Do jackscrews suffer from blowdown?How are cruise missiles different from ballistic missiles?Can the fluid from one hydraulic circuit go to another one (voluntarily or not) in flight?Why do aircraft have a crossover airspeed, and why does it increase at higher vertical load factors?Why does only one hydraulic intake line from the reservoir have a filter on the Arrow II?

Is "weekend warrior" derogatory?

What is the difference between increasing volume and increasing gain?

Get the exact size of files retrieved by find output

Are there types of animals that can't make the trip to space? (physiologically)

What action is recommended if your accommodation refuses to let you leave without paying additional fees?

What are one's options when facing religious discrimination at the airport?

How do my husband and I get over our fear of having another difficult baby?

Phonetic distortion when words are borrowed among languages

GPLv3 forces us to make code available, but to who?

Shell Sort, Insertion Sort, Bubble Sort, Selection Sort Algorithms (Python)

Would an object shot from earth fall into the sun?

What's the global, general word that stands for "center tone of a song"?

Realistically, how much do you need to start investing?

How to find places to store/land a private airplane?

Short story about a potato hotel that makes its guests into potatoes throughout the night

Can Familiars read and use spell scrolls?

Does the 'java' command compile Java programs?

How to transcribe an arpeggiated 4-note chord to be playable on a violin?

Could Boris Johnson face criminal charges for illegally proroguing Parliament?

Why does `FindFit` fail so badly in this simple case?

Manipulating a Column Containing Key/Value Pairs

As a team leader is it appropriate to bring in fundraiser candy?

What does a textbook look like while you are writing it?

Confusion regarding control system of Mars Rover?



Do jackscrews suffer from blowdown?


How are cruise missiles different from ballistic missiles?Can the fluid from one hydraulic circuit go to another one (voluntarily or not) in flight?Why do aircraft have a crossover airspeed, and why does it increase at higher vertical load factors?Why does only one hydraulic intake line from the reservoir have a filter on the Arrow II?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3












$begingroup$


With hydraulic control surfaces, at high airspeeds, there is a point where aerodynamic loads exceed the capability of the actuators. This limits control authority and can result in the control surface not being in the position commanded by the pilot.



Jackscrews are commonly used for horizontal stabilizer control. I know they can jam and be difficult to move under high loads, but can they be blown back from their set position or do they stay put?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
    $endgroup$
    – user3528438
    8 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


With hydraulic control surfaces, at high airspeeds, there is a point where aerodynamic loads exceed the capability of the actuators. This limits control authority and can result in the control surface not being in the position commanded by the pilot.



Jackscrews are commonly used for horizontal stabilizer control. I know they can jam and be difficult to move under high loads, but can they be blown back from their set position or do they stay put?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
    $endgroup$
    – user3528438
    8 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


With hydraulic control surfaces, at high airspeeds, there is a point where aerodynamic loads exceed the capability of the actuators. This limits control authority and can result in the control surface not being in the position commanded by the pilot.



Jackscrews are commonly used for horizontal stabilizer control. I know they can jam and be difficult to move under high loads, but can they be blown back from their set position or do they stay put?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




With hydraulic control surfaces, at high airspeeds, there is a point where aerodynamic loads exceed the capability of the actuators. This limits control authority and can result in the control surface not being in the position commanded by the pilot.



Jackscrews are commonly used for horizontal stabilizer control. I know they can jam and be difficult to move under high loads, but can they be blown back from their set position or do they stay put?







control-surfaces hydraulic-system






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









TomMcWTomMcW

18.9k11 gold badges79 silver badges173 bronze badges




18.9k11 gold badges79 silver badges173 bronze badges










  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
    $endgroup$
    – user3528438
    8 hours ago












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
    $endgroup$
    – user3528438
    8 hours ago







5




5




$begingroup$
Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
$endgroup$
– Ron Beyer
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Jack screws are used in accident investigations to determine the position of control surfaces like flaps at the moment of impact. I'd say the answer is "no, they stay put", but I don't have a definitive source on that.
$endgroup$
– Ron Beyer
9 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
$endgroup$
– user3528438
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is a very basic mechanical engineering problem. Essentially, when you push on it, the thread tries to rotate, the force of rotation is proportional to the force by a factor of x. At the same time, friction that tries to stop the rotation is also proportional, by another factor y. If your thread is not so steep, then x<y, meaning however large the force is, the friction that stops the rotation is always greater. This is a feature called "self locking" that is available to the designer.
$endgroup$
– user3528438
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














$begingroup$

Screws can be either self-locking or overhauling. Jackscrews used for stabilizer control are designed to be self-locking, since their purpose is to make the stabilizer adjustable, but prevent it from moving by itself.



A jackscrew (or screw jack) is pretty much by definition a self-locking screw.



Wikipedia: Screws - self-locking property






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$






















    4














    $begingroup$

    Acme screw type screw jacks with the square threads, as used in stab trim systems (as opposed to recirculating a ball screw), are usually inherently irreversible because of the higher friction of the direct sliding contact of the square sided threads vs a rolling ball interface (as a sliding interface, it's totally dependent on the grease to keep friction in check).



    This is why the trim screw jack of the 737 becomes extremely difficult to move manually when the jack is heavily loaded, even though the movement input is coming from input side that is supposed to be the low effort side, requiring a technique of unloading it with elevator inputs to manually trim when the airplane's actual speed and trim speed are far apart.



    Ballscrew type jacks however, typically used for flap actuators, have very low internal friction and very high efficiency thanks to the ball interface between the "nut" and screw (rolling, not sliding). As a result they can be back-driven more easily; how easily depends on the gear reduction within the worm drive gearbox.



    Ballscrew operated flap systems typically require friction brakes in the drive line, or anti-backdrive devices incorporated internally in each actuator (basically a clutch device that is disengaged only when the torque is coming from the input side), to prevent a flap surface that is disconnected from its drive motor from creeping up from air loads.



    Acme screw actuators also have internal brakes but these mainly function to lock an inoperative motor when there are dual motors, so that the live motor can't backdrive the dead one instead of the downstream gear train. They also serve to lock the acme screw when both motors are off, but this isn't as critical with an acme screw.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
      $endgroup$
      – ymb1
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
      $endgroup$
      – John K
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
      $endgroup$
      – ymb1
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
      $endgroup$
      – John K
      4 hours ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f70040%2fdo-jackscrews-suffer-from-blowdown%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    $begingroup$

    Screws can be either self-locking or overhauling. Jackscrews used for stabilizer control are designed to be self-locking, since their purpose is to make the stabilizer adjustable, but prevent it from moving by itself.



    A jackscrew (or screw jack) is pretty much by definition a self-locking screw.



    Wikipedia: Screws - self-locking property






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      6














      $begingroup$

      Screws can be either self-locking or overhauling. Jackscrews used for stabilizer control are designed to be self-locking, since their purpose is to make the stabilizer adjustable, but prevent it from moving by itself.



      A jackscrew (or screw jack) is pretty much by definition a self-locking screw.



      Wikipedia: Screws - self-locking property






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        6














        6










        6







        $begingroup$

        Screws can be either self-locking or overhauling. Jackscrews used for stabilizer control are designed to be self-locking, since their purpose is to make the stabilizer adjustable, but prevent it from moving by itself.



        A jackscrew (or screw jack) is pretty much by definition a self-locking screw.



        Wikipedia: Screws - self-locking property






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Screws can be either self-locking or overhauling. Jackscrews used for stabilizer control are designed to be self-locking, since their purpose is to make the stabilizer adjustable, but prevent it from moving by itself.



        A jackscrew (or screw jack) is pretty much by definition a self-locking screw.



        Wikipedia: Screws - self-locking property







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 8 hours ago









        Bianfable

        6,58024 silver badges51 bronze badges




        6,58024 silver badges51 bronze badges










        answered 8 hours ago









        Jpe61Jpe61

        1,2503 silver badges16 bronze badges




        1,2503 silver badges16 bronze badges


























            4














            $begingroup$

            Acme screw type screw jacks with the square threads, as used in stab trim systems (as opposed to recirculating a ball screw), are usually inherently irreversible because of the higher friction of the direct sliding contact of the square sided threads vs a rolling ball interface (as a sliding interface, it's totally dependent on the grease to keep friction in check).



            This is why the trim screw jack of the 737 becomes extremely difficult to move manually when the jack is heavily loaded, even though the movement input is coming from input side that is supposed to be the low effort side, requiring a technique of unloading it with elevator inputs to manually trim when the airplane's actual speed and trim speed are far apart.



            Ballscrew type jacks however, typically used for flap actuators, have very low internal friction and very high efficiency thanks to the ball interface between the "nut" and screw (rolling, not sliding). As a result they can be back-driven more easily; how easily depends on the gear reduction within the worm drive gearbox.



            Ballscrew operated flap systems typically require friction brakes in the drive line, or anti-backdrive devices incorporated internally in each actuator (basically a clutch device that is disengaged only when the torque is coming from the input side), to prevent a flap surface that is disconnected from its drive motor from creeping up from air loads.



            Acme screw actuators also have internal brakes but these mainly function to lock an inoperative motor when there are dual motors, so that the live motor can't backdrive the dead one instead of the downstream gear train. They also serve to lock the acme screw when both motors are off, but this isn't as critical with an acme screw.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              4 hours ago















            4














            $begingroup$

            Acme screw type screw jacks with the square threads, as used in stab trim systems (as opposed to recirculating a ball screw), are usually inherently irreversible because of the higher friction of the direct sliding contact of the square sided threads vs a rolling ball interface (as a sliding interface, it's totally dependent on the grease to keep friction in check).



            This is why the trim screw jack of the 737 becomes extremely difficult to move manually when the jack is heavily loaded, even though the movement input is coming from input side that is supposed to be the low effort side, requiring a technique of unloading it with elevator inputs to manually trim when the airplane's actual speed and trim speed are far apart.



            Ballscrew type jacks however, typically used for flap actuators, have very low internal friction and very high efficiency thanks to the ball interface between the "nut" and screw (rolling, not sliding). As a result they can be back-driven more easily; how easily depends on the gear reduction within the worm drive gearbox.



            Ballscrew operated flap systems typically require friction brakes in the drive line, or anti-backdrive devices incorporated internally in each actuator (basically a clutch device that is disengaged only when the torque is coming from the input side), to prevent a flap surface that is disconnected from its drive motor from creeping up from air loads.



            Acme screw actuators also have internal brakes but these mainly function to lock an inoperative motor when there are dual motors, so that the live motor can't backdrive the dead one instead of the downstream gear train. They also serve to lock the acme screw when both motors are off, but this isn't as critical with an acme screw.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              4 hours ago













            4














            4










            4







            $begingroup$

            Acme screw type screw jacks with the square threads, as used in stab trim systems (as opposed to recirculating a ball screw), are usually inherently irreversible because of the higher friction of the direct sliding contact of the square sided threads vs a rolling ball interface (as a sliding interface, it's totally dependent on the grease to keep friction in check).



            This is why the trim screw jack of the 737 becomes extremely difficult to move manually when the jack is heavily loaded, even though the movement input is coming from input side that is supposed to be the low effort side, requiring a technique of unloading it with elevator inputs to manually trim when the airplane's actual speed and trim speed are far apart.



            Ballscrew type jacks however, typically used for flap actuators, have very low internal friction and very high efficiency thanks to the ball interface between the "nut" and screw (rolling, not sliding). As a result they can be back-driven more easily; how easily depends on the gear reduction within the worm drive gearbox.



            Ballscrew operated flap systems typically require friction brakes in the drive line, or anti-backdrive devices incorporated internally in each actuator (basically a clutch device that is disengaged only when the torque is coming from the input side), to prevent a flap surface that is disconnected from its drive motor from creeping up from air loads.



            Acme screw actuators also have internal brakes but these mainly function to lock an inoperative motor when there are dual motors, so that the live motor can't backdrive the dead one instead of the downstream gear train. They also serve to lock the acme screw when both motors are off, but this isn't as critical with an acme screw.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Acme screw type screw jacks with the square threads, as used in stab trim systems (as opposed to recirculating a ball screw), are usually inherently irreversible because of the higher friction of the direct sliding contact of the square sided threads vs a rolling ball interface (as a sliding interface, it's totally dependent on the grease to keep friction in check).



            This is why the trim screw jack of the 737 becomes extremely difficult to move manually when the jack is heavily loaded, even though the movement input is coming from input side that is supposed to be the low effort side, requiring a technique of unloading it with elevator inputs to manually trim when the airplane's actual speed and trim speed are far apart.



            Ballscrew type jacks however, typically used for flap actuators, have very low internal friction and very high efficiency thanks to the ball interface between the "nut" and screw (rolling, not sliding). As a result they can be back-driven more easily; how easily depends on the gear reduction within the worm drive gearbox.



            Ballscrew operated flap systems typically require friction brakes in the drive line, or anti-backdrive devices incorporated internally in each actuator (basically a clutch device that is disengaged only when the torque is coming from the input side), to prevent a flap surface that is disconnected from its drive motor from creeping up from air loads.



            Acme screw actuators also have internal brakes but these mainly function to lock an inoperative motor when there are dual motors, so that the live motor can't backdrive the dead one instead of the downstream gear train. They also serve to lock the acme screw when both motors are off, but this isn't as critical with an acme screw.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            John KJohn K

            42.6k1 gold badge78 silver badges146 bronze badges




            42.6k1 gold badge78 silver badges146 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              4 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              5 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
              $endgroup$
              – ymb1
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
              $endgroup$
              – John K
              4 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – ymb1
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It seems screw friction is a function of the lead angle, and square threads have the least friction. A clarification on that point you've made would be appreciated.
            $endgroup$
            – ymb1
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I thought it was pretty clear. Yes square threads have less friction than tapered ones. Read it carefully. I'm talking about a sliding interface vs a roller interface. A ball screw sees no sliding of surfaces, it's a spiral ball bearing in effect. Ballscrews only need grease to keep water out and to lubricate the balls where they touch each other. Remove the grease and it's efficiency is only marginally reduced. An acme thread is two spiral surfaces sliding past each other and needs a grease film to function at all.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            5 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
            $endgroup$
            – ymb1
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Many thanks. I think it will be clearer if "the higher friction of the square sided threads" is changed to "the higher friction of direct contact", as what confused me is the mentioning of the square thread (shape-wise, it's low friction). / Interesting find is this 1955 Boeing patent for a stab trim that shows a ball/roller type.
            $endgroup$
            – ymb1
            4 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            4 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I've made some changes that may help. Interesting find there. Stab jacks on transport a/c use dual interleaved threads (it looks like one screw but it's actually two intermeshed) to allow a nut with two separate thread load paths. Not sure that can be done with a recirculating ball system, so that may be why you don't see that type in service.
            $endgroup$
            – John K
            4 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f70040%2fdo-jackscrews-suffer-from-blowdown%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її