Which US defense organization would respond to an invasion like this?If a single alien landed on Earth with the intention of selling it from under us - how would they achieve thisSudden, unexpected Blitz like attacks all over the world. What would happen next?Would this Alien race take over?What would the world be like with gendered robots that were fully functional? had sexual desires?What would an optimal robot look like intended to replace military infantry?What would have happened if Hitler had launched operation Sea lion (the planned invasion of England in September 1940)?What materials would be needed to build a human-like robot with access only to common materials in the 1980s?In a 1950s pre-war Fallout world-like , How would a Robot Nanny's capable of taking care of kids affect families?

It is as simple as ABC

How do I calculate how many of an item I'll have in this inventory system?

Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?

Why didn't this character get a funeral at the end of Avengers: Endgame?

Why would a military not separate its forces into different branches?

Is disk brake effectiveness mitigated by tyres losing traction under strong braking?

Should I mention being denied entry to UK due to a confusion in my Visa and Ticket bookings?

Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?

What is this weird transparent border appearing inside my Smart Object in Photoshop?

Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?

Would you use "llamarse" for an animal's name?

chromatic descent on minor chord

Are the Night's Watch still required?

History of the kernel of a homomorphism?

What was the first story to feature the plot "the monsters were human all along"?

Start job from another SQL server instance

Latex & Markdown files

A factorization game

What do "Sech" and "Vich" mean in this sentence?

Should homeowners insurance cover the cost of the home?

Is Benjen dead?

What was Bran's plan to kill the Night King?

How does summation index shifting work?

Typeset year in old-style numbers with biblatex



Which US defense organization would respond to an invasion like this?


If a single alien landed on Earth with the intention of selling it from under us - how would they achieve thisSudden, unexpected Blitz like attacks all over the world. What would happen next?Would this Alien race take over?What would the world be like with gendered robots that were fully functional? had sexual desires?What would an optimal robot look like intended to replace military infantry?What would have happened if Hitler had launched operation Sea lion (the planned invasion of England in September 1940)?What materials would be needed to build a human-like robot with access only to common materials in the 1980s?In a 1950s pre-war Fallout world-like , How would a Robot Nanny's capable of taking care of kids affect families?













2












$begingroup$


I'm at a critical point in a sci-fi novel where a couple of thousand Superintelligent artificial intelligences end up going haywire. Naturally, they're extremely intelligent, and thus, much harder to deal with than an average human.



Up to here, these AIs have been almost docile. The power lust of the man who created them forces these AIs into servitude, and then he leverages them like an army against an attacking force in order to defend a city.



This city is effectively an experiment put into action years ago by six scientists, who lead the entire place. Since the whole city counts as a private place, run by a private company, the US government has only some minor influence inside.



The nebulous part is this attacking force. Even if I was from the US, no US defence organization would really list 'to stop invasions, insurrections, rebellions and other forms of conflict caused by goddamn robots'. My best guess is Homeland Security, which sounds suited to responding to internal threats like this. What do you think?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
    $endgroup$
    – Grizzly
    1 hour ago















2












$begingroup$


I'm at a critical point in a sci-fi novel where a couple of thousand Superintelligent artificial intelligences end up going haywire. Naturally, they're extremely intelligent, and thus, much harder to deal with than an average human.



Up to here, these AIs have been almost docile. The power lust of the man who created them forces these AIs into servitude, and then he leverages them like an army against an attacking force in order to defend a city.



This city is effectively an experiment put into action years ago by six scientists, who lead the entire place. Since the whole city counts as a private place, run by a private company, the US government has only some minor influence inside.



The nebulous part is this attacking force. Even if I was from the US, no US defence organization would really list 'to stop invasions, insurrections, rebellions and other forms of conflict caused by goddamn robots'. My best guess is Homeland Security, which sounds suited to responding to internal threats like this. What do you think?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
    $endgroup$
    – Grizzly
    1 hour ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I'm at a critical point in a sci-fi novel where a couple of thousand Superintelligent artificial intelligences end up going haywire. Naturally, they're extremely intelligent, and thus, much harder to deal with than an average human.



Up to here, these AIs have been almost docile. The power lust of the man who created them forces these AIs into servitude, and then he leverages them like an army against an attacking force in order to defend a city.



This city is effectively an experiment put into action years ago by six scientists, who lead the entire place. Since the whole city counts as a private place, run by a private company, the US government has only some minor influence inside.



The nebulous part is this attacking force. Even if I was from the US, no US defence organization would really list 'to stop invasions, insurrections, rebellions and other forms of conflict caused by goddamn robots'. My best guess is Homeland Security, which sounds suited to responding to internal threats like this. What do you think?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm at a critical point in a sci-fi novel where a couple of thousand Superintelligent artificial intelligences end up going haywire. Naturally, they're extremely intelligent, and thus, much harder to deal with than an average human.



Up to here, these AIs have been almost docile. The power lust of the man who created them forces these AIs into servitude, and then he leverages them like an army against an attacking force in order to defend a city.



This city is effectively an experiment put into action years ago by six scientists, who lead the entire place. Since the whole city counts as a private place, run by a private company, the US government has only some minor influence inside.



The nebulous part is this attacking force. Even if I was from the US, no US defence organization would really list 'to stop invasions, insurrections, rebellions and other forms of conflict caused by goddamn robots'. My best guess is Homeland Security, which sounds suited to responding to internal threats like this. What do you think?







robots invasion






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









GrizzlyGrizzly

244




244











  • $begingroup$
    What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
    $endgroup$
    – Grizzly
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexis
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
    $endgroup$
    – Grizzly
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
What is specifically attacked? Depending on the target, it could be FBI or Secret Service or local police that would respond to it. Or is your question "Which US agency is best equipped to defend against a hacking invasion?"
$endgroup$
– Alexander
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
$endgroup$
– Alexis
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Is the AI's creator one of the six scientists?
$endgroup$
– Alexis
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
$endgroup$
– Alexis
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I find it really not clear who's attacking who? Are the AI attacking the city or defending it?
$endgroup$
– Alexis
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Unless the government in your world is radically different, the US doesn't have "only some minor influence" in its own cities. Even if they're organized as private entities, they're still bound by state and federal law.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
$endgroup$
– Grizzly
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The AIs have been leveraged by one of the six scientists in order to defend the city. Boiling down the US's objective, they really just want to bring the AIs under control, with the intent of destroying all of them and then taking control of the city. The plan to actually do that is a pretty long-winded one, but to sum it up, once all AIs are either captured or destroyed, the US wins. The scientist and AI slaver is trying to keep that from happening.
$endgroup$
– Grizzly
1 hour ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Invent it.



Big changes have taken place in the US, I gather. If there are thousands of superintelligent AIs milling about to be conscripted, over previous years there were probably other issues involving AIs and semisentitent automatons.



You can invent your government agency to deal with these. Heck, The Department of Motherland Security was only invented after 911 so the US is allowed to make new ones. Then you will also have some immunity from any concrete-thinking readers who protest "hey! hey! The NSA is not allowed to carry stun guns!" because you have invented your agency and its rules for your near future scenario. I suspect this new agency would itself employ some Daneel Olivaw type AIs as well as regular detectives. The agency personnel sometimes bump up against the older branches like the FBI, with political shenanigans, prejudice and backbiting helping to leaven your story.



Maybe you could repurpose ATF for your agency, so you could have some continuity with existing institutions. They could be Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Robots.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
    $endgroup$
    – Liam Morris
    55 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
    $endgroup$
    – Grizzly
    53 mins ago



















1












$begingroup$

The first people on the scene will almost certainly be law enforcement of some kind. Accordingly, the people who are sent in will depend on the laws they think the science team has broken.



The act of setting up a new, company-owned city in the middle of nowhere, as opposed to establishing oneself in an existing city (which would be, by all accounts, far cheaper and easier) is going to raise a lot of red flags. Probably the most benign case is that they're using it to launder money and/or dodge taxes on a grand scale. That will get the FBI (in its anti-racketeering role) and the IRS interested in their operations.



Once they're actually accused of a federal crime and a warrant issued, it becomes the job of the US Marshals Service to bring in the suspect(s) to stand trial.



On the other hand, if at any point the scientists want to equip their robot army with anything more menacing than various semiautomatics, they're going to end up breaking any number of federal gun laws. (It's also possible that, seeing the potential threat they pose, the government declares that the robots themselves are restricted munitions.) This will get the ATF involved right quick, and that will tend to bring events to a head fairly soon - gun crimes being both dangerous to the federal agents and not that complicated to prove.



If law enforcement feels that it needs more firepower, it can call in the National Guard (including state National Guards) for backup. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, actual-as-such armed forces - the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines - are not allowed to act in a law enforcement role within the US. However, they can act in support and provide information and logistics, so e.g. the FBI could ask for drone surveillance of the city, but could not request troops to be on hand when making arrests.



However, this is only a temporary condition. Under the Insurrection Act, the military can be deployed in a condition of "insurrection, domestic [i.e., internal, not international] violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" if the state proves unable to do so on its own. There's red tape involved, and the President (who makes the call in this situation) might want to request an act of Congress for the show of things. However, if it proves absolutely necessary they can be deployed.



(There's also an exemption in the law for cases involving nuclear materials. Hopefully your robots aren't fission-powered.)



Stepping from worldbuilding to writing for a moment, my personal feeling would be to put the ATF in the drivers' seat. Drawing a comparison to Ruby Ridge or Waco, writ however large, makes the government response sound more plausible.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    The National Guard is the highest level of response I'd expect to show up unless things have really gone south. The Army/Navy/Airforce are all specifically prohibited against operating on American soil, and things need to be at Civil War or invasion levels before those prohibitions get lifted. Basically, you only get the Army roll into town if the incident is a threat to the US as a whole.



    Assuming he only wants to control the city area, this will likely be treated as if someone barricaded their house and took hostages, but on a larger scale. Objectives will be to remove everyone possible from the area, and talk the guy down. (While our scientists attempt to break his control over the AIs.) Objectives will get a lot more bloody a lot faster if he's expanding the area he controls, or is killing people, but without that aspect, the goal will be to keep things peaceful.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
      $endgroup$
      – JGreenwell
      43 mins ago



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Every branch of the military has an engagement plan. They're already looking in to how to deal with a space threat that hits the US, today. They're constantly searching for new ways they can be attacked, and they have engagement specialists looking in to it. every kind of battlefield, every kind of engagement.



    Regardless of who is actually engaging in the fighting, they can all talk. National guard may be on the front lines, but they can bring in a specialist from the marines who is in the command room giving advice on how they've simulated this before.



    You can essentially do whatever you want. And if you want to have the airforce come in, call an emergency session of congress. Why would they have an emergency session at congress? because the CIA has already been monitoring this threat, and they're putting their response into action.



    By the way, every branch of the military can own a war machine. Planes aren't limited to the airforce and ships aren't limited to the navy.



    To win over your military audience. Consider engaging in their own language. Watch a few interviews with military persons.



    Look at this amazing interview with a 4-star general






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146295%2fwhich-us-defense-organization-would-respond-to-an-invasion-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Invent it.



      Big changes have taken place in the US, I gather. If there are thousands of superintelligent AIs milling about to be conscripted, over previous years there were probably other issues involving AIs and semisentitent automatons.



      You can invent your government agency to deal with these. Heck, The Department of Motherland Security was only invented after 911 so the US is allowed to make new ones. Then you will also have some immunity from any concrete-thinking readers who protest "hey! hey! The NSA is not allowed to carry stun guns!" because you have invented your agency and its rules for your near future scenario. I suspect this new agency would itself employ some Daneel Olivaw type AIs as well as regular detectives. The agency personnel sometimes bump up against the older branches like the FBI, with political shenanigans, prejudice and backbiting helping to leaven your story.



      Maybe you could repurpose ATF for your agency, so you could have some continuity with existing institutions. They could be Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Robots.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        55 mins ago











      • $begingroup$
        Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
        $endgroup$
        – Grizzly
        53 mins ago
















      4












      $begingroup$

      Invent it.



      Big changes have taken place in the US, I gather. If there are thousands of superintelligent AIs milling about to be conscripted, over previous years there were probably other issues involving AIs and semisentitent automatons.



      You can invent your government agency to deal with these. Heck, The Department of Motherland Security was only invented after 911 so the US is allowed to make new ones. Then you will also have some immunity from any concrete-thinking readers who protest "hey! hey! The NSA is not allowed to carry stun guns!" because you have invented your agency and its rules for your near future scenario. I suspect this new agency would itself employ some Daneel Olivaw type AIs as well as regular detectives. The agency personnel sometimes bump up against the older branches like the FBI, with political shenanigans, prejudice and backbiting helping to leaven your story.



      Maybe you could repurpose ATF for your agency, so you could have some continuity with existing institutions. They could be Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Robots.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        55 mins ago











      • $begingroup$
        Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
        $endgroup$
        – Grizzly
        53 mins ago














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Invent it.



      Big changes have taken place in the US, I gather. If there are thousands of superintelligent AIs milling about to be conscripted, over previous years there were probably other issues involving AIs and semisentitent automatons.



      You can invent your government agency to deal with these. Heck, The Department of Motherland Security was only invented after 911 so the US is allowed to make new ones. Then you will also have some immunity from any concrete-thinking readers who protest "hey! hey! The NSA is not allowed to carry stun guns!" because you have invented your agency and its rules for your near future scenario. I suspect this new agency would itself employ some Daneel Olivaw type AIs as well as regular detectives. The agency personnel sometimes bump up against the older branches like the FBI, with political shenanigans, prejudice and backbiting helping to leaven your story.



      Maybe you could repurpose ATF for your agency, so you could have some continuity with existing institutions. They could be Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Robots.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Invent it.



      Big changes have taken place in the US, I gather. If there are thousands of superintelligent AIs milling about to be conscripted, over previous years there were probably other issues involving AIs and semisentitent automatons.



      You can invent your government agency to deal with these. Heck, The Department of Motherland Security was only invented after 911 so the US is allowed to make new ones. Then you will also have some immunity from any concrete-thinking readers who protest "hey! hey! The NSA is not allowed to carry stun guns!" because you have invented your agency and its rules for your near future scenario. I suspect this new agency would itself employ some Daneel Olivaw type AIs as well as regular detectives. The agency personnel sometimes bump up against the older branches like the FBI, with political shenanigans, prejudice and backbiting helping to leaven your story.



      Maybe you could repurpose ATF for your agency, so you could have some continuity with existing institutions. They could be Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Robots.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 1 hour ago









      WillkWillk

      120k28226502




      120k28226502







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        55 mins ago











      • $begingroup$
        Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
        $endgroup$
        – Grizzly
        53 mins ago













      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
        $endgroup$
        – Liam Morris
        55 mins ago











      • $begingroup$
        Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
        $endgroup$
        – Grizzly
        53 mins ago








      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      55 mins ago





      $begingroup$
      Just to add to this, it is also plausible that, in a world where there is a high risk of cyber attacks, it is likely an organisation or department would already have been created to deal with these attacks long before Ai was developed. This pre-existing organisation, originally created to deal with any cyber attacks, would also deal with attacks from Ai. There may even be a branch within said organisation that specifically deals with rouge Ai attacks.
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      55 mins ago













      $begingroup$
      Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
      $endgroup$
      – Grizzly
      53 mins ago





      $begingroup$
      Very good point. There's definitely been enough time and plenty of AI-related stimuli to force the gov into making an agency like this.
      $endgroup$
      – Grizzly
      53 mins ago












      1












      $begingroup$

      The first people on the scene will almost certainly be law enforcement of some kind. Accordingly, the people who are sent in will depend on the laws they think the science team has broken.



      The act of setting up a new, company-owned city in the middle of nowhere, as opposed to establishing oneself in an existing city (which would be, by all accounts, far cheaper and easier) is going to raise a lot of red flags. Probably the most benign case is that they're using it to launder money and/or dodge taxes on a grand scale. That will get the FBI (in its anti-racketeering role) and the IRS interested in their operations.



      Once they're actually accused of a federal crime and a warrant issued, it becomes the job of the US Marshals Service to bring in the suspect(s) to stand trial.



      On the other hand, if at any point the scientists want to equip their robot army with anything more menacing than various semiautomatics, they're going to end up breaking any number of federal gun laws. (It's also possible that, seeing the potential threat they pose, the government declares that the robots themselves are restricted munitions.) This will get the ATF involved right quick, and that will tend to bring events to a head fairly soon - gun crimes being both dangerous to the federal agents and not that complicated to prove.



      If law enforcement feels that it needs more firepower, it can call in the National Guard (including state National Guards) for backup. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, actual-as-such armed forces - the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines - are not allowed to act in a law enforcement role within the US. However, they can act in support and provide information and logistics, so e.g. the FBI could ask for drone surveillance of the city, but could not request troops to be on hand when making arrests.



      However, this is only a temporary condition. Under the Insurrection Act, the military can be deployed in a condition of "insurrection, domestic [i.e., internal, not international] violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" if the state proves unable to do so on its own. There's red tape involved, and the President (who makes the call in this situation) might want to request an act of Congress for the show of things. However, if it proves absolutely necessary they can be deployed.



      (There's also an exemption in the law for cases involving nuclear materials. Hopefully your robots aren't fission-powered.)



      Stepping from worldbuilding to writing for a moment, my personal feeling would be to put the ATF in the drivers' seat. Drawing a comparison to Ruby Ridge or Waco, writ however large, makes the government response sound more plausible.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        The first people on the scene will almost certainly be law enforcement of some kind. Accordingly, the people who are sent in will depend on the laws they think the science team has broken.



        The act of setting up a new, company-owned city in the middle of nowhere, as opposed to establishing oneself in an existing city (which would be, by all accounts, far cheaper and easier) is going to raise a lot of red flags. Probably the most benign case is that they're using it to launder money and/or dodge taxes on a grand scale. That will get the FBI (in its anti-racketeering role) and the IRS interested in their operations.



        Once they're actually accused of a federal crime and a warrant issued, it becomes the job of the US Marshals Service to bring in the suspect(s) to stand trial.



        On the other hand, if at any point the scientists want to equip their robot army with anything more menacing than various semiautomatics, they're going to end up breaking any number of federal gun laws. (It's also possible that, seeing the potential threat they pose, the government declares that the robots themselves are restricted munitions.) This will get the ATF involved right quick, and that will tend to bring events to a head fairly soon - gun crimes being both dangerous to the federal agents and not that complicated to prove.



        If law enforcement feels that it needs more firepower, it can call in the National Guard (including state National Guards) for backup. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, actual-as-such armed forces - the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines - are not allowed to act in a law enforcement role within the US. However, they can act in support and provide information and logistics, so e.g. the FBI could ask for drone surveillance of the city, but could not request troops to be on hand when making arrests.



        However, this is only a temporary condition. Under the Insurrection Act, the military can be deployed in a condition of "insurrection, domestic [i.e., internal, not international] violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" if the state proves unable to do so on its own. There's red tape involved, and the President (who makes the call in this situation) might want to request an act of Congress for the show of things. However, if it proves absolutely necessary they can be deployed.



        (There's also an exemption in the law for cases involving nuclear materials. Hopefully your robots aren't fission-powered.)



        Stepping from worldbuilding to writing for a moment, my personal feeling would be to put the ATF in the drivers' seat. Drawing a comparison to Ruby Ridge or Waco, writ however large, makes the government response sound more plausible.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The first people on the scene will almost certainly be law enforcement of some kind. Accordingly, the people who are sent in will depend on the laws they think the science team has broken.



          The act of setting up a new, company-owned city in the middle of nowhere, as opposed to establishing oneself in an existing city (which would be, by all accounts, far cheaper and easier) is going to raise a lot of red flags. Probably the most benign case is that they're using it to launder money and/or dodge taxes on a grand scale. That will get the FBI (in its anti-racketeering role) and the IRS interested in their operations.



          Once they're actually accused of a federal crime and a warrant issued, it becomes the job of the US Marshals Service to bring in the suspect(s) to stand trial.



          On the other hand, if at any point the scientists want to equip their robot army with anything more menacing than various semiautomatics, they're going to end up breaking any number of federal gun laws. (It's also possible that, seeing the potential threat they pose, the government declares that the robots themselves are restricted munitions.) This will get the ATF involved right quick, and that will tend to bring events to a head fairly soon - gun crimes being both dangerous to the federal agents and not that complicated to prove.



          If law enforcement feels that it needs more firepower, it can call in the National Guard (including state National Guards) for backup. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, actual-as-such armed forces - the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines - are not allowed to act in a law enforcement role within the US. However, they can act in support and provide information and logistics, so e.g. the FBI could ask for drone surveillance of the city, but could not request troops to be on hand when making arrests.



          However, this is only a temporary condition. Under the Insurrection Act, the military can be deployed in a condition of "insurrection, domestic [i.e., internal, not international] violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" if the state proves unable to do so on its own. There's red tape involved, and the President (who makes the call in this situation) might want to request an act of Congress for the show of things. However, if it proves absolutely necessary they can be deployed.



          (There's also an exemption in the law for cases involving nuclear materials. Hopefully your robots aren't fission-powered.)



          Stepping from worldbuilding to writing for a moment, my personal feeling would be to put the ATF in the drivers' seat. Drawing a comparison to Ruby Ridge or Waco, writ however large, makes the government response sound more plausible.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The first people on the scene will almost certainly be law enforcement of some kind. Accordingly, the people who are sent in will depend on the laws they think the science team has broken.



          The act of setting up a new, company-owned city in the middle of nowhere, as opposed to establishing oneself in an existing city (which would be, by all accounts, far cheaper and easier) is going to raise a lot of red flags. Probably the most benign case is that they're using it to launder money and/or dodge taxes on a grand scale. That will get the FBI (in its anti-racketeering role) and the IRS interested in their operations.



          Once they're actually accused of a federal crime and a warrant issued, it becomes the job of the US Marshals Service to bring in the suspect(s) to stand trial.



          On the other hand, if at any point the scientists want to equip their robot army with anything more menacing than various semiautomatics, they're going to end up breaking any number of federal gun laws. (It's also possible that, seeing the potential threat they pose, the government declares that the robots themselves are restricted munitions.) This will get the ATF involved right quick, and that will tend to bring events to a head fairly soon - gun crimes being both dangerous to the federal agents and not that complicated to prove.



          If law enforcement feels that it needs more firepower, it can call in the National Guard (including state National Guards) for backup. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, actual-as-such armed forces - the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines - are not allowed to act in a law enforcement role within the US. However, they can act in support and provide information and logistics, so e.g. the FBI could ask for drone surveillance of the city, but could not request troops to be on hand when making arrests.



          However, this is only a temporary condition. Under the Insurrection Act, the military can be deployed in a condition of "insurrection, domestic [i.e., internal, not international] violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" if the state proves unable to do so on its own. There's red tape involved, and the President (who makes the call in this situation) might want to request an act of Congress for the show of things. However, if it proves absolutely necessary they can be deployed.



          (There's also an exemption in the law for cases involving nuclear materials. Hopefully your robots aren't fission-powered.)



          Stepping from worldbuilding to writing for a moment, my personal feeling would be to put the ATF in the drivers' seat. Drawing a comparison to Ruby Ridge or Waco, writ however large, makes the government response sound more plausible.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 47 mins ago









          CadenceCadence

          16.7k53358




          16.7k53358





















              0












              $begingroup$

              The National Guard is the highest level of response I'd expect to show up unless things have really gone south. The Army/Navy/Airforce are all specifically prohibited against operating on American soil, and things need to be at Civil War or invasion levels before those prohibitions get lifted. Basically, you only get the Army roll into town if the incident is a threat to the US as a whole.



              Assuming he only wants to control the city area, this will likely be treated as if someone barricaded their house and took hostages, but on a larger scale. Objectives will be to remove everyone possible from the area, and talk the guy down. (While our scientists attempt to break his control over the AIs.) Objectives will get a lot more bloody a lot faster if he's expanding the area he controls, or is killing people, but without that aspect, the goal will be to keep things peaceful.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
                $endgroup$
                – JGreenwell
                43 mins ago
















              0












              $begingroup$

              The National Guard is the highest level of response I'd expect to show up unless things have really gone south. The Army/Navy/Airforce are all specifically prohibited against operating on American soil, and things need to be at Civil War or invasion levels before those prohibitions get lifted. Basically, you only get the Army roll into town if the incident is a threat to the US as a whole.



              Assuming he only wants to control the city area, this will likely be treated as if someone barricaded their house and took hostages, but on a larger scale. Objectives will be to remove everyone possible from the area, and talk the guy down. (While our scientists attempt to break his control over the AIs.) Objectives will get a lot more bloody a lot faster if he's expanding the area he controls, or is killing people, but without that aspect, the goal will be to keep things peaceful.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
                $endgroup$
                – JGreenwell
                43 mins ago














              0












              0








              0





              $begingroup$

              The National Guard is the highest level of response I'd expect to show up unless things have really gone south. The Army/Navy/Airforce are all specifically prohibited against operating on American soil, and things need to be at Civil War or invasion levels before those prohibitions get lifted. Basically, you only get the Army roll into town if the incident is a threat to the US as a whole.



              Assuming he only wants to control the city area, this will likely be treated as if someone barricaded their house and took hostages, but on a larger scale. Objectives will be to remove everyone possible from the area, and talk the guy down. (While our scientists attempt to break his control over the AIs.) Objectives will get a lot more bloody a lot faster if he's expanding the area he controls, or is killing people, but without that aspect, the goal will be to keep things peaceful.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The National Guard is the highest level of response I'd expect to show up unless things have really gone south. The Army/Navy/Airforce are all specifically prohibited against operating on American soil, and things need to be at Civil War or invasion levels before those prohibitions get lifted. Basically, you only get the Army roll into town if the incident is a threat to the US as a whole.



              Assuming he only wants to control the city area, this will likely be treated as if someone barricaded their house and took hostages, but on a larger scale. Objectives will be to remove everyone possible from the area, and talk the guy down. (While our scientists attempt to break his control over the AIs.) Objectives will get a lot more bloody a lot faster if he's expanding the area he controls, or is killing people, but without that aspect, the goal will be to keep things peaceful.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              user3757614user3757614

              1,211157




              1,211157











              • $begingroup$
                We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
                $endgroup$
                – JGreenwell
                43 mins ago

















              • $begingroup$
                We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
                $endgroup$
                – JGreenwell
                43 mins ago
















              $begingroup$
              We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
              $endgroup$
              – JGreenwell
              43 mins ago





              $begingroup$
              We call the Civil war/invasion an Insurrection and, yes, the full military (and you missed the Marines) could get involved then.
              $endgroup$
              – JGreenwell
              43 mins ago












              0












              $begingroup$

              Every branch of the military has an engagement plan. They're already looking in to how to deal with a space threat that hits the US, today. They're constantly searching for new ways they can be attacked, and they have engagement specialists looking in to it. every kind of battlefield, every kind of engagement.



              Regardless of who is actually engaging in the fighting, they can all talk. National guard may be on the front lines, but they can bring in a specialist from the marines who is in the command room giving advice on how they've simulated this before.



              You can essentially do whatever you want. And if you want to have the airforce come in, call an emergency session of congress. Why would they have an emergency session at congress? because the CIA has already been monitoring this threat, and they're putting their response into action.



              By the way, every branch of the military can own a war machine. Planes aren't limited to the airforce and ships aren't limited to the navy.



              To win over your military audience. Consider engaging in their own language. Watch a few interviews with military persons.



              Look at this amazing interview with a 4-star general






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Every branch of the military has an engagement plan. They're already looking in to how to deal with a space threat that hits the US, today. They're constantly searching for new ways they can be attacked, and they have engagement specialists looking in to it. every kind of battlefield, every kind of engagement.



                Regardless of who is actually engaging in the fighting, they can all talk. National guard may be on the front lines, but they can bring in a specialist from the marines who is in the command room giving advice on how they've simulated this before.



                You can essentially do whatever you want. And if you want to have the airforce come in, call an emergency session of congress. Why would they have an emergency session at congress? because the CIA has already been monitoring this threat, and they're putting their response into action.



                By the way, every branch of the military can own a war machine. Planes aren't limited to the airforce and ships aren't limited to the navy.



                To win over your military audience. Consider engaging in their own language. Watch a few interviews with military persons.



                Look at this amazing interview with a 4-star general






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Every branch of the military has an engagement plan. They're already looking in to how to deal with a space threat that hits the US, today. They're constantly searching for new ways they can be attacked, and they have engagement specialists looking in to it. every kind of battlefield, every kind of engagement.



                  Regardless of who is actually engaging in the fighting, they can all talk. National guard may be on the front lines, but they can bring in a specialist from the marines who is in the command room giving advice on how they've simulated this before.



                  You can essentially do whatever you want. And if you want to have the airforce come in, call an emergency session of congress. Why would they have an emergency session at congress? because the CIA has already been monitoring this threat, and they're putting their response into action.



                  By the way, every branch of the military can own a war machine. Planes aren't limited to the airforce and ships aren't limited to the navy.



                  To win over your military audience. Consider engaging in their own language. Watch a few interviews with military persons.



                  Look at this amazing interview with a 4-star general






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  Every branch of the military has an engagement plan. They're already looking in to how to deal with a space threat that hits the US, today. They're constantly searching for new ways they can be attacked, and they have engagement specialists looking in to it. every kind of battlefield, every kind of engagement.



                  Regardless of who is actually engaging in the fighting, they can all talk. National guard may be on the front lines, but they can bring in a specialist from the marines who is in the command room giving advice on how they've simulated this before.



                  You can essentially do whatever you want. And if you want to have the airforce come in, call an emergency session of congress. Why would they have an emergency session at congress? because the CIA has already been monitoring this threat, and they're putting their response into action.



                  By the way, every branch of the military can own a war machine. Planes aren't limited to the airforce and ships aren't limited to the navy.



                  To win over your military audience. Consider engaging in their own language. Watch a few interviews with military persons.



                  Look at this amazing interview with a 4-star general







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 51 mins ago









                  Kellen MillsKellen Mills

                  11




                  11




                  New contributor




                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Kellen Mills is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146295%2fwhich-us-defense-organization-would-respond-to-an-invasion-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480