How to reference parameters outside of Apex Class that can be configured by AdministratorTimezone in datetime field in Custom SettingGenerate set of Ids from a map, am I doing it right?Deploying the custom settings and accessing classes to ProdRecord Type Id not being recognized when checked against value in List Custom SettingList Custom Setting with getInstance() inconsistent based on API VersionPassing parameters from a Test Class into an APEX Class that is called on a Visualforce pageCustom Setting list to query filterHow do I use a Protected Custom Setting?How to Query 2 Objects Down Parent to Child SOQL in APEX ClassCustom Settings in test classes for Lookup fields(ID)

GitHub repo with Apache License version 2 in package.json, but no full license copy nor comment headers

When does removing Goblin Warchief affect its cost reduction ability?

Is there a builtin function to turn selective Echos off?

Which museums have artworks of all four ninja turtles' namesakes?

CDG baggage claim before or after immigration?

Asking an expert in your field that you have never met to review your manuscript

Can someone explain to me the parameters of a lognormal distribution?

Paradox regarding phase transitions in relativistic systems

Manager encourages me to take day of sick leave instead of PTO, what's in it for him?

Hilbert's hotel, why can't I repeat it infinitely many times?

Social leper versus social leopard

How to deal with my team leader who keeps calling me about project updates even though I am on leave for personal reasons?

Is it true that, "just ten trading days represent 63 per cent of the returns of the past 50 years"?

How to manage expenditure when billing cycles and paycheck cycles are not aligned?

What do solvers like Gurobi and CPLEX do when they run into hard instances of MIP

How to ask a man to not take up more than one seat on public transport while avoiding conflict?

Can Northern Ireland's border issue be solved by repartition?

Can planetary bodies have a second axis of rotation?

What do these pins mean? Where should I plug them in?

Hiking with a mule or two?

Did HaShem ever command a Navi (Prophet) to break a law?

Do things made of adamantine rust?

In a jam session, when asked which key my non-transposing instrument (like a violin) is in, what do I answer?

To this riddle, I invite



How to reference parameters outside of Apex Class that can be configured by Administrator


Timezone in datetime field in Custom SettingGenerate set of Ids from a map, am I doing it right?Deploying the custom settings and accessing classes to ProdRecord Type Id not being recognized when checked against value in List Custom SettingList Custom Setting with getInstance() inconsistent based on API VersionPassing parameters from a Test Class into an APEX Class that is called on a Visualforce pageCustom Setting list to query filterHow do I use a Protected Custom Setting?How to Query 2 Objects Down Parent to Child SOQL in APEX ClassCustom Settings in test classes for Lookup fields(ID)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















Here is an example of the challenge I have faced multiple times. I was wondering if anyone could offer best practices on how they handle situations like these.



I have an apex class that process records. I want to store some parameters outside so that my administrator could modify these parameters in the future without modifying and deploying the Class.



Consider this example:
I have a class that processes records owned by Users of specific Profiles.
In my class I have an SOQL query:



List<Id> profileIds = _____________; //I want to reference these Ids.
List<Opportunity> liOpportunity = [Select Id....FROM Opportunity WHERE Owner.ProfileId IN: profileIds];


What I have done in the past is create a new List custom setting Config__c with a Custom Text Field to store the profile Ids called Value__c and comments__c.



Then I would create the following record:
enter image description here



In my Apex Class, now all I have to do is reference the Value field in the Custom Setting.



List<Id> profileIds = Config__c.getValues('ProfileIds').Value__c.split(';');


The advantages of this method are:



  1. Doesn't count towards governor limits

  2. Easily configurable without deployment if requirements change at a later date.

My questions are the following:



  1. Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)?


  2. Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?


I hope this is the correct forum / way to ask this question. If there is a problem with my question or it is unclear kindly comment and I will restructure the question.










share|improve this question
























  • Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

    – Jeferson Chaves
    8 hours ago

















2















Here is an example of the challenge I have faced multiple times. I was wondering if anyone could offer best practices on how they handle situations like these.



I have an apex class that process records. I want to store some parameters outside so that my administrator could modify these parameters in the future without modifying and deploying the Class.



Consider this example:
I have a class that processes records owned by Users of specific Profiles.
In my class I have an SOQL query:



List<Id> profileIds = _____________; //I want to reference these Ids.
List<Opportunity> liOpportunity = [Select Id....FROM Opportunity WHERE Owner.ProfileId IN: profileIds];


What I have done in the past is create a new List custom setting Config__c with a Custom Text Field to store the profile Ids called Value__c and comments__c.



Then I would create the following record:
enter image description here



In my Apex Class, now all I have to do is reference the Value field in the Custom Setting.



List<Id> profileIds = Config__c.getValues('ProfileIds').Value__c.split(';');


The advantages of this method are:



  1. Doesn't count towards governor limits

  2. Easily configurable without deployment if requirements change at a later date.

My questions are the following:



  1. Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)?


  2. Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?


I hope this is the correct forum / way to ask this question. If there is a problem with my question or it is unclear kindly comment and I will restructure the question.










share|improve this question
























  • Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

    – Jeferson Chaves
    8 hours ago













2












2








2








Here is an example of the challenge I have faced multiple times. I was wondering if anyone could offer best practices on how they handle situations like these.



I have an apex class that process records. I want to store some parameters outside so that my administrator could modify these parameters in the future without modifying and deploying the Class.



Consider this example:
I have a class that processes records owned by Users of specific Profiles.
In my class I have an SOQL query:



List<Id> profileIds = _____________; //I want to reference these Ids.
List<Opportunity> liOpportunity = [Select Id....FROM Opportunity WHERE Owner.ProfileId IN: profileIds];


What I have done in the past is create a new List custom setting Config__c with a Custom Text Field to store the profile Ids called Value__c and comments__c.



Then I would create the following record:
enter image description here



In my Apex Class, now all I have to do is reference the Value field in the Custom Setting.



List<Id> profileIds = Config__c.getValues('ProfileIds').Value__c.split(';');


The advantages of this method are:



  1. Doesn't count towards governor limits

  2. Easily configurable without deployment if requirements change at a later date.

My questions are the following:



  1. Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)?


  2. Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?


I hope this is the correct forum / way to ask this question. If there is a problem with my question or it is unclear kindly comment and I will restructure the question.










share|improve this question














Here is an example of the challenge I have faced multiple times. I was wondering if anyone could offer best practices on how they handle situations like these.



I have an apex class that process records. I want to store some parameters outside so that my administrator could modify these parameters in the future without modifying and deploying the Class.



Consider this example:
I have a class that processes records owned by Users of specific Profiles.
In my class I have an SOQL query:



List<Id> profileIds = _____________; //I want to reference these Ids.
List<Opportunity> liOpportunity = [Select Id....FROM Opportunity WHERE Owner.ProfileId IN: profileIds];


What I have done in the past is create a new List custom setting Config__c with a Custom Text Field to store the profile Ids called Value__c and comments__c.



Then I would create the following record:
enter image description here



In my Apex Class, now all I have to do is reference the Value field in the Custom Setting.



List<Id> profileIds = Config__c.getValues('ProfileIds').Value__c.split(';');


The advantages of this method are:



  1. Doesn't count towards governor limits

  2. Easily configurable without deployment if requirements change at a later date.

My questions are the following:



  1. Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)?


  2. Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?


I hope this is the correct forum / way to ask this question. If there is a problem with my question or it is unclear kindly comment and I will restructure the question.







apex customsetting configuration parameters






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Z33dawgZ33dawg

37010 bronze badges




37010 bronze badges















  • Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

    – Jeferson Chaves
    8 hours ago

















  • Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

    – Jeferson Chaves
    8 hours ago
















Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

– Jeferson Chaves
8 hours ago





Nowadays, I would prefer to store on Custom Metadata Type, unless you have a strong reason to store on Custom Settings.

– Jeferson Chaves
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5
















Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)/Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?



I would use custom metadata types for the following reason.



  1. We can use SOQL, and each profile ID can be a record of custom metadata. SOQL on custom metadata are not counted towards the governor SOQL limit

  2. Can be configured directly in prod. No need of deployment

  3. Can be source controlled as its a metadata, that mean you will retain history of what was the older value if you use Version control like GIT or SVN

  4. Can be deployed using ant and change set. You dont have to worry about moving them as they can also be packaged(read unmanaged, managed, unlocked etc)

  5. Can have relationships to other custom metadata records

  6. Can have entity deifinition and field definition to Standard/Custom Object and fields.





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    +1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

    – Chris Johnson
    7 hours ago











  • Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • @Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

    – Z33dawg
    5 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);














draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f278604%2fhow-to-reference-parameters-outside-of-apex-class-that-can-be-configured-by-admi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5
















Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)/Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?



I would use custom metadata types for the following reason.



  1. We can use SOQL, and each profile ID can be a record of custom metadata. SOQL on custom metadata are not counted towards the governor SOQL limit

  2. Can be configured directly in prod. No need of deployment

  3. Can be source controlled as its a metadata, that mean you will retain history of what was the older value if you use Version control like GIT or SVN

  4. Can be deployed using ant and change set. You dont have to worry about moving them as they can also be packaged(read unmanaged, managed, unlocked etc)

  5. Can have relationships to other custom metadata records

  6. Can have entity deifinition and field definition to Standard/Custom Object and fields.





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    +1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

    – Chris Johnson
    7 hours ago











  • Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • @Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

    – Z33dawg
    5 hours ago















5
















Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)/Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?



I would use custom metadata types for the following reason.



  1. We can use SOQL, and each profile ID can be a record of custom metadata. SOQL on custom metadata are not counted towards the governor SOQL limit

  2. Can be configured directly in prod. No need of deployment

  3. Can be source controlled as its a metadata, that mean you will retain history of what was the older value if you use Version control like GIT or SVN

  4. Can be deployed using ant and change set. You dont have to worry about moving them as they can also be packaged(read unmanaged, managed, unlocked etc)

  5. Can have relationships to other custom metadata records

  6. Can have entity deifinition and field definition to Standard/Custom Object and fields.





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    +1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

    – Chris Johnson
    7 hours ago











  • Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • @Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

    – Z33dawg
    5 hours ago













5














5










5









Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)/Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?



I would use custom metadata types for the following reason.



  1. We can use SOQL, and each profile ID can be a record of custom metadata. SOQL on custom metadata are not counted towards the governor SOQL limit

  2. Can be configured directly in prod. No need of deployment

  3. Can be source controlled as its a metadata, that mean you will retain history of what was the older value if you use Version control like GIT or SVN

  4. Can be deployed using ant and change set. You dont have to worry about moving them as they can also be packaged(read unmanaged, managed, unlocked etc)

  5. Can have relationships to other custom metadata records

  6. Can have entity deifinition and field definition to Standard/Custom Object and fields.





share|improve this answer















Is this an optimal way of doing this or is there a better way to accomplish this (with similar or greater advantages)/Would it be better to use a Custom Metadata Type for this scenario?



I would use custom metadata types for the following reason.



  1. We can use SOQL, and each profile ID can be a record of custom metadata. SOQL on custom metadata are not counted towards the governor SOQL limit

  2. Can be configured directly in prod. No need of deployment

  3. Can be source controlled as its a metadata, that mean you will retain history of what was the older value if you use Version control like GIT or SVN

  4. Can be deployed using ant and change set. You dont have to worry about moving them as they can also be packaged(read unmanaged, managed, unlocked etc)

  5. Can have relationships to other custom metadata records

  6. Can have entity deifinition and field definition to Standard/Custom Object and fields.






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Pranay JaiswalPranay Jaiswal

24.5k5 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges




24.5k5 gold badges35 silver badges77 bronze badges










  • 1





    +1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

    – Chris Johnson
    7 hours ago











  • Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • @Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

    – Z33dawg
    5 hours ago












  • 1





    +1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

    – Chris Johnson
    7 hours ago











  • Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

    – Z33dawg
    7 hours ago











  • @Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

    – Z33dawg
    5 hours ago







1




1





+1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

– Chris Johnson
7 hours ago





+1. One thing to note -- if you're used to working with Custom Settings, you'll need to think differently about Custom Metadata when it comes to test classes. Whereas you can (must) create specific Custom Settings in a test class, You cannot change Custom Metadata within your test class... you must use what is specified in your custom metadata.

– Chris Johnson
7 hours ago













Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

– Z33dawg
7 hours ago





Thanks, I see the benefits of using MDT's. in my scenario considering I created a record of custom mdt for each profile Id, how would you recommend an admin be able to select which profiles I would like to use in my class. I imagine you are implying that the admin create the MDT records if they want to be used or delete them if they should no longer be used. Could you elaborate?

– Z33dawg
7 hours ago













My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

– Z33dawg
7 hours ago





My Idea I guess would be to create a MDT Object like Apex_Config__mdt. I could then create custom fields such as a multiselect picklist Profiles__c (label: profile_name, value profile_id) , a comment field (to explain which fields to configure) Then I can create records of which I can query from classes. In my class I would query for the appropriate record and uses the field values. I could then reuse this model for different classes. Anyone have better ideas?

– Z33dawg
7 hours ago













@Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago





@Z33dawg that sounds ideal :)

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago













LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

– Z33dawg
5 hours ago





LOL I just checked and [obviously] for some reason, Salesforce does not support multi select picklists on custom MDT.

– Z33dawg
5 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f278604%2fhow-to-reference-parameters-outside-of-apex-class-that-can-be-configured-by-admi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її