How to verify whether function is surjective or injectiveIs this a function and injective/surjective questionInjective and surjective functionHow to tell whether or a function is surjective or injective?Determine whether F is injective and surjectiveA function that's injective but not surjective.is this “function” a surjective, but not injective function?Construct a function that is surjective, but not injectiveDetermine whether a function is injective, surjective, or bijective.How to find whether a function is injective or surjective

I didn't do any exit passport control when leaving Japan. What should I do?

How does Firefox know my ISP login page?

How can I find out a substance name based on its structural formula?

Negative feedbacks and "Language smoother"

String Operation to Split on Punctuation

How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?

Are there any rules around when something can be described as "based on a true story"?

Why is coffee provided during big chess events when it contains a banned substance?

Can digital computers understand infinity?

The colors in Resident Evil 7 are *completely* off

'The Kukhtarev's model' or 'Kukhtarev's model' ('John's car' or 'The John's car')?

Are There 3D Rules for Flying and Distance?

Would a physician with migraine better treat their patients?

Is consistent disregard for students' time "normal" in undergraduate research?

What are the consequences for downstream actors of redistributing a work under a wider CC license than the copyright holder authorized?

Variable fixing based on a good feasible solution

Is it true that if we start a sentence with 'the', this 'the' can be omitted?

Match the blocks

How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?

Find the songs and the event

Is a light year a different distance if measured from a moving object?

Giving a character trauma but not "diagnosing" her?

Big Bracket for equations

Trek Madone SLR Di2



How to verify whether function is surjective or injective


Is this a function and injective/surjective questionInjective and surjective functionHow to tell whether or a function is surjective or injective?Determine whether F is injective and surjectiveA function that's injective but not surjective.is this “function” a surjective, but not injective function?Construct a function that is surjective, but not injectiveDetermine whether a function is injective, surjective, or bijective.How to find whether a function is injective or surjective






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








3














$begingroup$


I'm trying to learn how to verify whether a certain function is surjective / injective.



$g:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbR$



$g(x)= 2x^5 +9$



How would I do so?



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago


















3














$begingroup$


I'm trying to learn how to verify whether a certain function is surjective / injective.



$g:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbR$



$g(x)= 2x^5 +9$



How would I do so?



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I'm trying to learn how to verify whether a certain function is surjective / injective.



$g:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbR$



$g(x)= 2x^5 +9$



How would I do so?



Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I'm trying to learn how to verify whether a certain function is surjective / injective.



$g:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbR$



$g(x)= 2x^5 +9$



How would I do so?



Thanks







calculus functions






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Cornman

6,2182 gold badges13 silver badges33 bronze badges




6,2182 gold badges13 silver badges33 bronze badges






New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









Peter F.Peter F.

433 bronze badges




433 bronze badges




New contributor



Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Peter F. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    8 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
Welcome to Mathematics Stack Exchange. For injective, you may show that if $2x^5+9=2a^5+9$ then $x=a$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@J.W.Tanner So basically I have to start with $a=2x^5+9$ and do equivalent operations until boths sides are the same?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
You should start with $2a^5+9=2x^5+9$; also, consider what would happen if the function were $2x^colorred2+9$ instead
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
8 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2
















$begingroup$

Your function is given by



$g:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g(x)=2x^5+9$.



We want to check if $g$ is injective/surjective. You have several ways to do that.
An analytic (more advanced) approach on surjectivity would to observe that:



$lim_xtoinfty g(x)=infty$ and



$lim_xto -infty g(x)=-infty$



By the mean-value theorem $g$ is surjective.



An analytic approach for injectivity would be to calculate



$g'(x)=10x^4$. We have that $g'(x)>0$ for every $xinmathbbR$. So $g$ is always increasing and thus injective.



As I said these methods are more advanced (but still pretty basic and are thought in a beginners analysis course).
I assume that you are starting out.



So an other approach is straight by definition.




For injectivity we have to show that if $g(a)=g(b)Rightarrow a=b$




We have $g(a)=g(b)Leftrightarrow 2a^5+9=2b^5+9Leftrightarrow a^5-b^5=0Leftrightarrow (a-b)(a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4)=0$



So either a-b=0 which implies a=b (what we had to show)



Or $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4=0$ but this is only $0$ iff $a=b=0$.



If $a=b=0$ there is nothing to show.
So let $a,bneq 0$. Then we can seperate 3 cases. $a,b>0$, $a,b<0$ and (without loss of generality) $a>0$ and $b<0$




Without loss of generality means that we can assume $a>0$ and $b<0$ and do not need to show the other case $a<0$ and $b>0$. Because there is symmetrie in the expression and if the inequalities are swapped, we could just swap a and b too.




If $a,b>0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$.



If $a,b<0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$. Since every summand is positive. You might want to check that for yourself, if it is not clear.



If $a>0$ and $b<0$, then $underbracea^4_>0+underbracea^3b_<0+underbracea^2b^2_>0+underbraceab^3_<0+underbraceb^4_>0$



Why is this now positive?
Well we have either $|a|geq |b|$ or $|a|leq |b|$.



If $|a|geq |b|$. Then we have that $a^4+a^3b>0$. Since $a^3(a+b)>0$ since every factor is positiv. $a^3$ is positiv for sure, since $a>0$.



Why is $a+b>0$? Since $|a|geq |b|$. Think about that.




Keep in mind that I am avoiding the use of the fifth root $sqrt[5]square$, because you might not know that concept yet in your class.




Else we could just use that here and deduce $a=b$ that way.
The approach above is the most 'basic'.



After all we showed that $g(a)=g(b)$ implies $a=b$. So $g$ is injective.




$g$ is surjective is showed like this:



By definition we have to show that for every $yinmathbbR$ (value range) there is some $xinmathbbR$ (definition range) such that $g(x)=y$.




So we have to solve the equation $2x^5+9=y$ for $x$.



This is done easily with the use of the fifth root (which we avoided earlier, but unfortunatly can not(!) avoid here).



We get: $x=sqrt[5]fracy-92$.



Indeed:



$g(sqrt[5]fracy-92)=2left(sqrt[5]fracy-92right)^5+9=2fracy-92+9=y$.




Notice that we have shown more here. We jus calculated the inverse function of $g$. Which is given by $g^-1:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g^-1(x)=sqrt[5]fracx-92$




We can check this by showing:



$g(g^-1(y))=y$ and $g^-1(g(x))=x$



Then $g^-1$ is indeed the inverse to $g$ and this shows immediatly that $g$ is not just surjective, but also injective!






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago


















2
















$begingroup$

Since $f'(x)=10x^4$ maintains a positive sign (except at finitely many points) for all real $x,$ it follows that the function $f(x)$ is monotonic on the real axis, and therefore injective there.



For surjectivity, note that as $xtopminfty,$ we have that $f(x)topminfty$ too respectively. Since the function is continuous, it follows by IVT that it is surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago


















1
















$begingroup$

Since in $Bbb R$, the following functions are bijective, so is their composition:
$$xmapsto x^5\ xmapsto 2x\ xmapsto x+9$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Verify the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    8 hours ago


















1
















$begingroup$

hint
You can put



$$f(x)=x^5$$
and



$$h(x)=2x+9$$



with $ g = h circ f $.



it is easy to prove that $f$ and $ h$ are bijectives.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);







Peter F. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381919%2fhow-to-verify-whether-function-is-surjective-or-injective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2
















$begingroup$

Your function is given by



$g:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g(x)=2x^5+9$.



We want to check if $g$ is injective/surjective. You have several ways to do that.
An analytic (more advanced) approach on surjectivity would to observe that:



$lim_xtoinfty g(x)=infty$ and



$lim_xto -infty g(x)=-infty$



By the mean-value theorem $g$ is surjective.



An analytic approach for injectivity would be to calculate



$g'(x)=10x^4$. We have that $g'(x)>0$ for every $xinmathbbR$. So $g$ is always increasing and thus injective.



As I said these methods are more advanced (but still pretty basic and are thought in a beginners analysis course).
I assume that you are starting out.



So an other approach is straight by definition.




For injectivity we have to show that if $g(a)=g(b)Rightarrow a=b$




We have $g(a)=g(b)Leftrightarrow 2a^5+9=2b^5+9Leftrightarrow a^5-b^5=0Leftrightarrow (a-b)(a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4)=0$



So either a-b=0 which implies a=b (what we had to show)



Or $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4=0$ but this is only $0$ iff $a=b=0$.



If $a=b=0$ there is nothing to show.
So let $a,bneq 0$. Then we can seperate 3 cases. $a,b>0$, $a,b<0$ and (without loss of generality) $a>0$ and $b<0$




Without loss of generality means that we can assume $a>0$ and $b<0$ and do not need to show the other case $a<0$ and $b>0$. Because there is symmetrie in the expression and if the inequalities are swapped, we could just swap a and b too.




If $a,b>0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$.



If $a,b<0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$. Since every summand is positive. You might want to check that for yourself, if it is not clear.



If $a>0$ and $b<0$, then $underbracea^4_>0+underbracea^3b_<0+underbracea^2b^2_>0+underbraceab^3_<0+underbraceb^4_>0$



Why is this now positive?
Well we have either $|a|geq |b|$ or $|a|leq |b|$.



If $|a|geq |b|$. Then we have that $a^4+a^3b>0$. Since $a^3(a+b)>0$ since every factor is positiv. $a^3$ is positiv for sure, since $a>0$.



Why is $a+b>0$? Since $|a|geq |b|$. Think about that.




Keep in mind that I am avoiding the use of the fifth root $sqrt[5]square$, because you might not know that concept yet in your class.




Else we could just use that here and deduce $a=b$ that way.
The approach above is the most 'basic'.



After all we showed that $g(a)=g(b)$ implies $a=b$. So $g$ is injective.




$g$ is surjective is showed like this:



By definition we have to show that for every $yinmathbbR$ (value range) there is some $xinmathbbR$ (definition range) such that $g(x)=y$.




So we have to solve the equation $2x^5+9=y$ for $x$.



This is done easily with the use of the fifth root (which we avoided earlier, but unfortunatly can not(!) avoid here).



We get: $x=sqrt[5]fracy-92$.



Indeed:



$g(sqrt[5]fracy-92)=2left(sqrt[5]fracy-92right)^5+9=2fracy-92+9=y$.




Notice that we have shown more here. We jus calculated the inverse function of $g$. Which is given by $g^-1:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g^-1(x)=sqrt[5]fracx-92$




We can check this by showing:



$g(g^-1(y))=y$ and $g^-1(g(x))=x$



Then $g^-1$ is indeed the inverse to $g$ and this shows immediatly that $g$ is not just surjective, but also injective!






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago















2
















$begingroup$

Your function is given by



$g:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g(x)=2x^5+9$.



We want to check if $g$ is injective/surjective. You have several ways to do that.
An analytic (more advanced) approach on surjectivity would to observe that:



$lim_xtoinfty g(x)=infty$ and



$lim_xto -infty g(x)=-infty$



By the mean-value theorem $g$ is surjective.



An analytic approach for injectivity would be to calculate



$g'(x)=10x^4$. We have that $g'(x)>0$ for every $xinmathbbR$. So $g$ is always increasing and thus injective.



As I said these methods are more advanced (but still pretty basic and are thought in a beginners analysis course).
I assume that you are starting out.



So an other approach is straight by definition.




For injectivity we have to show that if $g(a)=g(b)Rightarrow a=b$




We have $g(a)=g(b)Leftrightarrow 2a^5+9=2b^5+9Leftrightarrow a^5-b^5=0Leftrightarrow (a-b)(a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4)=0$



So either a-b=0 which implies a=b (what we had to show)



Or $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4=0$ but this is only $0$ iff $a=b=0$.



If $a=b=0$ there is nothing to show.
So let $a,bneq 0$. Then we can seperate 3 cases. $a,b>0$, $a,b<0$ and (without loss of generality) $a>0$ and $b<0$




Without loss of generality means that we can assume $a>0$ and $b<0$ and do not need to show the other case $a<0$ and $b>0$. Because there is symmetrie in the expression and if the inequalities are swapped, we could just swap a and b too.




If $a,b>0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$.



If $a,b<0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$. Since every summand is positive. You might want to check that for yourself, if it is not clear.



If $a>0$ and $b<0$, then $underbracea^4_>0+underbracea^3b_<0+underbracea^2b^2_>0+underbraceab^3_<0+underbraceb^4_>0$



Why is this now positive?
Well we have either $|a|geq |b|$ or $|a|leq |b|$.



If $|a|geq |b|$. Then we have that $a^4+a^3b>0$. Since $a^3(a+b)>0$ since every factor is positiv. $a^3$ is positiv for sure, since $a>0$.



Why is $a+b>0$? Since $|a|geq |b|$. Think about that.




Keep in mind that I am avoiding the use of the fifth root $sqrt[5]square$, because you might not know that concept yet in your class.




Else we could just use that here and deduce $a=b$ that way.
The approach above is the most 'basic'.



After all we showed that $g(a)=g(b)$ implies $a=b$. So $g$ is injective.




$g$ is surjective is showed like this:



By definition we have to show that for every $yinmathbbR$ (value range) there is some $xinmathbbR$ (definition range) such that $g(x)=y$.




So we have to solve the equation $2x^5+9=y$ for $x$.



This is done easily with the use of the fifth root (which we avoided earlier, but unfortunatly can not(!) avoid here).



We get: $x=sqrt[5]fracy-92$.



Indeed:



$g(sqrt[5]fracy-92)=2left(sqrt[5]fracy-92right)^5+9=2fracy-92+9=y$.




Notice that we have shown more here. We jus calculated the inverse function of $g$. Which is given by $g^-1:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g^-1(x)=sqrt[5]fracx-92$




We can check this by showing:



$g(g^-1(y))=y$ and $g^-1(g(x))=x$



Then $g^-1$ is indeed the inverse to $g$ and this shows immediatly that $g$ is not just surjective, but also injective!






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago













2














2










2







$begingroup$

Your function is given by



$g:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g(x)=2x^5+9$.



We want to check if $g$ is injective/surjective. You have several ways to do that.
An analytic (more advanced) approach on surjectivity would to observe that:



$lim_xtoinfty g(x)=infty$ and



$lim_xto -infty g(x)=-infty$



By the mean-value theorem $g$ is surjective.



An analytic approach for injectivity would be to calculate



$g'(x)=10x^4$. We have that $g'(x)>0$ for every $xinmathbbR$. So $g$ is always increasing and thus injective.



As I said these methods are more advanced (but still pretty basic and are thought in a beginners analysis course).
I assume that you are starting out.



So an other approach is straight by definition.




For injectivity we have to show that if $g(a)=g(b)Rightarrow a=b$




We have $g(a)=g(b)Leftrightarrow 2a^5+9=2b^5+9Leftrightarrow a^5-b^5=0Leftrightarrow (a-b)(a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4)=0$



So either a-b=0 which implies a=b (what we had to show)



Or $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4=0$ but this is only $0$ iff $a=b=0$.



If $a=b=0$ there is nothing to show.
So let $a,bneq 0$. Then we can seperate 3 cases. $a,b>0$, $a,b<0$ and (without loss of generality) $a>0$ and $b<0$




Without loss of generality means that we can assume $a>0$ and $b<0$ and do not need to show the other case $a<0$ and $b>0$. Because there is symmetrie in the expression and if the inequalities are swapped, we could just swap a and b too.




If $a,b>0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$.



If $a,b<0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$. Since every summand is positive. You might want to check that for yourself, if it is not clear.



If $a>0$ and $b<0$, then $underbracea^4_>0+underbracea^3b_<0+underbracea^2b^2_>0+underbraceab^3_<0+underbraceb^4_>0$



Why is this now positive?
Well we have either $|a|geq |b|$ or $|a|leq |b|$.



If $|a|geq |b|$. Then we have that $a^4+a^3b>0$. Since $a^3(a+b)>0$ since every factor is positiv. $a^3$ is positiv for sure, since $a>0$.



Why is $a+b>0$? Since $|a|geq |b|$. Think about that.




Keep in mind that I am avoiding the use of the fifth root $sqrt[5]square$, because you might not know that concept yet in your class.




Else we could just use that here and deduce $a=b$ that way.
The approach above is the most 'basic'.



After all we showed that $g(a)=g(b)$ implies $a=b$. So $g$ is injective.




$g$ is surjective is showed like this:



By definition we have to show that for every $yinmathbbR$ (value range) there is some $xinmathbbR$ (definition range) such that $g(x)=y$.




So we have to solve the equation $2x^5+9=y$ for $x$.



This is done easily with the use of the fifth root (which we avoided earlier, but unfortunatly can not(!) avoid here).



We get: $x=sqrt[5]fracy-92$.



Indeed:



$g(sqrt[5]fracy-92)=2left(sqrt[5]fracy-92right)^5+9=2fracy-92+9=y$.




Notice that we have shown more here. We jus calculated the inverse function of $g$. Which is given by $g^-1:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g^-1(x)=sqrt[5]fracx-92$




We can check this by showing:



$g(g^-1(y))=y$ and $g^-1(g(x))=x$



Then $g^-1$ is indeed the inverse to $g$ and this shows immediatly that $g$ is not just surjective, but also injective!






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$



Your function is given by



$g:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g(x)=2x^5+9$.



We want to check if $g$ is injective/surjective. You have several ways to do that.
An analytic (more advanced) approach on surjectivity would to observe that:



$lim_xtoinfty g(x)=infty$ and



$lim_xto -infty g(x)=-infty$



By the mean-value theorem $g$ is surjective.



An analytic approach for injectivity would be to calculate



$g'(x)=10x^4$. We have that $g'(x)>0$ for every $xinmathbbR$. So $g$ is always increasing and thus injective.



As I said these methods are more advanced (but still pretty basic and are thought in a beginners analysis course).
I assume that you are starting out.



So an other approach is straight by definition.




For injectivity we have to show that if $g(a)=g(b)Rightarrow a=b$




We have $g(a)=g(b)Leftrightarrow 2a^5+9=2b^5+9Leftrightarrow a^5-b^5=0Leftrightarrow (a-b)(a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4)=0$



So either a-b=0 which implies a=b (what we had to show)



Or $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4=0$ but this is only $0$ iff $a=b=0$.



If $a=b=0$ there is nothing to show.
So let $a,bneq 0$. Then we can seperate 3 cases. $a,b>0$, $a,b<0$ and (without loss of generality) $a>0$ and $b<0$




Without loss of generality means that we can assume $a>0$ and $b<0$ and do not need to show the other case $a<0$ and $b>0$. Because there is symmetrie in the expression and if the inequalities are swapped, we could just swap a and b too.




If $a,b>0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$.



If $a,b<0$ then $a^4+a^3b+a^2b^2+ab^3+b^4>0$. Since every summand is positive. You might want to check that for yourself, if it is not clear.



If $a>0$ and $b<0$, then $underbracea^4_>0+underbracea^3b_<0+underbracea^2b^2_>0+underbraceab^3_<0+underbraceb^4_>0$



Why is this now positive?
Well we have either $|a|geq |b|$ or $|a|leq |b|$.



If $|a|geq |b|$. Then we have that $a^4+a^3b>0$. Since $a^3(a+b)>0$ since every factor is positiv. $a^3$ is positiv for sure, since $a>0$.



Why is $a+b>0$? Since $|a|geq |b|$. Think about that.




Keep in mind that I am avoiding the use of the fifth root $sqrt[5]square$, because you might not know that concept yet in your class.




Else we could just use that here and deduce $a=b$ that way.
The approach above is the most 'basic'.



After all we showed that $g(a)=g(b)$ implies $a=b$. So $g$ is injective.




$g$ is surjective is showed like this:



By definition we have to show that for every $yinmathbbR$ (value range) there is some $xinmathbbR$ (definition range) such that $g(x)=y$.




So we have to solve the equation $2x^5+9=y$ for $x$.



This is done easily with the use of the fifth root (which we avoided earlier, but unfortunatly can not(!) avoid here).



We get: $x=sqrt[5]fracy-92$.



Indeed:



$g(sqrt[5]fracy-92)=2left(sqrt[5]fracy-92right)^5+9=2fracy-92+9=y$.




Notice that we have shown more here. We jus calculated the inverse function of $g$. Which is given by $g^-1:mathbbRtomathbbR$, $g^-1(x)=sqrt[5]fracx-92$




We can check this by showing:



$g(g^-1(y))=y$ and $g^-1(g(x))=x$



Then $g^-1$ is indeed the inverse to $g$ and this shows immediatly that $g$ is not just surjective, but also injective!







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









CornmanCornman

6,2182 gold badges13 silver badges33 bronze badges




6,2182 gold badges13 silver badges33 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Wow, thanks for such a detailed answer. To verify if I understand correctly; function is injective if it's always increasing or decreasing, so I just have to verify that?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
In general you can not use every method (exept the proof by definition) to every function. Your function has some properties other functions do not have. It is differentiable and continuous. To talk about the derivate you need a differentiable function, but not every function is.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PeterF. Also it depends on what you have showed in your lecture, as I tried to emphazise. If you have shown that result, you can use it. If the method can be applied.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
We didn't establish the concepts of differentiability and continuity (yet) at our lecture.
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
7 hours ago













$begingroup$
@PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PeterF. That is what I thought. So you have to use the approach by definition. I do not think that you have to avoid the use of the fifth root and can use that, because the part about surjectivity would not be possible then. At least I do not see a way to avoid the fifth root there.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
7 hours ago













2
















$begingroup$

Since $f'(x)=10x^4$ maintains a positive sign (except at finitely many points) for all real $x,$ it follows that the function $f(x)$ is monotonic on the real axis, and therefore injective there.



For surjectivity, note that as $xtopminfty,$ we have that $f(x)topminfty$ too respectively. Since the function is continuous, it follows by IVT that it is surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago















2
















$begingroup$

Since $f'(x)=10x^4$ maintains a positive sign (except at finitely many points) for all real $x,$ it follows that the function $f(x)$ is monotonic on the real axis, and therefore injective there.



For surjectivity, note that as $xtopminfty,$ we have that $f(x)topminfty$ too respectively. Since the function is continuous, it follows by IVT that it is surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago













2














2










2







$begingroup$

Since $f'(x)=10x^4$ maintains a positive sign (except at finitely many points) for all real $x,$ it follows that the function $f(x)$ is monotonic on the real axis, and therefore injective there.



For surjectivity, note that as $xtopminfty,$ we have that $f(x)topminfty$ too respectively. Since the function is continuous, it follows by IVT that it is surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



Since $f'(x)=10x^4$ maintains a positive sign (except at finitely many points) for all real $x,$ it follows that the function $f(x)$ is monotonic on the real axis, and therefore injective there.



For surjectivity, note that as $xtopminfty,$ we have that $f(x)topminfty$ too respectively. Since the function is continuous, it follows by IVT that it is surjective.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









AllawonderAllawonder

6,81710 silver badges19 bronze badges




6,81710 silver badges19 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Cornman
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
    $endgroup$
    – Allawonder
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PeterF. Check out my answer for a detailed insight in how to approach this. I showed several methods. Advanced and basic ones.
$endgroup$
– Cornman
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
$endgroup$
– Allawonder
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PeterF. In general, there is no recipe. However, the closest to being general is probably to try to apply the definitions first.
$endgroup$
– Allawonder
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
$endgroup$
– Allawonder
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@PeterF. For differentiable functions, you can always check the sign of the derivative for injectivity, as done above. Also, for functions continuous on their domain, you can always check the endpoints as done above to see if they're of different sign.
$endgroup$
– Allawonder
7 hours ago











1
















$begingroup$

Since in $Bbb R$, the following functions are bijective, so is their composition:
$$xmapsto x^5\ xmapsto 2x\ xmapsto x+9$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Verify the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    8 hours ago















1
















$begingroup$

Since in $Bbb R$, the following functions are bijective, so is their composition:
$$xmapsto x^5\ xmapsto 2x\ xmapsto x+9$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Verify the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    8 hours ago













1














1










1







$begingroup$

Since in $Bbb R$, the following functions are bijective, so is their composition:
$$xmapsto x^5\ xmapsto 2x\ xmapsto x+9$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



Since in $Bbb R$, the following functions are bijective, so is their composition:
$$xmapsto x^5\ xmapsto 2x\ xmapsto x+9$$







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









BerciBerci

66.2k2 gold badges42 silver badges76 bronze badges




66.2k2 gold badges42 silver badges76 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Verify the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Verify the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Verify the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Berci
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Verify the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Berci
8 hours ago











1
















$begingroup$

hint
You can put



$$f(x)=x^5$$
and



$$h(x)=2x+9$$



with $ g = h circ f $.



it is easy to prove that $f$ and $ h$ are bijectives.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago















1
















$begingroup$

hint
You can put



$$f(x)=x^5$$
and



$$h(x)=2x+9$$



with $ g = h circ f $.



it is easy to prove that $f$ and $ h$ are bijectives.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago













1














1










1







$begingroup$

hint
You can put



$$f(x)=x^5$$
and



$$h(x)=2x+9$$



with $ g = h circ f $.



it is easy to prove that $f$ and $ h$ are bijectives.






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$



hint
You can put



$$f(x)=x^5$$
and



$$h(x)=2x+9$$



with $ g = h circ f $.



it is easy to prove that $f$ and $ h$ are bijectives.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer




share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









hamam_Abdallahhamam_Abdallah

39.8k2 gold badges17 silver badges35 bronze badges




39.8k2 gold badges17 silver badges35 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
    $endgroup$
    – Peter F.
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
And how would I prove that some function is injective or surjective in general?
$endgroup$
– Peter F.
8 hours ago











Peter F. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded

















Peter F. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter F. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter F. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381919%2fhow-to-verify-whether-function-is-surjective-or-injective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її