What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?How to prove I live in a specific address?Can I pay someone to end a relationship?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Is it legal for a restaurant to not accept cash?I don't like the payment methods offered by my landlord. Do I still have to pay rent?Are there any Social Security loopholes I can use to justify my inability to pay rent to my parents?Can I get prosecuted in the US for buying and using a stolen gift card?Do legal tender laws prevent “no cash” restaurants?Does the government have to accept cash for taxes?Legal liability for theft of credit card information left in my care with no contract?
Suspension compromise for urban use
Why do my bicycle brakes get worse and feel more 'squishy" over time?
Souce that you can't you tell your wife not to lend to others?
Nirvana is the ground layer underneath them all
What is the most difficult concept to grasp in Calculus 1?
Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?
Heyawake: An Introductory Puzzle
What was the intention with the Commodore 128?
Graphs for which a calculus student can reasonably compute the arclength
How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?
Sum Square Difference, which way is more Pythonic?
How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give up
Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?
What is the opposite of "hunger level"?
What is the prop for Thor's hammer (Mjölnir) made of?
Weird resistor with dots around it
Why does Japan use the same type of AC power outlet as the US?
Sums of binomial coefficients weighted by incomplete gamma
Number in overlapping range
Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?
What is the proper name for a circle with a line through it?
Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?
Escape Velocity - Won't the orbital path just become larger with higher initial velocity?
Some pads on a PCB are marked in clusters and I can't understand which one is which
What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?
How to prove I live in a specific address?Can I pay someone to end a relationship?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Is it legal for a restaurant to not accept cash?I don't like the payment methods offered by my landlord. Do I still have to pay rent?Are there any Social Security loopholes I can use to justify my inability to pay rent to my parents?Can I get prosecuted in the US for buying and using a stolen gift card?Do legal tender laws prevent “no cash” restaurants?Does the government have to accept cash for taxes?Legal liability for theft of credit card information left in my care with no contract?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?
Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.
united-states debt
|
show 1 more comment
If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?
Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.
united-states debt
8
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
1
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?
Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.
united-states debt
If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?
Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.
united-states debt
united-states debt
asked 10 hours ago
FlanManFlanMan
1523 bronze badges
1523 bronze badges
8
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
1
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
8
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
1
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
8
8
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
1
1
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.
Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.
The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.
The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.
Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.
add a comment |
Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.
The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.
From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.
However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.
One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43764%2fwhat-if-a-restaurant-suddenly-cannot-accept-credit-cards-and-the-customer-has-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.
Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.
The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.
The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.
Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.
add a comment |
There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.
Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.
The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.
The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.
Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.
add a comment |
There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.
Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.
The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.
The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.
Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.
There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.
Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.
The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.
The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.
Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.
answered 10 hours ago
OwainOwain
5681 silver badge6 bronze badges
5681 silver badge6 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.
The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.
From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.
However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.
One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.
The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.
From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.
However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.
One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.
The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.
From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.
However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.
One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.
Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.
The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.
From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.
However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.
One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.
answered 10 hours ago
mongomongo
2961 silver badge8 bronze badges
2961 silver badge8 bronze badges
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
add a comment |
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
7
7
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.
– David
8 hours ago
1
1
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
@David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).
– mongo
7 hours ago
1
1
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
@David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?
– mongo
7 hours ago
4
4
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.
– David
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43764%2fwhat-if-a-restaurant-suddenly-cannot-accept-credit-cards-and-the-customer-has-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
8
Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.
– animuson♦
9 hours ago
McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.
– mark b
8 hours ago
@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.
– animuson♦
8 hours ago
1
@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?
– Vality
2 hours ago
What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago