Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat efficiencies make a realistic food chain?Could life survive on a diet of dust?Could hydroponic farms reasonably feed 100 billion people?How realistic could creating fake bruises be?What alternatives for fire can an aquatic sentient species use?What evolved weapons could be used against graphene skin?What animal could be used to make imitation human meat?What could possibly replace beer?In a single-continent world, what could cause hydrothermal vents?What Else Could Create Jeffrey Linn's Coastlines BESIDES The Influence of Ice?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

How come people say “Would of”?

Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

How to manage monthly salary

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

Any good smartcontract for "business calendar" oracles?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

"Riffle" two strings

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Spanish for "widget"

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?



Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat efficiencies make a realistic food chain?Could life survive on a diet of dust?Could hydroponic farms reasonably feed 100 billion people?How realistic could creating fake bruises be?What alternatives for fire can an aquatic sentient species use?What evolved weapons could be used against graphene skin?What animal could be used to make imitation human meat?What could possibly replace beer?In a single-continent world, what could cause hydrothermal vents?What Else Could Create Jeffrey Linn's Coastlines BESIDES The Influence of Ice?










5












$begingroup$


Phytoplankton are not to be taken for granted. Not only do they form the core of marine food webs around the world, they also release half of the world's oxygen. But phytoplankton, being plant-like organisms, need nutrients for their blooms to survive and thrive into populations large enough to be visible from space. For many, the origins of those nutrients come from one of the least likely sources: desert dust storms swept up from far away by deserts. As the dust settles down to the oceans, they drop down enough nutrients to create these vast blooms on an annual basis.



But what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



You could say that volcanic ash could be the answer, but there's a problem--unlike dust storms, volcanoes don't erupt at once or regularly. Two eruptions from one same volcano could be years or even decades apart, and that sort of duration gap won't do for plankton blooms. So what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



EDIT--NO manmade processes! Everyting MUST be natural!










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Phytoplankton are not to be taken for granted. Not only do they form the core of marine food webs around the world, they also release half of the world's oxygen. But phytoplankton, being plant-like organisms, need nutrients for their blooms to survive and thrive into populations large enough to be visible from space. For many, the origins of those nutrients come from one of the least likely sources: desert dust storms swept up from far away by deserts. As the dust settles down to the oceans, they drop down enough nutrients to create these vast blooms on an annual basis.



    But what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



    You could say that volcanic ash could be the answer, but there's a problem--unlike dust storms, volcanoes don't erupt at once or regularly. Two eruptions from one same volcano could be years or even decades apart, and that sort of duration gap won't do for plankton blooms. So what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



    EDIT--NO manmade processes! Everyting MUST be natural!










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      Phytoplankton are not to be taken for granted. Not only do they form the core of marine food webs around the world, they also release half of the world's oxygen. But phytoplankton, being plant-like organisms, need nutrients for their blooms to survive and thrive into populations large enough to be visible from space. For many, the origins of those nutrients come from one of the least likely sources: desert dust storms swept up from far away by deserts. As the dust settles down to the oceans, they drop down enough nutrients to create these vast blooms on an annual basis.



      But what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



      You could say that volcanic ash could be the answer, but there's a problem--unlike dust storms, volcanoes don't erupt at once or regularly. Two eruptions from one same volcano could be years or even decades apart, and that sort of duration gap won't do for plankton blooms. So what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



      EDIT--NO manmade processes! Everyting MUST be natural!










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Phytoplankton are not to be taken for granted. Not only do they form the core of marine food webs around the world, they also release half of the world's oxygen. But phytoplankton, being plant-like organisms, need nutrients for their blooms to survive and thrive into populations large enough to be visible from space. For many, the origins of those nutrients come from one of the least likely sources: desert dust storms swept up from far away by deserts. As the dust settles down to the oceans, they drop down enough nutrients to create these vast blooms on an annual basis.



      But what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



      You could say that volcanic ash could be the answer, but there's a problem--unlike dust storms, volcanoes don't erupt at once or regularly. Two eruptions from one same volcano could be years or even decades apart, and that sort of duration gap won't do for plankton blooms. So what else could feed a plankton bloom on a global scale and an annual basis?



      EDIT--NO manmade processes! Everyting MUST be natural!







      reality-check food ocean ecology






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      JohnWDailey

















      asked 5 hours ago









      JohnWDaileyJohnWDailey

      2,7562785




      2,7562785




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Rivers.



          river plume



          https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1257/mississippi-river-sediment-plume



          Depicted: the Mississippi dumping its load of sediment into the Gulf of Mexico. River flow is cyclical in most places, with high flow during rainy season or spring melt and low flow during dry season / winter or summer. During high flow, nutrients move from the land to the river and on to the sea. With the advent of synthetic fertilizer this can be too much of a good thing - so much nitrogen and phosphorus that they produce massive blooms, that then die.




          Icebergs.



          Icebergs generation is periodic, both intrayear and over longer periods.



          iceberg frequency
          https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/iceberg-frequency/



          Icebergs that have scraped along the land can ferry nutrients out to sea, releasing them slowly as the ice melts.



          green iceberg



          https://phys.org/news/2019-03-mystery-green-icebergs.html




          The green icebergs have been a curiosity to scientists for decades,
          but now glaciologists report in a new study that they suspect iron
          oxides in rock dust from Antarctica's mainland are turning some
          icebergs green... Iron is a key nutrient for phytoplankton,
          microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food web. But iron
          is scarce in many areas of the ocean.



          If experiments prove the new theory right, it would mean green
          icebergs are ferrying precious iron from Antarctica's mainland to the
          open sea when they break off, providing this key nutrient to the
          organisms that support nearly all marine life.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
            $endgroup$
            – Willk
            54 mins ago



















          3












          $begingroup$

          Eventually, phytoplankton don't really feed on dust, but on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron(Fe), and the various other nutrients plants need, that may compose it. But if a desert hold such nutrients, it will not stay a desert for long.



          An example of a yearly massive bloom could be a mass migration of ground animal, on shore, for reproductive purpose (a bit like toad, that need water even if they are most the time ground animal). They will stay on the shore for some weeks, defecating and urinating, and releasing a massive dose of nitrates, phosphate and so on...



          Second example, industrial activity, mainly agriculture, may lead to algae bloom (like in Brittany, France, with the famous green and smelly algae). And since plants grow on yearly cycle, fertilizer are used on a yearly basis






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Up-welling. Nutrients tend to sink to the bottom, or to deep water where not enough light reaches to keep photosynthetic life forms thriving. If there is some mechanism to vigorously return deep water to the surface then it can bring the nutrients with it.



          Up-welling might well be a seasonal thing. For example, currents could flow in one direction half the year when the snow melts in this hemisphere and builds up in the other. Then in the other direction for the other half of the year. This could produce a seasonal stirring of the deeper ocean layers.



          Up-welling could be driven by temperature differences produced by geological heating that does not rise to the level of volcanoes. Water is at its highest density at close to 1.5°C. So if you have something that warms the depths it will bring the deep water back to the surface. This probably isn't seasonal.



          In exotic places with exotic tides, that might do it. If a large moon had an exceedingly eccentric orbit, you could have extreme tides for the portion of the moon's orbit when it was closest, then far weaker tides the rest of the time.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143609%2frealistic-alternatives-to-dust-what-else-could-feed-a-plankton-bloom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Rivers.



          river plume



          https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1257/mississippi-river-sediment-plume



          Depicted: the Mississippi dumping its load of sediment into the Gulf of Mexico. River flow is cyclical in most places, with high flow during rainy season or spring melt and low flow during dry season / winter or summer. During high flow, nutrients move from the land to the river and on to the sea. With the advent of synthetic fertilizer this can be too much of a good thing - so much nitrogen and phosphorus that they produce massive blooms, that then die.




          Icebergs.



          Icebergs generation is periodic, both intrayear and over longer periods.



          iceberg frequency
          https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/iceberg-frequency/



          Icebergs that have scraped along the land can ferry nutrients out to sea, releasing them slowly as the ice melts.



          green iceberg



          https://phys.org/news/2019-03-mystery-green-icebergs.html




          The green icebergs have been a curiosity to scientists for decades,
          but now glaciologists report in a new study that they suspect iron
          oxides in rock dust from Antarctica's mainland are turning some
          icebergs green... Iron is a key nutrient for phytoplankton,
          microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food web. But iron
          is scarce in many areas of the ocean.



          If experiments prove the new theory right, it would mean green
          icebergs are ferrying precious iron from Antarctica's mainland to the
          open sea when they break off, providing this key nutrient to the
          organisms that support nearly all marine life.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
            $endgroup$
            – Willk
            54 mins ago
















          4












          $begingroup$

          Rivers.



          river plume



          https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1257/mississippi-river-sediment-plume



          Depicted: the Mississippi dumping its load of sediment into the Gulf of Mexico. River flow is cyclical in most places, with high flow during rainy season or spring melt and low flow during dry season / winter or summer. During high flow, nutrients move from the land to the river and on to the sea. With the advent of synthetic fertilizer this can be too much of a good thing - so much nitrogen and phosphorus that they produce massive blooms, that then die.




          Icebergs.



          Icebergs generation is periodic, both intrayear and over longer periods.



          iceberg frequency
          https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/iceberg-frequency/



          Icebergs that have scraped along the land can ferry nutrients out to sea, releasing them slowly as the ice melts.



          green iceberg



          https://phys.org/news/2019-03-mystery-green-icebergs.html




          The green icebergs have been a curiosity to scientists for decades,
          but now glaciologists report in a new study that they suspect iron
          oxides in rock dust from Antarctica's mainland are turning some
          icebergs green... Iron is a key nutrient for phytoplankton,
          microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food web. But iron
          is scarce in many areas of the ocean.



          If experiments prove the new theory right, it would mean green
          icebergs are ferrying precious iron from Antarctica's mainland to the
          open sea when they break off, providing this key nutrient to the
          organisms that support nearly all marine life.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
            $endgroup$
            – Willk
            54 mins ago














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Rivers.



          river plume



          https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1257/mississippi-river-sediment-plume



          Depicted: the Mississippi dumping its load of sediment into the Gulf of Mexico. River flow is cyclical in most places, with high flow during rainy season or spring melt and low flow during dry season / winter or summer. During high flow, nutrients move from the land to the river and on to the sea. With the advent of synthetic fertilizer this can be too much of a good thing - so much nitrogen and phosphorus that they produce massive blooms, that then die.




          Icebergs.



          Icebergs generation is periodic, both intrayear and over longer periods.



          iceberg frequency
          https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/iceberg-frequency/



          Icebergs that have scraped along the land can ferry nutrients out to sea, releasing them slowly as the ice melts.



          green iceberg



          https://phys.org/news/2019-03-mystery-green-icebergs.html




          The green icebergs have been a curiosity to scientists for decades,
          but now glaciologists report in a new study that they suspect iron
          oxides in rock dust from Antarctica's mainland are turning some
          icebergs green... Iron is a key nutrient for phytoplankton,
          microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food web. But iron
          is scarce in many areas of the ocean.



          If experiments prove the new theory right, it would mean green
          icebergs are ferrying precious iron from Antarctica's mainland to the
          open sea when they break off, providing this key nutrient to the
          organisms that support nearly all marine life.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Rivers.



          river plume



          https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1257/mississippi-river-sediment-plume



          Depicted: the Mississippi dumping its load of sediment into the Gulf of Mexico. River flow is cyclical in most places, with high flow during rainy season or spring melt and low flow during dry season / winter or summer. During high flow, nutrients move from the land to the river and on to the sea. With the advent of synthetic fertilizer this can be too much of a good thing - so much nitrogen and phosphorus that they produce massive blooms, that then die.




          Icebergs.



          Icebergs generation is periodic, both intrayear and over longer periods.



          iceberg frequency
          https://www.nationalgeographic.org/media/iceberg-frequency/



          Icebergs that have scraped along the land can ferry nutrients out to sea, releasing them slowly as the ice melts.



          green iceberg



          https://phys.org/news/2019-03-mystery-green-icebergs.html




          The green icebergs have been a curiosity to scientists for decades,
          but now glaciologists report in a new study that they suspect iron
          oxides in rock dust from Antarctica's mainland are turning some
          icebergs green... Iron is a key nutrient for phytoplankton,
          microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food web. But iron
          is scarce in many areas of the ocean.



          If experiments prove the new theory right, it would mean green
          icebergs are ferrying precious iron from Antarctica's mainland to the
          open sea when they break off, providing this key nutrient to the
          organisms that support nearly all marine life.








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          WillkWillk

          116k27220488




          116k27220488











          • $begingroup$
            So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
            $endgroup$
            – Willk
            54 mins ago

















          • $begingroup$
            So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
            $endgroup$
            – Willk
            54 mins ago
















          $begingroup$
          So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          So in an alternate Earth where many of our major rivers are crammed with reefs of clams, mussels and oysters, would the rivers still be dirty enough to dump nutrients into the sea?
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
          $endgroup$
          – Willk
          54 mins ago





          $begingroup$
          An interesting question. Clam infested waters might have more nutrients. In the US, invasive bivalves make the water clearer but also are associated with more algal blooms - possibly suggesting that with a large percentage of the primary producers at the bottom of the food chain filtered out by the bivalves more nutrients remain in the water, unused.
          $endgroup$
          – Willk
          54 mins ago












          3












          $begingroup$

          Eventually, phytoplankton don't really feed on dust, but on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron(Fe), and the various other nutrients plants need, that may compose it. But if a desert hold such nutrients, it will not stay a desert for long.



          An example of a yearly massive bloom could be a mass migration of ground animal, on shore, for reproductive purpose (a bit like toad, that need water even if they are most the time ground animal). They will stay on the shore for some weeks, defecating and urinating, and releasing a massive dose of nitrates, phosphate and so on...



          Second example, industrial activity, mainly agriculture, may lead to algae bloom (like in Brittany, France, with the famous green and smelly algae). And since plants grow on yearly cycle, fertilizer are used on a yearly basis






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          Eventually, phytoplankton don't really feed on dust, but on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron(Fe), and the various other nutrients plants need, that may compose it. But if a desert hold such nutrients, it will not stay a desert for long.



          An example of a yearly massive bloom could be a mass migration of ground animal, on shore, for reproductive purpose (a bit like toad, that need water even if they are most the time ground animal). They will stay on the shore for some weeks, defecating and urinating, and releasing a massive dose of nitrates, phosphate and so on...



          Second example, industrial activity, mainly agriculture, may lead to algae bloom (like in Brittany, France, with the famous green and smelly algae). And since plants grow on yearly cycle, fertilizer are used on a yearly basis






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Eventually, phytoplankton don't really feed on dust, but on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron(Fe), and the various other nutrients plants need, that may compose it. But if a desert hold such nutrients, it will not stay a desert for long.



          An example of a yearly massive bloom could be a mass migration of ground animal, on shore, for reproductive purpose (a bit like toad, that need water even if they are most the time ground animal). They will stay on the shore for some weeks, defecating and urinating, and releasing a massive dose of nitrates, phosphate and so on...



          Second example, industrial activity, mainly agriculture, may lead to algae bloom (like in Brittany, France, with the famous green and smelly algae). And since plants grow on yearly cycle, fertilizer are used on a yearly basis






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Eventually, phytoplankton don't really feed on dust, but on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), iron(Fe), and the various other nutrients plants need, that may compose it. But if a desert hold such nutrients, it will not stay a desert for long.



          An example of a yearly massive bloom could be a mass migration of ground animal, on shore, for reproductive purpose (a bit like toad, that need water even if they are most the time ground animal). They will stay on the shore for some weeks, defecating and urinating, and releasing a massive dose of nitrates, phosphate and so on...



          Second example, industrial activity, mainly agriculture, may lead to algae bloom (like in Brittany, France, with the famous green and smelly algae). And since plants grow on yearly cycle, fertilizer are used on a yearly basis







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 4 hours ago









          CailloumaxCailloumax

          38118




          38118











          • $begingroup$
            Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Just made an edit to clarify that I don't want manmade processes.
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago











          3












          $begingroup$

          Up-welling. Nutrients tend to sink to the bottom, or to deep water where not enough light reaches to keep photosynthetic life forms thriving. If there is some mechanism to vigorously return deep water to the surface then it can bring the nutrients with it.



          Up-welling might well be a seasonal thing. For example, currents could flow in one direction half the year when the snow melts in this hemisphere and builds up in the other. Then in the other direction for the other half of the year. This could produce a seasonal stirring of the deeper ocean layers.



          Up-welling could be driven by temperature differences produced by geological heating that does not rise to the level of volcanoes. Water is at its highest density at close to 1.5°C. So if you have something that warms the depths it will bring the deep water back to the surface. This probably isn't seasonal.



          In exotic places with exotic tides, that might do it. If a large moon had an exceedingly eccentric orbit, you could have extreme tides for the portion of the moon's orbit when it was closest, then far weaker tides the rest of the time.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Up-welling. Nutrients tend to sink to the bottom, or to deep water where not enough light reaches to keep photosynthetic life forms thriving. If there is some mechanism to vigorously return deep water to the surface then it can bring the nutrients with it.



          Up-welling might well be a seasonal thing. For example, currents could flow in one direction half the year when the snow melts in this hemisphere and builds up in the other. Then in the other direction for the other half of the year. This could produce a seasonal stirring of the deeper ocean layers.



          Up-welling could be driven by temperature differences produced by geological heating that does not rise to the level of volcanoes. Water is at its highest density at close to 1.5°C. So if you have something that warms the depths it will bring the deep water back to the surface. This probably isn't seasonal.



          In exotic places with exotic tides, that might do it. If a large moon had an exceedingly eccentric orbit, you could have extreme tides for the portion of the moon's orbit when it was closest, then far weaker tides the rest of the time.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Up-welling. Nutrients tend to sink to the bottom, or to deep water where not enough light reaches to keep photosynthetic life forms thriving. If there is some mechanism to vigorously return deep water to the surface then it can bring the nutrients with it.



          Up-welling might well be a seasonal thing. For example, currents could flow in one direction half the year when the snow melts in this hemisphere and builds up in the other. Then in the other direction for the other half of the year. This could produce a seasonal stirring of the deeper ocean layers.



          Up-welling could be driven by temperature differences produced by geological heating that does not rise to the level of volcanoes. Water is at its highest density at close to 1.5°C. So if you have something that warms the depths it will bring the deep water back to the surface. This probably isn't seasonal.



          In exotic places with exotic tides, that might do it. If a large moon had an exceedingly eccentric orbit, you could have extreme tides for the portion of the moon's orbit when it was closest, then far weaker tides the rest of the time.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          Up-welling. Nutrients tend to sink to the bottom, or to deep water where not enough light reaches to keep photosynthetic life forms thriving. If there is some mechanism to vigorously return deep water to the surface then it can bring the nutrients with it.



          Up-welling might well be a seasonal thing. For example, currents could flow in one direction half the year when the snow melts in this hemisphere and builds up in the other. Then in the other direction for the other half of the year. This could produce a seasonal stirring of the deeper ocean layers.



          Up-welling could be driven by temperature differences produced by geological heating that does not rise to the level of volcanoes. Water is at its highest density at close to 1.5°C. So if you have something that warms the depths it will bring the deep water back to the surface. This probably isn't seasonal.



          In exotic places with exotic tides, that might do it. If a large moon had an exceedingly eccentric orbit, you could have extreme tides for the portion of the moon's orbit when it was closest, then far weaker tides the rest of the time.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 4 hours ago









          puppetsockpuppetsock

          1311




          1311




          New contributor




          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          puppetsock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.











          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
            $endgroup$
            – JohnWDailey
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          Yes, but WHAT will be welled up?
          $endgroup$
          – JohnWDailey
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143609%2frealistic-alternatives-to-dust-what-else-could-feed-a-plankton-bloom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її