Why do popular TCP-using services have UDP as well as TCP entries in /etc/services?Why is my TCP throughput much greater than UDP throughput?How to permit any user (mysql, apache, etc) to use any TCP or UDP port?Why is my UDP bandwidth significantly lower than TCP bandwidth in iperfWhy doesn't NAT reserve ports from the machine's TCP and UDP port pool?Unknown runlevel on Ubuntu 14.04, services not starting on bootUsing tc, I want TCP and UDP to use the same bufferWhy do I have 2 SSH services?

What does a textbook look like while you are writing it?

Everyone Gets a Window Seat

Principled construction of the quaternions

Is the "spacetime" the same thing as the mathematical 4th dimension?

French license plates

Parent asking for money after moving out

What's the global, general word that stands for "center tone of a song"?

Would a horse be sufficient buffer to prevent injury when falling from a great height?

What action is recommended if your accommodation refuses to let you leave without paying additional fees?

How to say "respectively" in German when listing (enumerating) things

Why most footers have a background color as a divider of section?

Missing quartile in boxplot

Why the first octet of a MAC address always end with a binary 0?

Why do personal finance apps focus on outgoings rather than income

Does Bank Manager's discretion still exist in Mortgage Lending

Manager told a colleague of mine I was getting fired soon

Sending mail to the Professor for PhD, after seeing his tweet

How to identify whether a publisher is genuine or not?

How is this situation not a checkmate?

IEEE 754 square root with Newton-Raphson

Can anyone give me the reason why music is taught this way?

Phonetic distortion when words are borrowed among languages

How can Germany increase investments in Russia while EU economic sanctions against Russia are still in place?

Booting Ubuntu from USB drive on MSI motherboard -- EVERYTHING fails



Why do popular TCP-using services have UDP as well as TCP entries in /etc/services?


Why is my TCP throughput much greater than UDP throughput?How to permit any user (mysql, apache, etc) to use any TCP or UDP port?Why is my UDP bandwidth significantly lower than TCP bandwidth in iperfWhy doesn't NAT reserve ports from the machine's TCP and UDP port pool?Unknown runlevel on Ubuntu 14.04, services not starting on bootUsing tc, I want TCP and UDP to use the same bufferWhy do I have 2 SSH services?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









6















I'm reading a book on network programming with Go. One of the chapters deals with the /etc/services file. Something I noticed while exploring this file is that certain popular entries like HTTP and SSH, both of which use TCP at the transport layer, have a second entry for UDP. For example on Ubuntu 14.04:



ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep ssh /etc/services 
ssh 22/tcp # SSH Remote Login Protocol
ssh 22/udp

ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep http /etc/services
http 80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
http 80/udp # HyperText Transfer Protocol


Anyone know why these have two entries? I don't believe SSH or HTTP ever use UDP (confirmed by this question for SSH).










share|improve this question









New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    7 hours ago


















6















I'm reading a book on network programming with Go. One of the chapters deals with the /etc/services file. Something I noticed while exploring this file is that certain popular entries like HTTP and SSH, both of which use TCP at the transport layer, have a second entry for UDP. For example on Ubuntu 14.04:



ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep ssh /etc/services 
ssh 22/tcp # SSH Remote Login Protocol
ssh 22/udp

ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep http /etc/services
http 80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
http 80/udp # HyperText Transfer Protocol


Anyone know why these have two entries? I don't believe SSH or HTTP ever use UDP (confirmed by this question for SSH).










share|improve this question









New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    7 hours ago














6












6








6








I'm reading a book on network programming with Go. One of the chapters deals with the /etc/services file. Something I noticed while exploring this file is that certain popular entries like HTTP and SSH, both of which use TCP at the transport layer, have a second entry for UDP. For example on Ubuntu 14.04:



ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep ssh /etc/services 
ssh 22/tcp # SSH Remote Login Protocol
ssh 22/udp

ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep http /etc/services
http 80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
http 80/udp # HyperText Transfer Protocol


Anyone know why these have two entries? I don't believe SSH or HTTP ever use UDP (confirmed by this question for SSH).










share|improve this question









New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm reading a book on network programming with Go. One of the chapters deals with the /etc/services file. Something I noticed while exploring this file is that certain popular entries like HTTP and SSH, both of which use TCP at the transport layer, have a second entry for UDP. For example on Ubuntu 14.04:



ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep ssh /etc/services 
ssh 22/tcp # SSH Remote Login Protocol
ssh 22/udp

ubuntu@vm1:~$ grep http /etc/services
http 80/tcp www # WorldWideWeb HTTP
http 80/udp # HyperText Transfer Protocol


Anyone know why these have two entries? I don't believe SSH or HTTP ever use UDP (confirmed by this question for SSH).







linux networking services protocols






share|improve this question









New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







sixty4bit













New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









sixty4bitsixty4bit

1335 bronze badges




1335 bronze badges




New contributor



sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




sixty4bit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 2





    22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    7 hours ago













  • 2





    22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    7 hours ago








2




2





22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

– Stéphane Chazelas
8 hours ago





22/udp was removed in Debian in 2016. IANA still lists 22/udp and lists both udp and tcp for most protocols that are only usually implemented on either one of them. Could just be that it means 22 is reserved for ssh in case somebody wants to implement ssh over udp some day?

– Stéphane Chazelas
8 hours ago




2




2





See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

– Stéphane Chazelas
7 hours ago






See also section 7.1 of rfc6335

– Stéphane Chazelas
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4
















Basically, it's because that was the tradition from way back when port numbers started being assigned through approximately 2011. See, for example, §7.1 “Past Principles” of RFC 6335. It's possible they will be un-alloced someday, of course, as they're a limited resource (only 1023 available, total).



And, by the way, HTTP/3 runs over UDP. Though it can use any UDP port, not just 80/443. So really those are still unused.



As far as Debian is concerned, its /etc/services already had 22/udp in 1.0 (buzz 1996).



It was however removed in this commit in 2016, first released in version 5.4 of the netbase package.



As of writing, the latest stable version of Debian (buster) has 5.6. And the latest Ubuntu LTS (18.04, bionic) netbase package is based on Debian 5.4 and you can see its changelog also mentions the removal of udp/22.






share|improve this answer



























  • I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    7 hours ago











  • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

    – derobert
    5 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);







sixty4bit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f543724%2fwhy-do-popular-tcp-using-services-have-udp-as-well-as-tcp-entries-in-etc-servic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4
















Basically, it's because that was the tradition from way back when port numbers started being assigned through approximately 2011. See, for example, §7.1 “Past Principles” of RFC 6335. It's possible they will be un-alloced someday, of course, as they're a limited resource (only 1023 available, total).



And, by the way, HTTP/3 runs over UDP. Though it can use any UDP port, not just 80/443. So really those are still unused.



As far as Debian is concerned, its /etc/services already had 22/udp in 1.0 (buzz 1996).



It was however removed in this commit in 2016, first released in version 5.4 of the netbase package.



As of writing, the latest stable version of Debian (buster) has 5.6. And the latest Ubuntu LTS (18.04, bionic) netbase package is based on Debian 5.4 and you can see its changelog also mentions the removal of udp/22.






share|improve this answer



























  • I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    7 hours ago











  • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

    – derobert
    5 hours ago















4
















Basically, it's because that was the tradition from way back when port numbers started being assigned through approximately 2011. See, for example, §7.1 “Past Principles” of RFC 6335. It's possible they will be un-alloced someday, of course, as they're a limited resource (only 1023 available, total).



And, by the way, HTTP/3 runs over UDP. Though it can use any UDP port, not just 80/443. So really those are still unused.



As far as Debian is concerned, its /etc/services already had 22/udp in 1.0 (buzz 1996).



It was however removed in this commit in 2016, first released in version 5.4 of the netbase package.



As of writing, the latest stable version of Debian (buster) has 5.6. And the latest Ubuntu LTS (18.04, bionic) netbase package is based on Debian 5.4 and you can see its changelog also mentions the removal of udp/22.






share|improve this answer



























  • I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    7 hours ago











  • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

    – derobert
    5 hours ago













4














4










4









Basically, it's because that was the tradition from way back when port numbers started being assigned through approximately 2011. See, for example, §7.1 “Past Principles” of RFC 6335. It's possible they will be un-alloced someday, of course, as they're a limited resource (only 1023 available, total).



And, by the way, HTTP/3 runs over UDP. Though it can use any UDP port, not just 80/443. So really those are still unused.



As far as Debian is concerned, its /etc/services already had 22/udp in 1.0 (buzz 1996).



It was however removed in this commit in 2016, first released in version 5.4 of the netbase package.



As of writing, the latest stable version of Debian (buster) has 5.6. And the latest Ubuntu LTS (18.04, bionic) netbase package is based on Debian 5.4 and you can see its changelog also mentions the removal of udp/22.






share|improve this answer















Basically, it's because that was the tradition from way back when port numbers started being assigned through approximately 2011. See, for example, §7.1 “Past Principles” of RFC 6335. It's possible they will be un-alloced someday, of course, as they're a limited resource (only 1023 available, total).



And, by the way, HTTP/3 runs over UDP. Though it can use any UDP port, not just 80/443. So really those are still unused.



As far as Debian is concerned, its /etc/services already had 22/udp in 1.0 (buzz 1996).



It was however removed in this commit in 2016, first released in version 5.4 of the netbase package.



As of writing, the latest stable version of Debian (buster) has 5.6. And the latest Ubuntu LTS (18.04, bionic) netbase package is based on Debian 5.4 and you can see its changelog also mentions the removal of udp/22.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago









Stéphane Chazelas

336k58 gold badges655 silver badges1034 bronze badges




336k58 gold badges655 silver badges1034 bronze badges










answered 7 hours ago









derobertderobert

80.2k9 gold badges179 silver badges236 bronze badges




80.2k9 gold badges179 silver badges236 bronze badges















  • I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    7 hours ago











  • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

    – derobert
    5 hours ago

















  • I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    7 hours ago











  • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

    – derobert
    5 hours ago
















I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
7 hours ago





I may be mistaken, but also has to do with firewalls often blocking UDP

– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
7 hours ago













@SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

– derobert
5 hours ago





@SergiyKolodyazhnyy I'd think not, as this practice predates firewalls.

– derobert
5 hours ago











sixty4bit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded

















sixty4bit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












sixty4bit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











sixty4bit is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f543724%2fwhy-do-popular-tcp-using-services-have-udp-as-well-as-tcp-entries-in-etc-servic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單