How has NASA's mission operations software architecture evolved?How did the US government shutdown of 2013 affect NASA operations?How is the software for scientific space missions developed?Is GMAT still available? Where? How? (NASA's General Mission Analysis Tool)Info on NASA's NOS3 software and the rest of the suite used by STF-1What does the software quality process for NASA's SLS look like?How open is NASA's “open source” GMAT software?Has in-flight software changes ever involved a change of programming language?Apollo Mission Operations Control Room 2 display, what do these numbers indicate?How do these Apollo mission control displays work?Apollo Mission Control Room 2, how do these decimal number displays work?
How can I oppose my advisor granting gift authorship to a collaborator?
Adding transparency to ink drawing
IEEE Registration Authority mac prefix
Was "The Hobbit" ever abridged?
One hour 10 min layover in Newark; International -> Domestic connection. Enough time to clear customs?
Can I sleep overnight at Stansted Airport
Which is the best password hashing algorithm in .NET Core?
Are treasury bonds more liquid than USD?
Planet with a surface area that’s 90% water or more?
Splitting polygons at narrowest part using R?
What happens if I double Meddling Mage's 'enter the battlefield' trigger?
Why did the VIC-II and SID use 6 µm technology in the era of 3 µm and 1.5 µm?
a harmful idea/plan
Do index funds really have double-digit percents annual return rates?
Does the Scrying spell require you to have a clear path to the target in order to work?
Punishment in pacifist society
'Hard work never hurt anyone' Why not 'hurts'?
How to anonymously report the Establishment Clause being broken?
How to describe hit point damage without talking about wounds
Professor refuses to write a recommendation letter
Did Alan Turing's student Robin Gandy assert that Charles Babbage had no notion of a universal computing machine?
What are the main differences in the druid class between 5th edition and 3.5 edition?
Does this bike use hydraulic brakes?
Are language and thought the same?
How has NASA's mission operations software architecture evolved?
How did the US government shutdown of 2013 affect NASA operations?How is the software for scientific space missions developed?Is GMAT still available? Where? How? (NASA's General Mission Analysis Tool)Info on NASA's NOS3 software and the rest of the suite used by STF-1What does the software quality process for NASA's SLS look like?How open is NASA's “open source” GMAT software?Has in-flight software changes ever involved a change of programming language?Apollo Mission Operations Control Room 2 display, what do these numbers indicate?How do these Apollo mission control displays work?Apollo Mission Control Room 2, how do these decimal number displays work?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
As many of us know, the mission operations software of NASA has changed significantly over time. Needs have changed with the space program and mission operations software has adapted to keep up with these demands as well as the current state of the industry. However, mission operations software is not a monolith. It is composed of many different parts, and they need not all change at the same pace. If it ain't broke...well, you know the saying.
That said, what is the oldest software architecture in use in mission operations today? What is the newest (will accept deployed and high potential to-be-deployed)? Are there any trends in architectural changes over the last 20-30 years?
(If necessary to constrain the scope, answers should prioritize JSC and chiefly Mission Control.)
Ref: "Software Architecture" in NASA Software Engineering Handbook
nasa software mission-control operations development
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As many of us know, the mission operations software of NASA has changed significantly over time. Needs have changed with the space program and mission operations software has adapted to keep up with these demands as well as the current state of the industry. However, mission operations software is not a monolith. It is composed of many different parts, and they need not all change at the same pace. If it ain't broke...well, you know the saying.
That said, what is the oldest software architecture in use in mission operations today? What is the newest (will accept deployed and high potential to-be-deployed)? Are there any trends in architectural changes over the last 20-30 years?
(If necessary to constrain the scope, answers should prioritize JSC and chiefly Mission Control.)
Ref: "Software Architecture" in NASA Software Engineering Handbook
nasa software mission-control operations development
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As many of us know, the mission operations software of NASA has changed significantly over time. Needs have changed with the space program and mission operations software has adapted to keep up with these demands as well as the current state of the industry. However, mission operations software is not a monolith. It is composed of many different parts, and they need not all change at the same pace. If it ain't broke...well, you know the saying.
That said, what is the oldest software architecture in use in mission operations today? What is the newest (will accept deployed and high potential to-be-deployed)? Are there any trends in architectural changes over the last 20-30 years?
(If necessary to constrain the scope, answers should prioritize JSC and chiefly Mission Control.)
Ref: "Software Architecture" in NASA Software Engineering Handbook
nasa software mission-control operations development
$endgroup$
As many of us know, the mission operations software of NASA has changed significantly over time. Needs have changed with the space program and mission operations software has adapted to keep up with these demands as well as the current state of the industry. However, mission operations software is not a monolith. It is composed of many different parts, and they need not all change at the same pace. If it ain't broke...well, you know the saying.
That said, what is the oldest software architecture in use in mission operations today? What is the newest (will accept deployed and high potential to-be-deployed)? Are there any trends in architectural changes over the last 20-30 years?
(If necessary to constrain the scope, answers should prioritize JSC and chiefly Mission Control.)
Ref: "Software Architecture" in NASA Software Engineering Handbook
nasa software mission-control operations development
nasa software mission-control operations development
edited 7 hours ago
called2voyage
asked 8 hours ago
called2voyage♦called2voyage
18.1k8 gold badges84 silver badges134 bronze badges
18.1k8 gold badges84 silver badges134 bronze badges
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The biggest single change in the Houston Mission Control Center (MCC) occurred in the late 1990s. This was the change from a mainframe based system architecture to a workstation based system with a client/server architecture.
The project was led by John Muratore and it's discussed at some length in his oral history. Several of the papers in the Control Center Technology Conference Proceedings also discuss the upgrade. (This document is the source of the illustration).
The switchover was gradual with the new system first being used in a following mode, then gradually assuming control function-by-function. The last mainframe computer was not removed until 2002. (Building 30 Historical Documentation page 17)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38537%2fhow-has-nasas-mission-operations-software-architecture-evolved%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The biggest single change in the Houston Mission Control Center (MCC) occurred in the late 1990s. This was the change from a mainframe based system architecture to a workstation based system with a client/server architecture.
The project was led by John Muratore and it's discussed at some length in his oral history. Several of the papers in the Control Center Technology Conference Proceedings also discuss the upgrade. (This document is the source of the illustration).
The switchover was gradual with the new system first being used in a following mode, then gradually assuming control function-by-function. The last mainframe computer was not removed until 2002. (Building 30 Historical Documentation page 17)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The biggest single change in the Houston Mission Control Center (MCC) occurred in the late 1990s. This was the change from a mainframe based system architecture to a workstation based system with a client/server architecture.
The project was led by John Muratore and it's discussed at some length in his oral history. Several of the papers in the Control Center Technology Conference Proceedings also discuss the upgrade. (This document is the source of the illustration).
The switchover was gradual with the new system first being used in a following mode, then gradually assuming control function-by-function. The last mainframe computer was not removed until 2002. (Building 30 Historical Documentation page 17)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The biggest single change in the Houston Mission Control Center (MCC) occurred in the late 1990s. This was the change from a mainframe based system architecture to a workstation based system with a client/server architecture.
The project was led by John Muratore and it's discussed at some length in his oral history. Several of the papers in the Control Center Technology Conference Proceedings also discuss the upgrade. (This document is the source of the illustration).
The switchover was gradual with the new system first being used in a following mode, then gradually assuming control function-by-function. The last mainframe computer was not removed until 2002. (Building 30 Historical Documentation page 17)
$endgroup$
The biggest single change in the Houston Mission Control Center (MCC) occurred in the late 1990s. This was the change from a mainframe based system architecture to a workstation based system with a client/server architecture.
The project was led by John Muratore and it's discussed at some length in his oral history. Several of the papers in the Control Center Technology Conference Proceedings also discuss the upgrade. (This document is the source of the illustration).
The switchover was gradual with the new system first being used in a following mode, then gradually assuming control function-by-function. The last mainframe computer was not removed until 2002. (Building 30 Historical Documentation page 17)
answered 6 hours ago
Organic MarbleOrganic Marble
77.4k4 gold badges232 silver badges334 bronze badges
77.4k4 gold badges232 silver badges334 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Reading through part of the conference proceedings now. Very enlightening!
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Am I understanding correctly that GenSAA is still used as the base level of operations automation?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think GenSAA is a Goddard Space Flight Center thing. I was not directly involved in any expert systems stuff at JSC but my feeling is that none of it worked well there.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, what about CLIPS? That's what GenSAA was written in, and I see it was in use at JSC as well. I imagine some of the CLIPS code is still around, or is it?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage♦
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I remember CLIPS, it's one of the things that I referred to about not working well. (I was a console jockey not a MCC developer, so there may have been stuff going on behind the scenes/screens that I am completely ignorant of.)
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38537%2fhow-has-nasas-mission-operations-software-architecture-evolved%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
As an anecdote, the majority of GUI programs for Flight Ops are now programmed using Python and interfacing with pub/sub telemetry streams from the main servers.
$endgroup$
– CourageousPotato
1 hour ago