What would be the next technological step after advancing from cybernetic body parts to nanotechnology?Would nanotechnology-scale devices be vulnerable to EMP?What would be the next technological step for a civilization after it has depleted all resources that allow for conventional technologies?How advanced or effective weapons can be created from mostly animal body parts?In the future, how would a cybernetic implant work?What sort of cybernetic/genetic enhancements would make sense for cold-blooded soldiers leaving their natural habitat?What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
Can you feel passing through the sound barrier in an F-16?
Thread-safe, Convenient and Performant Random Number Generator
Defense against attacks using dictionaries
Potential new partner angry about first collaboration - how to answer email to close up this encounter in a graceful manner
Was Tuvok bluffing when he said that Voyager's transporters rendered the Kazon weapons useless?
Should my "average" PC be able to discern the potential of encountering a gelatinous cube from subtle clues?
Why don't we use Cavea-B
Why doesn't mathematics collapse even though humans quite often make mistakes in their proofs?
Why my earth simulation is slower than the reality?
A second course in the representation theory
Does adding the 'precise' tag to daggers break anything?
Is there such a thing as too inconvenient?
Don't understand MOSFET as amplifier
Can you grapple/shove with the Hunter Ranger's Whirlwind Attack?
Does Git delete empty folders?
Co-author responds to email by mistake cc'ing the EiC
Why don't politicians push for fossil fuel reduction by pointing out their scarcity?
Is it insecure to have an ansible user with passwordless sudo?
Can my boyfriend, who lives in the UK and has a Polish passport, visit me in the USA?
What is the improvement of the "legally binding commitment" proposed by Boris Johnson over the existing "backstop"?
Why did this happen to Thanos's ships at the end of "Avengers: Endgame"?
Something in the TV
Is "stainless" a bulk or a surface property of stainless steel?
Chess software to analyze games
What would be the next technological step after advancing from cybernetic body parts to nanotechnology?
Would nanotechnology-scale devices be vulnerable to EMP?What would be the next technological step for a civilization after it has depleted all resources that allow for conventional technologies?How advanced or effective weapons can be created from mostly animal body parts?In the future, how would a cybernetic implant work?What sort of cybernetic/genetic enhancements would make sense for cold-blooded soldiers leaving their natural habitat?What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Technology in 2019 has many ways of augmenting the human body, for example: hearing aids, pacemakers, artificial hips, breast implants, artificial spine discs, coronary stents and even artificial eye lenses. In addition to that there are many different kinds of prosthetics, even thought controlled.
Presumably the next big step will be all artificial organs, combined with advanced prosthetics, and humanity will enter a cybernetic era.
Assuming that at the peak of cybernetics era, the nanotechnology is perfected to the point where humans don't need surgeries that replace human organs and body parts. Instead, the nano robots that are always present in the blood stream instantly repair any damage to all organs and body parts and augment the human body, greatly increasing all capabilities.
Question:
What would be the next step after nanotechnology, and why?
(for example: could nano robots be replaced with some kind of DNA programs that are immune to EMP weapons in the wars of the future?)
science-based near-future medicine nanotechnology cybernetics
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Technology in 2019 has many ways of augmenting the human body, for example: hearing aids, pacemakers, artificial hips, breast implants, artificial spine discs, coronary stents and even artificial eye lenses. In addition to that there are many different kinds of prosthetics, even thought controlled.
Presumably the next big step will be all artificial organs, combined with advanced prosthetics, and humanity will enter a cybernetic era.
Assuming that at the peak of cybernetics era, the nanotechnology is perfected to the point where humans don't need surgeries that replace human organs and body parts. Instead, the nano robots that are always present in the blood stream instantly repair any damage to all organs and body parts and augment the human body, greatly increasing all capabilities.
Question:
What would be the next step after nanotechnology, and why?
(for example: could nano robots be replaced with some kind of DNA programs that are immune to EMP weapons in the wars of the future?)
science-based near-future medicine nanotechnology cybernetics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Technology in 2019 has many ways of augmenting the human body, for example: hearing aids, pacemakers, artificial hips, breast implants, artificial spine discs, coronary stents and even artificial eye lenses. In addition to that there are many different kinds of prosthetics, even thought controlled.
Presumably the next big step will be all artificial organs, combined with advanced prosthetics, and humanity will enter a cybernetic era.
Assuming that at the peak of cybernetics era, the nanotechnology is perfected to the point where humans don't need surgeries that replace human organs and body parts. Instead, the nano robots that are always present in the blood stream instantly repair any damage to all organs and body parts and augment the human body, greatly increasing all capabilities.
Question:
What would be the next step after nanotechnology, and why?
(for example: could nano robots be replaced with some kind of DNA programs that are immune to EMP weapons in the wars of the future?)
science-based near-future medicine nanotechnology cybernetics
$endgroup$
Technology in 2019 has many ways of augmenting the human body, for example: hearing aids, pacemakers, artificial hips, breast implants, artificial spine discs, coronary stents and even artificial eye lenses. In addition to that there are many different kinds of prosthetics, even thought controlled.
Presumably the next big step will be all artificial organs, combined with advanced prosthetics, and humanity will enter a cybernetic era.
Assuming that at the peak of cybernetics era, the nanotechnology is perfected to the point where humans don't need surgeries that replace human organs and body parts. Instead, the nano robots that are always present in the blood stream instantly repair any damage to all organs and body parts and augment the human body, greatly increasing all capabilities.
Question:
What would be the next step after nanotechnology, and why?
(for example: could nano robots be replaced with some kind of DNA programs that are immune to EMP weapons in the wars of the future?)
science-based near-future medicine nanotechnology cybernetics
science-based near-future medicine nanotechnology cybernetics
asked 9 hours ago
JinjinovJinjinov
1921 silver badge10 bronze badges
1921 silver badge10 bronze badges
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Picotech and Femtotech
If you define the technologies available by the scale of engineering that is being supported, then of course the next stage involves Picotech:
technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the picoscale with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. It would supposedly allow not only precision arrangement of atoms but even arrangement of their internal states, leading not only to enhanced control over natural chemical reactions but to the creation of entirely novel atoms and molecules, including some stable and useful forms of exotic matter.
And after that of course would be Femtotech:
a technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the femtoscale, with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. Femtotech would supposedly allow precision arrangement of the elementary particles that make up atoms. This would supposedly allow such things as transmutation of elements without the use of massive facilities or the release of radiation, the creation of various kinds of exotic stable or metastable elements and other fantastic effects.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That’s a tough question... especially because some of them are questioning the human nature at its core. But as can be seen ..the human strives for any enhancement possible to perfect itself. At some point it might be possible to replicate our brain to such a degree that existence itself becomes a question mark if it really is just like a picture but just more complicated. The body at that point would become somewhat unimportant...if a clone can persist and individuality is more seen as a process of the development of that picture through time and each iteration and change made.
At that point humans might give their bodies any form they can think of and what is doable. Death would also be not a question anymore. Bodies might not be reproduced naturally anymore but be hulls that you can put your brains into. At that moment though, humanity ceased to exist.
Dark enough :0 ?
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Task Specific Incarnations
As @WorldPeace suggests, brain replacement is the ultimate physical upgrade; allowing the consciousness to move from body to body and through the discipline of keeping backups and regular body maintenance, escaping death entirely.
Once that is achieved, although it will still be nice to have nanites onboard for impromptu repairs, the next big thing will be customization...
Need superior vision for your detail-oriented job, replace your human-norm optics with our new EagleEye 3000 occular replacements. Unlike the simple eye-replacements of the past, this new offering replaces your entire host and includes increased neurological tissue dedicated to interpreting your new higher resolution world view in real time and massive amounts of storage so that you never forget the details.
Going on a more sensual vacation, why not ride in a new host with ten times the normal pleasure receptors. Every nerve in your new body is optimized for your enjoyment.
Joining the latest Martian archaeological team, only a fool would leave Earth in less than a BioDome III fully sealed and self sufficient host. Models available for week-long, month-long and even year-long adventures between replenishment breaks. Fully radiation and vacuum resistant or your money back.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Ship of Theseus" brain replacement
(The details are here). If you have nanotechnology and picotechnology, you can work at a scale below glial cells and neurons. This allows to record and "decode" the operation of every single neuron, one a a time. Each new "nanoneuron" would interface with either existing biological neurons or other nanoneurons.
A single neuron's firing "rules" are quite straightforward (we know this from experiments on organisms like Planaria and freshwater snails). Our problem now is that complexity scales up so quickly that it's impossible to decode any significant neural circuit from above its scale. Nanoneural machines would not have this problem, and they could replace the brain one neuron at a time, leaving it working exactly as before.
But now the brain's state can be analyzed, transmitted, and saved. Also, defective or damaged neurons can now be replaced from backups. New neurons can be added, once the energy budget limit that dictates brain size has been removed. Once all neurons are actually nanomachines, their "clock" might safely be increased.
With a nanonic brain and a suitable body, man can now become immortal - as well as perhaps increasing his "natural" intelligence and controlling his body.
Darker possibilities include that of analyzing a brain state in search of the roots of some given convictions, beliefs, and loyalties - either to verify they're there, ensure they won't change, or ensure the opposite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153441%2fwhat-would-be-the-next-technological-step-after-advancing-from-cybernetic-body-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Picotech and Femtotech
If you define the technologies available by the scale of engineering that is being supported, then of course the next stage involves Picotech:
technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the picoscale with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. It would supposedly allow not only precision arrangement of atoms but even arrangement of their internal states, leading not only to enhanced control over natural chemical reactions but to the creation of entirely novel atoms and molecules, including some stable and useful forms of exotic matter.
And after that of course would be Femtotech:
a technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the femtoscale, with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. Femtotech would supposedly allow precision arrangement of the elementary particles that make up atoms. This would supposedly allow such things as transmutation of elements without the use of massive facilities or the release of radiation, the creation of various kinds of exotic stable or metastable elements and other fantastic effects.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picotech and Femtotech
If you define the technologies available by the scale of engineering that is being supported, then of course the next stage involves Picotech:
technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the picoscale with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. It would supposedly allow not only precision arrangement of atoms but even arrangement of their internal states, leading not only to enhanced control over natural chemical reactions but to the creation of entirely novel atoms and molecules, including some stable and useful forms of exotic matter.
And after that of course would be Femtotech:
a technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the femtoscale, with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. Femtotech would supposedly allow precision arrangement of the elementary particles that make up atoms. This would supposedly allow such things as transmutation of elements without the use of massive facilities or the release of radiation, the creation of various kinds of exotic stable or metastable elements and other fantastic effects.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picotech and Femtotech
If you define the technologies available by the scale of engineering that is being supported, then of course the next stage involves Picotech:
technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the picoscale with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. It would supposedly allow not only precision arrangement of atoms but even arrangement of their internal states, leading not only to enhanced control over natural chemical reactions but to the creation of entirely novel atoms and molecules, including some stable and useful forms of exotic matter.
And after that of course would be Femtotech:
a technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the femtoscale, with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. Femtotech would supposedly allow precision arrangement of the elementary particles that make up atoms. This would supposedly allow such things as transmutation of elements without the use of massive facilities or the release of radiation, the creation of various kinds of exotic stable or metastable elements and other fantastic effects.
$endgroup$
Picotech and Femtotech
If you define the technologies available by the scale of engineering that is being supported, then of course the next stage involves Picotech:
technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the picoscale with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. It would supposedly allow not only precision arrangement of atoms but even arrangement of their internal states, leading not only to enhanced control over natural chemical reactions but to the creation of entirely novel atoms and molecules, including some stable and useful forms of exotic matter.
And after that of course would be Femtotech:
a technology or set of technologies that rearranges matter on the femtoscale, with something analogous to nanotechnology's scope and precision. Femtotech would supposedly allow precision arrangement of the elementary particles that make up atoms. This would supposedly allow such things as transmutation of elements without the use of massive facilities or the release of radiation, the creation of various kinds of exotic stable or metastable elements and other fantastic effects.
answered 8 hours ago
vicky_molokhvicky_molokh
9692 silver badges18 bronze badges
9692 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That’s a tough question... especially because some of them are questioning the human nature at its core. But as can be seen ..the human strives for any enhancement possible to perfect itself. At some point it might be possible to replicate our brain to such a degree that existence itself becomes a question mark if it really is just like a picture but just more complicated. The body at that point would become somewhat unimportant...if a clone can persist and individuality is more seen as a process of the development of that picture through time and each iteration and change made.
At that point humans might give their bodies any form they can think of and what is doable. Death would also be not a question anymore. Bodies might not be reproduced naturally anymore but be hulls that you can put your brains into. At that moment though, humanity ceased to exist.
Dark enough :0 ?
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That’s a tough question... especially because some of them are questioning the human nature at its core. But as can be seen ..the human strives for any enhancement possible to perfect itself. At some point it might be possible to replicate our brain to such a degree that existence itself becomes a question mark if it really is just like a picture but just more complicated. The body at that point would become somewhat unimportant...if a clone can persist and individuality is more seen as a process of the development of that picture through time and each iteration and change made.
At that point humans might give their bodies any form they can think of and what is doable. Death would also be not a question anymore. Bodies might not be reproduced naturally anymore but be hulls that you can put your brains into. At that moment though, humanity ceased to exist.
Dark enough :0 ?
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That’s a tough question... especially because some of them are questioning the human nature at its core. But as can be seen ..the human strives for any enhancement possible to perfect itself. At some point it might be possible to replicate our brain to such a degree that existence itself becomes a question mark if it really is just like a picture but just more complicated. The body at that point would become somewhat unimportant...if a clone can persist and individuality is more seen as a process of the development of that picture through time and each iteration and change made.
At that point humans might give their bodies any form they can think of and what is doable. Death would also be not a question anymore. Bodies might not be reproduced naturally anymore but be hulls that you can put your brains into. At that moment though, humanity ceased to exist.
Dark enough :0 ?
New contributor
$endgroup$
That’s a tough question... especially because some of them are questioning the human nature at its core. But as can be seen ..the human strives for any enhancement possible to perfect itself. At some point it might be possible to replicate our brain to such a degree that existence itself becomes a question mark if it really is just like a picture but just more complicated. The body at that point would become somewhat unimportant...if a clone can persist and individuality is more seen as a process of the development of that picture through time and each iteration and change made.
At that point humans might give their bodies any form they can think of and what is doable. Death would also be not a question anymore. Bodies might not be reproduced naturally anymore but be hulls that you can put your brains into. At that moment though, humanity ceased to exist.
Dark enough :0 ?
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
World PeaceWorld Peace
1363 bronze badges
1363 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Task Specific Incarnations
As @WorldPeace suggests, brain replacement is the ultimate physical upgrade; allowing the consciousness to move from body to body and through the discipline of keeping backups and regular body maintenance, escaping death entirely.
Once that is achieved, although it will still be nice to have nanites onboard for impromptu repairs, the next big thing will be customization...
Need superior vision for your detail-oriented job, replace your human-norm optics with our new EagleEye 3000 occular replacements. Unlike the simple eye-replacements of the past, this new offering replaces your entire host and includes increased neurological tissue dedicated to interpreting your new higher resolution world view in real time and massive amounts of storage so that you never forget the details.
Going on a more sensual vacation, why not ride in a new host with ten times the normal pleasure receptors. Every nerve in your new body is optimized for your enjoyment.
Joining the latest Martian archaeological team, only a fool would leave Earth in less than a BioDome III fully sealed and self sufficient host. Models available for week-long, month-long and even year-long adventures between replenishment breaks. Fully radiation and vacuum resistant or your money back.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Task Specific Incarnations
As @WorldPeace suggests, brain replacement is the ultimate physical upgrade; allowing the consciousness to move from body to body and through the discipline of keeping backups and regular body maintenance, escaping death entirely.
Once that is achieved, although it will still be nice to have nanites onboard for impromptu repairs, the next big thing will be customization...
Need superior vision for your detail-oriented job, replace your human-norm optics with our new EagleEye 3000 occular replacements. Unlike the simple eye-replacements of the past, this new offering replaces your entire host and includes increased neurological tissue dedicated to interpreting your new higher resolution world view in real time and massive amounts of storage so that you never forget the details.
Going on a more sensual vacation, why not ride in a new host with ten times the normal pleasure receptors. Every nerve in your new body is optimized for your enjoyment.
Joining the latest Martian archaeological team, only a fool would leave Earth in less than a BioDome III fully sealed and self sufficient host. Models available for week-long, month-long and even year-long adventures between replenishment breaks. Fully radiation and vacuum resistant or your money back.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Task Specific Incarnations
As @WorldPeace suggests, brain replacement is the ultimate physical upgrade; allowing the consciousness to move from body to body and through the discipline of keeping backups and regular body maintenance, escaping death entirely.
Once that is achieved, although it will still be nice to have nanites onboard for impromptu repairs, the next big thing will be customization...
Need superior vision for your detail-oriented job, replace your human-norm optics with our new EagleEye 3000 occular replacements. Unlike the simple eye-replacements of the past, this new offering replaces your entire host and includes increased neurological tissue dedicated to interpreting your new higher resolution world view in real time and massive amounts of storage so that you never forget the details.
Going on a more sensual vacation, why not ride in a new host with ten times the normal pleasure receptors. Every nerve in your new body is optimized for your enjoyment.
Joining the latest Martian archaeological team, only a fool would leave Earth in less than a BioDome III fully sealed and self sufficient host. Models available for week-long, month-long and even year-long adventures between replenishment breaks. Fully radiation and vacuum resistant or your money back.
$endgroup$
Task Specific Incarnations
As @WorldPeace suggests, brain replacement is the ultimate physical upgrade; allowing the consciousness to move from body to body and through the discipline of keeping backups and regular body maintenance, escaping death entirely.
Once that is achieved, although it will still be nice to have nanites onboard for impromptu repairs, the next big thing will be customization...
Need superior vision for your detail-oriented job, replace your human-norm optics with our new EagleEye 3000 occular replacements. Unlike the simple eye-replacements of the past, this new offering replaces your entire host and includes increased neurological tissue dedicated to interpreting your new higher resolution world view in real time and massive amounts of storage so that you never forget the details.
Going on a more sensual vacation, why not ride in a new host with ten times the normal pleasure receptors. Every nerve in your new body is optimized for your enjoyment.
Joining the latest Martian archaeological team, only a fool would leave Earth in less than a BioDome III fully sealed and self sufficient host. Models available for week-long, month-long and even year-long adventures between replenishment breaks. Fully radiation and vacuum resistant or your money back.
answered 8 hours ago
Henry TaylorHenry Taylor
49.7k10 gold badges78 silver badges183 bronze badges
49.7k10 gold badges78 silver badges183 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I must say these points look like still a subset of the 'nanotech era'.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@vicky_molokh, How So? In each of the points, it is the entire host which is being replaced. At least that is what I am trying to portray. A completely new body customized to the requirements of each life experience. Nanites are about maintaining the host you are already wearing. This is about disposable incarnations.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Not just nanites, but general nanoscale construction. Reconstructing cells is generally considered within the 'nano' scope as far as I know, and the things you're listing seem to largely be about moving about, destroying or constructing cells.
$endgroup$
– vicky_molokh
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
If the question is "how were they made?", then yes, the host bodies are a production of nanoscale construction. I was referring to the commoditization of full human bodies. Not so much a shift in technology as a shift in perception of the final product. Similar in some respect to considering nanotech to be separate from cybernetics since technically nanites are "machines which get inserted into biological bodies" which makes them extremely generalize cybernetic implants.
$endgroup$
– Henry Taylor
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Ship of Theseus" brain replacement
(The details are here). If you have nanotechnology and picotechnology, you can work at a scale below glial cells and neurons. This allows to record and "decode" the operation of every single neuron, one a a time. Each new "nanoneuron" would interface with either existing biological neurons or other nanoneurons.
A single neuron's firing "rules" are quite straightforward (we know this from experiments on organisms like Planaria and freshwater snails). Our problem now is that complexity scales up so quickly that it's impossible to decode any significant neural circuit from above its scale. Nanoneural machines would not have this problem, and they could replace the brain one neuron at a time, leaving it working exactly as before.
But now the brain's state can be analyzed, transmitted, and saved. Also, defective or damaged neurons can now be replaced from backups. New neurons can be added, once the energy budget limit that dictates brain size has been removed. Once all neurons are actually nanomachines, their "clock" might safely be increased.
With a nanonic brain and a suitable body, man can now become immortal - as well as perhaps increasing his "natural" intelligence and controlling his body.
Darker possibilities include that of analyzing a brain state in search of the roots of some given convictions, beliefs, and loyalties - either to verify they're there, ensure they won't change, or ensure the opposite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Ship of Theseus" brain replacement
(The details are here). If you have nanotechnology and picotechnology, you can work at a scale below glial cells and neurons. This allows to record and "decode" the operation of every single neuron, one a a time. Each new "nanoneuron" would interface with either existing biological neurons or other nanoneurons.
A single neuron's firing "rules" are quite straightforward (we know this from experiments on organisms like Planaria and freshwater snails). Our problem now is that complexity scales up so quickly that it's impossible to decode any significant neural circuit from above its scale. Nanoneural machines would not have this problem, and they could replace the brain one neuron at a time, leaving it working exactly as before.
But now the brain's state can be analyzed, transmitted, and saved. Also, defective or damaged neurons can now be replaced from backups. New neurons can be added, once the energy budget limit that dictates brain size has been removed. Once all neurons are actually nanomachines, their "clock" might safely be increased.
With a nanonic brain and a suitable body, man can now become immortal - as well as perhaps increasing his "natural" intelligence and controlling his body.
Darker possibilities include that of analyzing a brain state in search of the roots of some given convictions, beliefs, and loyalties - either to verify they're there, ensure they won't change, or ensure the opposite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Ship of Theseus" brain replacement
(The details are here). If you have nanotechnology and picotechnology, you can work at a scale below glial cells and neurons. This allows to record and "decode" the operation of every single neuron, one a a time. Each new "nanoneuron" would interface with either existing biological neurons or other nanoneurons.
A single neuron's firing "rules" are quite straightforward (we know this from experiments on organisms like Planaria and freshwater snails). Our problem now is that complexity scales up so quickly that it's impossible to decode any significant neural circuit from above its scale. Nanoneural machines would not have this problem, and they could replace the brain one neuron at a time, leaving it working exactly as before.
But now the brain's state can be analyzed, transmitted, and saved. Also, defective or damaged neurons can now be replaced from backups. New neurons can be added, once the energy budget limit that dictates brain size has been removed. Once all neurons are actually nanomachines, their "clock" might safely be increased.
With a nanonic brain and a suitable body, man can now become immortal - as well as perhaps increasing his "natural" intelligence and controlling his body.
Darker possibilities include that of analyzing a brain state in search of the roots of some given convictions, beliefs, and loyalties - either to verify they're there, ensure they won't change, or ensure the opposite.
$endgroup$
"Ship of Theseus" brain replacement
(The details are here). If you have nanotechnology and picotechnology, you can work at a scale below glial cells and neurons. This allows to record and "decode" the operation of every single neuron, one a a time. Each new "nanoneuron" would interface with either existing biological neurons or other nanoneurons.
A single neuron's firing "rules" are quite straightforward (we know this from experiments on organisms like Planaria and freshwater snails). Our problem now is that complexity scales up so quickly that it's impossible to decode any significant neural circuit from above its scale. Nanoneural machines would not have this problem, and they could replace the brain one neuron at a time, leaving it working exactly as before.
But now the brain's state can be analyzed, transmitted, and saved. Also, defective or damaged neurons can now be replaced from backups. New neurons can be added, once the energy budget limit that dictates brain size has been removed. Once all neurons are actually nanomachines, their "clock" might safely be increased.
With a nanonic brain and a suitable body, man can now become immortal - as well as perhaps increasing his "natural" intelligence and controlling his body.
Darker possibilities include that of analyzing a brain state in search of the roots of some given convictions, beliefs, and loyalties - either to verify they're there, ensure they won't change, or ensure the opposite.
answered 8 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
32.4k2 gold badges60 silver badges105 bronze badges
32.4k2 gold badges60 silver badges105 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153441%2fwhat-would-be-the-next-technological-step-after-advancing-from-cybernetic-body-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"nanotechnology" just describes the approximate size of (a subset of) technological devices. It says nothing about what those devices can do, or what they are used for.
$endgroup$
– a CVn♦
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why do you think that a nanomachine could possibly be vulnerable to EMP weapons? I cannot imagine how something that small could possibly couple with the electromagnetic pulse. (Hint: compare the size of a nanomachine with the wavelength of the EM fluctuations induced by the weapon.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP i guess i watched too much Stargate :) they destroyed the replicators with EMP weapons :)
$endgroup$
– Jinjinov
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MorrisTheCat: Why would nanomachines be vulnerable to EMP weapons? EMP weapons work by inducing damaging voltage in electric conductors. A nanomachine is very very small; let's say that the EMP comes with a humongous 100 kV/m. (For comparison, the insulating ability of air is about 1000 kV/m tops.) The nanomachine is one micrometer long. This means that the EMP will induce a maximum of a measly 0.1 V in the longest conductor in the nanomachine.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure this can be answered, it may be too opinion based. What would make one answer such as 'genetic editing/engineering ' better than say 'machine consciousness'?
$endgroup$
– BKlassen
8 hours ago