What do you do if you have developments on your paper during the long peer review process?How to write a rebuttal for a conferenceIs it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?Is it normal that journals strongly suggest a professional English editing service?If during revision process an author discovers and corrects errors not detected by reviewers, should the author inform the editor of these changes?How should I respond to a reviewer comment that I didn't make changes when I did?My associate editor cannot contact the 2nd reviewerConditional acceptance then rejection – worthy of appeal?I got a provisional acceptance and submitted my clerical revisions almost two months ago. Email the editor?Does it have a bad effect on my career if I publish in Frontiers journals?Should I report apparent conflict with handling editor during peer review?
What can a pilot do if an air traffic controller is incapacitated?
What do you do if you have developments on your paper during the long peer review process?
Pseudo Game of Cups in Python
Centrifugal force with Newton's third law?
Why does NASA publish all the results/data it gets?
Temporarily moving a SQL Server 2016 database to SQL Server 2017 and then moving back. Is it possible?
Which museums have artworks of all four ninja turtles' namesakes?
Is the sentence "何でも忘れた" correct?
Why there so many pitch control surfaces on the Piaggio P180 Avanti?
Did Apollo carry and use WD40?
I reverse the source code, you negate the input!
Social leper versus social leopard
How is underwater propagation of sound possible?
What do solvers like Gurobi and CPLEX do when they run into hard instances of MIP
Is there an in-universe reason Harry says this or is this simply a Rowling mistake?
Asking an expert in your field that you have never met to review your manuscript
How to create a grid following points in QGIS?
Minimize taxes now that I earn more
Hilbert's hotel, why can't I repeat it infinitely many times?
Manager encourages me to take day of sick leave instead of PTO, what's in it for him?
How to make interviewee comfortable interviewing in lounge chairs
As a discovery writer, how do I complete an unfinished novel (which has highly diverged from the original plot ) after a time-gap?
How is the problem, G has no triangle in Logspace?
How use custom order in folder on Windows 7 and 10
What do you do if you have developments on your paper during the long peer review process?
How to write a rebuttal for a conferenceIs it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?Is it normal that journals strongly suggest a professional English editing service?If during revision process an author discovers and corrects errors not detected by reviewers, should the author inform the editor of these changes?How should I respond to a reviewer comment that I didn't make changes when I did?My associate editor cannot contact the 2nd reviewerConditional acceptance then rejection – worthy of appeal?I got a provisional acceptance and submitted my clerical revisions almost two months ago. Email the editor?Does it have a bad effect on my career if I publish in Frontiers journals?Should I report apparent conflict with handling editor during peer review?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We all know that the peer review process of a manuscript can take months, and months, and more months. In this period, ones continues to research, and sometimes your manuscript keeps suffering small changes as your investigation proceeds further. What do you do? Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments? Thanks.
peer-review
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment
|
We all know that the peer review process of a manuscript can take months, and months, and more months. In this period, ones continues to research, and sometimes your manuscript keeps suffering small changes as your investigation proceeds further. What do you do? Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments? Thanks.
peer-review
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment
|
We all know that the peer review process of a manuscript can take months, and months, and more months. In this period, ones continues to research, and sometimes your manuscript keeps suffering small changes as your investigation proceeds further. What do you do? Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments? Thanks.
peer-review
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
We all know that the peer review process of a manuscript can take months, and months, and more months. In this period, ones continues to research, and sometimes your manuscript keeps suffering small changes as your investigation proceeds further. What do you do? Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments? Thanks.
peer-review
peer-review
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Damián BeanatoDamián Beanato
562 bronze badges
562 bronze badges
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Damián Beanato is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments?
Yes, that's the most common thing to do.
Of course, if the paper is rejected, then you can incorporate the changes before submitting somewhere else.
If the new developments are dramatic, then you may instead decide to leave the original paper alone, and write a separate paper with the new work.
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
add a comment
|
This depends a lot on the scale of your proposed changes. If they are huge, you might have a new paper to follow on the first. If they are really small, as you suggest, you could just save them for a revision, supposing that the paper will be "accepted with revisions".
The intermediate case is a bit harder. If the changes alter the thrust of the paper or a major conclusion, you need to inform the editor. In the long run that will save time, in most cases.
But yes, you can and should point out things in the revision that weren't in the original to make the second round of review either go faster or be avoided.
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Damián Beanato is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137340%2fwhat-do-you-do-if-you-have-developments-on-your-paper-during-the-long-peer-revie%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments?
Yes, that's the most common thing to do.
Of course, if the paper is rejected, then you can incorporate the changes before submitting somewhere else.
If the new developments are dramatic, then you may instead decide to leave the original paper alone, and write a separate paper with the new work.
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments?
Yes, that's the most common thing to do.
Of course, if the paper is rejected, then you can incorporate the changes before submitting somewhere else.
If the new developments are dramatic, then you may instead decide to leave the original paper alone, and write a separate paper with the new work.
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments?
Yes, that's the most common thing to do.
Of course, if the paper is rejected, then you can incorporate the changes before submitting somewhere else.
If the new developments are dramatic, then you may instead decide to leave the original paper alone, and write a separate paper with the new work.
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
Wait until the first revision to introduce this changes and let the editor know that you did not exclusively modify your original manuscript based on the reviewers comments?
Yes, that's the most common thing to do.
Of course, if the paper is rejected, then you can incorporate the changes before submitting somewhere else.
If the new developments are dramatic, then you may instead decide to leave the original paper alone, and write a separate paper with the new work.
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
114k38 gold badges333 silver badges429 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
This depends a lot on the scale of your proposed changes. If they are huge, you might have a new paper to follow on the first. If they are really small, as you suggest, you could just save them for a revision, supposing that the paper will be "accepted with revisions".
The intermediate case is a bit harder. If the changes alter the thrust of the paper or a major conclusion, you need to inform the editor. In the long run that will save time, in most cases.
But yes, you can and should point out things in the revision that weren't in the original to make the second round of review either go faster or be avoided.
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
add a comment
|
This depends a lot on the scale of your proposed changes. If they are huge, you might have a new paper to follow on the first. If they are really small, as you suggest, you could just save them for a revision, supposing that the paper will be "accepted with revisions".
The intermediate case is a bit harder. If the changes alter the thrust of the paper or a major conclusion, you need to inform the editor. In the long run that will save time, in most cases.
But yes, you can and should point out things in the revision that weren't in the original to make the second round of review either go faster or be avoided.
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
add a comment
|
This depends a lot on the scale of your proposed changes. If they are huge, you might have a new paper to follow on the first. If they are really small, as you suggest, you could just save them for a revision, supposing that the paper will be "accepted with revisions".
The intermediate case is a bit harder. If the changes alter the thrust of the paper or a major conclusion, you need to inform the editor. In the long run that will save time, in most cases.
But yes, you can and should point out things in the revision that weren't in the original to make the second round of review either go faster or be avoided.
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
This depends a lot on the scale of your proposed changes. If they are huge, you might have a new paper to follow on the first. If they are really small, as you suggest, you could just save them for a revision, supposing that the paper will be "accepted with revisions".
The intermediate case is a bit harder. If the changes alter the thrust of the paper or a major conclusion, you need to inform the editor. In the long run that will save time, in most cases.
But yes, you can and should point out things in the revision that weren't in the original to make the second round of review either go faster or be avoided.
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
83.7k21 gold badges253 silver badges365 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Damián Beanato is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Damián Beanato is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Damián Beanato is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Damián Beanato is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137340%2fwhat-do-you-do-if-you-have-developments-on-your-paper-during-the-long-peer-revie%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
