Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to display a different number of significant digits in each column of TableForm output?Prevent graphics from rendering inside a held expressionHow to update Print-out “in place”?NumberForm pesky warning from ManipulateHow to separately define TraditionalForm and TeXFormPreventing Mathematica from simplifying numbers under the root?How to display numbers as multiples of a square rootPrinting out reals in a table with a specified number of digitsPadding a number doesn't work when transferring to LaTeXHandling expression differently for display vs. calculation?

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

When to use the root test. Is this not a good situation to use it?

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?

Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?

Can the Protection from Evil and Good spell be used on the caster?

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

What is this 4-propeller plane?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Geography at the pixel level

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?



Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to display a different number of significant digits in each column of TableForm output?Prevent graphics from rendering inside a held expressionHow to update Print-out “in place”?NumberForm pesky warning from ManipulateHow to separately define TraditionalForm and TeXFormPreventing Mathematica from simplifying numbers under the root?How to display numbers as multiples of a square rootPrinting out reals in a table with a specified number of digitsPadding a number doesn't work when transferring to LaTeXHandling expression differently for display vs. calculation?










3












$begingroup$


The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



    Do[
    Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
    i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


    It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




    the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



    Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



    By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6



      Do[
      Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
      i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]


      It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints




      the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`



      Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm, why is that?



      By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?







      output-formatting number-form






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      m_goldberg

      88.4k872199




      88.4k872199










      asked 8 hours ago









      zyyzyy

      1286




      1286




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



          StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



          Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



          The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



          You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



          Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
          N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



          the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



            V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



            Here is how you can get your output with Row.



            Column[
            Table[
            Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


            output



            One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



            numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
            Style[
            Column[
            Table[
            Row[
            "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
            ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
            i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
            FontFamily -> "Arial"]


            styled



            It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "387"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              6












              $begingroup$

              This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



              StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



              Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



              The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



              You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



              Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
              N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



              the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                6












                $begingroup$

                This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.



                  StringForm, InputForm, FullForm etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.



                  Other number display functions, like NumberForm, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.



                  The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.



                  You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:



                  Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", 
                  N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]



                  the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  RomanRoman

                  4,93011130




                  4,93011130





















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                      V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                      Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                      output



                      One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                      numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                      Style[
                      Column[
                      Table[
                      Row[
                      "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                      ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                      i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                      FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                      styled



                      It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                        V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                        Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                        output



                        One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                        numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                        Style[
                        Column[
                        Table[
                        Row[
                        "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                        ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                        i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                        FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                        styled



                        It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          StringForm is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.



                          V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm.



                          Here is how you can get your output with Row.



                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]]


                          output



                          One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:



                          numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
                          Style[
                          Column[
                          Table[
                          Row[
                          "the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
                          ", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
                          i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
                          FontFamily -> "Arial"]


                          styled



                          It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 1 hour ago

























                          answered 2 hours ago









                          m_goldbergm_goldberg

                          88.4k872199




                          88.4k872199



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單