Stop engineer from planning “bully projects”Disciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?Sending a stranger's CV to HRHow to convince HR to let my star employee work from home?How to deal with co-worker that is more managerial than engineer and somewhat bully?How to deal with violent language from superior in workplaceDisciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How to discipline overeager engineer
What are the rules for punctuating a conversation?
Why are engines with carburetors hard to start in cold weather?
3x3 self-descriptive squares
How to discipline overeager engineer
How are steel imports supposed to threaten US national security?
Find the percentage
How stable are PID loops really?
Are Ground Crew Airline or Airport Personnel?
Postal services in Italy - Poste Italiane vs. Friendpost vs. GPS
universal string conversion
How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game?
Coffee Grounds and Gritty Butter Cream Icing
Python Bingo game that stores card in a dictionary
Can a Dragon enter the feywild at will?
Ways to bypass spell resistance in 5e?
Landing Hero: Product snippets VS illustrations
What kind of mission objective would make a parabolic escape trajectory desirable?
Is there a more efficient alternative to pull down resistors?
What is /dev/null and why can't I use hx on it?
Does UPDATE without WHERE clause lock a table in PostgreSQL?
Can something have more sugar per 100g than the percentage of sugar that's in it?
Meaning/translation of title "The Light Fantastic" By Terry Pratchett
How to read a file line by line in Julia?
Son of the Revenge of the Riley Riddles in Reverse Strikes Again
Stop engineer from planning “bully projects”
Disciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?Sending a stranger's CV to HRHow to convince HR to let my star employee work from home?How to deal with co-worker that is more managerial than engineer and somewhat bully?How to deal with violent language from superior in workplaceDisciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How to discipline overeager engineer
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.
The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).
How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.
united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution
New contributor
add a comment
|
I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.
The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).
How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.
united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution
New contributor
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago
add a comment
|
I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.
The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).
How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.
united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution
New contributor
I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.
The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).
How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.
united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution
united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 19 mins ago
PinghPingh
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago
add a comment
|
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.
E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.
As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).
On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145768%2fstop-engineer-from-planning-bully-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.
E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.
As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).
On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.
add a comment
|
You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.
E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.
As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).
On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.
add a comment
|
You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.
E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.
As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).
On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.
You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.
E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.
As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).
On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.
answered 1 min ago
ShadowzeeShadowzee
8432 silver badges10 bronze badges
8432 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145768%2fstop-engineer-from-planning-bully-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?
– dan-klasson
2 mins ago