How is lower/no gravity simulated on a planet with gravity, without leaving the surface?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Could a Human reach escape velocity by jumping from the surface of Ceres (a dwarf planet)?Are Delta-V requirements for leaving the surface of a planet proportional to gravity?Could the ISS be spun to simulate Phobos' gravity?How can astronauts float in space without being affected by the gravitational force of nearby objects?How many seconds of near-zero gravity are practical with a Reduced Gravity Aircraft?Can a human body change direction when floating in a space without gravity?Is child birth possible in lower gravity?Would a self-winding watch work in space without gravity?How would you move in low gravity without a suit?
Remove outer padding in tikzcd
Is a MySQL database a viable alternative to LDAP?
RANK used in 'where' returns invalid column, but exists in results set
What is the difference between tl_to_str:V and tl_to_str:N?
Chandrayaan 2: Why is Vikram Lander's life limited to 14 Days?
Is there a specific way to describe over-grown, old, tough vegetables?
Capacitors with same voltage, same capacitance, same temp, different diameter?
Why can't some airports handle heavy aircraft while others do it easily (same runway length)?
I multiply the source, you (probably) multiply the output!
I need to know information from an old German birth certificate
What explains the Genie's fate?
How to descend a few exposed scrambling moves with minimal equipment?
Why did Tony's Arc Reactor do this?
Bit floating sequence
Distance faces never sharp/clear. Too picky?
Galilean transformation vs simple translation
Isn't that (two voices leaping to C like this) a breaking of the rules of four-part harmony?
Bacteria vats to generate edible biomass, require intermediary species?
What happens when a file that is 100% paged in to the page cache gets modified by another process
Can you mark a new target with the Hunter's Mark spell if the original target shifts to a different plane?
How should Thaumaturgy's "three times as loud as normal" be interpreted?
Contour plot of a sequence of spheres with increasing radius
Can you pop microwave popcorn on a stove?
How should we understand "unobscured by flying friends" in this context?
How is lower/no gravity simulated on a planet with gravity, without leaving the surface?
How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Could a Human reach escape velocity by jumping from the surface of Ceres (a dwarf planet)?Are Delta-V requirements for leaving the surface of a planet proportional to gravity?Could the ISS be spun to simulate Phobos' gravity?How can astronauts float in space without being affected by the gravitational force of nearby objects?How many seconds of near-zero gravity are practical with a Reduced Gravity Aircraft?Can a human body change direction when floating in a space without gravity?Is child birth possible in lower gravity?Would a self-winding watch work in space without gravity?How would you move in low gravity without a suit?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have seen videos of simulated lower gravity (possibly for training astronauts). I am curious what methods/techniques can be used to simulate lower gravity like environments without leaving the planet itself (that of course exculudes free-fall by definition). Or is it impossible?
gravity microgravity
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have seen videos of simulated lower gravity (possibly for training astronauts). I am curious what methods/techniques can be used to simulate lower gravity like environments without leaving the planet itself (that of course exculudes free-fall by definition). Or is it impossible?
gravity microgravity
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have seen videos of simulated lower gravity (possibly for training astronauts). I am curious what methods/techniques can be used to simulate lower gravity like environments without leaving the planet itself (that of course exculudes free-fall by definition). Or is it impossible?
gravity microgravity
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have seen videos of simulated lower gravity (possibly for training astronauts). I am curious what methods/techniques can be used to simulate lower gravity like environments without leaving the planet itself (that of course exculudes free-fall by definition). Or is it impossible?
gravity microgravity
gravity microgravity
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
DaveIditoDaveIdito
1161 bronze badge
1161 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The two most commonly used techniques for humans are neutral buoyancy and parabolic flights.
Neutral Buyoancy
Neutral buoyancy simulates the weightless environment of space. First equipment is lowered into the pool using an overhead crane. Suited astronauts then get in the tank and support divers add weight to the astronauts so that they experience no buoyant force and no rotational moment about their center of mass.
One downside of using neutral buoyancy to simulate microgravity is the significant amount of drag presented by water. Generally, drag effects are minimized by doing tasks slowly in the water. Another downside of neutral buoyancy simulation is that astronauts are not weightless within their suits, thus, precise suit sizing is critical. [2]
Parabolic Flights
The sensation of weightlessness is achieved by reducing thrust and lowering the nose to maintain a neutral, or "zero lift", configuration such that the aircraft follows a ballistic trajectory, with engine thrust exactly compensating for drag. Weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way "up-and-over the hump", until the craft reaches a downward pitch angle of around 30 degrees. At this point, the craft is pointing downward at high speed and must begin to pull back into the nose-up attitude to repeat the maneuver. [1, 3]
Drop tube / Drop tower
For non-human payloads, a drop tower or drop tube can be used (e.g. Fallturm Bremen (de, en)).
In physics and materials science, a drop tower or drop tube is a structure used to produce a controlled period of weightlessness for an object under study. Air bags, polystyrene pellets, and magnetic or mechanical brakes are sometimes used to arrest the fall of the experimental payload. In other cases, high-speed impact with a substrate at the bottom of the tower is an intentional part of the experimental protocol.
Not all such facilities are towers - NASA Glenn's Zero Gravity Research Facility is based on a vertical shaft, extending to 510 feet (155 m) below ground level.
The duration of free-fall produced in a drop tube depends on the length of the tube and its degree of internal evacuation. The 105-meter drop tube at Marshall Space Flight Center produces 4.6 seconds of weightlessness when it is fully evacuated. In the drop facility Fallturm Bremen at University of Bremen a catapult can be used to throw the experiment upwards to prolong the weightlessness from 4.74 to nearly 9.3 seconds. Negating the physical space needed for the initial acceleration, this technique doubles the effective period of weightlessness. The NASA Glenn Research Center has a 5 second drop tower (The Zero Gravity Facility) and a 2.2 second drop tower (The 2.2 Second Drop Tower). [4]
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced-gravity_aircraft
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_Buoyancy_Simulator
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut_training
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_tube
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NASA used several methods to simulate the effects of lunar gravity on astronauts, in preparation to the lunar landing. Neil Armstrong mentions "various simulations" when walking on the Moon for the first time:
"There seems to be no difficulty in moving around as we suspected. It's even perhaps easier than the simulations at one sixth g that we performed in the various simulations on the ground."
According to Lunar Gravity Simulation and its Effect on Human Performance, R.J. Shavelson, 1968, the main methods of lunar gravity simulation at the time were:
- parabolic aircraft flight
- water immersion
- vertical suspension, with counterbalances or springs to reduce weight
- inclined plane suspension
The inclined plane method, developed and patented by NASA in 1960s, involved sideways suspension of the test subject, allowing locomotion in a straight line (see short film on youtube). NASA has also more recently (1996) developed a new type of suspension system, called the "enhanced Zero-gravity Locomotion Simulator" or eZLS, which can be adjusted to simulate different levels of reduced gravity.
Long-term effects of reduced gravity on the body are also very important to study on the ground. Long-term reduced gravity is usually simulated either with bed rest, or dry immersion rest: floating partially under thermoneutral water in a waterproof loose "hammock" that keeps the skin dry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
DaveIdito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38647%2fhow-is-lower-no-gravity-simulated-on-a-planet-with-gravity-without-leaving-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The two most commonly used techniques for humans are neutral buoyancy and parabolic flights.
Neutral Buyoancy
Neutral buoyancy simulates the weightless environment of space. First equipment is lowered into the pool using an overhead crane. Suited astronauts then get in the tank and support divers add weight to the astronauts so that they experience no buoyant force and no rotational moment about their center of mass.
One downside of using neutral buoyancy to simulate microgravity is the significant amount of drag presented by water. Generally, drag effects are minimized by doing tasks slowly in the water. Another downside of neutral buoyancy simulation is that astronauts are not weightless within their suits, thus, precise suit sizing is critical. [2]
Parabolic Flights
The sensation of weightlessness is achieved by reducing thrust and lowering the nose to maintain a neutral, or "zero lift", configuration such that the aircraft follows a ballistic trajectory, with engine thrust exactly compensating for drag. Weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way "up-and-over the hump", until the craft reaches a downward pitch angle of around 30 degrees. At this point, the craft is pointing downward at high speed and must begin to pull back into the nose-up attitude to repeat the maneuver. [1, 3]
Drop tube / Drop tower
For non-human payloads, a drop tower or drop tube can be used (e.g. Fallturm Bremen (de, en)).
In physics and materials science, a drop tower or drop tube is a structure used to produce a controlled period of weightlessness for an object under study. Air bags, polystyrene pellets, and magnetic or mechanical brakes are sometimes used to arrest the fall of the experimental payload. In other cases, high-speed impact with a substrate at the bottom of the tower is an intentional part of the experimental protocol.
Not all such facilities are towers - NASA Glenn's Zero Gravity Research Facility is based on a vertical shaft, extending to 510 feet (155 m) below ground level.
The duration of free-fall produced in a drop tube depends on the length of the tube and its degree of internal evacuation. The 105-meter drop tube at Marshall Space Flight Center produces 4.6 seconds of weightlessness when it is fully evacuated. In the drop facility Fallturm Bremen at University of Bremen a catapult can be used to throw the experiment upwards to prolong the weightlessness from 4.74 to nearly 9.3 seconds. Negating the physical space needed for the initial acceleration, this technique doubles the effective period of weightlessness. The NASA Glenn Research Center has a 5 second drop tower (The Zero Gravity Facility) and a 2.2 second drop tower (The 2.2 Second Drop Tower). [4]
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced-gravity_aircraft
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_Buoyancy_Simulator
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut_training
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_tube
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The two most commonly used techniques for humans are neutral buoyancy and parabolic flights.
Neutral Buyoancy
Neutral buoyancy simulates the weightless environment of space. First equipment is lowered into the pool using an overhead crane. Suited astronauts then get in the tank and support divers add weight to the astronauts so that they experience no buoyant force and no rotational moment about their center of mass.
One downside of using neutral buoyancy to simulate microgravity is the significant amount of drag presented by water. Generally, drag effects are minimized by doing tasks slowly in the water. Another downside of neutral buoyancy simulation is that astronauts are not weightless within their suits, thus, precise suit sizing is critical. [2]
Parabolic Flights
The sensation of weightlessness is achieved by reducing thrust and lowering the nose to maintain a neutral, or "zero lift", configuration such that the aircraft follows a ballistic trajectory, with engine thrust exactly compensating for drag. Weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way "up-and-over the hump", until the craft reaches a downward pitch angle of around 30 degrees. At this point, the craft is pointing downward at high speed and must begin to pull back into the nose-up attitude to repeat the maneuver. [1, 3]
Drop tube / Drop tower
For non-human payloads, a drop tower or drop tube can be used (e.g. Fallturm Bremen (de, en)).
In physics and materials science, a drop tower or drop tube is a structure used to produce a controlled period of weightlessness for an object under study. Air bags, polystyrene pellets, and magnetic or mechanical brakes are sometimes used to arrest the fall of the experimental payload. In other cases, high-speed impact with a substrate at the bottom of the tower is an intentional part of the experimental protocol.
Not all such facilities are towers - NASA Glenn's Zero Gravity Research Facility is based on a vertical shaft, extending to 510 feet (155 m) below ground level.
The duration of free-fall produced in a drop tube depends on the length of the tube and its degree of internal evacuation. The 105-meter drop tube at Marshall Space Flight Center produces 4.6 seconds of weightlessness when it is fully evacuated. In the drop facility Fallturm Bremen at University of Bremen a catapult can be used to throw the experiment upwards to prolong the weightlessness from 4.74 to nearly 9.3 seconds. Negating the physical space needed for the initial acceleration, this technique doubles the effective period of weightlessness. The NASA Glenn Research Center has a 5 second drop tower (The Zero Gravity Facility) and a 2.2 second drop tower (The 2.2 Second Drop Tower). [4]
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced-gravity_aircraft
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_Buoyancy_Simulator
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut_training
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_tube
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The two most commonly used techniques for humans are neutral buoyancy and parabolic flights.
Neutral Buyoancy
Neutral buoyancy simulates the weightless environment of space. First equipment is lowered into the pool using an overhead crane. Suited astronauts then get in the tank and support divers add weight to the astronauts so that they experience no buoyant force and no rotational moment about their center of mass.
One downside of using neutral buoyancy to simulate microgravity is the significant amount of drag presented by water. Generally, drag effects are minimized by doing tasks slowly in the water. Another downside of neutral buoyancy simulation is that astronauts are not weightless within their suits, thus, precise suit sizing is critical. [2]
Parabolic Flights
The sensation of weightlessness is achieved by reducing thrust and lowering the nose to maintain a neutral, or "zero lift", configuration such that the aircraft follows a ballistic trajectory, with engine thrust exactly compensating for drag. Weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way "up-and-over the hump", until the craft reaches a downward pitch angle of around 30 degrees. At this point, the craft is pointing downward at high speed and must begin to pull back into the nose-up attitude to repeat the maneuver. [1, 3]
Drop tube / Drop tower
For non-human payloads, a drop tower or drop tube can be used (e.g. Fallturm Bremen (de, en)).
In physics and materials science, a drop tower or drop tube is a structure used to produce a controlled period of weightlessness for an object under study. Air bags, polystyrene pellets, and magnetic or mechanical brakes are sometimes used to arrest the fall of the experimental payload. In other cases, high-speed impact with a substrate at the bottom of the tower is an intentional part of the experimental protocol.
Not all such facilities are towers - NASA Glenn's Zero Gravity Research Facility is based on a vertical shaft, extending to 510 feet (155 m) below ground level.
The duration of free-fall produced in a drop tube depends on the length of the tube and its degree of internal evacuation. The 105-meter drop tube at Marshall Space Flight Center produces 4.6 seconds of weightlessness when it is fully evacuated. In the drop facility Fallturm Bremen at University of Bremen a catapult can be used to throw the experiment upwards to prolong the weightlessness from 4.74 to nearly 9.3 seconds. Negating the physical space needed for the initial acceleration, this technique doubles the effective period of weightlessness. The NASA Glenn Research Center has a 5 second drop tower (The Zero Gravity Facility) and a 2.2 second drop tower (The 2.2 Second Drop Tower). [4]
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced-gravity_aircraft
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_Buoyancy_Simulator
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut_training
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_tube
$endgroup$
The two most commonly used techniques for humans are neutral buoyancy and parabolic flights.
Neutral Buyoancy
Neutral buoyancy simulates the weightless environment of space. First equipment is lowered into the pool using an overhead crane. Suited astronauts then get in the tank and support divers add weight to the astronauts so that they experience no buoyant force and no rotational moment about their center of mass.
One downside of using neutral buoyancy to simulate microgravity is the significant amount of drag presented by water. Generally, drag effects are minimized by doing tasks slowly in the water. Another downside of neutral buoyancy simulation is that astronauts are not weightless within their suits, thus, precise suit sizing is critical. [2]
Parabolic Flights
The sensation of weightlessness is achieved by reducing thrust and lowering the nose to maintain a neutral, or "zero lift", configuration such that the aircraft follows a ballistic trajectory, with engine thrust exactly compensating for drag. Weightlessness begins while ascending and lasts all the way "up-and-over the hump", until the craft reaches a downward pitch angle of around 30 degrees. At this point, the craft is pointing downward at high speed and must begin to pull back into the nose-up attitude to repeat the maneuver. [1, 3]
Drop tube / Drop tower
For non-human payloads, a drop tower or drop tube can be used (e.g. Fallturm Bremen (de, en)).
In physics and materials science, a drop tower or drop tube is a structure used to produce a controlled period of weightlessness for an object under study. Air bags, polystyrene pellets, and magnetic or mechanical brakes are sometimes used to arrest the fall of the experimental payload. In other cases, high-speed impact with a substrate at the bottom of the tower is an intentional part of the experimental protocol.
Not all such facilities are towers - NASA Glenn's Zero Gravity Research Facility is based on a vertical shaft, extending to 510 feet (155 m) below ground level.
The duration of free-fall produced in a drop tube depends on the length of the tube and its degree of internal evacuation. The 105-meter drop tube at Marshall Space Flight Center produces 4.6 seconds of weightlessness when it is fully evacuated. In the drop facility Fallturm Bremen at University of Bremen a catapult can be used to throw the experiment upwards to prolong the weightlessness from 4.74 to nearly 9.3 seconds. Negating the physical space needed for the initial acceleration, this technique doubles the effective period of weightlessness. The NASA Glenn Research Center has a 5 second drop tower (The Zero Gravity Facility) and a 2.2 second drop tower (The 2.2 Second Drop Tower). [4]
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced-gravity_aircraft
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_Buoyancy_Simulator
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut_training
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drop_tube
answered 7 hours ago
PolygnomePolygnome
3,84718 silver badges31 bronze badges
3,84718 silver badges31 bronze badges
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
These techniques may be modified to simulate lower nonzero gravity.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NASA used several methods to simulate the effects of lunar gravity on astronauts, in preparation to the lunar landing. Neil Armstrong mentions "various simulations" when walking on the Moon for the first time:
"There seems to be no difficulty in moving around as we suspected. It's even perhaps easier than the simulations at one sixth g that we performed in the various simulations on the ground."
According to Lunar Gravity Simulation and its Effect on Human Performance, R.J. Shavelson, 1968, the main methods of lunar gravity simulation at the time were:
- parabolic aircraft flight
- water immersion
- vertical suspension, with counterbalances or springs to reduce weight
- inclined plane suspension
The inclined plane method, developed and patented by NASA in 1960s, involved sideways suspension of the test subject, allowing locomotion in a straight line (see short film on youtube). NASA has also more recently (1996) developed a new type of suspension system, called the "enhanced Zero-gravity Locomotion Simulator" or eZLS, which can be adjusted to simulate different levels of reduced gravity.
Long-term effects of reduced gravity on the body are also very important to study on the ground. Long-term reduced gravity is usually simulated either with bed rest, or dry immersion rest: floating partially under thermoneutral water in a waterproof loose "hammock" that keeps the skin dry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NASA used several methods to simulate the effects of lunar gravity on astronauts, in preparation to the lunar landing. Neil Armstrong mentions "various simulations" when walking on the Moon for the first time:
"There seems to be no difficulty in moving around as we suspected. It's even perhaps easier than the simulations at one sixth g that we performed in the various simulations on the ground."
According to Lunar Gravity Simulation and its Effect on Human Performance, R.J. Shavelson, 1968, the main methods of lunar gravity simulation at the time were:
- parabolic aircraft flight
- water immersion
- vertical suspension, with counterbalances or springs to reduce weight
- inclined plane suspension
The inclined plane method, developed and patented by NASA in 1960s, involved sideways suspension of the test subject, allowing locomotion in a straight line (see short film on youtube). NASA has also more recently (1996) developed a new type of suspension system, called the "enhanced Zero-gravity Locomotion Simulator" or eZLS, which can be adjusted to simulate different levels of reduced gravity.
Long-term effects of reduced gravity on the body are also very important to study on the ground. Long-term reduced gravity is usually simulated either with bed rest, or dry immersion rest: floating partially under thermoneutral water in a waterproof loose "hammock" that keeps the skin dry.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
NASA used several methods to simulate the effects of lunar gravity on astronauts, in preparation to the lunar landing. Neil Armstrong mentions "various simulations" when walking on the Moon for the first time:
"There seems to be no difficulty in moving around as we suspected. It's even perhaps easier than the simulations at one sixth g that we performed in the various simulations on the ground."
According to Lunar Gravity Simulation and its Effect on Human Performance, R.J. Shavelson, 1968, the main methods of lunar gravity simulation at the time were:
- parabolic aircraft flight
- water immersion
- vertical suspension, with counterbalances or springs to reduce weight
- inclined plane suspension
The inclined plane method, developed and patented by NASA in 1960s, involved sideways suspension of the test subject, allowing locomotion in a straight line (see short film on youtube). NASA has also more recently (1996) developed a new type of suspension system, called the "enhanced Zero-gravity Locomotion Simulator" or eZLS, which can be adjusted to simulate different levels of reduced gravity.
Long-term effects of reduced gravity on the body are also very important to study on the ground. Long-term reduced gravity is usually simulated either with bed rest, or dry immersion rest: floating partially under thermoneutral water in a waterproof loose "hammock" that keeps the skin dry.
$endgroup$
NASA used several methods to simulate the effects of lunar gravity on astronauts, in preparation to the lunar landing. Neil Armstrong mentions "various simulations" when walking on the Moon for the first time:
"There seems to be no difficulty in moving around as we suspected. It's even perhaps easier than the simulations at one sixth g that we performed in the various simulations on the ground."
According to Lunar Gravity Simulation and its Effect on Human Performance, R.J. Shavelson, 1968, the main methods of lunar gravity simulation at the time were:
- parabolic aircraft flight
- water immersion
- vertical suspension, with counterbalances or springs to reduce weight
- inclined plane suspension
The inclined plane method, developed and patented by NASA in 1960s, involved sideways suspension of the test subject, allowing locomotion in a straight line (see short film on youtube). NASA has also more recently (1996) developed a new type of suspension system, called the "enhanced Zero-gravity Locomotion Simulator" or eZLS, which can be adjusted to simulate different levels of reduced gravity.
Long-term effects of reduced gravity on the body are also very important to study on the ground. Long-term reduced gravity is usually simulated either with bed rest, or dry immersion rest: floating partially under thermoneutral water in a waterproof loose "hammock" that keeps the skin dry.
answered 5 hours ago
Miles MutkaMiles Mutka
1262 bronze badges
1262 bronze badges
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
there's a fifth method: the lunar lander simulators had a jet engine that produced enough thrust to counteract 5/6 of the simulator's weight.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
4 hours ago
add a comment |
DaveIdito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DaveIdito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DaveIdito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
DaveIdito is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38647%2fhow-is-lower-no-gravity-simulated-on-a-planet-with-gravity-without-leaving-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You may use a tall evacuated tube like the Fallturm of Bremen to simulate zero gravity for a short time. If the speed of free fall is lowered precisely, nonzero gravity may be simulated. Any value of gravity between the planet's gravity and zero could be simulated. Being within the tower is no leaving the planet itself.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Is using a plane "leaving the planet" or not, in your definition?
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Polygnome a plane needs an atmosphere of the planet. Staying in the atmosphere is no leave of the planet. But you need more pressure than the martian atmosphere for a plane to fly.
$endgroup$
– Uwe
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Uwe Yeah but the title says "leaving the surface" and the question body says "leaving the planet", so it would be nice if OP clarified what is meant.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
8 hours ago