Stop engineer from planning “bully projects”Disciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?Sending a stranger's CV to HRHow to convince HR to let my star employee work from home?How to deal with co-worker that is more managerial than engineer and somewhat bully?How to deal with violent language from superior in workplaceDisciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How to discipline overeager engineer

What are the rules for punctuating a conversation?

Why are engines with carburetors hard to start in cold weather?

3x3 self-descriptive squares

How to discipline overeager engineer

How are steel imports supposed to threaten US national security?

Find the percentage

How stable are PID loops really?

Are Ground Crew Airline or Airport Personnel?

Postal services in Italy - Poste Italiane vs. Friendpost vs. GPS

universal string conversion

How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game?

Coffee Grounds and Gritty Butter Cream Icing

Python Bingo game that stores card in a dictionary

Can a Dragon enter the feywild at will?

Ways to bypass spell resistance in 5e?

Landing Hero: Product snippets VS illustrations

What kind of mission objective would make a parabolic escape trajectory desirable?

Is there a more efficient alternative to pull down resistors?

What is /dev/null and why can't I use hx on it?

Does UPDATE without WHERE clause lock a table in PostgreSQL?

Can something have more sugar per 100g than the percentage of sugar that's in it?

Meaning/translation of title "The Light Fantastic" By Terry Pratchett

How to read a file line by line in Julia?

Son of the Revenge of the Riley Riddles in Reverse Strikes Again



Stop engineer from planning “bully projects”


Disciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How can I deal with troublesome Professional Engineer?Sending a stranger's CV to HRHow to convince HR to let my star employee work from home?How to deal with co-worker that is more managerial than engineer and somewhat bully?How to deal with violent language from superior in workplaceDisciplining hard-working but insubordinate engineer or his superior?How to discipline overeager engineer






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









0















I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.



The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).



How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

    – dan-klasson
    2 mins ago


















0















I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.



The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).



How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

    – dan-klasson
    2 mins ago














0












0








0








I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.



The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).



How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I work for a enginering company where a few senior engineers got into a large fight that caused a lot of concern. The more senior engineer "stone walled" the not as senior engineer apparently, and the junior engineer now runs an "automation team", whose job is to find inefficencies in the company, and improve or automate them.



The junior engineer gets to pick any part of the company to improve, but he is holding a grudge against my division's most senior engineer, and keeps automating tasks for just my division. It has a lot of engineers nervous that we'll become redundant, and some of our best engineers have either transferred to other units, or quit. Our team leaders have talked to this engineer, and he insists he's not being a bully, but he's just "fixing whatever problems come to mind first". We all agree on my team that he's trying to single out our division (most of the Windows developers in the company) first in order to get our most senior engineer fired (due to not enough people under his management).



How can we approach human resources to stop this bullying behavior, or get him to automate stuff that isn't our work exclusively? My boss keeps telling the team not to worry about layoffs, but we don't believe him, and since the project is saving the company money, we don't know how to properly ask for help.







united-states human-resources layoff bullying conflict-resolution






share|improve this question







New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 19 mins ago









PinghPingh

1




1




New contributor



Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Pingh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

    – dan-klasson
    2 mins ago


















  • Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

    – dan-klasson
    2 mins ago

















Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

– dan-klasson
2 mins ago






Chan still hasn't been fired or reprimanded?

– dan-klasson
2 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0
















You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.



E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.



As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).



On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.





share


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );







    Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145768%2fstop-engineer-from-planning-bully-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0
















    You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.



    E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.



    As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).



    On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.





    share





























      0
















      You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.



      E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.



      As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).



      On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.





      share



























        0














        0










        0









        You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.



        E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.



        As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).



        On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.





        share













        You can't stop Automation. When automation occurs in general, its aimed at increasing productivity by removing easy and repetitive tasks and allowing an employee to focus on more important work. If its the case that these automation procedures are being targeted at making people redundant, I would go back and look at any team which are under performing or struggling due to a high work load and have the automation team focus there, because there will be noticeable profits when increasing productivity, instead of trying to make people redundant.



        E.g. If sales is having a hard time processing orders, automate that. It creates more work over all. If engineering is having a hard time completing all the work. Automate parts of that to increase the number of completed projects.



        As your team is currently being automated then your going to have it tough. Automation usually requires there be a very well defined procedure in place, because Robots have a hard time accounting for the unknown or exceptions (there are so many exceptions). If your team is actually doing tasks that are very easily automated, I would personally look into retraining, as all industries will be looking to automate their work force (Like if your Job is literally following a manuscript, you should be slightly concerned that your aren't developing many skills or could be made redundant fairly easily).



        On a more personal level (not 100% advisable), you can always make automation more difficult by not providing complete information to the team performing the automation, or suggests skips/shortcuts like skipping validation checks which can cause huge issues further down in the line, or generally refusing to work with them. I don't advise this, because its a generally shitty thing to do... but I have seen it done, specially by some more senior staff who want to ensure their job security.






        share











        share


        share










        answered 1 min ago









        ShadowzeeShadowzee

        8432 silver badges10 bronze badges




        8432 silver badges10 bronze badges
























            Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded

















            Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Pingh is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145768%2fstop-engineer-from-planning-bully-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її