Complexity of verifying optimality in (mixed) integer programmingThe difference between max-min and min-maxSingle reference for Mixed Integer Programming formulations to linearize, handle logical constraints and disjunctive constraints, do Big M, etc?Using CPLEX “solution pool” to count feasible pointsWhen to use indicator constraints versus big-M approaches in solving (mixed-)integer programsConditional Controls in MIP Modelsmaximum eigenvalue across subsamplesHeuristics for mixed integer linear and nonlinear programsDeciding the presence of mixed-integer points in the relative interior of a polyhedronHow to write a mixed-integer linear programming formulation in Python using Gurobi?How to formulate this scheduling problem efficiently?

Blank spaces in a font

Why does Canada require bilingualism in a lot of federal government posts?

How well would the Moon protect the Earth from an Asteroid?

How to store my pliers and wire cutters on my desk?

What are the cons of stateless password generators?

Story about separate individuals coming together to make some supernatural universe power

Exploiting the delay when a festival ticket is scanned

Rampant sharing of authorship among colleagues in the name of "collaboration". Is not taking part in it a death knell for a future in academia?

Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?

Is it safe if the neutral lead is exposed and disconnected?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

Is it unprofessional to mention your cover letter and resume are best viewed in Chrome?

To find islands of 1 and 0 in matrix

Wrapping IMemoryCache with SemaphoreSlim

Complaints from (junior) developers against solution architects: how can we show the benefits of our work and improve relationships?

Newton's cradles

Why does the Eurostar not show youth pricing?

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

Why does aggregate initialization not work anymore since C++20 if a constructor is explicitly defaulted or deleted?

Alternatives to minimizing loss in regression

Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?

Self-deportation of American Citizens from US

Can Lightning Lure be used to knock out a creature like a magical Taser?

Why did Windows 95 crash the whole system but newer Windows only crashed programs?



Complexity of verifying optimality in (mixed) integer programming


The difference between max-min and min-maxSingle reference for Mixed Integer Programming formulations to linearize, handle logical constraints and disjunctive constraints, do Big M, etc?Using CPLEX “solution pool” to count feasible pointsWhen to use indicator constraints versus big-M approaches in solving (mixed-)integer programsConditional Controls in MIP Modelsmaximum eigenvalue across subsamplesHeuristics for mixed integer linear and nonlinear programsDeciding the presence of mixed-integer points in the relative interior of a polyhedronHow to write a mixed-integer linear programming formulation in Python using Gurobi?How to formulate this scheduling problem efficiently?













8












$begingroup$


I looked around for a while, but I couldn't find a precise answer to the following question.



If I'm given a candidate solution for a (mixed) integer (convex) program, what's the complexity of deciding whether this solution (a point in the decision space) is optimal or not? I imagine that this decision problem is not NP (i.e., optimality of a MIP feasible solution can't be certified in polynomial time), right? Do you know any text or a reference where this problem is treated in detail?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question







New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Lübbecke
    8 hours ago















8












$begingroup$


I looked around for a while, but I couldn't find a precise answer to the following question.



If I'm given a candidate solution for a (mixed) integer (convex) program, what's the complexity of deciding whether this solution (a point in the decision space) is optimal or not? I imagine that this decision problem is not NP (i.e., optimality of a MIP feasible solution can't be certified in polynomial time), right? Do you know any text or a reference where this problem is treated in detail?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question







New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Lübbecke
    8 hours ago













8












8








8





$begingroup$


I looked around for a while, but I couldn't find a precise answer to the following question.



If I'm given a candidate solution for a (mixed) integer (convex) program, what's the complexity of deciding whether this solution (a point in the decision space) is optimal or not? I imagine that this decision problem is not NP (i.e., optimality of a MIP feasible solution can't be certified in polynomial time), right? Do you know any text or a reference where this problem is treated in detail?



Thank you very much!










share|improve this question







New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I looked around for a while, but I couldn't find a precise answer to the following question.



If I'm given a candidate solution for a (mixed) integer (convex) program, what's the complexity of deciding whether this solution (a point in the decision space) is optimal or not? I imagine that this decision problem is not NP (i.e., optimality of a MIP feasible solution can't be certified in polynomial time), right? Do you know any text or a reference where this problem is treated in detail?



Thank you very much!







mixed-integer-programming computational-complexity






share|improve this question







New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









Tobia MarcucciTobia Marcucci

1434 bronze badges




1434 bronze badges




New contributor



Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Lübbecke
    8 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
    $endgroup$
    – Marco Lübbecke
    8 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
$endgroup$
– Marco Lübbecke
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
not sure if you don't give the answer yourself: MIP optimality can't be certified in polytime; otherwise you could decide a lot of (=all) NP-complete decision problems in polytime.
$endgroup$
– Marco Lübbecke
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Deciding if a given solution to a mixed integer linear program is optimal is coNP-complete.



When the answer is “no, it is not optimal” there is an efficiently verifiable witness—a better solution.



Minor caveat: This answer assumes that there is a better solution that is efficiently verifiable (which necessitates that it can be represented with a polynomial number of bits). This is true for mixed integer linear programs, but might not be true for a more generic mixed integer convex program. Here is a recent paper on the issue of polynomial-size bit encodings for mixed integer quadratic programs.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "700"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2for.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1095%2fcomplexity-of-verifying-optimality-in-mixed-integer-programming%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    Deciding if a given solution to a mixed integer linear program is optimal is coNP-complete.



    When the answer is “no, it is not optimal” there is an efficiently verifiable witness—a better solution.



    Minor caveat: This answer assumes that there is a better solution that is efficiently verifiable (which necessitates that it can be represented with a polynomial number of bits). This is true for mixed integer linear programs, but might not be true for a more generic mixed integer convex program. Here is a recent paper on the issue of polynomial-size bit encodings for mixed integer quadratic programs.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      9












      $begingroup$

      Deciding if a given solution to a mixed integer linear program is optimal is coNP-complete.



      When the answer is “no, it is not optimal” there is an efficiently verifiable witness—a better solution.



      Minor caveat: This answer assumes that there is a better solution that is efficiently verifiable (which necessitates that it can be represented with a polynomial number of bits). This is true for mixed integer linear programs, but might not be true for a more generic mixed integer convex program. Here is a recent paper on the issue of polynomial-size bit encodings for mixed integer quadratic programs.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        9












        9








        9





        $begingroup$

        Deciding if a given solution to a mixed integer linear program is optimal is coNP-complete.



        When the answer is “no, it is not optimal” there is an efficiently verifiable witness—a better solution.



        Minor caveat: This answer assumes that there is a better solution that is efficiently verifiable (which necessitates that it can be represented with a polynomial number of bits). This is true for mixed integer linear programs, but might not be true for a more generic mixed integer convex program. Here is a recent paper on the issue of polynomial-size bit encodings for mixed integer quadratic programs.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Deciding if a given solution to a mixed integer linear program is optimal is coNP-complete.



        When the answer is “no, it is not optimal” there is an efficiently verifiable witness—a better solution.



        Minor caveat: This answer assumes that there is a better solution that is efficiently verifiable (which necessitates that it can be represented with a polynomial number of bits). This is true for mixed integer linear programs, but might not be true for a more generic mixed integer convex program. Here is a recent paper on the issue of polynomial-size bit encodings for mixed integer quadratic programs.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        Austin BuchananAustin Buchanan

        3466 bronze badges




        3466 bronze badges























            Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Tobia Marcucci is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Operations Research Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2for.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1095%2fcomplexity-of-verifying-optimality-in-mixed-integer-programming%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її