Why is this weapon searching for a new owner?Is this homebrew hûthvír-like weapon balanced?Searching for trapsWhy is two-weapon fighting considered subpar for fighters?Searching for a lore-backed mineral that generates heatWhy is this uncommon magic item better than this rare magic item?In the Hoard of the Dragon Queen adventure, why does the cult follow this road?Where is the rule for moving slowly when searching for traps that’s referenced by Dungeon Delver?

Sort files in a given folders and provide as a list

Percentage buffer around multiline in QGIS?

Is there a reliable way to hide/convey a message in vocal expressions (speech, song,...)

The Planck constant for mathematicians

My research paper filed as a patent in China by my Chinese supervisor without me as inventor

Why did they ever make smaller than full-frame sensors?

Can I toggle Do Not Disturb on/off on my Mac as easily as I can on my iPhone?

Why did it become so much more expensive to start a university?

"Literally" Vs "In the true sense of the word"

What explanation do proponents of a Scotland-NI bridge give for it breaking Brexit impasse?

Might have gotten a coworker sick, should I address this?

Is low emotional intelligence associated with right-wing and prejudiced attitudes?

How do email clients "send later" without storing a password?

What is a realistic time needed to get a properly trained army?

What is the derivative of an exponential function with another function as its base?

Were Roman public roads build by private companies?

What was redacted in the Yellowhammer report? (Point 15)

In Germany, how can I maximize the impact of my charitable donations?

How are aircraft depainted?

Can I conceal an antihero's insanity - and should I?

Confirm the ending of a string

A medieval fantasy adventurer lights a torch in a 100% pure oxygen room. What happens?

Why is my fire extinguisher emptied after one use?

A shy person in a queue



Why is this weapon searching for a new owner?


Is this homebrew hûthvír-like weapon balanced?Searching for trapsWhy is two-weapon fighting considered subpar for fighters?Searching for a lore-backed mineral that generates heatWhy is this uncommon magic item better than this rare magic item?In the Hoard of the Dragon Queen adventure, why does the cult follow this road?Where is the rule for moving slowly when searching for traps that’s referenced by Dungeon Delver?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


In Dragon Heist, Meloon Wardragon wields Azuredge, the legendary greataxe.




Forged by the archwizard Ahghairon, this intelligent battleaxe was crafted to defend Waterdeep. Its current wielder is a former member of Force Grey named Meloon Wardragon, but the weapon is searching for a new owner.




Players discover that...




Meloon accompanied a fledgling band of adventurers on an expedition to Undermountain. There, his luck ran out. While resting in the dungeon, the adventuring party was attacked by monsters unleashed by Xanathar - including a number of intellect devourers. One of the creatures succeeded in magically devouring and replacing Meloon's brain, turning the champion of Tymora into a puppet. After finishing off his unsuspecting companions, Meloon returned to Waterdeep as a Xanathar Guild spy.




So...




Is Azuredge looking for a new owner because Meloon is being controlled?




My players have handled that problem with a swift Protection from Evil and Good, but I'm not sure if that was the actual reason, or if it was something else.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    9 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
    $endgroup$
    – FrazzleUK
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago

















5












$begingroup$


In Dragon Heist, Meloon Wardragon wields Azuredge, the legendary greataxe.




Forged by the archwizard Ahghairon, this intelligent battleaxe was crafted to defend Waterdeep. Its current wielder is a former member of Force Grey named Meloon Wardragon, but the weapon is searching for a new owner.




Players discover that...




Meloon accompanied a fledgling band of adventurers on an expedition to Undermountain. There, his luck ran out. While resting in the dungeon, the adventuring party was attacked by monsters unleashed by Xanathar - including a number of intellect devourers. One of the creatures succeeded in magically devouring and replacing Meloon's brain, turning the champion of Tymora into a puppet. After finishing off his unsuspecting companions, Meloon returned to Waterdeep as a Xanathar Guild spy.




So...




Is Azuredge looking for a new owner because Meloon is being controlled?




My players have handled that problem with a swift Protection from Evil and Good, but I'm not sure if that was the actual reason, or if it was something else.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    9 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
    $endgroup$
    – FrazzleUK
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


In Dragon Heist, Meloon Wardragon wields Azuredge, the legendary greataxe.




Forged by the archwizard Ahghairon, this intelligent battleaxe was crafted to defend Waterdeep. Its current wielder is a former member of Force Grey named Meloon Wardragon, but the weapon is searching for a new owner.




Players discover that...




Meloon accompanied a fledgling band of adventurers on an expedition to Undermountain. There, his luck ran out. While resting in the dungeon, the adventuring party was attacked by monsters unleashed by Xanathar - including a number of intellect devourers. One of the creatures succeeded in magically devouring and replacing Meloon's brain, turning the champion of Tymora into a puppet. After finishing off his unsuspecting companions, Meloon returned to Waterdeep as a Xanathar Guild spy.




So...




Is Azuredge looking for a new owner because Meloon is being controlled?




My players have handled that problem with a swift Protection from Evil and Good, but I'm not sure if that was the actual reason, or if it was something else.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In Dragon Heist, Meloon Wardragon wields Azuredge, the legendary greataxe.




Forged by the archwizard Ahghairon, this intelligent battleaxe was crafted to defend Waterdeep. Its current wielder is a former member of Force Grey named Meloon Wardragon, but the weapon is searching for a new owner.




Players discover that...




Meloon accompanied a fledgling band of adventurers on an expedition to Undermountain. There, his luck ran out. While resting in the dungeon, the adventuring party was attacked by monsters unleashed by Xanathar - including a number of intellect devourers. One of the creatures succeeded in magically devouring and replacing Meloon's brain, turning the champion of Tymora into a puppet. After finishing off his unsuspecting companions, Meloon returned to Waterdeep as a Xanathar Guild spy.




So...




Is Azuredge looking for a new owner because Meloon is being controlled?




My players have handled that problem with a swift Protection from Evil and Good, but I'm not sure if that was the actual reason, or if it was something else.







dnd-5e lore npc artifacts waterdeep-dragon-heist






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Tiggerous

15.8k4 gold badges69 silver badges123 bronze badges




15.8k4 gold badges69 silver badges123 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









BlueMoon93BlueMoon93

18.3k13 gold badges105 silver badges175 bronze badges




18.3k13 gold badges105 silver badges175 bronze badges










  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    9 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
    $endgroup$
    – FrazzleUK
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago












  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    9 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
    $endgroup$
    – BlueMoon93
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
    $endgroup$
    – FrazzleUK
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago







7




7




$begingroup$
Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Since Waterdeep Dragon Heist is a D&D 5e adventure, we don't need to fret about adding the tag. There's not even guessing involved, it's D&D 5e.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
9 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is also not primarily opinion-based. If there isn't an answer...that's an answer.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
@NautArch I've rewritten the last part, to keep the question more focused, to avoid confusion
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
$endgroup$
– FrazzleUK
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not sure if this is the place to put this or if it has already been answered somewhere else/a known bug. The text in the spoiler tags still appears in the excerpt on the All Questions page. Is there a way to avoid this?
$endgroup$
– FrazzleUK
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@FrazzleUK That may be a good thing to ask on Role-playing Games Meta!
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














$begingroup$

According to FR wikia, which quotes the novel Blackstaff Tower, Meloon Wardragon is a descendant of the woman part of whose spirit is bound to the weapon in question. Moreover, at some point (1479DR) he seems to have successfully retrieved the weapon from a stump, and she (the weapon) is known to stick to things with the strength of sovereign glue when she does not wish to be wielded by someone. So we can conclude that she used to be ok with Meloon in the past.



Their alignments are different: Meloon is listed NG, while she is LN, yet she seems to have been ok with Meloon for many years (W:DH is dated to around 1492 DR). Moreover, on page 210 of Waterdeep:Dragon Heist, there is a small subsection "Adjusted Game Statistics" that describes what happens when Meloon is "saved", we can read there that he can now attune to Azuredge, which means she is accepting him.



While it is up to you as the DM to rule however you prefer, I would interpret these data to mean that he will keep the weapon after the resolution of his condition.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$






















    5














    $begingroup$

    Your guess seems correct



    In addition to the information you posted, we have this little piece to work with...




    Personality. Azuredge is sworn to protect Waterdeep, and it desires to be wielded by a law-abiding person willing to dedicate everything to the city’s defense. The weapon is patient and takes its time finding its ideal wielder.




    We also know that




    Azuredge is actively rejecting Meloon (or, more accurately, the intellect devourer in Meloon's head).




    Because




    Each day at dawn, Meloon engages in a telepathic contest of wills with his magic axe, Azuredge, before leaving his room at the Yawning Portal. The axe wants a new wielder, but Meloon refuses to part with it.




    This is a dead-ringer for someone having a Conflict with a sentient magic item. I'm not going to copy the entire chunk in here, but here's the important bit summarized.



    If you lose your contest of wills with a magic item it can make demands of you, such as demanding you never part with it, pursue its goals, part with some item it hates, or--importantly--give the item to someone else. If you refuse, it can:




    • Make it impossible for its wielder to attune to it.

    • Suppress one or more of its activated properties.

    • Attempt to take control of its wielder



    We know that




    Meloon has lost at least one contest with the weapon, because his stat block says "Meloon wields Azuredge (see appendix A) but can’t attune to it, and thus gains none of its benefits."




    As for the why of things, the book does not address this directly but it is likely a safe assumption that it is looking for a new owner because




    it's old owner is effectively dead, and his body is being driven around by the minion of a horrible aberration who works with a crime lord. And said minion is trying to use Azuredge in service of said crime lord. See, Intellect devourers don't 'control' you. They eat your brain and replace it with themselves--"you" are no longer in there except on a very, very thin technicality (punt out the devourer then immediately hit the body with Regenerate can restore you without resurrection magic).




    Suffice to say...this is pretty antithetical to the weapon's personality, and explains what is going on.



    However, if you have a look below Meloon's statblock, you see this little bit of info (again, condensed because spoiler tags protest to being multiline)




    If Meloon is killed and raised from the dead, his true self is restored and his statistics change as follows: [...] He can attune to Azuredge




    Thus, it is reasonably clear that if the current state of affairs is resolved, the conflict is resolved as well, and Meloon can carry on wielding his axe. After all, if he can re-attune to the axe, it has stopped rejecting him. Naturally, as DM, you may opt to ignore this if you want someone else to end up with the axe. (Note: As a DM, I advise caution at handing Azuredge to a player long-term, especially at low level...that axe is a friggin monster).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$






















      1














      $begingroup$

      The module doesn't answer directly, but it does say that Meloon can now attune to the weapon where he couldn't before (p210, "Adjusted Game Statistics"). I think it's strongly implied that the previous owner's condition was the reason for the weapon being displeased and refusing to attune (as discussed in the DMG rules about sentient items on p.216, under "Conflict"), so resolving that situation in an ultimately non-fatal way would clear the path for returning the weapon to him.



      But that said, it's really up to the DM to decide if the weapon wants to go back to him. If the PCs want to give it back to him and/or the DM wants him to reclaim it, fine. If the DM wants to decide that Meloon is done with being a hero after his experience, then that's also valid. Or he could just want to hand off the axe to his rescuers, intending to go on being a hero, but maybe not with that specific weapon. Or the weapon could be looking for a new wielder even though it's allowing Meloon to attune to it again, like grudgingly going along with Meloon while keeping a watch for some likely hero. It's up to you.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
        $endgroup$
        – Darth Pseudonym
        7 hours ago














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156106%2fwhy-is-this-weapon-searching-for-a-new-owner%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7














      $begingroup$

      According to FR wikia, which quotes the novel Blackstaff Tower, Meloon Wardragon is a descendant of the woman part of whose spirit is bound to the weapon in question. Moreover, at some point (1479DR) he seems to have successfully retrieved the weapon from a stump, and she (the weapon) is known to stick to things with the strength of sovereign glue when she does not wish to be wielded by someone. So we can conclude that she used to be ok with Meloon in the past.



      Their alignments are different: Meloon is listed NG, while she is LN, yet she seems to have been ok with Meloon for many years (W:DH is dated to around 1492 DR). Moreover, on page 210 of Waterdeep:Dragon Heist, there is a small subsection "Adjusted Game Statistics" that describes what happens when Meloon is "saved", we can read there that he can now attune to Azuredge, which means she is accepting him.



      While it is up to you as the DM to rule however you prefer, I would interpret these data to mean that he will keep the weapon after the resolution of his condition.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



















        7














        $begingroup$

        According to FR wikia, which quotes the novel Blackstaff Tower, Meloon Wardragon is a descendant of the woman part of whose spirit is bound to the weapon in question. Moreover, at some point (1479DR) he seems to have successfully retrieved the weapon from a stump, and she (the weapon) is known to stick to things with the strength of sovereign glue when she does not wish to be wielded by someone. So we can conclude that she used to be ok with Meloon in the past.



        Their alignments are different: Meloon is listed NG, while she is LN, yet she seems to have been ok with Meloon for many years (W:DH is dated to around 1492 DR). Moreover, on page 210 of Waterdeep:Dragon Heist, there is a small subsection "Adjusted Game Statistics" that describes what happens when Meloon is "saved", we can read there that he can now attune to Azuredge, which means she is accepting him.



        While it is up to you as the DM to rule however you prefer, I would interpret these data to mean that he will keep the weapon after the resolution of his condition.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          7














          7










          7







          $begingroup$

          According to FR wikia, which quotes the novel Blackstaff Tower, Meloon Wardragon is a descendant of the woman part of whose spirit is bound to the weapon in question. Moreover, at some point (1479DR) he seems to have successfully retrieved the weapon from a stump, and she (the weapon) is known to stick to things with the strength of sovereign glue when she does not wish to be wielded by someone. So we can conclude that she used to be ok with Meloon in the past.



          Their alignments are different: Meloon is listed NG, while she is LN, yet she seems to have been ok with Meloon for many years (W:DH is dated to around 1492 DR). Moreover, on page 210 of Waterdeep:Dragon Heist, there is a small subsection "Adjusted Game Statistics" that describes what happens when Meloon is "saved", we can read there that he can now attune to Azuredge, which means she is accepting him.



          While it is up to you as the DM to rule however you prefer, I would interpret these data to mean that he will keep the weapon after the resolution of his condition.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          According to FR wikia, which quotes the novel Blackstaff Tower, Meloon Wardragon is a descendant of the woman part of whose spirit is bound to the weapon in question. Moreover, at some point (1479DR) he seems to have successfully retrieved the weapon from a stump, and she (the weapon) is known to stick to things with the strength of sovereign glue when she does not wish to be wielded by someone. So we can conclude that she used to be ok with Meloon in the past.



          Their alignments are different: Meloon is listed NG, while she is LN, yet she seems to have been ok with Meloon for many years (W:DH is dated to around 1492 DR). Moreover, on page 210 of Waterdeep:Dragon Heist, there is a small subsection "Adjusted Game Statistics" that describes what happens when Meloon is "saved", we can read there that he can now attune to Azuredge, which means she is accepting him.



          While it is up to you as the DM to rule however you prefer, I would interpret these data to mean that he will keep the weapon after the resolution of his condition.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          ZwiQZwiQ

          10.9k2 gold badges32 silver badges70 bronze badges




          10.9k2 gold badges32 silver badges70 bronze badges


























              5














              $begingroup$

              Your guess seems correct



              In addition to the information you posted, we have this little piece to work with...




              Personality. Azuredge is sworn to protect Waterdeep, and it desires to be wielded by a law-abiding person willing to dedicate everything to the city’s defense. The weapon is patient and takes its time finding its ideal wielder.




              We also know that




              Azuredge is actively rejecting Meloon (or, more accurately, the intellect devourer in Meloon's head).




              Because




              Each day at dawn, Meloon engages in a telepathic contest of wills with his magic axe, Azuredge, before leaving his room at the Yawning Portal. The axe wants a new wielder, but Meloon refuses to part with it.




              This is a dead-ringer for someone having a Conflict with a sentient magic item. I'm not going to copy the entire chunk in here, but here's the important bit summarized.



              If you lose your contest of wills with a magic item it can make demands of you, such as demanding you never part with it, pursue its goals, part with some item it hates, or--importantly--give the item to someone else. If you refuse, it can:




              • Make it impossible for its wielder to attune to it.

              • Suppress one or more of its activated properties.

              • Attempt to take control of its wielder



              We know that




              Meloon has lost at least one contest with the weapon, because his stat block says "Meloon wields Azuredge (see appendix A) but can’t attune to it, and thus gains none of its benefits."




              As for the why of things, the book does not address this directly but it is likely a safe assumption that it is looking for a new owner because




              it's old owner is effectively dead, and his body is being driven around by the minion of a horrible aberration who works with a crime lord. And said minion is trying to use Azuredge in service of said crime lord. See, Intellect devourers don't 'control' you. They eat your brain and replace it with themselves--"you" are no longer in there except on a very, very thin technicality (punt out the devourer then immediately hit the body with Regenerate can restore you without resurrection magic).




              Suffice to say...this is pretty antithetical to the weapon's personality, and explains what is going on.



              However, if you have a look below Meloon's statblock, you see this little bit of info (again, condensed because spoiler tags protest to being multiline)




              If Meloon is killed and raised from the dead, his true self is restored and his statistics change as follows: [...] He can attune to Azuredge




              Thus, it is reasonably clear that if the current state of affairs is resolved, the conflict is resolved as well, and Meloon can carry on wielding his axe. After all, if he can re-attune to the axe, it has stopped rejecting him. Naturally, as DM, you may opt to ignore this if you want someone else to end up with the axe. (Note: As a DM, I advise caution at handing Azuredge to a player long-term, especially at low level...that axe is a friggin monster).






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                5














                $begingroup$

                Your guess seems correct



                In addition to the information you posted, we have this little piece to work with...




                Personality. Azuredge is sworn to protect Waterdeep, and it desires to be wielded by a law-abiding person willing to dedicate everything to the city’s defense. The weapon is patient and takes its time finding its ideal wielder.




                We also know that




                Azuredge is actively rejecting Meloon (or, more accurately, the intellect devourer in Meloon's head).




                Because




                Each day at dawn, Meloon engages in a telepathic contest of wills with his magic axe, Azuredge, before leaving his room at the Yawning Portal. The axe wants a new wielder, but Meloon refuses to part with it.




                This is a dead-ringer for someone having a Conflict with a sentient magic item. I'm not going to copy the entire chunk in here, but here's the important bit summarized.



                If you lose your contest of wills with a magic item it can make demands of you, such as demanding you never part with it, pursue its goals, part with some item it hates, or--importantly--give the item to someone else. If you refuse, it can:




                • Make it impossible for its wielder to attune to it.

                • Suppress one or more of its activated properties.

                • Attempt to take control of its wielder



                We know that




                Meloon has lost at least one contest with the weapon, because his stat block says "Meloon wields Azuredge (see appendix A) but can’t attune to it, and thus gains none of its benefits."




                As for the why of things, the book does not address this directly but it is likely a safe assumption that it is looking for a new owner because




                it's old owner is effectively dead, and his body is being driven around by the minion of a horrible aberration who works with a crime lord. And said minion is trying to use Azuredge in service of said crime lord. See, Intellect devourers don't 'control' you. They eat your brain and replace it with themselves--"you" are no longer in there except on a very, very thin technicality (punt out the devourer then immediately hit the body with Regenerate can restore you without resurrection magic).




                Suffice to say...this is pretty antithetical to the weapon's personality, and explains what is going on.



                However, if you have a look below Meloon's statblock, you see this little bit of info (again, condensed because spoiler tags protest to being multiline)




                If Meloon is killed and raised from the dead, his true self is restored and his statistics change as follows: [...] He can attune to Azuredge




                Thus, it is reasonably clear that if the current state of affairs is resolved, the conflict is resolved as well, and Meloon can carry on wielding his axe. After all, if he can re-attune to the axe, it has stopped rejecting him. Naturally, as DM, you may opt to ignore this if you want someone else to end up with the axe. (Note: As a DM, I advise caution at handing Azuredge to a player long-term, especially at low level...that axe is a friggin monster).






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  5














                  5










                  5







                  $begingroup$

                  Your guess seems correct



                  In addition to the information you posted, we have this little piece to work with...




                  Personality. Azuredge is sworn to protect Waterdeep, and it desires to be wielded by a law-abiding person willing to dedicate everything to the city’s defense. The weapon is patient and takes its time finding its ideal wielder.




                  We also know that




                  Azuredge is actively rejecting Meloon (or, more accurately, the intellect devourer in Meloon's head).




                  Because




                  Each day at dawn, Meloon engages in a telepathic contest of wills with his magic axe, Azuredge, before leaving his room at the Yawning Portal. The axe wants a new wielder, but Meloon refuses to part with it.




                  This is a dead-ringer for someone having a Conflict with a sentient magic item. I'm not going to copy the entire chunk in here, but here's the important bit summarized.



                  If you lose your contest of wills with a magic item it can make demands of you, such as demanding you never part with it, pursue its goals, part with some item it hates, or--importantly--give the item to someone else. If you refuse, it can:




                  • Make it impossible for its wielder to attune to it.

                  • Suppress one or more of its activated properties.

                  • Attempt to take control of its wielder



                  We know that




                  Meloon has lost at least one contest with the weapon, because his stat block says "Meloon wields Azuredge (see appendix A) but can’t attune to it, and thus gains none of its benefits."




                  As for the why of things, the book does not address this directly but it is likely a safe assumption that it is looking for a new owner because




                  it's old owner is effectively dead, and his body is being driven around by the minion of a horrible aberration who works with a crime lord. And said minion is trying to use Azuredge in service of said crime lord. See, Intellect devourers don't 'control' you. They eat your brain and replace it with themselves--"you" are no longer in there except on a very, very thin technicality (punt out the devourer then immediately hit the body with Regenerate can restore you without resurrection magic).




                  Suffice to say...this is pretty antithetical to the weapon's personality, and explains what is going on.



                  However, if you have a look below Meloon's statblock, you see this little bit of info (again, condensed because spoiler tags protest to being multiline)




                  If Meloon is killed and raised from the dead, his true self is restored and his statistics change as follows: [...] He can attune to Azuredge




                  Thus, it is reasonably clear that if the current state of affairs is resolved, the conflict is resolved as well, and Meloon can carry on wielding his axe. After all, if he can re-attune to the axe, it has stopped rejecting him. Naturally, as DM, you may opt to ignore this if you want someone else to end up with the axe. (Note: As a DM, I advise caution at handing Azuredge to a player long-term, especially at low level...that axe is a friggin monster).






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your guess seems correct



                  In addition to the information you posted, we have this little piece to work with...




                  Personality. Azuredge is sworn to protect Waterdeep, and it desires to be wielded by a law-abiding person willing to dedicate everything to the city’s defense. The weapon is patient and takes its time finding its ideal wielder.




                  We also know that




                  Azuredge is actively rejecting Meloon (or, more accurately, the intellect devourer in Meloon's head).




                  Because




                  Each day at dawn, Meloon engages in a telepathic contest of wills with his magic axe, Azuredge, before leaving his room at the Yawning Portal. The axe wants a new wielder, but Meloon refuses to part with it.




                  This is a dead-ringer for someone having a Conflict with a sentient magic item. I'm not going to copy the entire chunk in here, but here's the important bit summarized.



                  If you lose your contest of wills with a magic item it can make demands of you, such as demanding you never part with it, pursue its goals, part with some item it hates, or--importantly--give the item to someone else. If you refuse, it can:




                  • Make it impossible for its wielder to attune to it.

                  • Suppress one or more of its activated properties.

                  • Attempt to take control of its wielder



                  We know that




                  Meloon has lost at least one contest with the weapon, because his stat block says "Meloon wields Azuredge (see appendix A) but can’t attune to it, and thus gains none of its benefits."




                  As for the why of things, the book does not address this directly but it is likely a safe assumption that it is looking for a new owner because




                  it's old owner is effectively dead, and his body is being driven around by the minion of a horrible aberration who works with a crime lord. And said minion is trying to use Azuredge in service of said crime lord. See, Intellect devourers don't 'control' you. They eat your brain and replace it with themselves--"you" are no longer in there except on a very, very thin technicality (punt out the devourer then immediately hit the body with Regenerate can restore you without resurrection magic).




                  Suffice to say...this is pretty antithetical to the weapon's personality, and explains what is going on.



                  However, if you have a look below Meloon's statblock, you see this little bit of info (again, condensed because spoiler tags protest to being multiline)




                  If Meloon is killed and raised from the dead, his true self is restored and his statistics change as follows: [...] He can attune to Azuredge




                  Thus, it is reasonably clear that if the current state of affairs is resolved, the conflict is resolved as well, and Meloon can carry on wielding his axe. After all, if he can re-attune to the axe, it has stopped rejecting him. Naturally, as DM, you may opt to ignore this if you want someone else to end up with the axe. (Note: As a DM, I advise caution at handing Azuredge to a player long-term, especially at low level...that axe is a friggin monster).







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  guildsbountyguildsbounty

                  43.3k9 gold badges176 silver badges207 bronze badges




                  43.3k9 gold badges176 silver badges207 bronze badges
























                      1














                      $begingroup$

                      The module doesn't answer directly, but it does say that Meloon can now attune to the weapon where he couldn't before (p210, "Adjusted Game Statistics"). I think it's strongly implied that the previous owner's condition was the reason for the weapon being displeased and refusing to attune (as discussed in the DMG rules about sentient items on p.216, under "Conflict"), so resolving that situation in an ultimately non-fatal way would clear the path for returning the weapon to him.



                      But that said, it's really up to the DM to decide if the weapon wants to go back to him. If the PCs want to give it back to him and/or the DM wants him to reclaim it, fine. If the DM wants to decide that Meloon is done with being a hero after his experience, then that's also valid. Or he could just want to hand off the axe to his rescuers, intending to go on being a hero, but maybe not with that specific weapon. Or the weapon could be looking for a new wielder even though it's allowing Meloon to attune to it again, like grudgingly going along with Meloon while keeping a watch for some likely hero. It's up to you.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Darth Pseudonym
                        7 hours ago
















                      1














                      $begingroup$

                      The module doesn't answer directly, but it does say that Meloon can now attune to the weapon where he couldn't before (p210, "Adjusted Game Statistics"). I think it's strongly implied that the previous owner's condition was the reason for the weapon being displeased and refusing to attune (as discussed in the DMG rules about sentient items on p.216, under "Conflict"), so resolving that situation in an ultimately non-fatal way would clear the path for returning the weapon to him.



                      But that said, it's really up to the DM to decide if the weapon wants to go back to him. If the PCs want to give it back to him and/or the DM wants him to reclaim it, fine. If the DM wants to decide that Meloon is done with being a hero after his experience, then that's also valid. Or he could just want to hand off the axe to his rescuers, intending to go on being a hero, but maybe not with that specific weapon. Or the weapon could be looking for a new wielder even though it's allowing Meloon to attune to it again, like grudgingly going along with Meloon while keeping a watch for some likely hero. It's up to you.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Darth Pseudonym
                        7 hours ago














                      1














                      1










                      1







                      $begingroup$

                      The module doesn't answer directly, but it does say that Meloon can now attune to the weapon where he couldn't before (p210, "Adjusted Game Statistics"). I think it's strongly implied that the previous owner's condition was the reason for the weapon being displeased and refusing to attune (as discussed in the DMG rules about sentient items on p.216, under "Conflict"), so resolving that situation in an ultimately non-fatal way would clear the path for returning the weapon to him.



                      But that said, it's really up to the DM to decide if the weapon wants to go back to him. If the PCs want to give it back to him and/or the DM wants him to reclaim it, fine. If the DM wants to decide that Meloon is done with being a hero after his experience, then that's also valid. Or he could just want to hand off the axe to his rescuers, intending to go on being a hero, but maybe not with that specific weapon. Or the weapon could be looking for a new wielder even though it's allowing Meloon to attune to it again, like grudgingly going along with Meloon while keeping a watch for some likely hero. It's up to you.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      The module doesn't answer directly, but it does say that Meloon can now attune to the weapon where he couldn't before (p210, "Adjusted Game Statistics"). I think it's strongly implied that the previous owner's condition was the reason for the weapon being displeased and refusing to attune (as discussed in the DMG rules about sentient items on p.216, under "Conflict"), so resolving that situation in an ultimately non-fatal way would clear the path for returning the weapon to him.



                      But that said, it's really up to the DM to decide if the weapon wants to go back to him. If the PCs want to give it back to him and/or the DM wants him to reclaim it, fine. If the DM wants to decide that Meloon is done with being a hero after his experience, then that's also valid. Or he could just want to hand off the axe to his rescuers, intending to go on being a hero, but maybe not with that specific weapon. Or the weapon could be looking for a new wielder even though it's allowing Meloon to attune to it again, like grudgingly going along with Meloon while keeping a watch for some likely hero. It's up to you.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 7 hours ago

























                      answered 8 hours ago









                      Darth PseudonymDarth Pseudonym

                      21k3 gold badges61 silver badges108 bronze badges




                      21k3 gold badges61 silver badges108 bronze badges














                      • $begingroup$
                        Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Darth Pseudonym
                        7 hours ago

















                      • $begingroup$
                        Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Darth Pseudonym
                        7 hours ago
















                      $begingroup$
                      Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Darth Pseudonym
                      7 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Only slightly. That's more evidence that my interpretation is accurate, but it still could be looking for a new wielder while letting Mel attune it. It doesn't really change the ultimate answer that it's up to the DM to decide what happens next.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Darth Pseudonym
                      7 hours ago



















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f156106%2fwhy-is-this-weapon-searching-for-a-new-owner%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480