Is it a code stealing situation?How do you manage promotion when using Scrum?How to handle a scrum member speaking for too long?As a scrum master, how do I get everyone to take deadlines seriously?What to do when new hire is un-cooperativeHow to Effectively Deal with a Difficult Scrum MasterIncorrect scrum meeting format not allowing for enough participation from developersHow should one be encouraged to ask to work in pair on a task which appears complex enough?
How to find directories containing only specific files
Why command hierarchy, if the chain of command is standing next to each other?
Boss asked a co-worker to assault me
What to do with a williow tree with a cracked split trunk due to strong winds
Heating Margarine in Pan = loss of calories?
Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?
Why did Saruman lie?
Can I enter the USA with an E-2 visa and a one way flight ticket?
Why did IBM make public the PC BIOS source code?
Super Duper Vdd stiffening required on 555 timer, what is the best way?
Regex crossword (sudoku?)
Why is statically linking glibc discouraged?
Why aren't rockets built with truss structures inside their fuel & oxidizer tanks to increase structural strength?
What are those bumps on top of the Antonov-225?
Help, I cannot decide when to start the story
Boss wants me to ignore a software API license prohibiting mass download
Is there a way to encourage or even force airlines and booking engines to show options with overnight layovers?
Is there a SQL/English like language that lets you define formulations given some data?
The cat ate your input again!
What can Amex do if I cancel their card after using the sign up bonus miles?
Why is the Lucas test not recommended to differentiate higher alcohols?
Corroded Metal vs Magical Armor, should it melt it?
Can lodestones be used to magnetize crude iron weapons?
If I control a zombie (animated) does it get undead fortitude saves when it's reduced to 0 HP?
Is it a code stealing situation?
How do you manage promotion when using Scrum?How to handle a scrum member speaking for too long?As a scrum master, how do I get everyone to take deadlines seriously?What to do when new hire is un-cooperativeHow to Effectively Deal with a Difficult Scrum MasterIncorrect scrum meeting format not allowing for enough participation from developersHow should one be encouraged to ask to work in pair on a task which appears complex enough?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
We are working using LeSS methodology.
Area is divided into feature teams, within a team we split items into task.
I (developer) and another one worked on the same item, we splitted it into tasks, and I gave him the option of choosing that tasks to do. That person for no reason started to do( repeat my tasks) , on my question on this , he told that he wants hands on on overall picture.
We agreed that we do the work on the branch that I created.
But the person made his branch, there has put his code, in which he tried to solve my task.
After I did my task I committed it to agreed branch, and as we need to have item to be done, has solved partially task of another person, on which he haven’t worked,
And made the commit to the branch, after that in branch is 90% of item.
While I was out of office for 3 days, what person created another branch, for build fix ( build was broken by another team), and put my changes manually to the new branch( just copied the files I created), and did the rest 10% of work in that branch. He did it in a way, that only his commits are in history, and as he just moved my files(not git move of course)) all history of my commits vanished. So it looks like he did all the work. And he have merged that branch into master
My arguments to him:
.Why should we fix build, when commit of another team has broken it, we have our tasks, on which we agreed to do, And this thing of branch creation to fix the build, looks more for me like he did that, to intentionally steal my work
On which he told that haven’t got time to merge the branch on which we agreed to do the work, and on which I did 90% of total work, to a newly created brunch fix-build
And that we are working for the same aim, as a team, so history of commits doesn’t matter for him, as in scrum there is no individuals, but there is the team.
My arguments: I put my best efforts into code, and I want to be associated with the work I do, as we are working for the contractor I want visibility, that my efforts are recognized and seen.
So that is why this situation for me is a code stealing
scrum
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
We are working using LeSS methodology.
Area is divided into feature teams, within a team we split items into task.
I (developer) and another one worked on the same item, we splitted it into tasks, and I gave him the option of choosing that tasks to do. That person for no reason started to do( repeat my tasks) , on my question on this , he told that he wants hands on on overall picture.
We agreed that we do the work on the branch that I created.
But the person made his branch, there has put his code, in which he tried to solve my task.
After I did my task I committed it to agreed branch, and as we need to have item to be done, has solved partially task of another person, on which he haven’t worked,
And made the commit to the branch, after that in branch is 90% of item.
While I was out of office for 3 days, what person created another branch, for build fix ( build was broken by another team), and put my changes manually to the new branch( just copied the files I created), and did the rest 10% of work in that branch. He did it in a way, that only his commits are in history, and as he just moved my files(not git move of course)) all history of my commits vanished. So it looks like he did all the work. And he have merged that branch into master
My arguments to him:
.Why should we fix build, when commit of another team has broken it, we have our tasks, on which we agreed to do, And this thing of branch creation to fix the build, looks more for me like he did that, to intentionally steal my work
On which he told that haven’t got time to merge the branch on which we agreed to do the work, and on which I did 90% of total work, to a newly created brunch fix-build
And that we are working for the same aim, as a team, so history of commits doesn’t matter for him, as in scrum there is no individuals, but there is the team.
My arguments: I put my best efforts into code, and I want to be associated with the work I do, as we are working for the contractor I want visibility, that my efforts are recognized and seen.
So that is why this situation for me is a code stealing
scrum
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago
add a comment |
We are working using LeSS methodology.
Area is divided into feature teams, within a team we split items into task.
I (developer) and another one worked on the same item, we splitted it into tasks, and I gave him the option of choosing that tasks to do. That person for no reason started to do( repeat my tasks) , on my question on this , he told that he wants hands on on overall picture.
We agreed that we do the work on the branch that I created.
But the person made his branch, there has put his code, in which he tried to solve my task.
After I did my task I committed it to agreed branch, and as we need to have item to be done, has solved partially task of another person, on which he haven’t worked,
And made the commit to the branch, after that in branch is 90% of item.
While I was out of office for 3 days, what person created another branch, for build fix ( build was broken by another team), and put my changes manually to the new branch( just copied the files I created), and did the rest 10% of work in that branch. He did it in a way, that only his commits are in history, and as he just moved my files(not git move of course)) all history of my commits vanished. So it looks like he did all the work. And he have merged that branch into master
My arguments to him:
.Why should we fix build, when commit of another team has broken it, we have our tasks, on which we agreed to do, And this thing of branch creation to fix the build, looks more for me like he did that, to intentionally steal my work
On which he told that haven’t got time to merge the branch on which we agreed to do the work, and on which I did 90% of total work, to a newly created brunch fix-build
And that we are working for the same aim, as a team, so history of commits doesn’t matter for him, as in scrum there is no individuals, but there is the team.
My arguments: I put my best efforts into code, and I want to be associated with the work I do, as we are working for the contractor I want visibility, that my efforts are recognized and seen.
So that is why this situation for me is a code stealing
scrum
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
We are working using LeSS methodology.
Area is divided into feature teams, within a team we split items into task.
I (developer) and another one worked on the same item, we splitted it into tasks, and I gave him the option of choosing that tasks to do. That person for no reason started to do( repeat my tasks) , on my question on this , he told that he wants hands on on overall picture.
We agreed that we do the work on the branch that I created.
But the person made his branch, there has put his code, in which he tried to solve my task.
After I did my task I committed it to agreed branch, and as we need to have item to be done, has solved partially task of another person, on which he haven’t worked,
And made the commit to the branch, after that in branch is 90% of item.
While I was out of office for 3 days, what person created another branch, for build fix ( build was broken by another team), and put my changes manually to the new branch( just copied the files I created), and did the rest 10% of work in that branch. He did it in a way, that only his commits are in history, and as he just moved my files(not git move of course)) all history of my commits vanished. So it looks like he did all the work. And he have merged that branch into master
My arguments to him:
.Why should we fix build, when commit of another team has broken it, we have our tasks, on which we agreed to do, And this thing of branch creation to fix the build, looks more for me like he did that, to intentionally steal my work
On which he told that haven’t got time to merge the branch on which we agreed to do the work, and on which I did 90% of total work, to a newly created brunch fix-build
And that we are working for the same aim, as a team, so history of commits doesn’t matter for him, as in scrum there is no individuals, but there is the team.
My arguments: I put my best efforts into code, and I want to be associated with the work I do, as we are working for the contractor I want visibility, that my efforts are recognized and seen.
So that is why this situation for me is a code stealing
scrum
scrum
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
asked 29 mins ago
spin_eightspin_eight
1012 bronze badges
1012 bronze badges
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
spin_eight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
spin_eight is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142153%2fis-it-a-code-stealing-situation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
spin_eight is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
spin_eight is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
spin_eight is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
spin_eight is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142153%2fis-it-a-code-stealing-situation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is the other branch, where you worked the 90% not visible?
– DarkCygnus
22 mins ago
@DarkCygnus it is remote branch, it is visible to everyone. we work via pull requests, he made the pull request on fix-build branch. And another company(our customers), fellow team make decisions on the pull request. My branch is visible within the system ( both for the company I work for and to the clients fellow team , it is remote branch
– spin_eight
18 mins ago
Then we can say that the work you did is visible by everyone right? How or why are you worried that this will not be seen or you will not get the credit you deserve? I'm trying to imagine how you git tree structure looks like, but as I "see" it there is your branch with several commits until that 90%, and then I see new branch whose first commit includes a bunch of code (oh, the code on that other branch) and then some new code, and then merge... is't it evident that you did most of the work? On another subject, this person clearly needs to stick to correct git usage
– DarkCygnus
13 mins ago
@DarkCygnus yes the branch is technically visible to everyone. But the way we pass done items, to the client is via pull request, and in it there is only fix-build branch. So only it is exposed explicitly to the customer, and I see no reason why they should search for the initial branch with my code in that case. That person intentionally misused git, in my opinion. He haven’t merged my work, but manually moved my files and did that under his commit and his name, all my commits history was lost
– spin_eight
8 mins ago
@DarkCygnus repo structure: remote feature-brunch( where we agreed to put all code), remote feature-name-of -other-guy(he created it to get hands on the project). I did 90% of item(2/3 tasks) and pushed it to the remote-feature brunch. The other guy created fix-build branch, took my files and commited them unde his name to fix-build branch, merged it with master and created pull requests on the fix-build branch
– spin_eight
2 mins ago