Can you use Shape Water on Tidal Wave?Can a readied action be taken after a spell is cast, but before it deals damage?What are the limitations on Shape Water?Could you use shape water to cause erosion?Shape-Water Vacuum BombCan you use the 'Shape Water' cantrip to fly?Can the Shape Water Cantrip be used to manipulate blood?Can the Tidal Wave spell trigger a vampire's weakness to running water?What effect, if any, do water-creating spells have underwater?Can you cast the Shape Water spell without an existing obvious pool of water?
Can you use Shape Water on Tidal Wave?
Did the US Climate Reference Network Show No New Warming Since 2005 in the US?
How does Harry wear the invisibility cloak?
Global variables and information security
One hour 10 min layover in Newark; International -> Domestic connection. Enough time to clear customs?
Is there any reason to change the ISO manually?
Was "The Hobbit" ever abridged?
Is torque as fundamental a concept as force?
Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?
What's the point of this macro?
Would you recommend a keyboard for beginners with or without lights in keys for learning?
What is this red bug infesting some trees in southern Germany?
What does "se jouer" mean here?
Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?
Travel to USA with a stuffed puppet
Does this bike use hydraulic brakes?
What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?
If I have an accident, should I file a claim with my car insurance company?
What exactly is a softlock?
What is the significance of 104% for throttle power and rotor speed?
Importance of electrolytic capacitor size
If p-value is exactly 1 (1.0000000), what are the confidence interval limits?
Professor refuses to write a recommendation letter
How many days for hunting?
Can you use Shape Water on Tidal Wave?
Can a readied action be taken after a spell is cast, but before it deals damage?What are the limitations on Shape Water?Could you use shape water to cause erosion?Shape-Water Vacuum BombCan you use the 'Shape Water' cantrip to fly?Can the Shape Water Cantrip be used to manipulate blood?Can the Tidal Wave spell trigger a vampire's weakness to running water?What effect, if any, do water-creating spells have underwater?Can you cast the Shape Water spell without an existing obvious pool of water?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is it possible to use Shape Water to control the water generated by Tidal Wave?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to use Shape Water to control the water generated by Tidal Wave?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to use Shape Water to control the water generated by Tidal Wave?
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
Is it possible to use Shape Water to control the water generated by Tidal Wave?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
asked 8 hours ago
NeutralVaxNeutralVax
5961 silver badge13 bronze badges
5961 silver badge13 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The tidal wave spell has a duration of instantaneous, and ends with this sentence:
The water then spreads out across the ground in all directions, extinguishing unprotected flames in its area and within 30 feet of it, and then it vanishes.
So no, you can't use shape water on the water from tidal wave, because there is no point in time where that's possible. Even if you readied an action to do it, reactions take place after their triggers, so the water will still be gone at the point when you cast shape water.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes
Shape Water does not require the water it affects to be non-magical. While it would require a readied action, casting Shape Water on the water created by a Tidal Wave spell is not only possible but also would allow you potentially protect some unprotected flames from being extinguished by ensuring they were not within 30' of the water created by the spell, since in is, in fact, that water's area and not the spell's which determines the radius unprotected flames are extinguished in.
Note, however, that the actual damage the spell deals is completely disconnected from the water it creates and so, while you could absolutely avoid getting hit by the water from the spell with a well-timed freeze or flow-reversal or whatnot depending on environmental circumstances you would still be subjected to the massive bludgeoning damage from the spell since, again, that has nothing to do with being hit by the water under the text of the rules. You may well be able to argue that preventing the water from hitting you should prevent the damage, however, depending on the style of your DM.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154669%2fcan-you-use-shape-water-on-tidal-wave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The tidal wave spell has a duration of instantaneous, and ends with this sentence:
The water then spreads out across the ground in all directions, extinguishing unprotected flames in its area and within 30 feet of it, and then it vanishes.
So no, you can't use shape water on the water from tidal wave, because there is no point in time where that's possible. Even if you readied an action to do it, reactions take place after their triggers, so the water will still be gone at the point when you cast shape water.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The tidal wave spell has a duration of instantaneous, and ends with this sentence:
The water then spreads out across the ground in all directions, extinguishing unprotected flames in its area and within 30 feet of it, and then it vanishes.
So no, you can't use shape water on the water from tidal wave, because there is no point in time where that's possible. Even if you readied an action to do it, reactions take place after their triggers, so the water will still be gone at the point when you cast shape water.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The tidal wave spell has a duration of instantaneous, and ends with this sentence:
The water then spreads out across the ground in all directions, extinguishing unprotected flames in its area and within 30 feet of it, and then it vanishes.
So no, you can't use shape water on the water from tidal wave, because there is no point in time where that's possible. Even if you readied an action to do it, reactions take place after their triggers, so the water will still be gone at the point when you cast shape water.
$endgroup$
The tidal wave spell has a duration of instantaneous, and ends with this sentence:
The water then spreads out across the ground in all directions, extinguishing unprotected flames in its area and within 30 feet of it, and then it vanishes.
So no, you can't use shape water on the water from tidal wave, because there is no point in time where that's possible. Even if you readied an action to do it, reactions take place after their triggers, so the water will still be gone at the point when you cast shape water.
edited 34 mins ago
Medix2
9,6062 gold badges31 silver badges96 bronze badges
9,6062 gold badges31 silver badges96 bronze badges
answered 6 hours ago
MinimanMiniman
119k29 gold badges545 silver badges728 bronze badges
119k29 gold badges545 silver badges728 bronze badges
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
And even if you could, the water would presumably just disappear immediately afterward anyway.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
6 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
You wouldn't set the trigger "when tidal wave is cast", you would set the trigger "When water appears" or, if you must "When water crashes down on X area". While the duration is instantaneous, there is a sequence of events outlined and there's no reason to think that just because no time is passing one cannot come after one thing and before another-- if they were truly simultaneous the caster of Tidal Wave could pick the order the steps happened in and that is clearly not the way the text reads.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@thedarkwanderer "Many spells are instantaneous. The spell harms, heals, creates, or alters a creature or an object in a way that can't be dispelled, because its magic exists only for an instant." If it's impossible to cast Dispel Magic on the water, there's no reason to assume it's possible to cast other spells on the water.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Medix2
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes
Shape Water does not require the water it affects to be non-magical. While it would require a readied action, casting Shape Water on the water created by a Tidal Wave spell is not only possible but also would allow you potentially protect some unprotected flames from being extinguished by ensuring they were not within 30' of the water created by the spell, since in is, in fact, that water's area and not the spell's which determines the radius unprotected flames are extinguished in.
Note, however, that the actual damage the spell deals is completely disconnected from the water it creates and so, while you could absolutely avoid getting hit by the water from the spell with a well-timed freeze or flow-reversal or whatnot depending on environmental circumstances you would still be subjected to the massive bludgeoning damage from the spell since, again, that has nothing to do with being hit by the water under the text of the rules. You may well be able to argue that preventing the water from hitting you should prevent the damage, however, depending on the style of your DM.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes
Shape Water does not require the water it affects to be non-magical. While it would require a readied action, casting Shape Water on the water created by a Tidal Wave spell is not only possible but also would allow you potentially protect some unprotected flames from being extinguished by ensuring they were not within 30' of the water created by the spell, since in is, in fact, that water's area and not the spell's which determines the radius unprotected flames are extinguished in.
Note, however, that the actual damage the spell deals is completely disconnected from the water it creates and so, while you could absolutely avoid getting hit by the water from the spell with a well-timed freeze or flow-reversal or whatnot depending on environmental circumstances you would still be subjected to the massive bludgeoning damage from the spell since, again, that has nothing to do with being hit by the water under the text of the rules. You may well be able to argue that preventing the water from hitting you should prevent the damage, however, depending on the style of your DM.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes
Shape Water does not require the water it affects to be non-magical. While it would require a readied action, casting Shape Water on the water created by a Tidal Wave spell is not only possible but also would allow you potentially protect some unprotected flames from being extinguished by ensuring they were not within 30' of the water created by the spell, since in is, in fact, that water's area and not the spell's which determines the radius unprotected flames are extinguished in.
Note, however, that the actual damage the spell deals is completely disconnected from the water it creates and so, while you could absolutely avoid getting hit by the water from the spell with a well-timed freeze or flow-reversal or whatnot depending on environmental circumstances you would still be subjected to the massive bludgeoning damage from the spell since, again, that has nothing to do with being hit by the water under the text of the rules. You may well be able to argue that preventing the water from hitting you should prevent the damage, however, depending on the style of your DM.
$endgroup$
Yes
Shape Water does not require the water it affects to be non-magical. While it would require a readied action, casting Shape Water on the water created by a Tidal Wave spell is not only possible but also would allow you potentially protect some unprotected flames from being extinguished by ensuring they were not within 30' of the water created by the spell, since in is, in fact, that water's area and not the spell's which determines the radius unprotected flames are extinguished in.
Note, however, that the actual damage the spell deals is completely disconnected from the water it creates and so, while you could absolutely avoid getting hit by the water from the spell with a well-timed freeze or flow-reversal or whatnot depending on environmental circumstances you would still be subjected to the massive bludgeoning damage from the spell since, again, that has nothing to do with being hit by the water under the text of the rules. You may well be able to argue that preventing the water from hitting you should prevent the damage, however, depending on the style of your DM.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
the dark wandererthe dark wanderer
41.7k7 gold badges108 silver badges218 bronze badges
41.7k7 gold badges108 silver badges218 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
There's a point on which I'm not sure I agree, "you would still be subjected to the damage": the spell states "You conjure up a wave of water that crashes down on an area within range..[...]. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." but if you redirect it with Shape Water, it no longer crashes down on the area it otherwise would have, so you wouldn't be considered "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" and wouldn't have to take damage from it.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The sentence you elipse clarifies that: "The area can be up to 30 feet long, up to 10 feet wide, and up to 10 feet tall. Each creature in that area must make a Dexterity saving throw." Now, the disjunction between water hitting and damage is definitely not something I'd consider intended by the spell, and so I would rule that blocking the water from hitting you e.g. via the Shape Water cantrip is sufficient to also avoid damage from the spell. But that would be a ruling contrary to the text, not one interpreting it.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Basically "a creature in the area the water crashed down in" isn't a reasonable interpretation of "that area" since that area was just defined as a region of space and the text merely states that water crashes down into the area you choose. Even if water no longer crashes down it still was part of the area you chose, and that, not that+water, is what triggers rolls for damage.
$endgroup$
– the dark wanderer
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
That is a fair point. I'm with you on probably ruling that the damage would be avoided, but I concur with your assertion that the rules as written would say otherwise.
$endgroup$
– John Clifford
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154669%2fcan-you-use-shape-water-on-tidal-wave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Please note for future reference, while brevity is acceptable, details and context are much more useful (in terms of both questions and answers) for both you and the community. Consider including things like why you're confused about a specific topic (are the rules ambiguous? has a DM or player said something that you're not sure about? etc.) or the specific situation that lead you to ask the question. That way we've got more details to work with and can better tailor answers to your specific needs.
$endgroup$
– Purple Monkey
7 hours ago