What is hot spotting in the context of adding files to tempdb?Tempdb Add files require RestartCreating new TempDB filesIncreased RAM, Worse PerformanceTempDB Version Store cleanupTempdb change settings and recommendationChaning tempdb settings on production databaseUnderstanding the usage of version store in tempdbTempDB contentions
Confusion in understanding control system?
What would a biological creature need in order to see the future?
IEEE Registration Authority mac prefix
Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?
What is hot spotting in the context of adding files to tempdb?
Adding transparency to ink drawing
Can a country avoid prosecution for crimes against humanity by denying it happened?
Is it rude to ask my opponent to resign an online game when they have a lost endgame?
When is it legal to castle moving the rook first?
Question about derivation of kinematics equations
'This one' as a pronoun
Finder/Terminal: Find files that contain less than 21 lines of text
Why would a Intel 8080 chip be destroyed if +12 V is connected before -5 V?
co-son-in-law or co-brother
Travel to USA with a stuffed puppet
Everyone for non livings
Are there photos of the Apollo LM showing disturbed lunar soil resulting from descent engine exhaust?
Solution of a differential equation in physics
What happens when there is no available physical memory left for SQL Server?
How could a planet have one hemisphere way warmer than the other without the planet being tidally locked?
In-universe, why does Doc Brown program the time machine to go to 1955?
'Hard work never hurt anyone' Why not 'hurts'?
Does POSIX guarantee the paths to any standard utilities?
Why don't they build airplanes from 3D printer plastic?
What is hot spotting in the context of adding files to tempdb?
Tempdb Add files require RestartCreating new TempDB filesIncreased RAM, Worse PerformanceTempDB Version Store cleanupTempdb change settings and recommendationChaning tempdb settings on production databaseUnderstanding the usage of version store in tempdbTempDB contentions
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to add tempdb files to a SQL Server without having to restart the SQL Server service. I saw this answer here on Database Administrators:
- Tempdb Add files require Restart
And one answer states:
ADD - no outage required. Although as Sean from Microsoft pointed out,
SQL will prefer to use the lower filled files. If you are going from 1
data file and adding more, then SQL will use the new ones for a while,
but your performance won't be worse than only having one file.
However, if you have 2+ already and add one more, then it will hotspot
on the new one and decrease performance.
However, a comment cautions the following:
I would put an addendum on the "Add" part: "Add: No, but you'll most
likely be imbalanced so you'll be hot spotting which could make things
much worse."
I have the following questions about that comment but was instructed to ask those questions in a new question of my own (this one) rather than asking the commenter via comment in that question's answers.
Specifically:
- What is hot spotting? (I got some info via Google but not in detail
what happens with hotspotting on tempdb after adding files) - What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
- What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
sql-server tempdb troubleshooting
add a comment |
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to add tempdb files to a SQL Server without having to restart the SQL Server service. I saw this answer here on Database Administrators:
- Tempdb Add files require Restart
And one answer states:
ADD - no outage required. Although as Sean from Microsoft pointed out,
SQL will prefer to use the lower filled files. If you are going from 1
data file and adding more, then SQL will use the new ones for a while,
but your performance won't be worse than only having one file.
However, if you have 2+ already and add one more, then it will hotspot
on the new one and decrease performance.
However, a comment cautions the following:
I would put an addendum on the "Add" part: "Add: No, but you'll most
likely be imbalanced so you'll be hot spotting which could make things
much worse."
I have the following questions about that comment but was instructed to ask those questions in a new question of my own (this one) rather than asking the commenter via comment in that question's answers.
Specifically:
- What is hot spotting? (I got some info via Google but not in detail
what happens with hotspotting on tempdb after adding files) - What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
- What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
sql-server tempdb troubleshooting
add a comment |
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to add tempdb files to a SQL Server without having to restart the SQL Server service. I saw this answer here on Database Administrators:
- Tempdb Add files require Restart
And one answer states:
ADD - no outage required. Although as Sean from Microsoft pointed out,
SQL will prefer to use the lower filled files. If you are going from 1
data file and adding more, then SQL will use the new ones for a while,
but your performance won't be worse than only having one file.
However, if you have 2+ already and add one more, then it will hotspot
on the new one and decrease performance.
However, a comment cautions the following:
I would put an addendum on the "Add" part: "Add: No, but you'll most
likely be imbalanced so you'll be hot spotting which could make things
much worse."
I have the following questions about that comment but was instructed to ask those questions in a new question of my own (this one) rather than asking the commenter via comment in that question's answers.
Specifically:
- What is hot spotting? (I got some info via Google but not in detail
what happens with hotspotting on tempdb after adding files) - What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
- What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
sql-server tempdb troubleshooting
I'm trying to find out whether it is possible to add tempdb files to a SQL Server without having to restart the SQL Server service. I saw this answer here on Database Administrators:
- Tempdb Add files require Restart
And one answer states:
ADD - no outage required. Although as Sean from Microsoft pointed out,
SQL will prefer to use the lower filled files. If you are going from 1
data file and adding more, then SQL will use the new ones for a while,
but your performance won't be worse than only having one file.
However, if you have 2+ already and add one more, then it will hotspot
on the new one and decrease performance.
However, a comment cautions the following:
I would put an addendum on the "Add" part: "Add: No, but you'll most
likely be imbalanced so you'll be hot spotting which could make things
much worse."
I have the following questions about that comment but was instructed to ask those questions in a new question of my own (this one) rather than asking the commenter via comment in that question's answers.
Specifically:
- What is hot spotting? (I got some info via Google but not in detail
what happens with hotspotting on tempdb after adding files) - What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
- What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
sql-server tempdb troubleshooting
sql-server tempdb troubleshooting
edited 7 hours ago
Aaron Bertrand♦
160k19 gold badges320 silver badges525 bronze badges
160k19 gold badges320 silver badges525 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
jrdevdbajrdevdba
1514 bronze badges
1514 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What is hot spotting?
"Hot spotting" in this context means that, even though tempdb has multiple files, all the I/O work is being done in a single file. If tempdb is busy enough to justify adding files, the imbalance that leads to hot-spotting (due to proportional fill) will be short-lived, so I think the warnings may be a little Chicken Little. In my experience, anyway.
What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
I think it is deemed to be worse in tempdb because it takes a brunt of the write activity in most workloads. You can certainly suffer similar problems in user databases, but since you're already trying to solve a problem in tempdb...
What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
Write times, mostly. Imagine everyone trying to use the same ATM, even when there are 7 other ATMs nearby. Only so much can be written at any point in time; everything else has to wait. With more files (and enough cores to schedule the work), the I/O can be spread more evenly.
Just make sure:
- you have an even number of files
- all the files are the same size
- all the files have the same autogrow settings
- the number of files is somehow driven by number of cores
- depending on version (these are enabled by default in more modern versions of SQL Server), you are using trace flags 1117 (grow all data files at once) and 1118 (don't use mixed allocation extents).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f246889%2fwhat-is-hot-spotting-in-the-context-of-adding-files-to-tempdb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What is hot spotting?
"Hot spotting" in this context means that, even though tempdb has multiple files, all the I/O work is being done in a single file. If tempdb is busy enough to justify adding files, the imbalance that leads to hot-spotting (due to proportional fill) will be short-lived, so I think the warnings may be a little Chicken Little. In my experience, anyway.
What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
I think it is deemed to be worse in tempdb because it takes a brunt of the write activity in most workloads. You can certainly suffer similar problems in user databases, but since you're already trying to solve a problem in tempdb...
What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
Write times, mostly. Imagine everyone trying to use the same ATM, even when there are 7 other ATMs nearby. Only so much can be written at any point in time; everything else has to wait. With more files (and enough cores to schedule the work), the I/O can be spread more evenly.
Just make sure:
- you have an even number of files
- all the files are the same size
- all the files have the same autogrow settings
- the number of files is somehow driven by number of cores
- depending on version (these are enabled by default in more modern versions of SQL Server), you are using trace flags 1117 (grow all data files at once) and 1118 (don't use mixed allocation extents).
add a comment |
What is hot spotting?
"Hot spotting" in this context means that, even though tempdb has multiple files, all the I/O work is being done in a single file. If tempdb is busy enough to justify adding files, the imbalance that leads to hot-spotting (due to proportional fill) will be short-lived, so I think the warnings may be a little Chicken Little. In my experience, anyway.
What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
I think it is deemed to be worse in tempdb because it takes a brunt of the write activity in most workloads. You can certainly suffer similar problems in user databases, but since you're already trying to solve a problem in tempdb...
What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
Write times, mostly. Imagine everyone trying to use the same ATM, even when there are 7 other ATMs nearby. Only so much can be written at any point in time; everything else has to wait. With more files (and enough cores to schedule the work), the I/O can be spread more evenly.
Just make sure:
- you have an even number of files
- all the files are the same size
- all the files have the same autogrow settings
- the number of files is somehow driven by number of cores
- depending on version (these are enabled by default in more modern versions of SQL Server), you are using trace flags 1117 (grow all data files at once) and 1118 (don't use mixed allocation extents).
add a comment |
What is hot spotting?
"Hot spotting" in this context means that, even though tempdb has multiple files, all the I/O work is being done in a single file. If tempdb is busy enough to justify adding files, the imbalance that leads to hot-spotting (due to proportional fill) will be short-lived, so I think the warnings may be a little Chicken Little. In my experience, anyway.
What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
I think it is deemed to be worse in tempdb because it takes a brunt of the write activity in most workloads. You can certainly suffer similar problems in user databases, but since you're already trying to solve a problem in tempdb...
What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
Write times, mostly. Imagine everyone trying to use the same ATM, even when there are 7 other ATMs nearby. Only so much can be written at any point in time; everything else has to wait. With more files (and enough cores to schedule the work), the I/O can be spread more evenly.
Just make sure:
- you have an even number of files
- all the files are the same size
- all the files have the same autogrow settings
- the number of files is somehow driven by number of cores
- depending on version (these are enabled by default in more modern versions of SQL Server), you are using trace flags 1117 (grow all data files at once) and 1118 (don't use mixed allocation extents).
What is hot spotting?
"Hot spotting" in this context means that, even though tempdb has multiple files, all the I/O work is being done in a single file. If tempdb is busy enough to justify adding files, the imbalance that leads to hot-spotting (due to proportional fill) will be short-lived, so I think the warnings may be a little Chicken Little. In my experience, anyway.
What about hot spotting makes things much worse in tempdb?
I think it is deemed to be worse in tempdb because it takes a brunt of the write activity in most workloads. You can certainly suffer similar problems in user databases, but since you're already trying to solve a problem in tempdb...
What specific things in the DB would get much worse?
Write times, mostly. Imagine everyone trying to use the same ATM, even when there are 7 other ATMs nearby. Only so much can be written at any point in time; everything else has to wait. With more files (and enough cores to schedule the work), the I/O can be spread more evenly.
Just make sure:
- you have an even number of files
- all the files are the same size
- all the files have the same autogrow settings
- the number of files is somehow driven by number of cores
- depending on version (these are enabled by default in more modern versions of SQL Server), you are using trace flags 1117 (grow all data files at once) and 1118 (don't use mixed allocation extents).
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron Bertrand♦Aaron Bertrand
160k19 gold badges320 silver badges525 bronze badges
160k19 gold badges320 silver badges525 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f246889%2fwhat-is-hot-spotting-in-the-context-of-adding-files-to-tempdb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown