In the old name Dreadnought, is nought an adverb or a noun?What did they call illegitimate children in Old English days?Name for when an adjective modifying a noun leaves the class of objects the noun describes‘pescatarian’: synonyms & etymologyWhere did 'cahoot" come from, when did it first appear, and how did it acquire its pejorative sense?Is the term “tooltip” for the upvote and downvote button on StackExchange accurate?Noun + Infinitive vs. Gerund + NounIs “giddy” derived from “Gid” which was Middle English for “God”?The history of the English “postmeridian”Shakespeare's “say sooth” vs. “tell truth”

Why do baby boomers have to sell 5% of their retirement accounts by the end of the year?

ISO how high is right at night

What sport was she watching?

question about the notation of conditional expectation

What actually is "unallocated space"?

What happens when supercritical fuel tanks deplete below critical point?

'Though shall not steal' - Verification

Russian Caesar cipher

What is the "5th Edition Adventures" book series?

2000's spooky show with a group of teens telling spooky stories in the woods

Is it allowed to let the engine of an aircraft idle without a pilot in the plane. (For both helicopters and aeroplanes)

Grade changes with auto grader

How can a stock trade for a fraction of a cent?

Did it take 3 minutes to reload a musket when the second amendment to the US constitution was ratified?

Car as a good investment

Why is Trump releasing (or not) his tax returns such a big deal?

Is the tap water in France safe to drink?

Word for 'most late'

How does a ball bearing door hinge work?

In the old name Dreadnought, is nought an adverb or a noun?

Did the US push the Kurds to lower their defences against Turkey in the months preceding the latest Turkish military operation against them?

Moonlight bright enough to see by

Why do these two ways of understanding constant acceleration give different results?

Why is Mars cold?



In the old name Dreadnought, is nought an adverb or a noun?


What did they call illegitimate children in Old English days?Name for when an adjective modifying a noun leaves the class of objects the noun describes‘pescatarian’: synonyms & etymologyWhere did 'cahoot" come from, when did it first appear, and how did it acquire its pejorative sense?Is the term “tooltip” for the upvote and downvote button on StackExchange accurate?Noun + Infinitive vs. Gerund + NounIs “giddy” derived from “Gid” which was Middle English for “God”?The history of the English “postmeridian”Shakespeare's “say sooth” vs. “tell truth”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









5

















The name Dreadnought, a class of naval ship, originates from the eponymous HMS Dreadnought. Wikipedia indicates that




Dreadnought's name, and the class of battleships named after her,
means "a fearless person"




Its reference for this is




'Dreadnought' in Google Dictionary and Merriam-Webster dictionaries




However, when I google "Dreadnought", Google's dictionary tells me




noun: dreadnought; plural noun: dreadnoughts



  1. (historical) a type of battleship introduced in the early 20th century, larger and faster than its predecessors and equipped entirely with large-caliber guns.


  2. (archaic) a heavy overcoat for stormy weather.




Similarly, Merriam-Webster tells me




dreadnought, noun



1 : a warm garment of thick cloth also : the cloth



2 [ Dreadnought, British battleship ] a : battleship



b : one that is among the largest or most powerful of its kind




It seems to me that the word is composed of two somewhat archaic words, dread and nought. I believe that in this usage, dread means fear, and nought is one variant spelling of the noun naught, meaning nothing. So one might "update" the word to fears-nothing.



However I wonder if that's correct — naught, nought, and not are all homophones, and historically, English spelling hasn't been exactly standardized. The term could be "updated" as Does not fear, from the more archaic Fears not, where not is the adverb.



Which is a more modern form of the word Dreadnought? What more accurately represents the original meaning? Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?










share|improve this question























  • 1





    "Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

    – David M
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

    – Spagirl
    7 hours ago











  • @Spagirl Nor to me.

    – tchrist
    6 hours ago











  • @DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

    – user1359
    5 hours ago











  • @user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

    – David M
    5 hours ago


















5

















The name Dreadnought, a class of naval ship, originates from the eponymous HMS Dreadnought. Wikipedia indicates that




Dreadnought's name, and the class of battleships named after her,
means "a fearless person"




Its reference for this is




'Dreadnought' in Google Dictionary and Merriam-Webster dictionaries




However, when I google "Dreadnought", Google's dictionary tells me




noun: dreadnought; plural noun: dreadnoughts



  1. (historical) a type of battleship introduced in the early 20th century, larger and faster than its predecessors and equipped entirely with large-caliber guns.


  2. (archaic) a heavy overcoat for stormy weather.




Similarly, Merriam-Webster tells me




dreadnought, noun



1 : a warm garment of thick cloth also : the cloth



2 [ Dreadnought, British battleship ] a : battleship



b : one that is among the largest or most powerful of its kind




It seems to me that the word is composed of two somewhat archaic words, dread and nought. I believe that in this usage, dread means fear, and nought is one variant spelling of the noun naught, meaning nothing. So one might "update" the word to fears-nothing.



However I wonder if that's correct — naught, nought, and not are all homophones, and historically, English spelling hasn't been exactly standardized. The term could be "updated" as Does not fear, from the more archaic Fears not, where not is the adverb.



Which is a more modern form of the word Dreadnought? What more accurately represents the original meaning? Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?










share|improve this question























  • 1





    "Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

    – David M
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

    – Spagirl
    7 hours ago











  • @Spagirl Nor to me.

    – tchrist
    6 hours ago











  • @DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

    – user1359
    5 hours ago











  • @user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

    – David M
    5 hours ago














5












5








5








The name Dreadnought, a class of naval ship, originates from the eponymous HMS Dreadnought. Wikipedia indicates that




Dreadnought's name, and the class of battleships named after her,
means "a fearless person"




Its reference for this is




'Dreadnought' in Google Dictionary and Merriam-Webster dictionaries




However, when I google "Dreadnought", Google's dictionary tells me




noun: dreadnought; plural noun: dreadnoughts



  1. (historical) a type of battleship introduced in the early 20th century, larger and faster than its predecessors and equipped entirely with large-caliber guns.


  2. (archaic) a heavy overcoat for stormy weather.




Similarly, Merriam-Webster tells me




dreadnought, noun



1 : a warm garment of thick cloth also : the cloth



2 [ Dreadnought, British battleship ] a : battleship



b : one that is among the largest or most powerful of its kind




It seems to me that the word is composed of two somewhat archaic words, dread and nought. I believe that in this usage, dread means fear, and nought is one variant spelling of the noun naught, meaning nothing. So one might "update" the word to fears-nothing.



However I wonder if that's correct — naught, nought, and not are all homophones, and historically, English spelling hasn't been exactly standardized. The term could be "updated" as Does not fear, from the more archaic Fears not, where not is the adverb.



Which is a more modern form of the word Dreadnought? What more accurately represents the original meaning? Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?










share|improve this question

















The name Dreadnought, a class of naval ship, originates from the eponymous HMS Dreadnought. Wikipedia indicates that




Dreadnought's name, and the class of battleships named after her,
means "a fearless person"




Its reference for this is




'Dreadnought' in Google Dictionary and Merriam-Webster dictionaries




However, when I google "Dreadnought", Google's dictionary tells me




noun: dreadnought; plural noun: dreadnoughts



  1. (historical) a type of battleship introduced in the early 20th century, larger and faster than its predecessors and equipped entirely with large-caliber guns.


  2. (archaic) a heavy overcoat for stormy weather.




Similarly, Merriam-Webster tells me




dreadnought, noun



1 : a warm garment of thick cloth also : the cloth



2 [ Dreadnought, British battleship ] a : battleship



b : one that is among the largest or most powerful of its kind




It seems to me that the word is composed of two somewhat archaic words, dread and nought. I believe that in this usage, dread means fear, and nought is one variant spelling of the noun naught, meaning nothing. So one might "update" the word to fears-nothing.



However I wonder if that's correct — naught, nought, and not are all homophones, and historically, English spelling hasn't been exactly standardized. The term could be "updated" as Does not fear, from the more archaic Fears not, where not is the adverb.



Which is a more modern form of the word Dreadnought? What more accurately represents the original meaning? Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?







etymology archaic






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









choster

39.7k14 gold badges88 silver badges144 bronze badges




39.7k14 gold badges88 silver badges144 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









user1359user1359

1,1807 silver badges13 bronze badges




1,1807 silver badges13 bronze badges










  • 1





    "Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

    – David M
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

    – Spagirl
    7 hours ago











  • @Spagirl Nor to me.

    – tchrist
    6 hours ago











  • @DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

    – user1359
    5 hours ago











  • @user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

    – David M
    5 hours ago













  • 1





    "Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

    – David M
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

    – Spagirl
    7 hours ago











  • @Spagirl Nor to me.

    – tchrist
    6 hours ago











  • @DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

    – user1359
    5 hours ago











  • @user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

    – David M
    5 hours ago








1




1





"Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

– David M
8 hours ago





"Fears-nothing, that the ship fears no other ship in the water? Or Does not fear, that the ship does not fear any other ship?" These two sentences seem to say the same thing as one another . . .

– David M
8 hours ago




3




3





nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

– Spagirl
7 hours ago





nought and not are all homophones’, not to me they aren’t.

– Spagirl
7 hours ago













@Spagirl Nor to me.

– tchrist
6 hours ago





@Spagirl Nor to me.

– tchrist
6 hours ago













@DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

– user1359
5 hours ago





@DavidM Their meaning is identical, but their grammars are different, which is the crux of my question.

– user1359
5 hours ago













@user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

– David M
5 hours ago






@user1359 Fears not(hing) vs does not fear. They're effectively just inversions that mean the same thing. As in: fears something that happens to be nothing. And, does not fear. Either would be a perfectly acceptable interpretation. But, combined into a word, it's not particularly important to analyze the grammar of it.

– David M
5 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4


















As you surmise, dreadnought originates as a compound of dread and nought, and nought is a noun, so the original meaning was something like shies from nothing. But if you will forgive the use of that most tiresome favorite adverb of pretentious Internet commenters, actually, the first English Dreadnought was a Third Rate galleon commissioned during the reign of Elizabeth I, built in 1573.



Dread is relatively straightforward, meaning to fear, shrink from, be reverent of, and similar senses of having apprehension, from Middle English onwards.



Not (sometimes nocht or noht in older works) is an etymological descendent of nought, but by the time dreadnought appears, it was already a distinct word, and dreadnought is not simply a fanciful spelling of dread-not.



As for naught and nought, the OED draws a distinction between the two as their spellings represented distinct pronunciations until the 17th century or so. They are at least fraternal twins, however:




From the Old English period onwards there is no clear distinction in meaning or function between the two words. (naught adj. is attested considerably earlier than the adjectival uses below, but it is unclear whether this is simply an accident of the historical record, or reflects a real distinction in use.) Usage of one word or the other in any given sense varies relatively freely (and sometimes differs between editions of the same work) down to the 20th cent., although some patterns have been enforced by printers and dictionaries. In early modern English the adjectival senses ‘worthless’, ‘bad’, ‘immoral’ were especially associated with naught (compare naughty adj.), although the use of nought was not uncommon.…



In northern dialects nought generally preserved Middle English -o- ; the vowel of the form nowt… generally has the same sound as that of grow, flown, and other words which had a diphthong /ɔu/ in Middle English.




We no longer use nought in the sense it is used in dreadnought, either. According to the OED, it is a count noun for something which does not exist, a use which is marked obsolete and not attested after a 1642 Henry More ode:




Bringing hid Noughts into existencie, Or sleeping Somethings into wide day-light.




That said, dreadnought began to be used as an adjective in later years meaning without fear:




God is our hope, God is our reuenge, & God is dread naught indeede. (1592, William Burton in Dauids Euidenece)




For this, we have no shortage of synonyms, any number of which the Royal Navy has adopted in turn: fearless, dauntless, intrepid, gallant, undaunted, brave, valiant, and so on. (They never learned what the U.S. Navy learned, that abstract qualities do not have legislators and voters who will vote money to build ships named after them).



I would add that the cloth known as dreadnought was contemporaneously known as fearnought, and in fact the earliest OED entry for fearnought predates dreadnought by more than two decades.






share|improve this answer

































    1


















    Apart from the use as a name for Martin Guitar, I've never seen it refer to anything but the ship.



    But the meaning is clearly fears nothing. As Edwin Ashworth points out, nothing is the direct object of fears.



    Etymonline tells us:



    Dreadnought




    literally "one who or that which fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.




    Dread




    late 12c., "to fear very much, be in shrinking apprehension or expectation of," a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan "counsel or advise against," also "to dread, fear, be afraid," from ond-, and- "against" (the same first element in answer, from PIE root *ant-) + rædan "to advise" (from PIE root *re- "to reason, count"). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading.
    As a noun from c. 1200, "great fear or apprehension; cause or object of apprehension." As a past-participle adjective (from the former strong past participle), "dreaded, frightful," c.1400; later "held in awe" (early 15c.).




    And yes, as you alluded to, nought is a variant of naught.




    Middle English, from Old English nowiht "nothing," variant of nawiht (see naught). Meaning "zero, cipher" is from early 15c. Expression for nought "in vain" is from c. 1200. To come to nought is from early 15c. (become to naught, ycome to naught are from c. 1300).







    share|improve this answer























    • 2





      In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

      – Edwin Ashworth
      7 hours ago











    • @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

      – David M
      6 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515161%2fin-the-old-name-dreadnought-is-nought-an-adverb-or-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4


















    As you surmise, dreadnought originates as a compound of dread and nought, and nought is a noun, so the original meaning was something like shies from nothing. But if you will forgive the use of that most tiresome favorite adverb of pretentious Internet commenters, actually, the first English Dreadnought was a Third Rate galleon commissioned during the reign of Elizabeth I, built in 1573.



    Dread is relatively straightforward, meaning to fear, shrink from, be reverent of, and similar senses of having apprehension, from Middle English onwards.



    Not (sometimes nocht or noht in older works) is an etymological descendent of nought, but by the time dreadnought appears, it was already a distinct word, and dreadnought is not simply a fanciful spelling of dread-not.



    As for naught and nought, the OED draws a distinction between the two as their spellings represented distinct pronunciations until the 17th century or so. They are at least fraternal twins, however:




    From the Old English period onwards there is no clear distinction in meaning or function between the two words. (naught adj. is attested considerably earlier than the adjectival uses below, but it is unclear whether this is simply an accident of the historical record, or reflects a real distinction in use.) Usage of one word or the other in any given sense varies relatively freely (and sometimes differs between editions of the same work) down to the 20th cent., although some patterns have been enforced by printers and dictionaries. In early modern English the adjectival senses ‘worthless’, ‘bad’, ‘immoral’ were especially associated with naught (compare naughty adj.), although the use of nought was not uncommon.…



    In northern dialects nought generally preserved Middle English -o- ; the vowel of the form nowt… generally has the same sound as that of grow, flown, and other words which had a diphthong /ɔu/ in Middle English.




    We no longer use nought in the sense it is used in dreadnought, either. According to the OED, it is a count noun for something which does not exist, a use which is marked obsolete and not attested after a 1642 Henry More ode:




    Bringing hid Noughts into existencie, Or sleeping Somethings into wide day-light.




    That said, dreadnought began to be used as an adjective in later years meaning without fear:




    God is our hope, God is our reuenge, & God is dread naught indeede. (1592, William Burton in Dauids Euidenece)




    For this, we have no shortage of synonyms, any number of which the Royal Navy has adopted in turn: fearless, dauntless, intrepid, gallant, undaunted, brave, valiant, and so on. (They never learned what the U.S. Navy learned, that abstract qualities do not have legislators and voters who will vote money to build ships named after them).



    I would add that the cloth known as dreadnought was contemporaneously known as fearnought, and in fact the earliest OED entry for fearnought predates dreadnought by more than two decades.






    share|improve this answer






























      4


















      As you surmise, dreadnought originates as a compound of dread and nought, and nought is a noun, so the original meaning was something like shies from nothing. But if you will forgive the use of that most tiresome favorite adverb of pretentious Internet commenters, actually, the first English Dreadnought was a Third Rate galleon commissioned during the reign of Elizabeth I, built in 1573.



      Dread is relatively straightforward, meaning to fear, shrink from, be reverent of, and similar senses of having apprehension, from Middle English onwards.



      Not (sometimes nocht or noht in older works) is an etymological descendent of nought, but by the time dreadnought appears, it was already a distinct word, and dreadnought is not simply a fanciful spelling of dread-not.



      As for naught and nought, the OED draws a distinction between the two as their spellings represented distinct pronunciations until the 17th century or so. They are at least fraternal twins, however:




      From the Old English period onwards there is no clear distinction in meaning or function between the two words. (naught adj. is attested considerably earlier than the adjectival uses below, but it is unclear whether this is simply an accident of the historical record, or reflects a real distinction in use.) Usage of one word or the other in any given sense varies relatively freely (and sometimes differs between editions of the same work) down to the 20th cent., although some patterns have been enforced by printers and dictionaries. In early modern English the adjectival senses ‘worthless’, ‘bad’, ‘immoral’ were especially associated with naught (compare naughty adj.), although the use of nought was not uncommon.…



      In northern dialects nought generally preserved Middle English -o- ; the vowel of the form nowt… generally has the same sound as that of grow, flown, and other words which had a diphthong /ɔu/ in Middle English.




      We no longer use nought in the sense it is used in dreadnought, either. According to the OED, it is a count noun for something which does not exist, a use which is marked obsolete and not attested after a 1642 Henry More ode:




      Bringing hid Noughts into existencie, Or sleeping Somethings into wide day-light.




      That said, dreadnought began to be used as an adjective in later years meaning without fear:




      God is our hope, God is our reuenge, & God is dread naught indeede. (1592, William Burton in Dauids Euidenece)




      For this, we have no shortage of synonyms, any number of which the Royal Navy has adopted in turn: fearless, dauntless, intrepid, gallant, undaunted, brave, valiant, and so on. (They never learned what the U.S. Navy learned, that abstract qualities do not have legislators and voters who will vote money to build ships named after them).



      I would add that the cloth known as dreadnought was contemporaneously known as fearnought, and in fact the earliest OED entry for fearnought predates dreadnought by more than two decades.






      share|improve this answer




























        4














        4










        4









        As you surmise, dreadnought originates as a compound of dread and nought, and nought is a noun, so the original meaning was something like shies from nothing. But if you will forgive the use of that most tiresome favorite adverb of pretentious Internet commenters, actually, the first English Dreadnought was a Third Rate galleon commissioned during the reign of Elizabeth I, built in 1573.



        Dread is relatively straightforward, meaning to fear, shrink from, be reverent of, and similar senses of having apprehension, from Middle English onwards.



        Not (sometimes nocht or noht in older works) is an etymological descendent of nought, but by the time dreadnought appears, it was already a distinct word, and dreadnought is not simply a fanciful spelling of dread-not.



        As for naught and nought, the OED draws a distinction between the two as their spellings represented distinct pronunciations until the 17th century or so. They are at least fraternal twins, however:




        From the Old English period onwards there is no clear distinction in meaning or function between the two words. (naught adj. is attested considerably earlier than the adjectival uses below, but it is unclear whether this is simply an accident of the historical record, or reflects a real distinction in use.) Usage of one word or the other in any given sense varies relatively freely (and sometimes differs between editions of the same work) down to the 20th cent., although some patterns have been enforced by printers and dictionaries. In early modern English the adjectival senses ‘worthless’, ‘bad’, ‘immoral’ were especially associated with naught (compare naughty adj.), although the use of nought was not uncommon.…



        In northern dialects nought generally preserved Middle English -o- ; the vowel of the form nowt… generally has the same sound as that of grow, flown, and other words which had a diphthong /ɔu/ in Middle English.




        We no longer use nought in the sense it is used in dreadnought, either. According to the OED, it is a count noun for something which does not exist, a use which is marked obsolete and not attested after a 1642 Henry More ode:




        Bringing hid Noughts into existencie, Or sleeping Somethings into wide day-light.




        That said, dreadnought began to be used as an adjective in later years meaning without fear:




        God is our hope, God is our reuenge, & God is dread naught indeede. (1592, William Burton in Dauids Euidenece)




        For this, we have no shortage of synonyms, any number of which the Royal Navy has adopted in turn: fearless, dauntless, intrepid, gallant, undaunted, brave, valiant, and so on. (They never learned what the U.S. Navy learned, that abstract qualities do not have legislators and voters who will vote money to build ships named after them).



        I would add that the cloth known as dreadnought was contemporaneously known as fearnought, and in fact the earliest OED entry for fearnought predates dreadnought by more than two decades.






        share|improve this answer














        As you surmise, dreadnought originates as a compound of dread and nought, and nought is a noun, so the original meaning was something like shies from nothing. But if you will forgive the use of that most tiresome favorite adverb of pretentious Internet commenters, actually, the first English Dreadnought was a Third Rate galleon commissioned during the reign of Elizabeth I, built in 1573.



        Dread is relatively straightforward, meaning to fear, shrink from, be reverent of, and similar senses of having apprehension, from Middle English onwards.



        Not (sometimes nocht or noht in older works) is an etymological descendent of nought, but by the time dreadnought appears, it was already a distinct word, and dreadnought is not simply a fanciful spelling of dread-not.



        As for naught and nought, the OED draws a distinction between the two as their spellings represented distinct pronunciations until the 17th century or so. They are at least fraternal twins, however:




        From the Old English period onwards there is no clear distinction in meaning or function between the two words. (naught adj. is attested considerably earlier than the adjectival uses below, but it is unclear whether this is simply an accident of the historical record, or reflects a real distinction in use.) Usage of one word or the other in any given sense varies relatively freely (and sometimes differs between editions of the same work) down to the 20th cent., although some patterns have been enforced by printers and dictionaries. In early modern English the adjectival senses ‘worthless’, ‘bad’, ‘immoral’ were especially associated with naught (compare naughty adj.), although the use of nought was not uncommon.…



        In northern dialects nought generally preserved Middle English -o- ; the vowel of the form nowt… generally has the same sound as that of grow, flown, and other words which had a diphthong /ɔu/ in Middle English.




        We no longer use nought in the sense it is used in dreadnought, either. According to the OED, it is a count noun for something which does not exist, a use which is marked obsolete and not attested after a 1642 Henry More ode:




        Bringing hid Noughts into existencie, Or sleeping Somethings into wide day-light.




        That said, dreadnought began to be used as an adjective in later years meaning without fear:




        God is our hope, God is our reuenge, & God is dread naught indeede. (1592, William Burton in Dauids Euidenece)




        For this, we have no shortage of synonyms, any number of which the Royal Navy has adopted in turn: fearless, dauntless, intrepid, gallant, undaunted, brave, valiant, and so on. (They never learned what the U.S. Navy learned, that abstract qualities do not have legislators and voters who will vote money to build ships named after them).



        I would add that the cloth known as dreadnought was contemporaneously known as fearnought, and in fact the earliest OED entry for fearnought predates dreadnought by more than two decades.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        chosterchoster

        39.7k14 gold badges88 silver badges144 bronze badges




        39.7k14 gold badges88 silver badges144 bronze badges


























            1


















            Apart from the use as a name for Martin Guitar, I've never seen it refer to anything but the ship.



            But the meaning is clearly fears nothing. As Edwin Ashworth points out, nothing is the direct object of fears.



            Etymonline tells us:



            Dreadnought




            literally "one who or that which fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.




            Dread




            late 12c., "to fear very much, be in shrinking apprehension or expectation of," a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan "counsel or advise against," also "to dread, fear, be afraid," from ond-, and- "against" (the same first element in answer, from PIE root *ant-) + rædan "to advise" (from PIE root *re- "to reason, count"). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading.
            As a noun from c. 1200, "great fear or apprehension; cause or object of apprehension." As a past-participle adjective (from the former strong past participle), "dreaded, frightful," c.1400; later "held in awe" (early 15c.).




            And yes, as you alluded to, nought is a variant of naught.




            Middle English, from Old English nowiht "nothing," variant of nawiht (see naught). Meaning "zero, cipher" is from early 15c. Expression for nought "in vain" is from c. 1200. To come to nought is from early 15c. (become to naught, ycome to naught are from c. 1300).







            share|improve this answer























            • 2





              In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              7 hours ago











            • @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

              – David M
              6 hours ago
















            1


















            Apart from the use as a name for Martin Guitar, I've never seen it refer to anything but the ship.



            But the meaning is clearly fears nothing. As Edwin Ashworth points out, nothing is the direct object of fears.



            Etymonline tells us:



            Dreadnought




            literally "one who or that which fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.




            Dread




            late 12c., "to fear very much, be in shrinking apprehension or expectation of," a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan "counsel or advise against," also "to dread, fear, be afraid," from ond-, and- "against" (the same first element in answer, from PIE root *ant-) + rædan "to advise" (from PIE root *re- "to reason, count"). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading.
            As a noun from c. 1200, "great fear or apprehension; cause or object of apprehension." As a past-participle adjective (from the former strong past participle), "dreaded, frightful," c.1400; later "held in awe" (early 15c.).




            And yes, as you alluded to, nought is a variant of naught.




            Middle English, from Old English nowiht "nothing," variant of nawiht (see naught). Meaning "zero, cipher" is from early 15c. Expression for nought "in vain" is from c. 1200. To come to nought is from early 15c. (become to naught, ycome to naught are from c. 1300).







            share|improve this answer























            • 2





              In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              7 hours ago











            • @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

              – David M
              6 hours ago














            1














            1










            1









            Apart from the use as a name for Martin Guitar, I've never seen it refer to anything but the ship.



            But the meaning is clearly fears nothing. As Edwin Ashworth points out, nothing is the direct object of fears.



            Etymonline tells us:



            Dreadnought




            literally "one who or that which fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.




            Dread




            late 12c., "to fear very much, be in shrinking apprehension or expectation of," a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan "counsel or advise against," also "to dread, fear, be afraid," from ond-, and- "against" (the same first element in answer, from PIE root *ant-) + rædan "to advise" (from PIE root *re- "to reason, count"). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading.
            As a noun from c. 1200, "great fear or apprehension; cause or object of apprehension." As a past-participle adjective (from the former strong past participle), "dreaded, frightful," c.1400; later "held in awe" (early 15c.).




            And yes, as you alluded to, nought is a variant of naught.




            Middle English, from Old English nowiht "nothing," variant of nawiht (see naught). Meaning "zero, cipher" is from early 15c. Expression for nought "in vain" is from c. 1200. To come to nought is from early 15c. (become to naught, ycome to naught are from c. 1300).







            share|improve this answer
















            Apart from the use as a name for Martin Guitar, I've never seen it refer to anything but the ship.



            But the meaning is clearly fears nothing. As Edwin Ashworth points out, nothing is the direct object of fears.



            Etymonline tells us:



            Dreadnought




            literally "one who or that which fears nothing," from the verbal phrase (drede ich nawiht is attested from c. 1200); see dread (v.) + nought (n.). As a synonym for "battleship" (1916) it is from a specific ship's name. Dreadnought is mentioned as the name of a ship in the Royal Navy as early as c. 1596, but the modern generic sense is from the name of the first of a new class of British battleships, based on the "all big-gun" principle (armed with 10 big guns rather than 4 large guns and a battery of smaller ones), launched Feb. 18, 1906.




            Dread




            late 12c., "to fear very much, be in shrinking apprehension or expectation of," a shortening of Old English adrædan, contraction of ondrædan "counsel or advise against," also "to dread, fear, be afraid," from ond-, and- "against" (the same first element in answer, from PIE root *ant-) + rædan "to advise" (from PIE root *re- "to reason, count"). Cognate of Old Saxon andradon, Old High German intraten. Related: Dreaded; dreading.
            As a noun from c. 1200, "great fear or apprehension; cause or object of apprehension." As a past-participle adjective (from the former strong past participle), "dreaded, frightful," c.1400; later "held in awe" (early 15c.).




            And yes, as you alluded to, nought is a variant of naught.




            Middle English, from Old English nowiht "nothing," variant of nawiht (see naught). Meaning "zero, cipher" is from early 15c. Expression for nought "in vain" is from c. 1200. To come to nought is from early 15c. (become to naught, ycome to naught are from c. 1300).








            share|improve this answer















            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            David MDavid M

            17.8k8 gold badges58 silver badges109 bronze badges




            17.8k8 gold badges58 silver badges109 bronze badges










            • 2





              In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              7 hours ago











            • @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

              – David M
              6 hours ago













            • 2





              In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

              – Edwin Ashworth
              7 hours ago











            • @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

              – David M
              6 hours ago








            2




            2





            In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

            – Edwin Ashworth
            7 hours ago





            In'fears nothing' , 'nothing' is a DO, not an adverb.

            – Edwin Ashworth
            7 hours ago













            @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

            – David M
            6 hours ago






            @EdwinAshworth true. My mistake. I'll take it out. This is the danger of answering while distracted.

            – David M
            6 hours ago



















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515161%2fin-the-old-name-dreadnought-is-nought-an-adverb-or-a-noun%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單