Back to the Tunguska
Homepage













EXPERIMENTAL HINTS ON THE FRAGMENTATION
OF THE TUNGUSKA COSMIC BODY



R. Serra 1, S. Cecchini 2  M. Galli 1 and
G. Longo 1-3



1 - Dipartimento di Fisica
dell'Universita' di Bologna, Via Irnerio 46, Bologna (Italy)

2 - Istituto di Studio e Tecnologie delle Radiazioni Extraterrestri, CNR, Via
De' Castagnoli 1, Bologna (Italy)

3 - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna, Via Irnerio
46, Bologna (Italy)



(Published on: Planetary and
Space Science
, 42, n.9, p. 777-783; 1994)















Abstract



It has been found that in the resin of trees that have survived
the Tunguska catastrophe, the quantity of microsized particles trapped at the
moment of the event vary markedly from one site to another. The high density
of particles found in the trees close to the epicentre, may be an
experimental point in favour of the fragmentation model recently developed
for the Tunguska body.


Introduction


It has been shown in a previous work, that new experimental data on the
composition of the Tunguska Cosmic Body (TCB) can be obtained by searching in
the tree-resin for microsized particles trapped at the moment of the event
(Longo et al.. 1994). After dating the resin on the basis of the
growth tree-rings, the size, morphology and chemical composition of the
particles trapped have been determined using a scanning electron microscope
equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer. Thus, 5854 particles
have been found in the resin deposited in the years 1885-1930 on the branches
of 7 Tunguska trees. Among them, of particular interest was a group of 518
particles, the so-called "high-Z" particles, containing at least 1
% of one of the following elements: Ti, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Sr, Ag,
Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, W, Au, Pb and Bi. Indeed, the time distributions of these
particles, clearly showing peaks centred on 1908, made it possible to
recognise a first list of 14 elements as probable constituents of the TCB.

In the present work, in order to search for experimental indications on the
mechanism of the Tunguska explosion, the same particles are examined in more
detail taking into account their provenance from trees located in different
directions and at different distances from the epicentre of the explosion.


Tunguska trees examined


The region of the Tunguska catastrophe is shown in Fig. 1. As can be seen,
the area of overthrown trees extends over 2,150 km2 and inside it
about 1,000 km2 of forest has been charred. The
"butterfly" shape of the area of forest devastation has been
explained by a superposition of a spherical blast wave generated by the
terminal explosion of the TCB in the atmosphere and a conical ballistic wave
axially symmetrical to the approach path of the body itself (Zotkin and
Tsikulin 1966).




























Figure 1


The region of the Tunguska catastrophe
and the trajectory of the TCB.

- . - . -  limit of overthrown trees

------  limit of charred trees

__   hide huts of the closest eyewitnessess.




In the inset:     M = Moscow             
T = Tomsk

                         
K = Krasnojarsk        V
= Vanavara.


 

The shaded area corresponds to Fig. 3.



The conclusion that the TCB exploded at a height of 8 2 km above a point
of the earth surface (60 53' 09" N, 101 53' 40" E), usually
called "epicentre", has been definitely acquired after more than 20
years of intensive work which mainly consisted in measuring the azimuths of
many tens of thousands (out of several tens of millions) of felled tree
trunks in 1,475 "points" (with a surface of 0.25 hectare each) in
the Tunguska region (Florenskij 1963, Fast 1967, Fast et al. 1967,
Fast et al. 1976, Fast et al. 1983). An impressive result of
this work is shown in Fig. 2, reproduced from the paper of Fast et al.
(1976).






 



Figure 2



Isolines of the field of the azimuths of
felled trees, in degrees to the east of the magnetic North (The azimuth =
0 corresponds to the direction of the magnetic North).




The values printed diagonally are the azimuths calculated for 1 km
2 surfaces
by the interpolating the measured average azimuth-values.



 Here the field of the directions of overthrown trees is given in
degrees to the east of the magnetic North. In their works Fast and coworkers
use a coordinate system whose x-axis (ordinate) and y-axis (abscissa) are
rotated to the east of the true meridian respectively by 4 and 94. In their
system the singularity of the field of the azimuths of felled trees is found
to have the coordinates x = 39.2 km, y = 20.7 km, which correspond to the
geographical coordinates of the epicentre given above. A detailed analysis of
the deviations from a strict radial direction of the measured azimuths
(taking into account the effect of local relief on the propagation of the
explosive wave) made it possible to determine the terminal trajectory of the
TCB.

In Fig. 3, which corresponds to the shaded area of Fig. 1, are indicated the
itineraries covered by the authors of the present work and the places where
the wood samples with resin were taken. As explained in the previous paper
(Longo et al. 1994), the resin samples from the roots of tree n 2,
uprooted by the explosion of 1908, were taken as control samples and are of
no interest for the present investigation. Nor is tree n 3 considered here
due to the fact that the resin examined was originated mainly by a trauma
caused by the 1908 explosion and therefore is different from the other resin
samples, taken from withered branches of living trees, which were the main
object of searching. This leaves us with 6 trees coming from 4 different
sites of the Tunguska region.






 



Figure 3



Itineraries (- - - - -) and
places ( O ) where the numbered trees were growing.



 Results


The 409 high-Z particles, found in the 1902-1914 resin of these 6 trees
and which can be related to the Tunguska event, are divided in Table 1 with
reference to their provenance from four different sites. Taking into account
that the resin surface examined on different trees was not the same, the data
are presented in per mil with respect to the total number of particles found
in the corresponding trees (fifth column), and in the number of high-Z
particles found on one square centimetre of resin surface (sixth column). As
can be seen from Table 1, both these values markedly vary from one site to
another.

All the resin samples were taken from Siberian spruces (Picea obovata),
with abundant resin, except for the samples taken for comparison from tree n
5, a Siberian pine (Pinus cembra). If the data for trees n 5 and n 6
are considered separately, the data for the high-Z particles from Siberian
spruce n 6 reach the values of 331 per mil and 186 particles/cm2.
The data on high-Z particles trapped in 1902-1914 in the 5 trees of the same
species (Picea obovata) are graphed in Fig. 4.






 



Figure 4



High-Z particles found in the resin samples
from Siberian spruces in the period 1902-1914.



 For each tree, clear abundance peaks of high-Z particles have been
found corresponding to the date of the Tunguska event, though with great
quantitative difference from one peak to another, as can be seen from the
graphs in Fig. 5. This figure shows the main part of the time distribution
for the 84 high-Z particles out of 2241 and for the 178 high-Z particles out
of 733 respectively found in tree n 1 and in tree n 6 in the three periods
considered: 1902-1914, which corresponds to particles that can be related to
the Tunguska event; 1885-1901 and 1915-1930, which correspond to
"background particles" trapped before and after the Tunguska event.

The differences between the data (fifth and sixth column of Table 1) for tree
n 1 and trees n 4 + n 8 can probably be related to the different distances
of these trees from the epicentre. The position of tree n 7, on the
continuation of the trajectory of the TCB, can explain the enhanced values
found in this case.

What remains difficult to understand are the striking differences between the
data for tree n 1 and for trees n 5 + n 6 (Table 1) and especially that
between trees n 1 and n 6 (Figs 4-5). These differences cannot be
attributed to the distance from the epicentre on the ground: in each case the
distance from the explosion point, at an altitude of about 8 kilometres, is
practically the same.






 



Figure 5



Time distribution (per mil) of the high-Z
particles found in the resin samples from tree n 6 and tree n 1.



 Discussion and
conclusions


The quantitative differences illustrated in Table 1 and in Figs. 4-5 may
be fortuitous. Many different causes can affect the quantity of trapped
particles: the fluidity of the resin, the screening by other branches or
trees, etc... However, the effect of such accidental causes is attenuated for
particles coming from an altitude of about 8 km and for data like those of Table
1 referring to tree n 1 or to trees n 5 + n 6, which are each obtained by
summing the data for 6 resin samples from 3 different branches. Therefore the
different quantity of high-Z particles trapped in these trees is probably too
large to be fortuitous.

If this is not so, one possible explanation of the case can be sought in
Kulik's idea of the existence of secondary centres of the explosive
wave propagation. This idea was based on examination of the results of the
aerial photographic survey of the central part of the Tunguska region,
carried out in 1938 under the direction of Kulik. The survey consisted in
1,500 good quality photographs, on a scale 1:4700, covering an area of 250 km2
of devastated forest (Kulik 1939, Kulik 1940). As stated by Krinov (1966),
"the individual flattened trees were clearly seen in the photographs.
Even in the unenlarged prints, the directions in which their tops and roots
were facing could be easily made out". These directions, clearly showing
the general radial pattern of the treefall, made it possible, according to
Kulik, to identify from 2 to 4 secondary centres of wave propagation.

The two main secondary centres, located in the western part of the Southern
swamp, are shown in Fig. 6, where the straight lines indicate the directions
of the fallen trees. Figure 6 is drawn on the basis of Kulik's figure (1939)
with the addition of some lines taken from the subsequent papers (Kulik 1940,
Krinov 1949), where the directions of overthrown trees were indicated with
the aid of threads extended over a field mosaic photographic chart of the
region.






 



Figure 6



The two main secondary centres of explosive
wave propagation (circles) according to Kulik (1939, 1940).


 


 The straight lines indicate the
directions of the fallen trees. The shaded region corresponds to the
western part of the Southern swamp (see Fig. 3). The cross shows the
position of trees n 5 and n 6.



 It should be noted that Figure 6 does not contradict the trend for
the whole Tunguska region shown in Fig. 2. Indeed, taking into account that
in the vicinity of the epicentre the homogeneity condition is broken, in
Fast's works all the measured azimuth values in a square of 36 km2
around the epicentre are ignored (Fast et al. 1976). The whole area of
Fig. 6 lies inside that square, while outside it Kulik's data reveal an
essentially radial pattern.

The subsequent direct methodical measurement of the azimuths of fallen trees,
begun 20 years after Kulik's aerial survey, has not confirmed the presence of
secondary explosive centres (Florenskij et al. 1960, Florenskij 1963,
Plekhanov 1964). At that time, however, many details visible on Kulik's
photographs had disappeared. The direct measurements, carried out 50-70 years
after the catastrophe, refer to conifers only, the fallen broadleaf trees
(essentially birches and aspens) having rotted away. On the other hand an
accurate examination of the data on the atmospheric and seismic waves
associated with the Tunguska event have confirmed that the catastrophe was
the result of a single explosion, though not definitely ruling out the
possibility of some close explosions, contemporaneous or with short
time-delays between them (Pasechnik 1976).

One of the secondary centres of wave propagation, shown in Fig. 6, is located
on the ground at less than half a kilometre from trees n 5 and n 6. If this
centre really existed, it could explain the data, given in Table 1 and in
Figs. 4-5, only by assuming that it was at a very low altitude, while the
main effects on the whole forest came from an explosion at a greater height.
Though it is difficult to justify such an assumption, it seems worthwhile
to re-examine Kulik's aerial photographic survey with modern instrumentation
and with a computer-aided analysis of the directions of all the fallen trees
visible in these photographs
. As confirmed to the authors of the present
work by N. V. Vasiljev, deputy chairman of the Commission on Meteorites and
Cosmic Dust of the Siberian Section of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and
by G. V. Andreev, chairman of the Tomsk section of the Astronomo-geodesical
Society, Kulik's photographs are preserved in Tomsk in the archives of the
Astronomo-geodesical Society and are available for examination.

A second possible explanation of the data is related to the use of the fragmentation
model
to explain the Tunguska event. Detailed calculations which include
the effect of aerodynamic forces that can fracture the meteoroid, and the
heating of the bolide due to friction with the atmosphere, have recently been
performed, showing that the Tunguska event is fully compatible with the
catastrophic disruption of a 60-100 m diameter asteroid of the common stony
class (Chyba et al. 1993, Hills and Goda 1993).

In the continuous fragmentation model of Hills and Goda (1993) large
asteroids undergo several stages of fragmentation with a progressive increase
in the radius of the debris cloud, a decrease in the maximum size of the
fragments and a progressive increase in the aerodynamic braking until each
piece descends independently to the ground without further fragmentation.
Following this model, the energy dissipation ("explosion") at the
end of the visible path of the Tunguska impactor is sufficient to explain the
2,000 km2 of forest devastation. Assuming an initial diameter of
the impactor equal to about 80 m and an initial impact velocity greater than
20 km/s, the TCB is expected to have produced fragments with a maximum mass
of less than 1 kg (less than 1 g for a velocity greater than 30 km/s).
This "pile of gravel" would probably have formed a layer less than
1 cm thick with a radius of less than 1 km.

If a great portion of this debris cloud fell in the western part of the
Southern swamp, where the Churgima river begins, it was undoubtedly difficult
to find "pieces" of the exploded body by beginning to search for
them in the whole region of forest devastation more than 20 years after the
event.

The high density of microsized particles found in the resin of trees n 5 and
n 6 may be an experimental point in favour of the fragmentation model.
Therefore, it seems worthwhile to continue the search for microremnants of
the TCB in the vicinity of the epicentre and, especially, on the southern
bank of the western part of the Southern swamp.


Acknowledgment
This research was supported in part by MURST (60 %) grants of the
Italian Ministry for the University and the Scientific and Technological
Research.


Table 1.
High-Z particles found in the resin samples from Tunguska branches in the
period 1902-1914. d is the distance of the trees from the epicentre
and S the branch-resin surface examined on these trees.



































Tree
number



d
(km)



S
(cm2)



High-Z
particles



Number
per mil



Particles/cm2



5 + 6



1



2.21



291



268



132



1



3.5



2.12



55



50



26



7



5.5



0.56



37



135



66



4 + 8



7.5



1.45



26



40



18



 References


Chyba, C. F., P. J. Thomas and K. J. Zahnle, The 1908 Tunguska explosion: atmospheric
disruption of a stony asteroid, Nature 361, 40-44, 1993.

Fast, V. G., Statisticheskij analiz parametrov
Tungusskogo vyvala, in Problema Tungusskogo meteorita, part 2, 40-61,
Izdatelstvo Tomskogo Universiteta, Tomsk, 1967.


Fast, V. G., A. P. Bojarkina and M. V. Baklanov, Razrushenija, vyzvannyje
udarnoj volnoj Tungusskogo meteorita, in Problema Tungusskogo meteorita,
part 2, 62-104, Izdatelstvo Tomskogo Universiteta, Tomsk, 1967.


Fast, V. G., A. P. Barannik and S. A. Razin, O pole napravlenij povala
derevjev v rajone padenija Tungusskogo meteorita, in Voprosy meteoritiki,
39-52, Izdatelstvo Tomskogo Universiteta, Tomsk, 1976.


Fast, V. G., N. P. Fast and N. A. Golenberg, Katalog povala lesa, vyzvannogo
Tungusskim meteoritom, in Meteoritnyje i meteornyje issledovanija,
24-74, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1983.


Florenskij, K. P., B. I. Vronskij, Ju. M. Emeljanov, I. T. Zotkin and O. A.
Kirova, Predvaritelnyje rezultaty rabot Tungusskoj meteoritnoj ekspeditsii
1958 g., Meteoritika 19, 103-134, 1960.


Florenskij, K. P., Predvaritelnyje rezultaty Tungusskoj meteoritnoj
kompleksnoj ekspeditsii 1961 g., Meteoritika 23, 3-29, 1963.

Hills, J. G. and M. P. Goda, The fragmentation of small asteroids in
the atmosphere, Astron. J. 105, 1114-1144, 1993.


Krinov E. L., Tungusskij meteorit, Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR,
Moscow-Leningrad, 1949.


Krinov E. L., Giant Meteorites, 125-265, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1966.


Kulik, L. A., Dannyje po Tungusskomu meteoritu k 1939 godu, Doklady Akad.
Nauk SSSR
22, n 8, 520-524, 1939.


Kulik, L. A., Meteoritnaja ekspeditsija na Podkamennuju Tungusku v 1939 g., Doklady
Akad. Nauk SSSR
28, n 7, 597-601, 1940.


Longo, G., R. Serra, S. Cecchini and M. Galli, Search for microremnants of
the Tunguska Cosmic Body, Planet. Space Sci., to be published, 1994.


Pasechnik, I. P., Otsenka parametrov vzryva Tungusskogo meteorita po
seismicheskim i microbarograficheskim dannym, in Kosmicheskoje veshchestvo
na zemle
, 24-54, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1976.


Plekhanov, G. F., Nekotoryje itogi raboty kompleksnoj samodejatel'noj
ekspeditsii po izucheniju problemy Tungusskogo meteorita, Meteoritika
24, 170-176, 1964.


Zotkin, I. T. and M. A. Tsikulin, Simulation of the explosion of the Tungus
meteorite, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 11, 183-186, 1966.












|  Back to the Tunguska
Homepage  |





Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單