Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property NameHow to convey LWC's complex Reactive property back to markup?How to set a public reactive property in the declared component during component constructionProperty “selectedContact” of [object:vm undefined > (51)] is set to a non-trackable objectHow to set default value for a select in lwc

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Revoked SSL certificate

A case of the sniffles

Roll the carpet

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

meaning of に in 本当に?

DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Rock identification in KY



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property Name


How to convey LWC's complex Reactive property back to markup?How to set a public reactive property in the declared component during component constructionProperty “selectedContact” of [object:vm undefined > (51)] is set to a non-trackable objectHow to set default value for a select in lwc






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question






















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    9 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    9 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago

















4















Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question






















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    9 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    9 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago













4












4








4








Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question














Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?







lightning-web-components






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









Pranay JaiswalPranay Jaiswal

18.6k53158




18.6k53158












  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    9 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    9 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago

















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    9 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    9 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    9 hours ago
















Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago





Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago













Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

– Pranay Jaiswal
9 hours ago






Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

– Pranay Jaiswal
9 hours ago














I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago





I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago













@JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

– sfdcfox
9 hours ago





@JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

– sfdcfox
9 hours ago













@sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago





@sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

– Jayant Das
9 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    2 hours ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    2 hours ago


















1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256761%2funcaught-typeerror-set-on-proxy-trap-returned-falsish-for-property-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    2 hours ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    2 hours ago















3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    2 hours ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    2 hours ago













3












3








3







Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer













Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









sfdcfoxsfdcfox

263k12209456




263k12209456












  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    2 hours ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    2 hours ago

















  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    2 hours ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    2 hours ago
















+1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

– Jayant Das
8 hours ago






+1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

– Jayant Das
8 hours ago














Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago





Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago













@JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

– tsalb
2 hours ago






@JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

– tsalb
2 hours ago














@tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

– Jayant Das
2 hours ago





@tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

– Jayant Das
2 hours ago













1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago















1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago













1












1








1







This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer













This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









Jayant DasJayant Das

18k21330




18k21330












  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago

















  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    8 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago
















This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

– sfdcfox
8 hours ago





This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

– sfdcfox
8 hours ago













Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

– Jayant Das
8 hours ago





Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

– Jayant Das
8 hours ago













+1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago





+1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago




1




1





I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago





I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256761%2funcaught-typeerror-set-on-proxy-trap-returned-falsish-for-property-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單