Is it appropriate to send out a manuscript under review to a professor?I found a nontrivial mistake in my currently-under-review paper. Should I send a correction to the editor?Average time alloted for manuscript review across disciplinesWhat does the “re-review” mean?Is it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?When writing referee's report after paper revision, can I discuss the reports of other referees?Which review recommendation should I give to maximize the likelihood that a manuscript is rejected?Who to contact when handling editor is anonymous and manuscript is delayed?What happens if a reviewer withdraws himself from peer review process?What to do for a paper with a very long review process?Asking the Managing Editor for Manuscript Update
How come the Russian cognate for the Czech word "čerstvý" (fresh) means entirely the opposite thing (stale)?
Can massive damage kill you while at 0 HP?
Difference between $HOME and ~
In 1700s, why was 'books that never read' grammatical?
How are steel imports supposed to threaten US national security?
I am confused with the word order when putting a sentence into passé composé with reflexive verbs
Abuse of Illusory Reality
What kind of mission objective would make a parabolic escape trajectory desirable?
I pay for a service, but I miss the broadcast
Which accidental continues through the bar?
Rat proofing compost bin but allowing worms in
Looking for PC graphics demo software from the early 90s called "Unreal"
How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game?
Is it appropriate to send out a manuscript under review to a professor?
What if you can't publish in very high impact journal or top conference during your PhD?
Without exposing his identity, did Roy help his parents with money so that they can afford to stay in their home?
False Shadow of an Orb
A goat is tied to the corner of a shed
Was Wayne Brady considered a guest star on the original "Whose Line Is It Anyway?"
Can something have more sugar per 100g than the percentage of sugar that's in it?
Meaning/translation of title "The Light Fantastic" By Terry Pratchett
Understanding and grammar meaning behind "やったことないしなー"
How do lasers measure short distances (<1cm) when electronics are too slow for time-of-flight to work?
This fell out of my toilet when I unscrewed the supply line. What is it?
Is it appropriate to send out a manuscript under review to a professor?
I found a nontrivial mistake in my currently-under-review paper. Should I send a correction to the editor?Average time alloted for manuscript review across disciplinesWhat does the “re-review” mean?Is it common to be given 6 months for a minor revision outcome?When writing referee's report after paper revision, can I discuss the reports of other referees?Which review recommendation should I give to maximize the likelihood that a manuscript is rejected?Who to contact when handling editor is anonymous and manuscript is delayed?What happens if a reviewer withdraws himself from peer review process?What to do for a paper with a very long review process?Asking the Managing Editor for Manuscript Update
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
New contributor
add a comment
|
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
New contributor
add a comment
|
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
New contributor
I have a MPhil and planning to start my PhD soon. I sumbitted a manuscript to a popular journal in the field. After two rounds of major revisions, the editor is requesting a minor revision now. I finished the revision and submitted. The revised manuscript is now "with editor".
At the same time, i am emailing an oversea Professor who is one of the big names in the field. I am trying to invite her to be my co-author of my second manuscript. She agreed to read. And she asked me to send her the one with editor. Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"? She mentioned that one of her PhD students may want to read my manuscripts too.
In fact, i would like to collaborate with this professor and ask her to be my oversea PhD advisor. I am happy that she wants to read my works. But i am not sure if this is an appropriate action to send out a manuscript under review.
Thanks in advance.
peer-review paper-submission
peer-review paper-submission
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
Azor Ahai
5,8171 gold badge23 silver badges48 bronze badges
5,8171 gold badge23 silver badges48 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
WH1810WH1810
262 bronze badges
262 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
WH1810 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137848%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-out-a-manuscript-under-review-to-a-professor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
You still hold all rights to your work, so yes, it is fine to send it.
I'm assuming that you don't have concerns that your work will be stolen if you show it to someone else.
Even if you sign away your copyright to the paper, no one is ever likely to object to informal sharing with colleagues.
answered 9 hours ago
BuffyBuffy
86.2k23 gold badges265 silver badges376 bronze badges
86.2k23 gold badges265 silver badges376 bronze badges
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
1
1
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
+1 - although it's worth mentioning that the situation is more complicated if the OP isn't the sole author. In such a case one should of course get permission from the other author(s) first. (Also, I'd recommend that the OP state the status of the article when they send it, but that's just a suggestion.)
– Noah Schweber
6 hours ago
1
1
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
@NoahSchweber, yes, the "you" can be plural.
– Buffy
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
As long as it is made clear that it is not yet accepted for publication. In lots of disciplines there is a thriving sharing of unpublished articles, often called "preprints" even in cases where the articles don't ever get published. Heh. In some cases, the preprint archive has similar reputation to some journals.
– puppetsock
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
add a comment
|
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
Is it appropriate to send her the manuscript which is "with editor"?
Yes, sharing manuscripts is a great way to collaborate and see the quality of the work you have done.
Just make sure you know more about her PhD student and what collaboration is possible with the PhD student as well. Sometimes the collaboration is with the PhD student who has more time to work with you compared to the professor. Being too focused on a professorial level supervision may result in you missing out on great collaboration and supervision opportunity. A PhD student may be more up-to-date and have more time to spend with you to develop your PhD.
It is worthwhile to look at the rules and regulation around external/overseas advisors at your institution before you consider it too deeply. How much time and paperwork is involved? What are the expectations? etc. Is worthwhile to contact the university that the professor is at to see how easy it is to do external supervision with her institution. Some places require external supervisors to do courses before they can do the supervision which is a lot of hassle and painful administrative timewasting.
Either way, it sounds like you at least have an external thesis examiner...
answered 3 hours ago
PoidahPoidah
2,3056 silver badges21 bronze badges
2,3056 silver badges21 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
WH1810 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
WH1810 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
WH1810 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
WH1810 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137848%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-out-a-manuscript-under-review-to-a-professor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown