Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?Should I use UPS with my laptop to extend the battery life?Some questions on laptop batteryNotebook no longer recognizes battery. What are my options?Increasing Laptop Battery Service LifePrevent i7 from overclocking while on batteryWhy wont new hard drive use battery power?Lenovo Energy Management - Battery life on dual bootBattery indicator can't refresh battery stateLaptop won't boot without power cable connectedDoes dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?

Why is my fluorescent tube orange on one side, white on the other and dark in the middle?

Do 3/8 (37.5%) of Quadratics Have No x-Intercepts?

If the Moon were impacted by a suitably sized meteor, how long would it take to impact the Earth?

Who said "one can be a powerful king with a very small sceptre"?

Is it possible for a particle to decay via gravity?

Did Vladimir Lenin have a cat?

Alternatives to minimizing loss in regression

Why are we moving in circles with a tandem kayak?

What Marvel character has this 'W' symbol?

How to efficiently shred a lot of cabbage?

What language is Raven using for her attack in the new 52?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

How does a poisoned arrow combine with the spell Conjure Barrage?

Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?

Argand formula and more for quaternions?

Wrapping IMemoryCache with SemaphoreSlim

In syntax, why cannot we say things like "he took walked at the park"? but can say "he took a walk at the park"?

GNU sort stable sort when sort does not know sort order

Is it unprofessional to mention your cover letter and resume are best viewed in Chrome?

What are the cons of stateless password generators?

Omnidirectional LED, is it possible?

how to understand the error info "Illegal parameter number in definition of reserved@a. ...t2+cdots+sqrt2}}_n项 , cdots 收敛.$}"

Complaints from (junior) developers against solution architects: how can we show the benefits of our work and improve relationships?

Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?



Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?


Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?Should I use UPS with my laptop to extend the battery life?Some questions on laptop batteryNotebook no longer recognizes battery. What are my options?Increasing Laptop Battery Service LifePrevent i7 from overclocking while on batteryWhy wont new hard drive use battery power?Lenovo Energy Management - Battery life on dual bootBattery indicator can't refresh battery stateLaptop won't boot without power cable connectedDoes dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    40 mins ago


















2















This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    40 mins ago














2












2








2








This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?







ubuntu laptop battery






share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 22 mins ago







user1068838













New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 12 hours ago









user1068838user1068838

671 silver badge5 bronze badges




671 silver badge5 bronze badges




New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    40 mins ago













  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    10 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    40 mins ago








4




4





No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

– GabrielaGarcia
11 hours ago





No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

– GabrielaGarcia
11 hours ago




1




1





I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

– Ronaldo
11 hours ago





I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

– Ronaldo
11 hours ago




1




1





I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

– Nobody
10 hours ago





I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

– Nobody
10 hours ago




4




4





@nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

– davidgo
8 hours ago





@nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

– davidgo
8 hours ago




1




1





@Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

– user1068838
40 mins ago






@Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

– user1068838
40 mins ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



  • Heavy discharge

  • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

  • Number of charge/discharge cycles

  • Heat

  • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

  • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



  1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

  2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

  3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
    3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

  4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

  5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

  6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

(Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






share|improve this answer


































    4














    Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



    You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



    But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



    If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



    The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



    You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



    Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






    share|improve this answer

























    • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

      – user1068838
      30 mins ago


















    0














    No.



    How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

      – davidgo
      8 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1465822%2fdoes-ubuntu-reduces-battery-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



    The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



    • Heavy discharge

    • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

    • Number of charge/discharge cycles

    • Heat

    • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

    • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

    Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



    Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



    1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

    2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

    3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
      3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

    4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

    5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

    6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

    (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






    share|improve this answer































      7














      Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



      The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



      • Heavy discharge

      • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

      • Number of charge/discharge cycles

      • Heat

      • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

      • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

      Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



      Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



      1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

      2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

      3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
        3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

      4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

      5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

      6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

      (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






      share|improve this answer





























        7












        7








        7







        Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



        The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



        • Heavy discharge

        • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

        • Number of charge/discharge cycles

        • Heat

        • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

        • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

        Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



        Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



        1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

        2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

        3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
          3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

        4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

        5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

        6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

        (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






        share|improve this answer















        Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



        The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



        • Heavy discharge

        • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

        • Number of charge/discharge cycles

        • Heat

        • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

        • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

        Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



        Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



        1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

        2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

        3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
          3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

        4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

        5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

        6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

        (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        davidgodavidgo

        47.1k7 gold badges60 silver badges97 bronze badges




        47.1k7 gold badges60 silver badges97 bronze badges


























            4














            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer

























            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              30 mins ago















            4














            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer

























            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              30 mins ago













            4












            4








            4







            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer













            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            fixer1234fixer1234

            21.4k14 gold badges53 silver badges87 bronze badges




            21.4k14 gold badges53 silver badges87 bronze badges















            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              30 mins ago

















            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              30 mins ago
















            You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

            – user1068838
            30 mins ago





            You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

            – user1068838
            30 mins ago











            0














            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              8 hours ago















            0














            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              8 hours ago













            0












            0








            0







            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer













            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 10 hours ago









            NobodyNobody

            1778 bronze badges




            1778 bronze badges










            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              8 hours ago












            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              8 hours ago







            3




            3





            This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

            – davidgo
            8 hours ago





            This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

            – davidgo
            8 hours ago










            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1465822%2fdoes-ubuntu-reduces-battery-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її