The anatomy of an organic infrared generatorCentaur anatomy helpHow to modify the human eye to see into the ultraviolet and infrared bands?Internal, organic cold fusion engineIdeal short-term organic enginewhat type of head anatomy would simians evolveOrganic Thermoelectric Phase Change MaterialThe Biology behind a slime that uses hydrofluoric acid to disable and digest prey.Can you create a living vehicle fueled by organic material?

Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?

C++ Least cost swapping 2

Why is the battery jumpered to a resistor in this schematic?

Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?

What happened after the end of the Truman Show?

Are unaudited server logs admissible in a court of law?

How do I cope with haze for the photos containing sky and trees at a distance?

Why do aircraft leave cruising altitude long before landing just to circle?

Airline power sockets shut down when I plug my computer in. How can I avoid that?

Adding things to bunches of things vs multiplication

Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?

Meaning and structure of headline "Hair it is: A List of ..."

Why is su world executable?

Postdoc interview - somewhat positive reply but no news?

Photoshop older default brushes

Output the list of musical notes

What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?

Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?

My new Acer Aspire 7 doesn't have a Legacy Boot option, what can I do to get it?

What's the relationship betweeen MS-DOS and XENIX?

Ending a line of dialogue with "?!": Allowed or obnoxious?

A reccomended structured approach to self studying music theory for songwriting

What is the opposite of "hunger level"?

Representing an indicator function: binary variables and "indicator constraints"



The anatomy of an organic infrared generator


Centaur anatomy helpHow to modify the human eye to see into the ultraviolet and infrared bands?Internal, organic cold fusion engineIdeal short-term organic enginewhat type of head anatomy would simians evolveOrganic Thermoelectric Phase Change MaterialThe Biology behind a slime that uses hydrofluoric acid to disable and digest prey.Can you create a living vehicle fueled by organic material?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


I have a concept for a species of arctic-dwelling organism (let’s just call it a polar bear) that evolved an organ that was able to produce microwaves, which it uses to tunnel through ice.



If such a thing is possible, my question is: which already-existing organ(s) would evolve into this new organ (like how electrocytes evolved from muscle cells in electric eels), what organic structures and processes would develop inside this organ, and what ramifications would this have on the organism’s physiology? As in, how would its body change in order to cope with this new organ?



Edit: thanks to your answers, I realize now that not only is evolving this organ incredibly improbable, but that microwaves are an incredibly inefficient method of melting ice, and that infrared rays would be better.
So, let’s call it an organic infrared generator, and the organ be housed inside an entirely unique genetically modified organism. What additional biological processes might it have to cope with the organ, and what would it look like?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
    $endgroup$
    – Chickens are not cows
    7 hours ago

















4












$begingroup$


I have a concept for a species of arctic-dwelling organism (let’s just call it a polar bear) that evolved an organ that was able to produce microwaves, which it uses to tunnel through ice.



If such a thing is possible, my question is: which already-existing organ(s) would evolve into this new organ (like how electrocytes evolved from muscle cells in electric eels), what organic structures and processes would develop inside this organ, and what ramifications would this have on the organism’s physiology? As in, how would its body change in order to cope with this new organ?



Edit: thanks to your answers, I realize now that not only is evolving this organ incredibly improbable, but that microwaves are an incredibly inefficient method of melting ice, and that infrared rays would be better.
So, let’s call it an organic infrared generator, and the organ be housed inside an entirely unique genetically modified organism. What additional biological processes might it have to cope with the organ, and what would it look like?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
    $endgroup$
    – Chickens are not cows
    7 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I have a concept for a species of arctic-dwelling organism (let’s just call it a polar bear) that evolved an organ that was able to produce microwaves, which it uses to tunnel through ice.



If such a thing is possible, my question is: which already-existing organ(s) would evolve into this new organ (like how electrocytes evolved from muscle cells in electric eels), what organic structures and processes would develop inside this organ, and what ramifications would this have on the organism’s physiology? As in, how would its body change in order to cope with this new organ?



Edit: thanks to your answers, I realize now that not only is evolving this organ incredibly improbable, but that microwaves are an incredibly inefficient method of melting ice, and that infrared rays would be better.
So, let’s call it an organic infrared generator, and the organ be housed inside an entirely unique genetically modified organism. What additional biological processes might it have to cope with the organ, and what would it look like?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a concept for a species of arctic-dwelling organism (let’s just call it a polar bear) that evolved an organ that was able to produce microwaves, which it uses to tunnel through ice.



If such a thing is possible, my question is: which already-existing organ(s) would evolve into this new organ (like how electrocytes evolved from muscle cells in electric eels), what organic structures and processes would develop inside this organ, and what ramifications would this have on the organism’s physiology? As in, how would its body change in order to cope with this new organ?



Edit: thanks to your answers, I realize now that not only is evolving this organ incredibly improbable, but that microwaves are an incredibly inefficient method of melting ice, and that infrared rays would be better.
So, let’s call it an organic infrared generator, and the organ be housed inside an entirely unique genetically modified organism. What additional biological processes might it have to cope with the organ, and what would it look like?







biology biochemistry bio-mechanics radiation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Cobbington

















asked 9 hours ago









CobbingtonCobbington

5254 silver badges13 bronze badges




5254 silver badges13 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
    $endgroup$
    – Chickens are not cows
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
    $endgroup$
    – Chickens are not cows
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
$endgroup$
– JBH
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
This is a very subjective question and I'm voting to close as POB. Given enough time, pretty much anything can evolve into anything. Biology already uses electricity, so hind sight makes it logical that a muscle might evolve into an electrocyte. But nothing about biology (that I know of) uses microwaves, which makes this a complete guess, which is off-topic. Further, asking 4 questions is too broad (also a reason to close). If you ask one, specific question and qualify the question so there can be a best answer, I'd be happy to retract.
$endgroup$
– JBH
9 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
At the time of this comment, the two answers don't seem to have addressed the concern that microwaves, whilst good at heating liquid water - ice is really quite unresponsive to microwave energy. Unless you've compelling reasons to write this into your story (for which you would need to concoct an elaborate scenario involving squirting hot water onto the ice to melt it), you might want to go with infra-red as more practical.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
7 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

TL;DR: generation of high power microwaves from organic mechanisms is very, very hard and evolutionarily unlikely. Microwaves are also a terrible way of tunnelling through ice. Note that polar bears and leopard seals don't bother in the real world; who are you to argue with those highly effective apex predators?




As another answer already touches on the inefficiency of melting ice (even more so when you consider that there's no energy-dense food in there to make the tunnelling worthwhile!) I won't go into that, but lets consider the physiological issues of microwave generation.



Microwave generators have two important kinds of material that are hard to come by in nature: microwave-transparent materials, to cover and protect the business end of the emitting device, and microwave-reflecting materials to ensure that all the microwaves go where they are wanted (eg. out the front) and aren't absorbed by the rest of the equipment which would cause undesirable power loss, heating and damage.



Lightweight polymers like polystyrene or polythene are easy to come by courtesy of modern chemistry and industry, but there aren't many good biological equivalents. The presence of any water is undesirable (because of the resulting energy loss, heat generation and ultimately physical damage that will result) and growing a water-free biological membrane sounds like an absolute nightmare, and something deeply unlikely to evolve naturally. It is remotely possible that you could have some sort of super-thin layer of specialised bone, horn, hair or tooth and have the extruding layer of cells die off, maybe.



Similarly, sheet metals and metal meshes have been available to humans for millenia, but bulk deposition of metals in organic creatures isn't a thing, let alone formation of nice smooth reflecting cavities. There's no obvious evolutionary path to such a trait... seems like mineral/protein composites that most tooth or bone or shell-bearing animals produce is quite good enough without the hassle and energetic expense of refining metals.



Finally, even if you've solved those two not-insignificant problems, you need to actually generate microwaves. Human approaches to this involve vacuum tubes (good luck evolving a vacuum-sealed cavity in a biological organism!) or semiconductors. The latter might just possibly be able to have some organic counterparts but: they are low power microwave sources, the sort useful for communication, perhaps, but not for generating the enormous amounts of power you need to melt enough ice to fit your body through.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    5












    $begingroup$

    While it's imaginable that an organ could evolve to emit low-powered microwaves, this is not a practical way of tunnelling through ice.



    Melting ice - changing it from solid to liquid without substantially altering its temperature - takes a lot of energy. According to Wikipedia, enough energy to raise the temperature of an equal mass of water by 80°C. You then need to raise the temperature of the newly melted water enough to let it flow away before the heat leaks away into the surrounding ice and it freezes again.



    Your creature needs to radiate all of that energy as microwaves without cooking itself, which is not plausible, supply rather more chemical energy to the microwave generator organ, which is not going to be 100% efficient, and eat enough to supply all that chemical energy as well as its normal needs. It's just not evolutionarily plausible. Evolving strong claws or teeth, and the muscles to use them to tunnel through ice is far more practical.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
      $endgroup$
      – Renan
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      8 hours ago


















    3












    $begingroup$

    I agree with all the observations that such an organ would be as unlikely to evolve as Douglas Adam’s Babel Fish. But, if it did it would more than likely have these properties



    1. A primary dimension — longest — an integer multiple of 6.25 cm. This would allow the cavity to resonate at the same frequency as a microwave oven ~2.3 GHz — the resonant frequency of hydrogen


    2. The organ would be some sort MASER on the animal's skull or spine or shoulder blades or pelvis. The wavelength of the emission excites hydrogen atoms in molecules and while good for softening the ice, it's bad for organic tissue since it will tend to cause their proteins to cook. I think this means the rest of the bear, or walrus must be protected from the emission. I can’t think of a really good way to do that sort of metal shielding which would be odd. Conceptually a complex series of layered materials could form an interference pattern and act as an RF mirror but doesn’t seem evolutionarily likely


    3. Some sort of chemical reaction similar to a primary cell battery to generate the power needed to drive the organic maser in the bear's skull (or wherever)


    The maser wouldn’t melt the ice but since the skin depth of 2.3 GHZ is very long, the maser could soften the ice, causing fractures, that would allow the bear's great physical strength and adamantium claws — sorry, those are wolverines, right not bears — strong and sharp claws to carve the ice.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153202%2fthe-anatomy-of-an-organic-infrared-generator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      TL;DR: generation of high power microwaves from organic mechanisms is very, very hard and evolutionarily unlikely. Microwaves are also a terrible way of tunnelling through ice. Note that polar bears and leopard seals don't bother in the real world; who are you to argue with those highly effective apex predators?




      As another answer already touches on the inefficiency of melting ice (even more so when you consider that there's no energy-dense food in there to make the tunnelling worthwhile!) I won't go into that, but lets consider the physiological issues of microwave generation.



      Microwave generators have two important kinds of material that are hard to come by in nature: microwave-transparent materials, to cover and protect the business end of the emitting device, and microwave-reflecting materials to ensure that all the microwaves go where they are wanted (eg. out the front) and aren't absorbed by the rest of the equipment which would cause undesirable power loss, heating and damage.



      Lightweight polymers like polystyrene or polythene are easy to come by courtesy of modern chemistry and industry, but there aren't many good biological equivalents. The presence of any water is undesirable (because of the resulting energy loss, heat generation and ultimately physical damage that will result) and growing a water-free biological membrane sounds like an absolute nightmare, and something deeply unlikely to evolve naturally. It is remotely possible that you could have some sort of super-thin layer of specialised bone, horn, hair or tooth and have the extruding layer of cells die off, maybe.



      Similarly, sheet metals and metal meshes have been available to humans for millenia, but bulk deposition of metals in organic creatures isn't a thing, let alone formation of nice smooth reflecting cavities. There's no obvious evolutionary path to such a trait... seems like mineral/protein composites that most tooth or bone or shell-bearing animals produce is quite good enough without the hassle and energetic expense of refining metals.



      Finally, even if you've solved those two not-insignificant problems, you need to actually generate microwaves. Human approaches to this involve vacuum tubes (good luck evolving a vacuum-sealed cavity in a biological organism!) or semiconductors. The latter might just possibly be able to have some organic counterparts but: they are low power microwave sources, the sort useful for communication, perhaps, but not for generating the enormous amounts of power you need to melt enough ice to fit your body through.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        6












        $begingroup$

        TL;DR: generation of high power microwaves from organic mechanisms is very, very hard and evolutionarily unlikely. Microwaves are also a terrible way of tunnelling through ice. Note that polar bears and leopard seals don't bother in the real world; who are you to argue with those highly effective apex predators?




        As another answer already touches on the inefficiency of melting ice (even more so when you consider that there's no energy-dense food in there to make the tunnelling worthwhile!) I won't go into that, but lets consider the physiological issues of microwave generation.



        Microwave generators have two important kinds of material that are hard to come by in nature: microwave-transparent materials, to cover and protect the business end of the emitting device, and microwave-reflecting materials to ensure that all the microwaves go where they are wanted (eg. out the front) and aren't absorbed by the rest of the equipment which would cause undesirable power loss, heating and damage.



        Lightweight polymers like polystyrene or polythene are easy to come by courtesy of modern chemistry and industry, but there aren't many good biological equivalents. The presence of any water is undesirable (because of the resulting energy loss, heat generation and ultimately physical damage that will result) and growing a water-free biological membrane sounds like an absolute nightmare, and something deeply unlikely to evolve naturally. It is remotely possible that you could have some sort of super-thin layer of specialised bone, horn, hair or tooth and have the extruding layer of cells die off, maybe.



        Similarly, sheet metals and metal meshes have been available to humans for millenia, but bulk deposition of metals in organic creatures isn't a thing, let alone formation of nice smooth reflecting cavities. There's no obvious evolutionary path to such a trait... seems like mineral/protein composites that most tooth or bone or shell-bearing animals produce is quite good enough without the hassle and energetic expense of refining metals.



        Finally, even if you've solved those two not-insignificant problems, you need to actually generate microwaves. Human approaches to this involve vacuum tubes (good luck evolving a vacuum-sealed cavity in a biological organism!) or semiconductors. The latter might just possibly be able to have some organic counterparts but: they are low power microwave sources, the sort useful for communication, perhaps, but not for generating the enormous amounts of power you need to melt enough ice to fit your body through.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          TL;DR: generation of high power microwaves from organic mechanisms is very, very hard and evolutionarily unlikely. Microwaves are also a terrible way of tunnelling through ice. Note that polar bears and leopard seals don't bother in the real world; who are you to argue with those highly effective apex predators?




          As another answer already touches on the inefficiency of melting ice (even more so when you consider that there's no energy-dense food in there to make the tunnelling worthwhile!) I won't go into that, but lets consider the physiological issues of microwave generation.



          Microwave generators have two important kinds of material that are hard to come by in nature: microwave-transparent materials, to cover and protect the business end of the emitting device, and microwave-reflecting materials to ensure that all the microwaves go where they are wanted (eg. out the front) and aren't absorbed by the rest of the equipment which would cause undesirable power loss, heating and damage.



          Lightweight polymers like polystyrene or polythene are easy to come by courtesy of modern chemistry and industry, but there aren't many good biological equivalents. The presence of any water is undesirable (because of the resulting energy loss, heat generation and ultimately physical damage that will result) and growing a water-free biological membrane sounds like an absolute nightmare, and something deeply unlikely to evolve naturally. It is remotely possible that you could have some sort of super-thin layer of specialised bone, horn, hair or tooth and have the extruding layer of cells die off, maybe.



          Similarly, sheet metals and metal meshes have been available to humans for millenia, but bulk deposition of metals in organic creatures isn't a thing, let alone formation of nice smooth reflecting cavities. There's no obvious evolutionary path to such a trait... seems like mineral/protein composites that most tooth or bone or shell-bearing animals produce is quite good enough without the hassle and energetic expense of refining metals.



          Finally, even if you've solved those two not-insignificant problems, you need to actually generate microwaves. Human approaches to this involve vacuum tubes (good luck evolving a vacuum-sealed cavity in a biological organism!) or semiconductors. The latter might just possibly be able to have some organic counterparts but: they are low power microwave sources, the sort useful for communication, perhaps, but not for generating the enormous amounts of power you need to melt enough ice to fit your body through.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          TL;DR: generation of high power microwaves from organic mechanisms is very, very hard and evolutionarily unlikely. Microwaves are also a terrible way of tunnelling through ice. Note that polar bears and leopard seals don't bother in the real world; who are you to argue with those highly effective apex predators?




          As another answer already touches on the inefficiency of melting ice (even more so when you consider that there's no energy-dense food in there to make the tunnelling worthwhile!) I won't go into that, but lets consider the physiological issues of microwave generation.



          Microwave generators have two important kinds of material that are hard to come by in nature: microwave-transparent materials, to cover and protect the business end of the emitting device, and microwave-reflecting materials to ensure that all the microwaves go where they are wanted (eg. out the front) and aren't absorbed by the rest of the equipment which would cause undesirable power loss, heating and damage.



          Lightweight polymers like polystyrene or polythene are easy to come by courtesy of modern chemistry and industry, but there aren't many good biological equivalents. The presence of any water is undesirable (because of the resulting energy loss, heat generation and ultimately physical damage that will result) and growing a water-free biological membrane sounds like an absolute nightmare, and something deeply unlikely to evolve naturally. It is remotely possible that you could have some sort of super-thin layer of specialised bone, horn, hair or tooth and have the extruding layer of cells die off, maybe.



          Similarly, sheet metals and metal meshes have been available to humans for millenia, but bulk deposition of metals in organic creatures isn't a thing, let alone formation of nice smooth reflecting cavities. There's no obvious evolutionary path to such a trait... seems like mineral/protein composites that most tooth or bone or shell-bearing animals produce is quite good enough without the hassle and energetic expense of refining metals.



          Finally, even if you've solved those two not-insignificant problems, you need to actually generate microwaves. Human approaches to this involve vacuum tubes (good luck evolving a vacuum-sealed cavity in a biological organism!) or semiconductors. The latter might just possibly be able to have some organic counterparts but: they are low power microwave sources, the sort useful for communication, perhaps, but not for generating the enormous amounts of power you need to melt enough ice to fit your body through.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime

          10.7k22 silver badges56 bronze badges




          10.7k22 silver badges56 bronze badges


























              5












              $begingroup$

              While it's imaginable that an organ could evolve to emit low-powered microwaves, this is not a practical way of tunnelling through ice.



              Melting ice - changing it from solid to liquid without substantially altering its temperature - takes a lot of energy. According to Wikipedia, enough energy to raise the temperature of an equal mass of water by 80°C. You then need to raise the temperature of the newly melted water enough to let it flow away before the heat leaks away into the surrounding ice and it freezes again.



              Your creature needs to radiate all of that energy as microwaves without cooking itself, which is not plausible, supply rather more chemical energy to the microwave generator organ, which is not going to be 100% efficient, and eat enough to supply all that chemical energy as well as its normal needs. It's just not evolutionarily plausible. Evolving strong claws or teeth, and the muscles to use them to tunnel through ice is far more practical.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago















              5












              $begingroup$

              While it's imaginable that an organ could evolve to emit low-powered microwaves, this is not a practical way of tunnelling through ice.



              Melting ice - changing it from solid to liquid without substantially altering its temperature - takes a lot of energy. According to Wikipedia, enough energy to raise the temperature of an equal mass of water by 80°C. You then need to raise the temperature of the newly melted water enough to let it flow away before the heat leaks away into the surrounding ice and it freezes again.



              Your creature needs to radiate all of that energy as microwaves without cooking itself, which is not plausible, supply rather more chemical energy to the microwave generator organ, which is not going to be 100% efficient, and eat enough to supply all that chemical energy as well as its normal needs. It's just not evolutionarily plausible. Evolving strong claws or teeth, and the muscles to use them to tunnel through ice is far more practical.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago













              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              While it's imaginable that an organ could evolve to emit low-powered microwaves, this is not a practical way of tunnelling through ice.



              Melting ice - changing it from solid to liquid without substantially altering its temperature - takes a lot of energy. According to Wikipedia, enough energy to raise the temperature of an equal mass of water by 80°C. You then need to raise the temperature of the newly melted water enough to let it flow away before the heat leaks away into the surrounding ice and it freezes again.



              Your creature needs to radiate all of that energy as microwaves without cooking itself, which is not plausible, supply rather more chemical energy to the microwave generator organ, which is not going to be 100% efficient, and eat enough to supply all that chemical energy as well as its normal needs. It's just not evolutionarily plausible. Evolving strong claws or teeth, and the muscles to use them to tunnel through ice is far more practical.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              While it's imaginable that an organ could evolve to emit low-powered microwaves, this is not a practical way of tunnelling through ice.



              Melting ice - changing it from solid to liquid without substantially altering its temperature - takes a lot of energy. According to Wikipedia, enough energy to raise the temperature of an equal mass of water by 80°C. You then need to raise the temperature of the newly melted water enough to let it flow away before the heat leaks away into the surrounding ice and it freezes again.



              Your creature needs to radiate all of that energy as microwaves without cooking itself, which is not plausible, supply rather more chemical energy to the microwave generator organ, which is not going to be 100% efficient, and eat enough to supply all that chemical energy as well as its normal needs. It's just not evolutionarily plausible. Evolving strong claws or teeth, and the muscles to use them to tunnel through ice is far more practical.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 8 hours ago









              John DallmanJohn Dallman

              14.2k3 gold badges34 silver badges59 bronze badges




              14.2k3 gold badges34 silver badges59 bronze badges














              • $begingroup$
                Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
                $endgroup$
                – Renan
                8 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
                $endgroup$
                – Starfish Prime
                8 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              8 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Tunneling through sea ice or glacial ice is basically impractical no matter what means you use. There aren't a whole lot of creatures that bore through solid rock, for example, and you're less likely to freeze to death doing that.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              8 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              8 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @starfishprime solid rock is usually at least 5.5 to 6 times denser than ice. Polar bears do dig into ice to build their dens.
              $endgroup$
              – Renan
              8 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              8 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @Renan they dig into dense snow, not ice. Ice is too hard for polar bears to tunnel into, and is a much more effective material for losing body heat into.
              $endgroup$
              – Starfish Prime
              8 hours ago











              3












              $begingroup$

              I agree with all the observations that such an organ would be as unlikely to evolve as Douglas Adam’s Babel Fish. But, if it did it would more than likely have these properties



              1. A primary dimension — longest — an integer multiple of 6.25 cm. This would allow the cavity to resonate at the same frequency as a microwave oven ~2.3 GHz — the resonant frequency of hydrogen


              2. The organ would be some sort MASER on the animal's skull or spine or shoulder blades or pelvis. The wavelength of the emission excites hydrogen atoms in molecules and while good for softening the ice, it's bad for organic tissue since it will tend to cause their proteins to cook. I think this means the rest of the bear, or walrus must be protected from the emission. I can’t think of a really good way to do that sort of metal shielding which would be odd. Conceptually a complex series of layered materials could form an interference pattern and act as an RF mirror but doesn’t seem evolutionarily likely


              3. Some sort of chemical reaction similar to a primary cell battery to generate the power needed to drive the organic maser in the bear's skull (or wherever)


              The maser wouldn’t melt the ice but since the skin depth of 2.3 GHZ is very long, the maser could soften the ice, causing fractures, that would allow the bear's great physical strength and adamantium claws — sorry, those are wolverines, right not bears — strong and sharp claws to carve the ice.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



















                3












                $begingroup$

                I agree with all the observations that such an organ would be as unlikely to evolve as Douglas Adam’s Babel Fish. But, if it did it would more than likely have these properties



                1. A primary dimension — longest — an integer multiple of 6.25 cm. This would allow the cavity to resonate at the same frequency as a microwave oven ~2.3 GHz — the resonant frequency of hydrogen


                2. The organ would be some sort MASER on the animal's skull or spine or shoulder blades or pelvis. The wavelength of the emission excites hydrogen atoms in molecules and while good for softening the ice, it's bad for organic tissue since it will tend to cause their proteins to cook. I think this means the rest of the bear, or walrus must be protected from the emission. I can’t think of a really good way to do that sort of metal shielding which would be odd. Conceptually a complex series of layered materials could form an interference pattern and act as an RF mirror but doesn’t seem evolutionarily likely


                3. Some sort of chemical reaction similar to a primary cell battery to generate the power needed to drive the organic maser in the bear's skull (or wherever)


                The maser wouldn’t melt the ice but since the skin depth of 2.3 GHZ is very long, the maser could soften the ice, causing fractures, that would allow the bear's great physical strength and adamantium claws — sorry, those are wolverines, right not bears — strong and sharp claws to carve the ice.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  I agree with all the observations that such an organ would be as unlikely to evolve as Douglas Adam’s Babel Fish. But, if it did it would more than likely have these properties



                  1. A primary dimension — longest — an integer multiple of 6.25 cm. This would allow the cavity to resonate at the same frequency as a microwave oven ~2.3 GHz — the resonant frequency of hydrogen


                  2. The organ would be some sort MASER on the animal's skull or spine or shoulder blades or pelvis. The wavelength of the emission excites hydrogen atoms in molecules and while good for softening the ice, it's bad for organic tissue since it will tend to cause their proteins to cook. I think this means the rest of the bear, or walrus must be protected from the emission. I can’t think of a really good way to do that sort of metal shielding which would be odd. Conceptually a complex series of layered materials could form an interference pattern and act as an RF mirror but doesn’t seem evolutionarily likely


                  3. Some sort of chemical reaction similar to a primary cell battery to generate the power needed to drive the organic maser in the bear's skull (or wherever)


                  The maser wouldn’t melt the ice but since the skin depth of 2.3 GHZ is very long, the maser could soften the ice, causing fractures, that would allow the bear's great physical strength and adamantium claws — sorry, those are wolverines, right not bears — strong and sharp claws to carve the ice.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  I agree with all the observations that such an organ would be as unlikely to evolve as Douglas Adam’s Babel Fish. But, if it did it would more than likely have these properties



                  1. A primary dimension — longest — an integer multiple of 6.25 cm. This would allow the cavity to resonate at the same frequency as a microwave oven ~2.3 GHz — the resonant frequency of hydrogen


                  2. The organ would be some sort MASER on the animal's skull or spine or shoulder blades or pelvis. The wavelength of the emission excites hydrogen atoms in molecules and while good for softening the ice, it's bad for organic tissue since it will tend to cause their proteins to cook. I think this means the rest of the bear, or walrus must be protected from the emission. I can’t think of a really good way to do that sort of metal shielding which would be odd. Conceptually a complex series of layered materials could form an interference pattern and act as an RF mirror but doesn’t seem evolutionarily likely


                  3. Some sort of chemical reaction similar to a primary cell battery to generate the power needed to drive the organic maser in the bear's skull (or wherever)


                  The maser wouldn’t melt the ice but since the skin depth of 2.3 GHZ is very long, the maser could soften the ice, causing fractures, that would allow the bear's great physical strength and adamantium claws — sorry, those are wolverines, right not bears — strong and sharp claws to carve the ice.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago

























                  answered 3 hours ago









                  EDLEDL

                  4,7024 silver badges28 bronze badges




                  4,7024 silver badges28 bronze badges






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153202%2fthe-anatomy-of-an-organic-infrared-generator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單