algebra permutationsElement of Largest Order in $S_n$Permutation Group NotationSome naive questions about embeddingsStabilizers of permutationsPrimitive Element theorem, permutationsNumber of permutations with given cyclic structureLinear Algebra question on permutationsNumber of Even Permutations $p$ such that $pqp^-1=q$Absract Algebra: PermutationsEquivalence relation on $S_n$ involving algebraic permutations

How can demon technology be prevented from surpassing humans?

Can i hide one of my siamese twins heads in public?

An idiomatic word for "very little" in this context?

Reading an LP/MPS file using Pyomo software

Is it possible to do a low carb diet for a month in Sicily?

Is consistent disregard for students' time "normal" in undergraduate research?

Can digital computers understand infinity?

Would a physician with migraine better treat their patients?

How to protect my Wi-Fi password from being displayed by Android phones when sharing it with QR code?

Fill a bowl with alphabet soup

Why is lying to Congress a crime?

What happens if undefined C++ behaviour meets C defined behaviour?

What is the use of putting the grave accent after catcode?

Is Having my Players Control Two Parties a Good Idea?

Are There 3D Rules for Flying and Distance?

Did smallpox emerge in 1580?

Proofreading a novel: is it okay to use a question mark with an exclamation mark - "?!"

I didn't do any exit passport control when leaving Japan. What should I do?

Novel set in the future, children cannot change the class they are born into, one class is made uneducated by associating books with pain

Trek Madone SLR Di2

How should I tell a professor the answer to something he doesn't know?

Does my code handle negative numbers or zero when summing squared digits?

The colors in Resident Evil 7 are *completely* off

Why is it popular to teach modulus via the example of mod 12 and analogue clocks?



algebra permutations


Element of Largest Order in $S_n$Permutation Group NotationSome naive questions about embeddingsStabilizers of permutationsPrimitive Element theorem, permutationsNumber of permutations with given cyclic structureLinear Algebra question on permutationsNumber of Even Permutations $p$ such that $pqp^-1=q$Absract Algebra: PermutationsEquivalence relation on $S_n$ involving algebraic permutations






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








3














$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago

















3














$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Ok, this is rather a question than a problem. So, if we have $sigma:in S_n$ a permutation, why there is a natural number, say $p$, such that $sigma^p=e$, where $e$ is the identical permutation?







abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









NumbersNumbers

1616 bronze badges




1616 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    8 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
It would improve your posts of Questions to work out an example or two, so that you can provide Readers with a better indication of where you got with understanding the underlying mechanism, e.g. in this case taking a power of a permutation of $n$ things.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4
















$begingroup$

In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
    $endgroup$
    – Numbers
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    8 hours ago


















0
















$begingroup$

The set $$sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



That is $$sigma ^m-n=e$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$






















    0
















    $begingroup$

    One more methodical idea is the following:



    Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
    beginalign
    a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
    a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
    &;; vdots\
    a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
    endalign

    sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_i+1, a_i+1 to a_i+2,dots$.



    An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
    beginalign
    1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
    2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
    3 to 1 to 2 to 3
    endalign






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$
















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381779%2falgebra-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4
















      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        8 hours ago















      4
















      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        8 hours ago













      4














      4










      4







      $begingroup$

      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      In any finite group every element has finite order by Lagrange. Hence for every $sigmain S_n$ there exists a $p$ such that $sigma ^p=id$. However, the largest possible order of an element in $S_n$ is much smaller than the group order, see here:



      Element of Largest Order in $S_n$







      share|cite|improve this answer













      share|cite|improve this answer




      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

      88k6 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges




      88k6 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges














      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        8 hours ago
















      • $begingroup$
        yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
        $endgroup$
        – Numbers
        8 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
        $endgroup$
        – Dietrich Burde
        8 hours ago















      $begingroup$
      yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
      $endgroup$
      – Numbers
      8 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      yeah, ok, I forgot to mention that I don t now group theory.
      $endgroup$
      – Numbers
      8 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      8 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Lagrange is at the very beginning of group theory, and you don't have to know group theory for it.
      $endgroup$
      – Dietrich Burde
      8 hours ago













      0
















      $begingroup$

      The set $$sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



      That is $$sigma ^m-n=e$$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



















        0
















        $begingroup$

        The set $$sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



        That is $$sigma ^m-n=e$$






        share|cite|improve this answer










        $endgroup$

















          0














          0










          0







          $begingroup$

          The set $$sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



          That is $$sigma ^m-n=e$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          The set $$sigma,sigma^2, sigma^3,...$$ is finite so at some points we have $sigma ^m=sigma^n$



          That is $$sigma ^m-n=e$$







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer




          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Mohammad Riazi-KermaniMohammad Riazi-Kermani

          54.4k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges




          54.4k4 gold badges27 silver badges74 bronze badges
























              0
















              $begingroup$

              One more methodical idea is the following:



              Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
              beginalign
              a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
              a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
              &;; vdots\
              a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
              endalign

              sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_i+1, a_i+1 to a_i+2,dots$.



              An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
              beginalign
              1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
              2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
              3 to 1 to 2 to 3
              endalign






              share|cite|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



















                0
















                $begingroup$

                One more methodical idea is the following:



                Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                beginalign
                a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                &;; vdots\
                a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                endalign

                sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_i+1, a_i+1 to a_i+2,dots$.



                An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                beginalign
                1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                endalign






                share|cite|improve this answer










                $endgroup$

















                  0














                  0










                  0







                  $begingroup$

                  One more methodical idea is the following:



                  Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                  beginalign
                  a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                  a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                  &;; vdots\
                  a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                  endalign

                  sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_i+1, a_i+1 to a_i+2,dots$.



                  An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                  beginalign
                  1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                  2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                  3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                  endalign






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  One more methodical idea is the following:



                  Let $sigma = (a_1a_2dots a_k)$. Consider $$sigma^k = (a_1a_2dots a_k)(a_1a_2dots a_k)cdots (a_1a_2dots a_k).$$ Then
                  beginalign
                  a_1 to a_2 to &cdots to a_k to a_1,\
                  a_2 to a_3 to &cdots to a_1 to a_2,\
                  &;; vdots\
                  a_k to a_1 to &cdots to a_1 to a_k,
                  endalign

                  sending every $a_i$ to itself. Think of this as sort of chaining together $a_i to a_i+1, a_i+1 to a_i+2,dots$.



                  An explicit example: If we have $(123)^3 = (123)(123)(123)$, then
                  beginalign
                  1 to 2 to 3 to 1\
                  2 to 3 to 1 to 2\
                  3 to 1 to 2 to 3
                  endalign







                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  share|cite|improve this answer




                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  HendrixHendrix

                  4414 silver badges15 bronze badges




                  4414 silver badges15 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3381779%2falgebra-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її