Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)US work authorization laws for non-resident aliensIs lying/faking income for loans illegal?Can the cashier be held liable for credit card fraud if procedure isn't followed?When does the government charge for fraudCan an employer owe money for an employee's income tax?Promissory Note Versus Loan Agreement for Real Estate InvestmentIs it still consider Fraud if it is GIVEN for free?Is a disclaimer for a medical product enough to protect the company against prosecution for fraud?How to report Airbnb income in tax return?Is this a Prima Facie case for State Tax Fraud?
Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?
Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions
How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Does detail obscure or enhance action?
What's that red-plus icon near a text?
Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
Add text to same line using sed
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Codimension of non-flat locus
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
Malcev's paper "On a class of homogeneous spaces" in English
LWC SFDX source push error TypeError: LWC1009: decl.moveTo is not a function
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Today is the Center
Modeling an IP Address
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Is there a name for fork-protected pieces?
tikz convert color string to hex value
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
US work authorization laws for non-resident aliensIs lying/faking income for loans illegal?Can the cashier be held liable for credit card fraud if procedure isn't followed?When does the government charge for fraudCan an employer owe money for an employee's income tax?Promissory Note Versus Loan Agreement for Real Estate InvestmentIs it still consider Fraud if it is GIVEN for free?Is a disclaimer for a medical product enough to protect the company against prosecution for fraud?How to report Airbnb income in tax return?Is this a Prima Facie case for State Tax Fraud?
Hypothetically, A wants to pay B a considerable amount of money.
In order to reduce the paper trail, A pays me the money and I transfer it to B.
To further obscure the paper trail, I declare the payment from A as income for work (non-existent) done by me for A, enter it on my US Income Tax return as taxable income, and pay the resulting tax.
I have submitted a false tax return, but it leads to an increase in tax paid. Is it still a crime?
Edit: No money laundering. A legally possesses the money and has a perfectly legal (and very private) reason to pay it to B.
united-states fraud federal-tax-law
add a comment |
Hypothetically, A wants to pay B a considerable amount of money.
In order to reduce the paper trail, A pays me the money and I transfer it to B.
To further obscure the paper trail, I declare the payment from A as income for work (non-existent) done by me for A, enter it on my US Income Tax return as taxable income, and pay the resulting tax.
I have submitted a false tax return, but it leads to an increase in tax paid. Is it still a crime?
Edit: No money laundering. A legally possesses the money and has a perfectly legal (and very private) reason to pay it to B.
united-states fraud federal-tax-law
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago
add a comment |
Hypothetically, A wants to pay B a considerable amount of money.
In order to reduce the paper trail, A pays me the money and I transfer it to B.
To further obscure the paper trail, I declare the payment from A as income for work (non-existent) done by me for A, enter it on my US Income Tax return as taxable income, and pay the resulting tax.
I have submitted a false tax return, but it leads to an increase in tax paid. Is it still a crime?
Edit: No money laundering. A legally possesses the money and has a perfectly legal (and very private) reason to pay it to B.
united-states fraud federal-tax-law
Hypothetically, A wants to pay B a considerable amount of money.
In order to reduce the paper trail, A pays me the money and I transfer it to B.
To further obscure the paper trail, I declare the payment from A as income for work (non-existent) done by me for A, enter it on my US Income Tax return as taxable income, and pay the resulting tax.
I have submitted a false tax return, but it leads to an increase in tax paid. Is it still a crime?
Edit: No money laundering. A legally possesses the money and has a perfectly legal (and very private) reason to pay it to B.
united-states fraud federal-tax-law
united-states fraud federal-tax-law
edited 2 hours ago
DJohnM
asked 7 hours ago
DJohnMDJohnM
375212
375212
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago
add a comment |
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The primary crime that you have described is called money laundering.
There are also multiple tax related crimes that could be implicated, not all of which require that taxes due by the person charged by reduced. See, e.g., Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371); Attempts To Interfere With Administration of Internal Revenue Laws (I.R.C. § 7212); Fraudulent Returns, Statements or Other Documents (I.R.C. § 7207); Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7)), etc.
add a comment |
Did you misreport your income, now? How do you determine that?
You received income from A. You did a service for A. You may have wildly overcharged, (or did you? You had expenses).
IRS is concerned with the Step Doctrine. If doing something in one step is illegal, and you do several steps that have the same effect, then the steps are illegal.
You are assuring us that the single step is legal, so the steps are legal.
Examples.
You're allowed to donate $2800 to a candidate's primary election. You give $2800 to a friend for him to donate to that same candidate. The "step doctrine" says that's the same as you giving $5600, and you are over limits!
You get $1,000,000 cash selling meth. It would be illegal to deposit the whole lump without explaining the source. So you deposit $5000/day (structuring) or buy a car wash and sell washes to phantom customers (laundering).
Here's the exception that proves the rule. Your income is too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA. You contribute $5000 to a NDIRA (no income limits). You immediately convert the NDIRA to a Roth (Income limits were removed in 2005). That was long thought to be illegal because of the Step Doctrine, but IRS and Congress have stated that it's OK.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38852%2fis-it-tax-fraud-for-an-individual-to-declare-non-taxable-revenue-as-taxable-inco%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The primary crime that you have described is called money laundering.
There are also multiple tax related crimes that could be implicated, not all of which require that taxes due by the person charged by reduced. See, e.g., Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371); Attempts To Interfere With Administration of Internal Revenue Laws (I.R.C. § 7212); Fraudulent Returns, Statements or Other Documents (I.R.C. § 7207); Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7)), etc.
add a comment |
The primary crime that you have described is called money laundering.
There are also multiple tax related crimes that could be implicated, not all of which require that taxes due by the person charged by reduced. See, e.g., Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371); Attempts To Interfere With Administration of Internal Revenue Laws (I.R.C. § 7212); Fraudulent Returns, Statements or Other Documents (I.R.C. § 7207); Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7)), etc.
add a comment |
The primary crime that you have described is called money laundering.
There are also multiple tax related crimes that could be implicated, not all of which require that taxes due by the person charged by reduced. See, e.g., Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371); Attempts To Interfere With Administration of Internal Revenue Laws (I.R.C. § 7212); Fraudulent Returns, Statements or Other Documents (I.R.C. § 7207); Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7)), etc.
The primary crime that you have described is called money laundering.
There are also multiple tax related crimes that could be implicated, not all of which require that taxes due by the person charged by reduced. See, e.g., Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371); Attempts To Interfere With Administration of Internal Revenue Laws (I.R.C. § 7212); Fraudulent Returns, Statements or Other Documents (I.R.C. § 7207); Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7)), etc.
answered 7 hours ago
ohwillekeohwilleke
52k259131
52k259131
add a comment |
add a comment |
Did you misreport your income, now? How do you determine that?
You received income from A. You did a service for A. You may have wildly overcharged, (or did you? You had expenses).
IRS is concerned with the Step Doctrine. If doing something in one step is illegal, and you do several steps that have the same effect, then the steps are illegal.
You are assuring us that the single step is legal, so the steps are legal.
Examples.
You're allowed to donate $2800 to a candidate's primary election. You give $2800 to a friend for him to donate to that same candidate. The "step doctrine" says that's the same as you giving $5600, and you are over limits!
You get $1,000,000 cash selling meth. It would be illegal to deposit the whole lump without explaining the source. So you deposit $5000/day (structuring) or buy a car wash and sell washes to phantom customers (laundering).
Here's the exception that proves the rule. Your income is too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA. You contribute $5000 to a NDIRA (no income limits). You immediately convert the NDIRA to a Roth (Income limits were removed in 2005). That was long thought to be illegal because of the Step Doctrine, but IRS and Congress have stated that it's OK.
add a comment |
Did you misreport your income, now? How do you determine that?
You received income from A. You did a service for A. You may have wildly overcharged, (or did you? You had expenses).
IRS is concerned with the Step Doctrine. If doing something in one step is illegal, and you do several steps that have the same effect, then the steps are illegal.
You are assuring us that the single step is legal, so the steps are legal.
Examples.
You're allowed to donate $2800 to a candidate's primary election. You give $2800 to a friend for him to donate to that same candidate. The "step doctrine" says that's the same as you giving $5600, and you are over limits!
You get $1,000,000 cash selling meth. It would be illegal to deposit the whole lump without explaining the source. So you deposit $5000/day (structuring) or buy a car wash and sell washes to phantom customers (laundering).
Here's the exception that proves the rule. Your income is too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA. You contribute $5000 to a NDIRA (no income limits). You immediately convert the NDIRA to a Roth (Income limits were removed in 2005). That was long thought to be illegal because of the Step Doctrine, but IRS and Congress have stated that it's OK.
add a comment |
Did you misreport your income, now? How do you determine that?
You received income from A. You did a service for A. You may have wildly overcharged, (or did you? You had expenses).
IRS is concerned with the Step Doctrine. If doing something in one step is illegal, and you do several steps that have the same effect, then the steps are illegal.
You are assuring us that the single step is legal, so the steps are legal.
Examples.
You're allowed to donate $2800 to a candidate's primary election. You give $2800 to a friend for him to donate to that same candidate. The "step doctrine" says that's the same as you giving $5600, and you are over limits!
You get $1,000,000 cash selling meth. It would be illegal to deposit the whole lump without explaining the source. So you deposit $5000/day (structuring) or buy a car wash and sell washes to phantom customers (laundering).
Here's the exception that proves the rule. Your income is too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA. You contribute $5000 to a NDIRA (no income limits). You immediately convert the NDIRA to a Roth (Income limits were removed in 2005). That was long thought to be illegal because of the Step Doctrine, but IRS and Congress have stated that it's OK.
Did you misreport your income, now? How do you determine that?
You received income from A. You did a service for A. You may have wildly overcharged, (or did you? You had expenses).
IRS is concerned with the Step Doctrine. If doing something in one step is illegal, and you do several steps that have the same effect, then the steps are illegal.
You are assuring us that the single step is legal, so the steps are legal.
Examples.
You're allowed to donate $2800 to a candidate's primary election. You give $2800 to a friend for him to donate to that same candidate. The "step doctrine" says that's the same as you giving $5600, and you are over limits!
You get $1,000,000 cash selling meth. It would be illegal to deposit the whole lump without explaining the source. So you deposit $5000/day (structuring) or buy a car wash and sell washes to phantom customers (laundering).
Here's the exception that proves the rule. Your income is too high to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA. You contribute $5000 to a NDIRA (no income limits). You immediately convert the NDIRA to a Roth (Income limits were removed in 2005). That was long thought to be illegal because of the Step Doctrine, but IRS and Congress have stated that it's OK.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
HarperHarper
3,0141215
3,0141215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38852%2fis-it-tax-fraud-for-an-individual-to-declare-non-taxable-revenue-as-taxable-inco%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Money laundering is a different crime than tax fraud, but still a crime.
– SJuan76
7 hours ago
How do you know that your 20% tax bracket was greater than the tax bracket of person B? Either way this is a fraud against the US government. I would assume that they didn't want a paper trail because they have an outstanding debt like child support. Even if it wasn't money laundering it's still fraud.
– Ron Beyer
2 hours ago
What does B's tax bracket have to do with anything? It's my taxes, with or without the fake income, that is of concern...
– DJohnM
2 hours ago
Why is it crucial to your scenario that you not report the income as miscellaneous income on Schedule 1; why do you have to classify it as wages?
– user6726
53 mins ago