Attenuator Cascaded Connection The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In

How to change the limits of integration

How long do I have to send payment?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Feasability of miniature nuclear reactors for humanoid cyborgs

Lethal sonic weapons

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

What is the best strategy for white in this position?

Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?

Inversion Puzzle

If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?

"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

I looked up a future colleague on linkedin before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?

Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?



Attenuator Cascaded Connection



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In










1












$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?










share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




PAT1220-C-10DB-T5 is a 10dB attenuator. (This chip is just an example, it could be any other component as well).



  1. Can I simply connect 3 of them in series in a PCB design to make my cheap 30dB attenuator?


  2. I have a few attenuator modules with an SMA connector. One of them is 20dB while others are 6dB and 10dB. Can I again connect them in series to get higher attenuation?







rf-power electronics






share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Mike Waters

3,7752635




3,7752635






New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 8 hours ago









nandflash1nandflash1

252




252




New contributor




nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






nandflash1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
    $endgroup$
    – tomnexus
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Be aware that as you get to >> 40 dB attention, leakage around the components will start to exceed the attenuated signal. You start to need to put each stage in a separate shielded can or cavity.
$endgroup$
– tomnexus
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you. How can i shield in such case.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
@nandflash1 Please ask about the shielding in a new question on electronicsSE, including an image of the PCB. Not only is printed circuit board design off-topic for this site, but you are likely to get a better answer there. :-)
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
4 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    7 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    7 hours ago















3












$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    7 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Yes, you can cascade attenuators to realize more attenuation. Attenuation (in dB) will increase algebraically, as long as all individual attenuators are designed to operate at the same impedance and they are operating at that impedance. For example, mixing 75$Omega$ and 50$Omega$ attenuators may produce unexpected results. Same for using terminators in a system that doesn't terminate in the appropriate characteristic impedance.



Depending on what you're doing, be aware of the amount of power that each attenuator can dissipate. Putting 1W into a 30dB attenuator means only 1mW comes out - the attenuator has to dissipate the rest!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









Brian K1LIBrian K1LI

1,747114




1,747114











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
    $endgroup$
    – nandflash1
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you. I am aware of the power rating of components.
$endgroup$
– nandflash1
7 hours ago










nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











nandflash1 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13244%2fattenuator-cascaded-connection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її