Can an Arcane Focus be embedded in one's body?Arcane focus influences both attack and damage?Can I cast a spell without an Arcane Focus?Can a tattoo be used as an arcane focus?Can I use an object to provide temporary hit points?Can I craft an Arcane Focus Shield?Can a glass eye be an Arcane focus?What is allowed to be an Arcane focus?Can an arcane trickster/wizard multiclass use an arcane focus for their arcane trickster spells?Can a Bard use an arcane focus?
Movie where people enter a church but find they can't leave, not in English
What should come first—characters or plot?
"Opusculum hoc, quamdiu vixero, doctioribus emendandum offero."?
Tex Quotes(UVa 272)
How much does Commander Data weigh?
What stops you from using fixed income in developing countries?
How do we tell which part of kinetic energy gives rise to temperature?
How to obtain a polynomial with these conditions?
Hangman game in Python - need feedback on the quality of code
Should I stick with American terminology in my English set young adult book?
"There were either twelve sexes or none."
Prison offence - trespassing underwood fence
How long do you think advanced cybernetic implants would plausibly last?
How does the OS tell whether an "Address is already in use"?
When one problem is added to the previous one
Filling a listlineplot with a texture
Expressing the act of drawing
How many lines of code does the original TeX contain?
Limitations with dynamical systems vs. PDEs?
Server Integrity Check CheckCommands question
Why does Windows store Wi-Fi passwords in a reversible format?
Tipa throwing error because of `implies` and `iff`. Workaround or fix?
Does Yeshayahu 43:10b / 43:13a imply HaShem was created?
How were medieval castles built in swamps or marshes without draining them?
Can an Arcane Focus be embedded in one's body?
Arcane focus influences both attack and damage?Can I cast a spell without an Arcane Focus?Can a tattoo be used as an arcane focus?Can I use an object to provide temporary hit points?Can I craft an Arcane Focus Shield?Can a glass eye be an Arcane focus?What is allowed to be an Arcane focus?Can an arcane trickster/wizard multiclass use an arcane focus for their arcane trickster spells?Can a Bard use an arcane focus?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
So, I had this idea for an albino orc, who was thrown out of his clan for being different, and ended up being raised by some elves. These elves taught him the way of magic, and thus, there was Vajor Galailo, the albino orc wizard.
I usually mess around with HeroForge to create a visual for my character, and came across the option to embed a gem in his forehead.
So I came up with this idea: Vajor, still being an orc with a low wisdom score, keeps losing his arcane focus, a gem. After encoutering this problem multiple times, he decides to make sure he never loses it again, and embeds the gem in his own forehead.
Would this be allowed?
dnd-5e arcane-focus
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, I had this idea for an albino orc, who was thrown out of his clan for being different, and ended up being raised by some elves. These elves taught him the way of magic, and thus, there was Vajor Galailo, the albino orc wizard.
I usually mess around with HeroForge to create a visual for my character, and came across the option to embed a gem in his forehead.
So I came up with this idea: Vajor, still being an orc with a low wisdom score, keeps losing his arcane focus, a gem. After encoutering this problem multiple times, he decides to make sure he never loses it again, and embeds the gem in his own forehead.
Would this be allowed?
dnd-5e arcane-focus
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, I had this idea for an albino orc, who was thrown out of his clan for being different, and ended up being raised by some elves. These elves taught him the way of magic, and thus, there was Vajor Galailo, the albino orc wizard.
I usually mess around with HeroForge to create a visual for my character, and came across the option to embed a gem in his forehead.
So I came up with this idea: Vajor, still being an orc with a low wisdom score, keeps losing his arcane focus, a gem. After encoutering this problem multiple times, he decides to make sure he never loses it again, and embeds the gem in his own forehead.
Would this be allowed?
dnd-5e arcane-focus
New contributor
$endgroup$
So, I had this idea for an albino orc, who was thrown out of his clan for being different, and ended up being raised by some elves. These elves taught him the way of magic, and thus, there was Vajor Galailo, the albino orc wizard.
I usually mess around with HeroForge to create a visual for my character, and came across the option to embed a gem in his forehead.
So I came up with this idea: Vajor, still being an orc with a low wisdom score, keeps losing his arcane focus, a gem. After encoutering this problem multiple times, he decides to make sure he never loses it again, and embeds the gem in his own forehead.
Would this be allowed?
dnd-5e arcane-focus
dnd-5e arcane-focus
New contributor
New contributor
edited 10 hours ago
Rubiksmoose♦
73.2k11 gold badges365 silver badges505 bronze badges
73.2k11 gold badges365 silver badges505 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 10 hours ago
dylanr2003dylanr2003
536 bronze badges
536 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This would have some mechanical benefits for your character
If your arcane focus is physically attached to your body, this gives several potential advantages, the most obvious of which is that you cannot be forced to drop it. This would mean that, for example, a fighter's Disarming Attack would not be able to deprive you of your focus. Perhaps more importantly, if your party is captured and has all their items confiscated, it won't be possible for them to confiscate your focus (either that, or they will confiscate it very painfully).
In addition, you will be able to "drop" your arcane focus in order to grab something else without fear of losing it. For example, normally you wouldn't be able to stow your focus, pull out a weapon, and attack all on the same turn. Any character can do this by dropping their focus on the ground (a free action) instead of stowing it, but then they risk losing the focus if they aren't able to return to pick it back up later. With your focus embedded in your forehead, you will not run this risk, which gives you a little more flexibility in battle. Essentially, the hand with which you manipulate your focus will always be free to do other things in between casting spells. (I'm assuming you would still need to touch the focus with your hand in order to cast spells with it.)
All in all, these are minor advantages that probably won't come up very often, unless you specifically design your character around them by intentionally taking advantage of the ability to quickly switch what you're holding. If your DM finds these minor effecs acceptable, they could certainly allow you do run with this character concept. However, be prepared for them to say no if they feel it would be unfair.
In official Adventurer's League play, I'm pretty sure this would not be allowed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No and yes
No, if you want it to be permanently affixed so that it grants mechanical advantages such that it couldn't be removed.
Yes, if this is just how you imagine and describe your character but that the mechanical sitation is no different than if you stored it in a pouch or on a string around your neck.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
dylanr2003 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154153%2fcan-an-arcane-focus-be-embedded-in-ones-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This would have some mechanical benefits for your character
If your arcane focus is physically attached to your body, this gives several potential advantages, the most obvious of which is that you cannot be forced to drop it. This would mean that, for example, a fighter's Disarming Attack would not be able to deprive you of your focus. Perhaps more importantly, if your party is captured and has all their items confiscated, it won't be possible for them to confiscate your focus (either that, or they will confiscate it very painfully).
In addition, you will be able to "drop" your arcane focus in order to grab something else without fear of losing it. For example, normally you wouldn't be able to stow your focus, pull out a weapon, and attack all on the same turn. Any character can do this by dropping their focus on the ground (a free action) instead of stowing it, but then they risk losing the focus if they aren't able to return to pick it back up later. With your focus embedded in your forehead, you will not run this risk, which gives you a little more flexibility in battle. Essentially, the hand with which you manipulate your focus will always be free to do other things in between casting spells. (I'm assuming you would still need to touch the focus with your hand in order to cast spells with it.)
All in all, these are minor advantages that probably won't come up very often, unless you specifically design your character around them by intentionally taking advantage of the ability to quickly switch what you're holding. If your DM finds these minor effecs acceptable, they could certainly allow you do run with this character concept. However, be prepared for them to say no if they feel it would be unfair.
In official Adventurer's League play, I'm pretty sure this would not be allowed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would have some mechanical benefits for your character
If your arcane focus is physically attached to your body, this gives several potential advantages, the most obvious of which is that you cannot be forced to drop it. This would mean that, for example, a fighter's Disarming Attack would not be able to deprive you of your focus. Perhaps more importantly, if your party is captured and has all their items confiscated, it won't be possible for them to confiscate your focus (either that, or they will confiscate it very painfully).
In addition, you will be able to "drop" your arcane focus in order to grab something else without fear of losing it. For example, normally you wouldn't be able to stow your focus, pull out a weapon, and attack all on the same turn. Any character can do this by dropping their focus on the ground (a free action) instead of stowing it, but then they risk losing the focus if they aren't able to return to pick it back up later. With your focus embedded in your forehead, you will not run this risk, which gives you a little more flexibility in battle. Essentially, the hand with which you manipulate your focus will always be free to do other things in between casting spells. (I'm assuming you would still need to touch the focus with your hand in order to cast spells with it.)
All in all, these are minor advantages that probably won't come up very often, unless you specifically design your character around them by intentionally taking advantage of the ability to quickly switch what you're holding. If your DM finds these minor effecs acceptable, they could certainly allow you do run with this character concept. However, be prepared for them to say no if they feel it would be unfair.
In official Adventurer's League play, I'm pretty sure this would not be allowed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would have some mechanical benefits for your character
If your arcane focus is physically attached to your body, this gives several potential advantages, the most obvious of which is that you cannot be forced to drop it. This would mean that, for example, a fighter's Disarming Attack would not be able to deprive you of your focus. Perhaps more importantly, if your party is captured and has all their items confiscated, it won't be possible for them to confiscate your focus (either that, or they will confiscate it very painfully).
In addition, you will be able to "drop" your arcane focus in order to grab something else without fear of losing it. For example, normally you wouldn't be able to stow your focus, pull out a weapon, and attack all on the same turn. Any character can do this by dropping their focus on the ground (a free action) instead of stowing it, but then they risk losing the focus if they aren't able to return to pick it back up later. With your focus embedded in your forehead, you will not run this risk, which gives you a little more flexibility in battle. Essentially, the hand with which you manipulate your focus will always be free to do other things in between casting spells. (I'm assuming you would still need to touch the focus with your hand in order to cast spells with it.)
All in all, these are minor advantages that probably won't come up very often, unless you specifically design your character around them by intentionally taking advantage of the ability to quickly switch what you're holding. If your DM finds these minor effecs acceptable, they could certainly allow you do run with this character concept. However, be prepared for them to say no if they feel it would be unfair.
In official Adventurer's League play, I'm pretty sure this would not be allowed.
$endgroup$
This would have some mechanical benefits for your character
If your arcane focus is physically attached to your body, this gives several potential advantages, the most obvious of which is that you cannot be forced to drop it. This would mean that, for example, a fighter's Disarming Attack would not be able to deprive you of your focus. Perhaps more importantly, if your party is captured and has all their items confiscated, it won't be possible for them to confiscate your focus (either that, or they will confiscate it very painfully).
In addition, you will be able to "drop" your arcane focus in order to grab something else without fear of losing it. For example, normally you wouldn't be able to stow your focus, pull out a weapon, and attack all on the same turn. Any character can do this by dropping their focus on the ground (a free action) instead of stowing it, but then they risk losing the focus if they aren't able to return to pick it back up later. With your focus embedded in your forehead, you will not run this risk, which gives you a little more flexibility in battle. Essentially, the hand with which you manipulate your focus will always be free to do other things in between casting spells. (I'm assuming you would still need to touch the focus with your hand in order to cast spells with it.)
All in all, these are minor advantages that probably won't come up very often, unless you specifically design your character around them by intentionally taking advantage of the ability to quickly switch what you're holding. If your DM finds these minor effecs acceptable, they could certainly allow you do run with this character concept. However, be prepared for them to say no if they feel it would be unfair.
In official Adventurer's League play, I'm pretty sure this would not be allowed.
answered 9 hours ago
Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson
19.1k2 gold badges60 silver badges132 bronze badges
19.1k2 gold badges60 silver badges132 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
It’s worth noting that a character could get these benefits by wearing their Arcane Focus (e.g. embedding the crystal into a crown or the back of a glove they’re wearing).
$endgroup$
– nick012000
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@nick012000 wearing a focus is not sufficient, you would have hold the crown or glove in your hand to cast a spell with it. "A spellcaster must have a hand free to access a spell's material components—or to hold a spellcasting focus —but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components."
$endgroup$
– Ruse
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No and yes
No, if you want it to be permanently affixed so that it grants mechanical advantages such that it couldn't be removed.
Yes, if this is just how you imagine and describe your character but that the mechanical sitation is no different than if you stored it in a pouch or on a string around your neck.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No and yes
No, if you want it to be permanently affixed so that it grants mechanical advantages such that it couldn't be removed.
Yes, if this is just how you imagine and describe your character but that the mechanical sitation is no different than if you stored it in a pouch or on a string around your neck.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No and yes
No, if you want it to be permanently affixed so that it grants mechanical advantages such that it couldn't be removed.
Yes, if this is just how you imagine and describe your character but that the mechanical sitation is no different than if you stored it in a pouch or on a string around your neck.
$endgroup$
No and yes
No, if you want it to be permanently affixed so that it grants mechanical advantages such that it couldn't be removed.
Yes, if this is just how you imagine and describe your character but that the mechanical sitation is no different than if you stored it in a pouch or on a string around your neck.
answered 1 hour ago
Dale MDale M
121k26 gold badges316 silver badges537 bronze badges
121k26 gold badges316 silver badges537 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
dylanr2003 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
dylanr2003 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
dylanr2003 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
dylanr2003 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154153%2fcan-an-arcane-focus-be-embedded-in-ones-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is the gem supposed to be unremovable by any means, or can it just not get lost by accident?
$endgroup$
– Mark Wells
8 hours ago