Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?Does HaShem need rest?Why was this world created?Better for Man to Not have Been CreatedWhere was Adam created?What does HaShem benefits from making the human being?Was the universe created by soundwaves?When was water created?Why did HaShem allowed Yeshayahu to serve naked?On the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1

Can RMSE and MAE have the same value?

Prove your innocence

How many lines of code does the original TeX contain?

Who was the most successful German spy against Great Britain in WWII, from the contemporary German perspective?

Joining lists with same elements

Why do banks “park” their money at the European Central Bank?

What should come first—characters or plot?

How to send bitcoin from an offline Bitcoin Core that doesn't have a synced balance?

Tex Quotes(UVa 272)

Redacting URLs as an email-phishing preventative?

Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?

Separating old 2 x 4 brick with wheel holder

Counting common values in two arrays

about to retire but not retired yet, employed but not working any more

"fF" letter combination seems to be typeset strangely or incorrectly

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

Is first Ubuntu user root?

Architectural feasibility of a tiered circular stone keep

Can $! cause race conditions when used in scripts running in parallel?

“T” in subscript in formulas

Discussing work with supervisor in an invited dinner with his family

What are the occurences of total war in the Native Americans?

Immediate Smaller Element Time Limit Exceeded

"There were either twelve sexes or none."



Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?


Does HaShem need rest?Why was this world created?Better for Man to Not have Been CreatedWhere was Adam created?What does HaShem benefits from making the human being?Was the universe created by soundwaves?When was water created?Why did HaShem allowed Yeshayahu to serve naked?On the interpretation of Genesis 1: 1






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I cannot read Hebrew and am struggling a great deal to understand Yeshayahu 43:10/43:13. In my English versions, these verse-parts seem very much to suggest that HaShem was Himself ‘formed’ at some point in time. My NIV, for example, has ‘Before Me no god was formed, nor will there be one after Me’ / ‘... From ancient days I am He’.



Am I being stupid here? Why does Hashem appears to be saying here that there was a ‘before’ and ‘after’ in relation to Him? Needless to say, the implications of my reading are disastrous: Only the Most High / Uncreated One can worshipped / honoured and obeyed as G-d!



I am guessing that this is just another case of inexact translation, hence my question. Still: my faith is falling to bits because of this problem - please help!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

    – mbloch
    6 hours ago











  • Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago

















3















I cannot read Hebrew and am struggling a great deal to understand Yeshayahu 43:10/43:13. In my English versions, these verse-parts seem very much to suggest that HaShem was Himself ‘formed’ at some point in time. My NIV, for example, has ‘Before Me no god was formed, nor will there be one after Me’ / ‘... From ancient days I am He’.



Am I being stupid here? Why does Hashem appears to be saying here that there was a ‘before’ and ‘after’ in relation to Him? Needless to say, the implications of my reading are disastrous: Only the Most High / Uncreated One can worshipped / honoured and obeyed as G-d!



I am guessing that this is just another case of inexact translation, hence my question. Still: my faith is falling to bits because of this problem - please help!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

    – mbloch
    6 hours ago











  • Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago













3












3








3








I cannot read Hebrew and am struggling a great deal to understand Yeshayahu 43:10/43:13. In my English versions, these verse-parts seem very much to suggest that HaShem was Himself ‘formed’ at some point in time. My NIV, for example, has ‘Before Me no god was formed, nor will there be one after Me’ / ‘... From ancient days I am He’.



Am I being stupid here? Why does Hashem appears to be saying here that there was a ‘before’ and ‘after’ in relation to Him? Needless to say, the implications of my reading are disastrous: Only the Most High / Uncreated One can worshipped / honoured and obeyed as G-d!



I am guessing that this is just another case of inexact translation, hence my question. Still: my faith is falling to bits because of this problem - please help!










share|improve this question









New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I cannot read Hebrew and am struggling a great deal to understand Yeshayahu 43:10/43:13. In my English versions, these verse-parts seem very much to suggest that HaShem was Himself ‘formed’ at some point in time. My NIV, for example, has ‘Before Me no god was formed, nor will there be one after Me’ / ‘... From ancient days I am He’.



Am I being stupid here? Why does Hashem appears to be saying here that there was a ‘before’ and ‘after’ in relation to Him? Needless to say, the implications of my reading are disastrous: Only the Most High / Uncreated One can worshipped / honoured and obeyed as G-d!



I am guessing that this is just another case of inexact translation, hence my question. Still: my faith is falling to bits because of this problem - please help!







theology creation isaiah-yeshaya-the-book






share|improve this question









New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









b a

19.4k2 gold badges43 silver badges87 bronze badges




19.4k2 gold badges43 silver badges87 bronze badges






New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









Tom WTom W

214 bronze badges




214 bronze badges




New contributor



Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Tom W is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

    – mbloch
    6 hours ago











  • Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago

















  • Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

    – mbloch
    6 hours ago











  • Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago
















Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

– mbloch
6 hours ago





Welcome to MiYodeya Tom and thanks for this first question. Can I recommend you take the tour to get a sense of how the site works? Great to have you learn with us!

– mbloch
6 hours ago













Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

– Tom W
6 hours ago





Yes, I will do - thanks for the tip. All my best to you, TW

– Tom W
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6















Your question has been asked before by traditional commentators (e.g., Radak). artscroll translates the end of 43:10




before Me nothing was created by a god, nor will there be after Me!




and comments based on Radak and Mahari Kara




This is addressed to idolaters, who believed that there was another
divine being. Isaiah repudiates the notion that there ever was or ever
will be a deity other than Hashem. The verse is not to be taken
literally, that God exists in a time zone - as could be inferred from
the terms before Me and after Me - because God is infinite and
eternal; He created the vey concept of time, so it is impossible to
envision anything actually "before" or "after" Him.




They translate 43:13




Even before there was a day [Radak: even before the world existed], I was He, and there is none who can save
from My hand; when I act, who can reverse it?







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    4 hours ago




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6















Your question has been asked before by traditional commentators (e.g., Radak). artscroll translates the end of 43:10




before Me nothing was created by a god, nor will there be after Me!




and comments based on Radak and Mahari Kara




This is addressed to idolaters, who believed that there was another
divine being. Isaiah repudiates the notion that there ever was or ever
will be a deity other than Hashem. The verse is not to be taken
literally, that God exists in a time zone - as could be inferred from
the terms before Me and after Me - because God is infinite and
eternal; He created the vey concept of time, so it is impossible to
envision anything actually "before" or "after" Him.




They translate 43:13




Even before there was a day [Radak: even before the world existed], I was He, and there is none who can save
from My hand; when I act, who can reverse it?







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    4 hours ago















6















Your question has been asked before by traditional commentators (e.g., Radak). artscroll translates the end of 43:10




before Me nothing was created by a god, nor will there be after Me!




and comments based on Radak and Mahari Kara




This is addressed to idolaters, who believed that there was another
divine being. Isaiah repudiates the notion that there ever was or ever
will be a deity other than Hashem. The verse is not to be taken
literally, that God exists in a time zone - as could be inferred from
the terms before Me and after Me - because God is infinite and
eternal; He created the vey concept of time, so it is impossible to
envision anything actually "before" or "after" Him.




They translate 43:13




Even before there was a day [Radak: even before the world existed], I was He, and there is none who can save
from My hand; when I act, who can reverse it?







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    4 hours ago













6














6










6









Your question has been asked before by traditional commentators (e.g., Radak). artscroll translates the end of 43:10




before Me nothing was created by a god, nor will there be after Me!




and comments based on Radak and Mahari Kara




This is addressed to idolaters, who believed that there was another
divine being. Isaiah repudiates the notion that there ever was or ever
will be a deity other than Hashem. The verse is not to be taken
literally, that God exists in a time zone - as could be inferred from
the terms before Me and after Me - because God is infinite and
eternal; He created the vey concept of time, so it is impossible to
envision anything actually "before" or "after" Him.




They translate 43:13




Even before there was a day [Radak: even before the world existed], I was He, and there is none who can save
from My hand; when I act, who can reverse it?







share|improve this answer













Your question has been asked before by traditional commentators (e.g., Radak). artscroll translates the end of 43:10




before Me nothing was created by a god, nor will there be after Me!




and comments based on Radak and Mahari Kara




This is addressed to idolaters, who believed that there was another
divine being. Isaiah repudiates the notion that there ever was or ever
will be a deity other than Hashem. The verse is not to be taken
literally, that God exists in a time zone - as could be inferred from
the terms before Me and after Me - because God is infinite and
eternal; He created the vey concept of time, so it is impossible to
envision anything actually "before" or "after" Him.




They translate 43:13




Even before there was a day [Radak: even before the world existed], I was He, and there is none who can save
from My hand; when I act, who can reverse it?








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









mblochmbloch

31.4k6 gold badges51 silver badges147 bronze badges




31.4k6 gold badges51 silver badges147 bronze badges










  • 3





    Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    4 hours ago












  • 3





    Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

    – Tom W
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    @TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

    – Dr. Shmuel
    4 hours ago







3




3





Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

– Tom W
6 hours ago





Thank you so much for this - my blessings to you. I can feel the faith returning to my heart. If there is any way I can repay you, please do let me know. Yours truly, TW

– Tom W
6 hours ago




1




1





@TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago





@TomW Repay him by just keeping at it.

– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480