CDReceiverBox" and return a readable string - "CD Receiver Box".
My current working solution:
function splitCamelCase(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
I would like to condense the amount of replace statements I'm using by at least combining the first two replace statements and the last two together since they are semi similar. The more concise I can make this the better.
CodePen: https://codepen.io/andrewgarrison/pen/dEQrMy
javascript strings regex
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to take camelCase and PascalCase strings into a function and spit them out as Title Case. This function also needs to be able to handle odd PascalCase strings with capitalized abbreviations such as "CDReceiverBox" and return a readable string - "CD Receiver Box".
My current working solution:
function splitCamelCase(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
I would like to condense the amount of replace statements I'm using by at least combining the first two replace statements and the last two together since they are semi similar. The more concise I can make this the better.
CodePen: https://codepen.io/andrewgarrison/pen/dEQrMy
javascript strings regex
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to take camelCase and PascalCase strings into a function and spit them out as Title Case. This function also needs to be able to handle odd PascalCase strings with capitalized abbreviations such as "CDReceiverBox" and return a readable string - "CD Receiver Box".
My current working solution:
function splitCamelCase(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
I would like to condense the amount of replace statements I'm using by at least combining the first two replace statements and the last two together since they are semi similar. The more concise I can make this the better.
CodePen: https://codepen.io/andrewgarrison/pen/dEQrMy
javascript strings regex
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I'm trying to take camelCase and PascalCase strings into a function and spit them out as Title Case. This function also needs to be able to handle odd PascalCase strings with capitalized abbreviations such as "CDReceiverBox" and return a readable string - "CD Receiver Box".
My current working solution:
function splitCamelCase(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
I would like to condense the amount of replace statements I'm using by at least combining the first two replace statements and the last two together since they are semi similar. The more concise I can make this the better.
CodePen: https://codepen.io/andrewgarrison/pen/dEQrMy
javascript strings regex
javascript strings regex
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
200_success
133k20160429
133k20160429
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Andrew GarrisonAndrew Garrison
484
484
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I like your solution quite a bit. It's clear, easy to read and I don't see any bugs.
There are many ways to condense the replace calls as you mention, but I think you're at a point where such changes can easily have a disproportionate impact on readability. That's good--it means the code is already pretty optimal from that standpoint.
For example, here's a one-shot replace using alternation, but its merit is debatable:
const splitCamelCase = s => s.replace(
/^[a-z]|^([A-Z]+)(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])+(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])(?=[a-z]+)/g,
m => " " + m.toUpperCase()
).trim()
;
The idea here is to enumerate each scenario, join the patterns with |s, and provide an arrow function to handle the addition of a space and a capital letter for each match.
With the two extremes in mind, I prefer a balanced approach such as:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/s*([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
or perhaps
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
These should offer ideas as far as how far you want to go in making the succinctness versus readability tradeoff. But, failing the possibility of a shortcut I might have overlooked, keeping your code basically as-is seems like a fine option to me.
If it's performance you're after in reducing replace calls, there's no guarantee that fewer calls will translate into better performance. Under the hood, the regex engine may make more passes to compensate; you can benchmark and tweak using a debugger like regex101. For performance, it's likely best to avoid regex entirely and write a single-pass loop by hand.
Here's a test runner:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs likeaB,aBCoraBCdthat start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.
$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could save one .replace() call by replacing the last two with:
.replace(/(^| ) +/g, "$1")
which both removes leading spaces and collapses multiple consecutive spaces to one anywhere else in the string. However, I'm not 100% sure that you should, since it's not really clear which way is more efficient in practice, and your way seems more readable anyway.
If you do keep the two calls separate, however, you should optimize the first regexp to / +/g (with two spaces before to + sign) to avoid unnecessarily matching and replacing single spaces. Also, swapping the order of the last two calls could improve performance slightly in cases where the only extra spaces to be removed are at the beginning of the string.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f221419%2fconvert-camelcase-and-pascalcase-to-title-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I like your solution quite a bit. It's clear, easy to read and I don't see any bugs.
There are many ways to condense the replace calls as you mention, but I think you're at a point where such changes can easily have a disproportionate impact on readability. That's good--it means the code is already pretty optimal from that standpoint.
For example, here's a one-shot replace using alternation, but its merit is debatable:
const splitCamelCase = s => s.replace(
/^[a-z]|^([A-Z]+)(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])+(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])(?=[a-z]+)/g,
m => " " + m.toUpperCase()
).trim()
;
The idea here is to enumerate each scenario, join the patterns with |s, and provide an arrow function to handle the addition of a space and a capital letter for each match.
With the two extremes in mind, I prefer a balanced approach such as:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/s*([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
or perhaps
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
These should offer ideas as far as how far you want to go in making the succinctness versus readability tradeoff. But, failing the possibility of a shortcut I might have overlooked, keeping your code basically as-is seems like a fine option to me.
If it's performance you're after in reducing replace calls, there's no guarantee that fewer calls will translate into better performance. Under the hood, the regex engine may make more passes to compensate; you can benchmark and tweak using a debugger like regex101. For performance, it's likely best to avoid regex entirely and write a single-pass loop by hand.
Here's a test runner:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs likeaB,aBCoraBCdthat start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.
$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like your solution quite a bit. It's clear, easy to read and I don't see any bugs.
There are many ways to condense the replace calls as you mention, but I think you're at a point where such changes can easily have a disproportionate impact on readability. That's good--it means the code is already pretty optimal from that standpoint.
For example, here's a one-shot replace using alternation, but its merit is debatable:
const splitCamelCase = s => s.replace(
/^[a-z]|^([A-Z]+)(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])+(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])(?=[a-z]+)/g,
m => " " + m.toUpperCase()
).trim()
;
The idea here is to enumerate each scenario, join the patterns with |s, and provide an arrow function to handle the addition of a space and a capital letter for each match.
With the two extremes in mind, I prefer a balanced approach such as:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/s*([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
or perhaps
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
These should offer ideas as far as how far you want to go in making the succinctness versus readability tradeoff. But, failing the possibility of a shortcut I might have overlooked, keeping your code basically as-is seems like a fine option to me.
If it's performance you're after in reducing replace calls, there's no guarantee that fewer calls will translate into better performance. Under the hood, the regex engine may make more passes to compensate; you can benchmark and tweak using a debugger like regex101. For performance, it's likely best to avoid regex entirely and write a single-pass loop by hand.
Here's a test runner:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs likeaB,aBCoraBCdthat start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.
$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I like your solution quite a bit. It's clear, easy to read and I don't see any bugs.
There are many ways to condense the replace calls as you mention, but I think you're at a point where such changes can easily have a disproportionate impact on readability. That's good--it means the code is already pretty optimal from that standpoint.
For example, here's a one-shot replace using alternation, but its merit is debatable:
const splitCamelCase = s => s.replace(
/^[a-z]|^([A-Z]+)(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])+(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])(?=[a-z]+)/g,
m => " " + m.toUpperCase()
).trim()
;
The idea here is to enumerate each scenario, join the patterns with |s, and provide an arrow function to handle the addition of a space and a capital letter for each match.
With the two extremes in mind, I prefer a balanced approach such as:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/s*([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
or perhaps
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
These should offer ideas as far as how far you want to go in making the succinctness versus readability tradeoff. But, failing the possibility of a shortcut I might have overlooked, keeping your code basically as-is seems like a fine option to me.
If it's performance you're after in reducing replace calls, there's no guarantee that fewer calls will translate into better performance. Under the hood, the regex engine may make more passes to compensate; you can benchmark and tweak using a debugger like regex101. For performance, it's likely best to avoid regex entirely and write a single-pass loop by hand.
Here's a test runner:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
$endgroup$
I like your solution quite a bit. It's clear, easy to read and I don't see any bugs.
There are many ways to condense the replace calls as you mention, but I think you're at a point where such changes can easily have a disproportionate impact on readability. That's good--it means the code is already pretty optimal from that standpoint.
For example, here's a one-shot replace using alternation, but its merit is debatable:
const splitCamelCase = s => s.replace(
/^[a-z]|^([A-Z]+)(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])+(?=[A-Z]|$)|([A-Z])(?=[a-z]+)/g,
m => " " + m.toUpperCase()
).trim()
;
The idea here is to enumerate each scenario, join the patterns with |s, and provide an arrow function to handle the addition of a space and a capital letter for each match.
With the two extremes in mind, I prefer a balanced approach such as:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/s*([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
or perhaps
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
These should offer ideas as far as how far you want to go in making the succinctness versus readability tradeoff. But, failing the possibility of a shortcut I might have overlooked, keeping your code basically as-is seems like a fine option to me.
If it's performance you're after in reducing replace calls, there's no guarantee that fewer calls will translate into better performance. Under the hood, the regex engine may make more passes to compensate; you can benchmark and tweak using a debugger like regex101. For performance, it's likely best to avoid regex entirely and write a single-pass loop by hand.
Here's a test runner:
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
const splitCamelCase = s =>
s.replace(/([A-Z][a-z]|[A-Z]+(?=[A-Z]|$))/g, " $1")
.replace(/./, m => m.toUpperCase())
.trim()
;
[
"AAABbbbbCcDddEEFffGGHhIiJ",
"AaBbCcDDEeFGgHHHH",
"CDBoomBoxAAAABbbbCCC",
"CDBoomBox",
"camelCase",
"camel",
"Camel",
"c",
"C",
"Aa",
"AA",
"aa",
"AAA",
"aB",
"aBC",
"aBCc",
"",
].forEach(test =>
console.log(
splitCamelCaseOriginal(test) === splitCamelCase(test)
? `'$test' -> '$splitCamelCase(test)'`
: "TEST FAILED"
)
);
function splitCamelCaseOriginal(camelCaseString)
const result = camelCaseString
.replace(/([A-Z][a-z])/g, " $1")
.replace(/([A-Z]+)/g, " $1")
.replace(/ +/g, " ")
.replace(/^ +/g, "");
return result.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + result.slice(1);
edited 3 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
ggorlenggorlen
8181314
8181314
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs likeaB,aBCoraBCdthat start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.
$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs likeaB,aBCoraBCdthat start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.
$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs like
aB, aBC or aBCd that start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
FWIW, your code gives different results from the OP's for inputs like
aB, aBC or aBCd that start with a lowercase letter followed by an uppercase letter. That's the one situation where it matters whether you capitalize the first letter before or after adding the spaces.$endgroup$
– Ilmari Karonen
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good catch, fixed.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could save one .replace() call by replacing the last two with:
.replace(/(^| ) +/g, "$1")
which both removes leading spaces and collapses multiple consecutive spaces to one anywhere else in the string. However, I'm not 100% sure that you should, since it's not really clear which way is more efficient in practice, and your way seems more readable anyway.
If you do keep the two calls separate, however, you should optimize the first regexp to / +/g (with two spaces before to + sign) to avoid unnecessarily matching and replacing single spaces. Also, swapping the order of the last two calls could improve performance slightly in cases where the only extra spaces to be removed are at the beginning of the string.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could save one .replace() call by replacing the last two with:
.replace(/(^| ) +/g, "$1")
which both removes leading spaces and collapses multiple consecutive spaces to one anywhere else in the string. However, I'm not 100% sure that you should, since it's not really clear which way is more efficient in practice, and your way seems more readable anyway.
If you do keep the two calls separate, however, you should optimize the first regexp to / +/g (with two spaces before to + sign) to avoid unnecessarily matching and replacing single spaces. Also, swapping the order of the last two calls could improve performance slightly in cases where the only extra spaces to be removed are at the beginning of the string.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could save one .replace() call by replacing the last two with:
.replace(/(^| ) +/g, "$1")
which both removes leading spaces and collapses multiple consecutive spaces to one anywhere else in the string. However, I'm not 100% sure that you should, since it's not really clear which way is more efficient in practice, and your way seems more readable anyway.
If you do keep the two calls separate, however, you should optimize the first regexp to / +/g (with two spaces before to + sign) to avoid unnecessarily matching and replacing single spaces. Also, swapping the order of the last two calls could improve performance slightly in cases where the only extra spaces to be removed are at the beginning of the string.
$endgroup$
You could save one .replace() call by replacing the last two with:
.replace(/(^| ) +/g, "$1")
which both removes leading spaces and collapses multiple consecutive spaces to one anywhere else in the string. However, I'm not 100% sure that you should, since it's not really clear which way is more efficient in practice, and your way seems more readable anyway.
If you do keep the two calls separate, however, you should optimize the first regexp to / +/g (with two spaces before to + sign) to avoid unnecessarily matching and replacing single spaces. Also, swapping the order of the last two calls could improve performance slightly in cases where the only extra spaces to be removed are at the beginning of the string.
answered 7 hours ago
Ilmari KaronenIlmari Karonen
2,011915
2,011915
add a comment |
add a comment |
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Andrew Garrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f221419%2fconvert-camelcase-and-pascalcase-to-title-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown