Puzzles with multiple, user-specific, solutionsA hunt for long forgotten treasure …but beware the pirate's curse!Ideas on puzzles for a scientific eventWhat drives the brain when creating puzzles?Red herrings in detective puzzlesEngel's Enigma OptimalsNear-impossible puzzle for ChristmasLogical descriptions of logic puzzlesLooking for a party puzzleCoding puzzles with pen and paperHow to create a puzzle from a pre-existing, fixed data source?How to generate a Zebra Puzzle?Creating a maze that is traversed by a pair of compasses
Introduction to the Sicilian
Easy way to get process information from a window
How to remove rebar passing through an inaccessible pipe
Rampant sharing of authorship among colleagues in the name of "collaboration". Is not taking part in it a death knell for a future in academia?
Should 2FA be enabled on service accounts?
What parameters are to be considered when choosing a MOSFET?
How would a lunar colony attack Earth?
What is the oxidation state of Mn in HMn(CO)5?
Just how much information should you share with a former client?
What to expect in a jazz audition
Applying for mortgage when living together but only one will be on the mortgage
What are the cons of stateless password generators?
Why didn't General Martok receive discommendation in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine?
May a hotel provide accommodation for fewer people than booked?
Can you remove a blindfold using the Telekinesis spell?
Value of a limit.
How can flights operated by the same company have such different prices when marketed by another?
Can machine learning learn a function like finding maximum from a list?
In the Schrödinger equation, can I have a Hamiltonian without a kinetic term?
Why was the Lobbying Transparency and Accountability Act of 2006 deemed too weak?
Coworker mumbles to herself when working, how to ask her to stop?
How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?
Why would an invisible personal shield be necessary?
Why are prop blades not shaped like household fan blades?
Puzzles with multiple, user-specific, solutions
A hunt for long forgotten treasure …but beware the pirate's curse!Ideas on puzzles for a scientific eventWhat drives the brain when creating puzzles?Red herrings in detective puzzlesEngel's Enigma OptimalsNear-impossible puzzle for ChristmasLogical descriptions of logic puzzlesLooking for a party puzzleCoding puzzles with pen and paperHow to create a puzzle from a pre-existing, fixed data source?How to generate a Zebra Puzzle?Creating a maze that is traversed by a pair of compasses
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have been tasked with coming up with a puzzle given the following constraints:
- Users (possibly 200 in all) will arrive at a fixed location and see a portion of the puzzle, which will be common to all users.
- There will be nobody present at this location to offer hints, or explanations.
- There should be multiple (between 5 and 20) different solutions given the same common information. Each user will be given some additional information that combines with the common information to yield a solution. (Given constraint #2, this is mostly to prevent cheating between users. It is acceptable for multiple solution paths to eventually yield the same solution as long as users know they can't simply copy off the person next to them.)
- Users may be given a prop or two, but they should be simple/cheap to acquire/manufacture. I have no desire to provide functioning copies of the Enigma machine to each of 200 possible users.
- Wordplay and culture-specific knowledge should be avoided.
- Internet access can not be assumed, and users are not avid puzzlers (so probably nothing more complicated than a standard Caesar cipher should be involved).
- Time to solution should be between 5 and 15 minutes. Faster isn't an issue, but neither should people be stuck for 60+ minutes.
- My time is valuable, as is that of the people who will check the solutions. The various solutions should be relatively quick to create and to confirm.
I have basically no idea what kind of puzzle would satisfy all of the constraints.
In this question I saw a reference to using different-colored cellophane to create different solution paths. This is very cool, but it would seem that only three different paths are possible (red/green/blue, or magenta/cyan/yellow), where I need at least five. A puzzle using a grid-based map as in this puzzle would seem to offer many different (and easily-checked) solutions, but then I would need to come up with a set of clues for each desired solution.
I am not (knowingly) requesting a ready-made puzzle, but rather some guidelines or puzzle types that combine common information with user-specific information to arrive at user-specific solutions.
puzzle-creation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been tasked with coming up with a puzzle given the following constraints:
- Users (possibly 200 in all) will arrive at a fixed location and see a portion of the puzzle, which will be common to all users.
- There will be nobody present at this location to offer hints, or explanations.
- There should be multiple (between 5 and 20) different solutions given the same common information. Each user will be given some additional information that combines with the common information to yield a solution. (Given constraint #2, this is mostly to prevent cheating between users. It is acceptable for multiple solution paths to eventually yield the same solution as long as users know they can't simply copy off the person next to them.)
- Users may be given a prop or two, but they should be simple/cheap to acquire/manufacture. I have no desire to provide functioning copies of the Enigma machine to each of 200 possible users.
- Wordplay and culture-specific knowledge should be avoided.
- Internet access can not be assumed, and users are not avid puzzlers (so probably nothing more complicated than a standard Caesar cipher should be involved).
- Time to solution should be between 5 and 15 minutes. Faster isn't an issue, but neither should people be stuck for 60+ minutes.
- My time is valuable, as is that of the people who will check the solutions. The various solutions should be relatively quick to create and to confirm.
I have basically no idea what kind of puzzle would satisfy all of the constraints.
In this question I saw a reference to using different-colored cellophane to create different solution paths. This is very cool, but it would seem that only three different paths are possible (red/green/blue, or magenta/cyan/yellow), where I need at least five. A puzzle using a grid-based map as in this puzzle would seem to offer many different (and easily-checked) solutions, but then I would need to come up with a set of clues for each desired solution.
I am not (knowingly) requesting a ready-made puzzle, but rather some guidelines or puzzle types that combine common information with user-specific information to arrive at user-specific solutions.
puzzle-creation
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been tasked with coming up with a puzzle given the following constraints:
- Users (possibly 200 in all) will arrive at a fixed location and see a portion of the puzzle, which will be common to all users.
- There will be nobody present at this location to offer hints, or explanations.
- There should be multiple (between 5 and 20) different solutions given the same common information. Each user will be given some additional information that combines with the common information to yield a solution. (Given constraint #2, this is mostly to prevent cheating between users. It is acceptable for multiple solution paths to eventually yield the same solution as long as users know they can't simply copy off the person next to them.)
- Users may be given a prop or two, but they should be simple/cheap to acquire/manufacture. I have no desire to provide functioning copies of the Enigma machine to each of 200 possible users.
- Wordplay and culture-specific knowledge should be avoided.
- Internet access can not be assumed, and users are not avid puzzlers (so probably nothing more complicated than a standard Caesar cipher should be involved).
- Time to solution should be between 5 and 15 minutes. Faster isn't an issue, but neither should people be stuck for 60+ minutes.
- My time is valuable, as is that of the people who will check the solutions. The various solutions should be relatively quick to create and to confirm.
I have basically no idea what kind of puzzle would satisfy all of the constraints.
In this question I saw a reference to using different-colored cellophane to create different solution paths. This is very cool, but it would seem that only three different paths are possible (red/green/blue, or magenta/cyan/yellow), where I need at least five. A puzzle using a grid-based map as in this puzzle would seem to offer many different (and easily-checked) solutions, but then I would need to come up with a set of clues for each desired solution.
I am not (knowingly) requesting a ready-made puzzle, but rather some guidelines or puzzle types that combine common information with user-specific information to arrive at user-specific solutions.
puzzle-creation
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have been tasked with coming up with a puzzle given the following constraints:
- Users (possibly 200 in all) will arrive at a fixed location and see a portion of the puzzle, which will be common to all users.
- There will be nobody present at this location to offer hints, or explanations.
- There should be multiple (between 5 and 20) different solutions given the same common information. Each user will be given some additional information that combines with the common information to yield a solution. (Given constraint #2, this is mostly to prevent cheating between users. It is acceptable for multiple solution paths to eventually yield the same solution as long as users know they can't simply copy off the person next to them.)
- Users may be given a prop or two, but they should be simple/cheap to acquire/manufacture. I have no desire to provide functioning copies of the Enigma machine to each of 200 possible users.
- Wordplay and culture-specific knowledge should be avoided.
- Internet access can not be assumed, and users are not avid puzzlers (so probably nothing more complicated than a standard Caesar cipher should be involved).
- Time to solution should be between 5 and 15 minutes. Faster isn't an issue, but neither should people be stuck for 60+ minutes.
- My time is valuable, as is that of the people who will check the solutions. The various solutions should be relatively quick to create and to confirm.
I have basically no idea what kind of puzzle would satisfy all of the constraints.
In this question I saw a reference to using different-colored cellophane to create different solution paths. This is very cool, but it would seem that only three different paths are possible (red/green/blue, or magenta/cyan/yellow), where I need at least five. A puzzle using a grid-based map as in this puzzle would seem to offer many different (and easily-checked) solutions, but then I would need to come up with a set of clues for each desired solution.
I am not (knowingly) requesting a ready-made puzzle, but rather some guidelines or puzzle types that combine common information with user-specific information to arrive at user-specific solutions.
puzzle-creation
puzzle-creation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
GrundulumGrundulum
261 bronze badge
261 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Would a physical puzzle of some sort be appropriate? I'm thinking of something like a maze, with a lot of endpoints, but missing the middle section. Each user is given a piece of card with the centre of the maze on it, but each user's card is different, and leads them to a different endpoint.
The endpoint could just be a password/phrase to be communicated to the person checking the solution, or could be a further small puzzle that needs to be solved (e.g. simple cipher or anagram).
Or, if you don't want to design a whole maze, perhaps a word spelled out using a seven-segment display:
_ _ _ _ _ _
| |_| | |_| |_ |_
|_ | | | | | | |_
(using a lowercase R)
If you provide only the top half on-site,
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | |
you can give different bottom halves to different people, creating different words:
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | |_| |_ |
| |_| | _| |_ |
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |_| |_ |_
|_ |_| | | _||_
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | | | | |_
|_ | | |_ |_| | |_
Neither half can be interpreted on its own; you need them both to get the final word.
(I wrote a quick Python script to find words that would match a given top segment. Other words for this particular one include CORNER, ENCASE, EARNER, CASPER, and a few more obscure ones.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Grundulum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86781%2fpuzzles-with-multiple-user-specific-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Would a physical puzzle of some sort be appropriate? I'm thinking of something like a maze, with a lot of endpoints, but missing the middle section. Each user is given a piece of card with the centre of the maze on it, but each user's card is different, and leads them to a different endpoint.
The endpoint could just be a password/phrase to be communicated to the person checking the solution, or could be a further small puzzle that needs to be solved (e.g. simple cipher or anagram).
Or, if you don't want to design a whole maze, perhaps a word spelled out using a seven-segment display:
_ _ _ _ _ _
| |_| | |_| |_ |_
|_ | | | | | | |_
(using a lowercase R)
If you provide only the top half on-site,
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | |
you can give different bottom halves to different people, creating different words:
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | |_| |_ |
| |_| | _| |_ |
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |_| |_ |_
|_ |_| | | _||_
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | | | | |_
|_ | | |_ |_| | |_
Neither half can be interpreted on its own; you need them both to get the final word.
(I wrote a quick Python script to find words that would match a given top segment. Other words for this particular one include CORNER, ENCASE, EARNER, CASPER, and a few more obscure ones.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Would a physical puzzle of some sort be appropriate? I'm thinking of something like a maze, with a lot of endpoints, but missing the middle section. Each user is given a piece of card with the centre of the maze on it, but each user's card is different, and leads them to a different endpoint.
The endpoint could just be a password/phrase to be communicated to the person checking the solution, or could be a further small puzzle that needs to be solved (e.g. simple cipher or anagram).
Or, if you don't want to design a whole maze, perhaps a word spelled out using a seven-segment display:
_ _ _ _ _ _
| |_| | |_| |_ |_
|_ | | | | | | |_
(using a lowercase R)
If you provide only the top half on-site,
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | |
you can give different bottom halves to different people, creating different words:
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | |_| |_ |
| |_| | _| |_ |
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |_| |_ |_
|_ |_| | | _||_
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | | | | |_
|_ | | |_ |_| | |_
Neither half can be interpreted on its own; you need them both to get the final word.
(I wrote a quick Python script to find words that would match a given top segment. Other words for this particular one include CORNER, ENCASE, EARNER, CASPER, and a few more obscure ones.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Would a physical puzzle of some sort be appropriate? I'm thinking of something like a maze, with a lot of endpoints, but missing the middle section. Each user is given a piece of card with the centre of the maze on it, but each user's card is different, and leads them to a different endpoint.
The endpoint could just be a password/phrase to be communicated to the person checking the solution, or could be a further small puzzle that needs to be solved (e.g. simple cipher or anagram).
Or, if you don't want to design a whole maze, perhaps a word spelled out using a seven-segment display:
_ _ _ _ _ _
| |_| | |_| |_ |_
|_ | | | | | | |_
(using a lowercase R)
If you provide only the top half on-site,
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | |
you can give different bottom halves to different people, creating different words:
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | |_| |_ |
| |_| | _| |_ |
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |_| |_ |_
|_ |_| | | _||_
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | | | | |_
|_ | | |_ |_| | |_
Neither half can be interpreted on its own; you need them both to get the final word.
(I wrote a quick Python script to find words that would match a given top segment. Other words for this particular one include CORNER, ENCASE, EARNER, CASPER, and a few more obscure ones.)
$endgroup$
Would a physical puzzle of some sort be appropriate? I'm thinking of something like a maze, with a lot of endpoints, but missing the middle section. Each user is given a piece of card with the centre of the maze on it, but each user's card is different, and leads them to a different endpoint.
The endpoint could just be a password/phrase to be communicated to the person checking the solution, or could be a further small puzzle that needs to be solved (e.g. simple cipher or anagram).
Or, if you don't want to design a whole maze, perhaps a word spelled out using a seven-segment display:
_ _ _ _ _ _
| |_| | |_| |_ |_
|_ | | | | | | |_
(using a lowercase R)
If you provide only the top half on-site,
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | | | | |
you can give different bottom halves to different people, creating different words:
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | |_| |_ |
| |_| | _| |_ |
_ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |_| |_ |_
|_ |_| | | _||_
_ _ _ _ _ _
|_ | | | | | | |_
|_ | | |_ |_| | |_
Neither half can be interpreted on its own; you need them both to get the final word.
(I wrote a quick Python script to find words that would match a given top segment. Other words for this particular one include CORNER, ENCASE, EARNER, CASPER, and a few more obscure ones.)
edited 5 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
GentlePurpleRain♦GentlePurpleRain
17.6k6 gold badges70 silver badges139 bronze badges
17.6k6 gold badges70 silver badges139 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Grundulum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Grundulum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Grundulum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Grundulum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86781%2fpuzzles-with-multiple-user-specific-solutions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This looks like it belongs in meta?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
7 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@JoshuaBizley No. Meta is for discussions about the site. This site is for questions about the creation and solving of puzzles, which this question clearly is.
$endgroup$
– GentlePurpleRain♦
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Ah my bad . . .
$endgroup$
– Joshua Bizley
6 hours ago