Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?TLC5940 with multiple voltage RGB LEDsInfrared spotlight project, need x50 resistors. How many ohms what type to use?About a solar cell phone chargerLED Resistor Choice with changing voltageIs there a limit to the number of parallel LED if each has its own resistor?Is there any pitfall to using resistors in series AND parallel for an LED array?Determining voltage and current changes to make components compatible with the voltage sourceResistors before every led?LED Blinking after replace

How can God warn people of the upcoming rapture without disrupting society?

How to remove ambiguity: "... lives in the city of H, the capital of the province of NS, WHERE the unemployment rate is ..."?

Is it possible to grow new organs through exposure to radioactivity?

If I animate and control a zombie, does it benefit from Undead Fortitude when it's reduced to 0 HP?

Why am I not billed for EOB balance?

Is there a way to count the number of lines of text in a file including non-delimited ones?

Software for validating answers from students

How do you deal with the emotions of not being the one to find the cause of a bug?

Can renaming a method preserve encapsulation?

Does one make a shehecheyanu on "used" jewelry?

Modeling the uncertainty of the input parameters

How is являться different from есть and быть

Why aren't rockets built with truss structures inside their fuel & oxidizer tanks to increase structural strength?

The cat ate your input again!

How far did Gandalf and the Balrog drop from the bridge in Moria?

Is there a SQL/English like language that lets you define formulations given some data?

Can lodestones be used to magnetize crude iron weapons?

How to find directories containing only specific files

Is there a way to encourage or even force airlines and booking engines to show options with overnight layovers?

Telephone number in spoken words

Boss asked a co-worker to assault me

How to derive this identity

Do I have to cite common CS algorithms?

Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?



Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?


TLC5940 with multiple voltage RGB LEDsInfrared spotlight project, need x50 resistors. How many ohms what type to use?About a solar cell phone chargerLED Resistor Choice with changing voltageIs there a limit to the number of parallel LED if each has its own resistor?Is there any pitfall to using resistors in series AND parallel for an LED array?Determining voltage and current changes to make components compatible with the voltage sourceResistors before every led?LED Blinking after replace






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


This might sound like a stupid question, but I want a confirmation. I watched a video on Youtube about using LEDs. Those LEDs required a voltage around 2 volts at 20 mA.



In order to power one LED using a 5 volts power supply, the author used a resistor in series. He calculated he needed around 150 ohms (using U=RI, 5-2=3 volts, 3V/20mA=150ohms).



What I find disturbing is that the resistor, in order to control the voltage must be consuming energy too. P=UI, so 3x20mA=60mW, on top of the LED 2x20mA=40mW. In other words, adding +150% energy consumption to the actual need for lighting up the LED.



Am I missing something or is it typical to spend extra energy just to be able to use electronic components that require a lower voltage?
And second question, is there a way to avoid doing it for this type of circuit (5V source, 2V LED)?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$


    This might sound like a stupid question, but I want a confirmation. I watched a video on Youtube about using LEDs. Those LEDs required a voltage around 2 volts at 20 mA.



    In order to power one LED using a 5 volts power supply, the author used a resistor in series. He calculated he needed around 150 ohms (using U=RI, 5-2=3 volts, 3V/20mA=150ohms).



    What I find disturbing is that the resistor, in order to control the voltage must be consuming energy too. P=UI, so 3x20mA=60mW, on top of the LED 2x20mA=40mW. In other words, adding +150% energy consumption to the actual need for lighting up the LED.



    Am I missing something or is it typical to spend extra energy just to be able to use electronic components that require a lower voltage?
    And second question, is there a way to avoid doing it for this type of circuit (5V source, 2V LED)?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor



    Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$
















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      This might sound like a stupid question, but I want a confirmation. I watched a video on Youtube about using LEDs. Those LEDs required a voltage around 2 volts at 20 mA.



      In order to power one LED using a 5 volts power supply, the author used a resistor in series. He calculated he needed around 150 ohms (using U=RI, 5-2=3 volts, 3V/20mA=150ohms).



      What I find disturbing is that the resistor, in order to control the voltage must be consuming energy too. P=UI, so 3x20mA=60mW, on top of the LED 2x20mA=40mW. In other words, adding +150% energy consumption to the actual need for lighting up the LED.



      Am I missing something or is it typical to spend extra energy just to be able to use electronic components that require a lower voltage?
      And second question, is there a way to avoid doing it for this type of circuit (5V source, 2V LED)?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      This might sound like a stupid question, but I want a confirmation. I watched a video on Youtube about using LEDs. Those LEDs required a voltage around 2 volts at 20 mA.



      In order to power one LED using a 5 volts power supply, the author used a resistor in series. He calculated he needed around 150 ohms (using U=RI, 5-2=3 volts, 3V/20mA=150ohms).



      What I find disturbing is that the resistor, in order to control the voltage must be consuming energy too. P=UI, so 3x20mA=60mW, on top of the LED 2x20mA=40mW. In other words, adding +150% energy consumption to the actual need for lighting up the LED.



      Am I missing something or is it typical to spend extra energy just to be able to use electronic components that require a lower voltage?
      And second question, is there a way to avoid doing it for this type of circuit (5V source, 2V LED)?







      voltage resistors electricity






      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor



      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      JRE

      27.6k6 gold badges52 silver badges89 bronze badges




      27.6k6 gold badges52 silver badges89 bronze badges






      New contributor



      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 8 hours ago









      ExocytosisExocytosis

      1045 bronze badges




      1045 bronze badges




      New contributor



      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Exocytosis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Yes, that resistor wastes power.



          If the author is using an LED for an indicator light, then they're wasting a lot more power by their choice of LED. An LED that needs 20mA to show up in a brightly-lit room is typical of 1970's technology. If you shop for higher-brightness LEDs you'll blast your eyeballs out at 20mA, and you'll find yourself stopping the thing down to 1mA or so. One such LED, with a matching resistor, would use 3.3mW at 3.3V, where a 20mA, 1.5V LED alone (never mind the resistor) would use 30mW.



          The ultimate way to reduce the circuit power consumption would be to use the most efficient LEDs that you could find, and power them with a switching converter. A decent switching converter will have somewhere between 80% and 95% efficiency, so you'll use between 25 and 5% more power than just the LED. But you'd have to use one per LED (or LED string), and it's hard to justify a super-efficient switching converter for each indicator light.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$






















            4












            $begingroup$

            You've got the right idea. Partly.



            An LED used with a series resistor does waste the energy dissipated in the resistor. Depending on the voltage from the power supply, you can easily waste more energy in the resistor than you use for the LED.



            So far, you are correct.



            What I want to correct is the idea that the resistor is there to lower the voltage.



            The resistor is there to limit the current.



            LEDs are current driven devices. The forward voltage varies with current and temperature.



            To get a stable brightness out of an LED, you regulate the current.



            You will have noticed that the calculation for the series resistor uses the desired LED current. You take the difference of the supply voltage and the (approximate) forward voltage of the LED, and divide that by the current to find the value for the series resistor.



            If you tried to regulate an LED only by regulating the voltage, then you would destroy your LED very quickly. Just below the forward voltage, the LED doesn't light up at all. Just above the forward voltage the LED becomes the next best thing to a short circuit. There is a tiny range in between where it lights up and passes only a little bit of current.



            That little range is impossible to hit with just a voltage regulator - it moves with temperature and current - current makes the LED get warmer, and warmer makes the LED conduct more. You would be varying the voltage up and down wildly with some kind of feedback circuit measuring the current.



            Or, just regulate the current to begin with. Provide no more current than needed to light your LED at the desired brightness, and let the voltage do as it pleases - the voltage is of no interest.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Your answer is the closest to correct.
              $endgroup$
              – GSLI
              5 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
              $endgroup$
              – JRE
              5 hours ago


















            3












            $begingroup$

            No, you are not missing anything. The energy consumed by the resistor is wasted but, if you were contemplating a circuit that used tens or hundreds of LEDs you might consider a buck regulator to step the LED circuit supply voltage down to maybe 3 volts and make a significant net power saving per LED drive.



            You’ll still need a 50 ohm resistor but it will only be dropping around 1 volt and dissipating only 20 mW.



            The good news is that many modern LEDs need only a couple of mA to obtain sufficient brightness for “standard” applications.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$






















              0












              $begingroup$

              @Exocytosis



              Here's what you're missing. Your power supply has a given potentional: 5V. That isn't going away. When you put 5V across a component that can't handle it, you MUST do something with that extra potential or you will unbalance the voltage/current ratio in the circuit-- and the component will be damaged (in this case the LED).



              The LED is not in and of itself strong-enough to resist the potential applied across it- That is specifically why the datasheet is telling you it can only withstand a potential across it of 2VDC. That's the first thing. The second thing is how much energy you blow through it- in this case, the datasheet apparently says 20mA. Understand that just because a datasheet provides a MAXIMUM current value of 20mA, it does not mean you should actually operate the device at that level (or should you). There will usually be no appreciable difference between 8-10mA and 20mA, depending on color.



              The resistor you use is doing a couple of things- it is taking up the slack for the voltage the LED can't handle, and it is limiting the current through the LED to what you designate you want to run through it.



              The heat being dissipated by the resistor is NOT excess or left-over, it's actually only the heat being generated by the amount of current you are limiting the LED to. That's an important point. The resistor cannot dissipate energy that isn't flowing through it. And it certainly is NOT carrying the full current of your power-supply.



              So, Ohm's Laws says:



              R = E / I
              R = 5-2 / 0.008
              R = 3 / 0.008
              R = 375 Ohms


              In this case, we'll go with 360 Ohms (it's the closest available).



              I = E / R
              I = 5-2 / 360
              I = 3 / 360
              I = 0.0083 (or 8.3mA).


              Now that you know how much current is flowing, and what resistor to use, you can calculate how fat a resistor you need, based on what it's dissipating:



              Watt's Law is handy here:



              P = I E
              P = 0.0083 * 3
              P = 0.0249 Watts
              P = 24.9mW


              Now that you know how much energy is dissipated, you can size the resistor. An 8th Watt (1/8th of a Watt) Resistor will dissipate 250mW. For safety, you want a resistor that can handle twice what your Wattage requirements are. Therefore, 24.9*2 = 49.8mW . That small amount is far less than 250mW, so you can use an 8th-Watt resistor.



              Hope that helps.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                $endgroup$
                – immibis
                1 hour ago



















              -1












              $begingroup$

              One point I would like to mention is the circuits which are meant to be drive LEDs. The constant current circuitry can come in handy to save power when multiple LEDs are needed to be driven.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                $endgroup$
                – GSLI
                5 hours ago


















              -2












              $begingroup$

              Without the resistor to limit current flow, the LED heats up, draws even more current, and burns out. On high power LEDs, an active circuit to control the current is used instead, acting the same as a switching power supply.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                Your Answer






                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
                StackExchange.schematics.init();
                );
                , "cicuitlab");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "135"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );






                Exocytosis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452813%2fwill-using-a-resistor-in-series-with-a-led-to-control-its-voltage-increase-the-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                6 Answers
                6






                active

                oldest

                votes








                6 Answers
                6






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                4












                $begingroup$

                Yes, that resistor wastes power.



                If the author is using an LED for an indicator light, then they're wasting a lot more power by their choice of LED. An LED that needs 20mA to show up in a brightly-lit room is typical of 1970's technology. If you shop for higher-brightness LEDs you'll blast your eyeballs out at 20mA, and you'll find yourself stopping the thing down to 1mA or so. One such LED, with a matching resistor, would use 3.3mW at 3.3V, where a 20mA, 1.5V LED alone (never mind the resistor) would use 30mW.



                The ultimate way to reduce the circuit power consumption would be to use the most efficient LEDs that you could find, and power them with a switching converter. A decent switching converter will have somewhere between 80% and 95% efficiency, so you'll use between 25 and 5% more power than just the LED. But you'd have to use one per LED (or LED string), and it's hard to justify a super-efficient switching converter for each indicator light.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, that resistor wastes power.



                  If the author is using an LED for an indicator light, then they're wasting a lot more power by their choice of LED. An LED that needs 20mA to show up in a brightly-lit room is typical of 1970's technology. If you shop for higher-brightness LEDs you'll blast your eyeballs out at 20mA, and you'll find yourself stopping the thing down to 1mA or so. One such LED, with a matching resistor, would use 3.3mW at 3.3V, where a 20mA, 1.5V LED alone (never mind the resistor) would use 30mW.



                  The ultimate way to reduce the circuit power consumption would be to use the most efficient LEDs that you could find, and power them with a switching converter. A decent switching converter will have somewhere between 80% and 95% efficiency, so you'll use between 25 and 5% more power than just the LED. But you'd have to use one per LED (or LED string), and it's hard to justify a super-efficient switching converter for each indicator light.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    Yes, that resistor wastes power.



                    If the author is using an LED for an indicator light, then they're wasting a lot more power by their choice of LED. An LED that needs 20mA to show up in a brightly-lit room is typical of 1970's technology. If you shop for higher-brightness LEDs you'll blast your eyeballs out at 20mA, and you'll find yourself stopping the thing down to 1mA or so. One such LED, with a matching resistor, would use 3.3mW at 3.3V, where a 20mA, 1.5V LED alone (never mind the resistor) would use 30mW.



                    The ultimate way to reduce the circuit power consumption would be to use the most efficient LEDs that you could find, and power them with a switching converter. A decent switching converter will have somewhere between 80% and 95% efficiency, so you'll use between 25 and 5% more power than just the LED. But you'd have to use one per LED (or LED string), and it's hard to justify a super-efficient switching converter for each indicator light.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Yes, that resistor wastes power.



                    If the author is using an LED for an indicator light, then they're wasting a lot more power by their choice of LED. An LED that needs 20mA to show up in a brightly-lit room is typical of 1970's technology. If you shop for higher-brightness LEDs you'll blast your eyeballs out at 20mA, and you'll find yourself stopping the thing down to 1mA or so. One such LED, with a matching resistor, would use 3.3mW at 3.3V, where a 20mA, 1.5V LED alone (never mind the resistor) would use 30mW.



                    The ultimate way to reduce the circuit power consumption would be to use the most efficient LEDs that you could find, and power them with a switching converter. A decent switching converter will have somewhere between 80% and 95% efficiency, so you'll use between 25 and 5% more power than just the LED. But you'd have to use one per LED (or LED string), and it's hard to justify a super-efficient switching converter for each indicator light.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 7 hours ago









                    TimWescottTimWescott

                    11.8k1 gold badge9 silver badges23 bronze badges




                    11.8k1 gold badge9 silver badges23 bronze badges


























                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        You've got the right idea. Partly.



                        An LED used with a series resistor does waste the energy dissipated in the resistor. Depending on the voltage from the power supply, you can easily waste more energy in the resistor than you use for the LED.



                        So far, you are correct.



                        What I want to correct is the idea that the resistor is there to lower the voltage.



                        The resistor is there to limit the current.



                        LEDs are current driven devices. The forward voltage varies with current and temperature.



                        To get a stable brightness out of an LED, you regulate the current.



                        You will have noticed that the calculation for the series resistor uses the desired LED current. You take the difference of the supply voltage and the (approximate) forward voltage of the LED, and divide that by the current to find the value for the series resistor.



                        If you tried to regulate an LED only by regulating the voltage, then you would destroy your LED very quickly. Just below the forward voltage, the LED doesn't light up at all. Just above the forward voltage the LED becomes the next best thing to a short circuit. There is a tiny range in between where it lights up and passes only a little bit of current.



                        That little range is impossible to hit with just a voltage regulator - it moves with temperature and current - current makes the LED get warmer, and warmer makes the LED conduct more. You would be varying the voltage up and down wildly with some kind of feedback circuit measuring the current.



                        Or, just regulate the current to begin with. Provide no more current than needed to light your LED at the desired brightness, and let the voltage do as it pleases - the voltage is of no interest.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$














                        • $begingroup$
                          Your answer is the closest to correct.
                          $endgroup$
                          – GSLI
                          5 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JRE
                          5 hours ago















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        You've got the right idea. Partly.



                        An LED used with a series resistor does waste the energy dissipated in the resistor. Depending on the voltage from the power supply, you can easily waste more energy in the resistor than you use for the LED.



                        So far, you are correct.



                        What I want to correct is the idea that the resistor is there to lower the voltage.



                        The resistor is there to limit the current.



                        LEDs are current driven devices. The forward voltage varies with current and temperature.



                        To get a stable brightness out of an LED, you regulate the current.



                        You will have noticed that the calculation for the series resistor uses the desired LED current. You take the difference of the supply voltage and the (approximate) forward voltage of the LED, and divide that by the current to find the value for the series resistor.



                        If you tried to regulate an LED only by regulating the voltage, then you would destroy your LED very quickly. Just below the forward voltage, the LED doesn't light up at all. Just above the forward voltage the LED becomes the next best thing to a short circuit. There is a tiny range in between where it lights up and passes only a little bit of current.



                        That little range is impossible to hit with just a voltage regulator - it moves with temperature and current - current makes the LED get warmer, and warmer makes the LED conduct more. You would be varying the voltage up and down wildly with some kind of feedback circuit measuring the current.



                        Or, just regulate the current to begin with. Provide no more current than needed to light your LED at the desired brightness, and let the voltage do as it pleases - the voltage is of no interest.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$














                        • $begingroup$
                          Your answer is the closest to correct.
                          $endgroup$
                          – GSLI
                          5 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JRE
                          5 hours ago













                        4












                        4








                        4





                        $begingroup$

                        You've got the right idea. Partly.



                        An LED used with a series resistor does waste the energy dissipated in the resistor. Depending on the voltage from the power supply, you can easily waste more energy in the resistor than you use for the LED.



                        So far, you are correct.



                        What I want to correct is the idea that the resistor is there to lower the voltage.



                        The resistor is there to limit the current.



                        LEDs are current driven devices. The forward voltage varies with current and temperature.



                        To get a stable brightness out of an LED, you regulate the current.



                        You will have noticed that the calculation for the series resistor uses the desired LED current. You take the difference of the supply voltage and the (approximate) forward voltage of the LED, and divide that by the current to find the value for the series resistor.



                        If you tried to regulate an LED only by regulating the voltage, then you would destroy your LED very quickly. Just below the forward voltage, the LED doesn't light up at all. Just above the forward voltage the LED becomes the next best thing to a short circuit. There is a tiny range in between where it lights up and passes only a little bit of current.



                        That little range is impossible to hit with just a voltage regulator - it moves with temperature and current - current makes the LED get warmer, and warmer makes the LED conduct more. You would be varying the voltage up and down wildly with some kind of feedback circuit measuring the current.



                        Or, just regulate the current to begin with. Provide no more current than needed to light your LED at the desired brightness, and let the voltage do as it pleases - the voltage is of no interest.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        You've got the right idea. Partly.



                        An LED used with a series resistor does waste the energy dissipated in the resistor. Depending on the voltage from the power supply, you can easily waste more energy in the resistor than you use for the LED.



                        So far, you are correct.



                        What I want to correct is the idea that the resistor is there to lower the voltage.



                        The resistor is there to limit the current.



                        LEDs are current driven devices. The forward voltage varies with current and temperature.



                        To get a stable brightness out of an LED, you regulate the current.



                        You will have noticed that the calculation for the series resistor uses the desired LED current. You take the difference of the supply voltage and the (approximate) forward voltage of the LED, and divide that by the current to find the value for the series resistor.



                        If you tried to regulate an LED only by regulating the voltage, then you would destroy your LED very quickly. Just below the forward voltage, the LED doesn't light up at all. Just above the forward voltage the LED becomes the next best thing to a short circuit. There is a tiny range in between where it lights up and passes only a little bit of current.



                        That little range is impossible to hit with just a voltage regulator - it moves with temperature and current - current makes the LED get warmer, and warmer makes the LED conduct more. You would be varying the voltage up and down wildly with some kind of feedback circuit measuring the current.



                        Or, just regulate the current to begin with. Provide no more current than needed to light your LED at the desired brightness, and let the voltage do as it pleases - the voltage is of no interest.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 6 hours ago









                        JREJRE

                        27.6k6 gold badges52 silver badges89 bronze badges




                        27.6k6 gold badges52 silver badges89 bronze badges














                        • $begingroup$
                          Your answer is the closest to correct.
                          $endgroup$
                          – GSLI
                          5 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JRE
                          5 hours ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          Your answer is the closest to correct.
                          $endgroup$
                          – GSLI
                          5 hours ago











                        • $begingroup$
                          @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                          $endgroup$
                          – JRE
                          5 hours ago















                        $begingroup$
                        Your answer is the closest to correct.
                        $endgroup$
                        – GSLI
                        5 hours ago





                        $begingroup$
                        Your answer is the closest to correct.
                        $endgroup$
                        – GSLI
                        5 hours ago













                        $begingroup$
                        @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JRE
                        5 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @GSLI: I posted my answer like nearly two hours after the others. It's still climbing. And if it stays lower voted, well, no biggie.
                        $endgroup$
                        – JRE
                        5 hours ago











                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        No, you are not missing anything. The energy consumed by the resistor is wasted but, if you were contemplating a circuit that used tens or hundreds of LEDs you might consider a buck regulator to step the LED circuit supply voltage down to maybe 3 volts and make a significant net power saving per LED drive.



                        You’ll still need a 50 ohm resistor but it will only be dropping around 1 volt and dissipating only 20 mW.



                        The good news is that many modern LEDs need only a couple of mA to obtain sufficient brightness for “standard” applications.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          No, you are not missing anything. The energy consumed by the resistor is wasted but, if you were contemplating a circuit that used tens or hundreds of LEDs you might consider a buck regulator to step the LED circuit supply voltage down to maybe 3 volts and make a significant net power saving per LED drive.



                          You’ll still need a 50 ohm resistor but it will only be dropping around 1 volt and dissipating only 20 mW.



                          The good news is that many modern LEDs need only a couple of mA to obtain sufficient brightness for “standard” applications.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            3












                            3








                            3





                            $begingroup$

                            No, you are not missing anything. The energy consumed by the resistor is wasted but, if you were contemplating a circuit that used tens or hundreds of LEDs you might consider a buck regulator to step the LED circuit supply voltage down to maybe 3 volts and make a significant net power saving per LED drive.



                            You’ll still need a 50 ohm resistor but it will only be dropping around 1 volt and dissipating only 20 mW.



                            The good news is that many modern LEDs need only a couple of mA to obtain sufficient brightness for “standard” applications.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            No, you are not missing anything. The energy consumed by the resistor is wasted but, if you were contemplating a circuit that used tens or hundreds of LEDs you might consider a buck regulator to step the LED circuit supply voltage down to maybe 3 volts and make a significant net power saving per LED drive.



                            You’ll still need a 50 ohm resistor but it will only be dropping around 1 volt and dissipating only 20 mW.



                            The good news is that many modern LEDs need only a couple of mA to obtain sufficient brightness for “standard” applications.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 8 hours ago









                            Andy akaAndy aka

                            251k11 gold badges193 silver badges447 bronze badges




                            251k11 gold badges193 silver badges447 bronze badges
























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                @Exocytosis



                                Here's what you're missing. Your power supply has a given potentional: 5V. That isn't going away. When you put 5V across a component that can't handle it, you MUST do something with that extra potential or you will unbalance the voltage/current ratio in the circuit-- and the component will be damaged (in this case the LED).



                                The LED is not in and of itself strong-enough to resist the potential applied across it- That is specifically why the datasheet is telling you it can only withstand a potential across it of 2VDC. That's the first thing. The second thing is how much energy you blow through it- in this case, the datasheet apparently says 20mA. Understand that just because a datasheet provides a MAXIMUM current value of 20mA, it does not mean you should actually operate the device at that level (or should you). There will usually be no appreciable difference between 8-10mA and 20mA, depending on color.



                                The resistor you use is doing a couple of things- it is taking up the slack for the voltage the LED can't handle, and it is limiting the current through the LED to what you designate you want to run through it.



                                The heat being dissipated by the resistor is NOT excess or left-over, it's actually only the heat being generated by the amount of current you are limiting the LED to. That's an important point. The resistor cannot dissipate energy that isn't flowing through it. And it certainly is NOT carrying the full current of your power-supply.



                                So, Ohm's Laws says:



                                R = E / I
                                R = 5-2 / 0.008
                                R = 3 / 0.008
                                R = 375 Ohms


                                In this case, we'll go with 360 Ohms (it's the closest available).



                                I = E / R
                                I = 5-2 / 360
                                I = 3 / 360
                                I = 0.0083 (or 8.3mA).


                                Now that you know how much current is flowing, and what resistor to use, you can calculate how fat a resistor you need, based on what it's dissipating:



                                Watt's Law is handy here:



                                P = I E
                                P = 0.0083 * 3
                                P = 0.0249 Watts
                                P = 24.9mW


                                Now that you know how much energy is dissipated, you can size the resistor. An 8th Watt (1/8th of a Watt) Resistor will dissipate 250mW. For safety, you want a resistor that can handle twice what your Wattage requirements are. Therefore, 24.9*2 = 49.8mW . That small amount is far less than 250mW, so you can use an 8th-Watt resistor.



                                Hope that helps.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$














                                • $begingroup$
                                  It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – immibis
                                  1 hour ago
















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                @Exocytosis



                                Here's what you're missing. Your power supply has a given potentional: 5V. That isn't going away. When you put 5V across a component that can't handle it, you MUST do something with that extra potential or you will unbalance the voltage/current ratio in the circuit-- and the component will be damaged (in this case the LED).



                                The LED is not in and of itself strong-enough to resist the potential applied across it- That is specifically why the datasheet is telling you it can only withstand a potential across it of 2VDC. That's the first thing. The second thing is how much energy you blow through it- in this case, the datasheet apparently says 20mA. Understand that just because a datasheet provides a MAXIMUM current value of 20mA, it does not mean you should actually operate the device at that level (or should you). There will usually be no appreciable difference between 8-10mA and 20mA, depending on color.



                                The resistor you use is doing a couple of things- it is taking up the slack for the voltage the LED can't handle, and it is limiting the current through the LED to what you designate you want to run through it.



                                The heat being dissipated by the resistor is NOT excess or left-over, it's actually only the heat being generated by the amount of current you are limiting the LED to. That's an important point. The resistor cannot dissipate energy that isn't flowing through it. And it certainly is NOT carrying the full current of your power-supply.



                                So, Ohm's Laws says:



                                R = E / I
                                R = 5-2 / 0.008
                                R = 3 / 0.008
                                R = 375 Ohms


                                In this case, we'll go with 360 Ohms (it's the closest available).



                                I = E / R
                                I = 5-2 / 360
                                I = 3 / 360
                                I = 0.0083 (or 8.3mA).


                                Now that you know how much current is flowing, and what resistor to use, you can calculate how fat a resistor you need, based on what it's dissipating:



                                Watt's Law is handy here:



                                P = I E
                                P = 0.0083 * 3
                                P = 0.0249 Watts
                                P = 24.9mW


                                Now that you know how much energy is dissipated, you can size the resistor. An 8th Watt (1/8th of a Watt) Resistor will dissipate 250mW. For safety, you want a resistor that can handle twice what your Wattage requirements are. Therefore, 24.9*2 = 49.8mW . That small amount is far less than 250mW, so you can use an 8th-Watt resistor.



                                Hope that helps.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$














                                • $begingroup$
                                  It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – immibis
                                  1 hour ago














                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                @Exocytosis



                                Here's what you're missing. Your power supply has a given potentional: 5V. That isn't going away. When you put 5V across a component that can't handle it, you MUST do something with that extra potential or you will unbalance the voltage/current ratio in the circuit-- and the component will be damaged (in this case the LED).



                                The LED is not in and of itself strong-enough to resist the potential applied across it- That is specifically why the datasheet is telling you it can only withstand a potential across it of 2VDC. That's the first thing. The second thing is how much energy you blow through it- in this case, the datasheet apparently says 20mA. Understand that just because a datasheet provides a MAXIMUM current value of 20mA, it does not mean you should actually operate the device at that level (or should you). There will usually be no appreciable difference between 8-10mA and 20mA, depending on color.



                                The resistor you use is doing a couple of things- it is taking up the slack for the voltage the LED can't handle, and it is limiting the current through the LED to what you designate you want to run through it.



                                The heat being dissipated by the resistor is NOT excess or left-over, it's actually only the heat being generated by the amount of current you are limiting the LED to. That's an important point. The resistor cannot dissipate energy that isn't flowing through it. And it certainly is NOT carrying the full current of your power-supply.



                                So, Ohm's Laws says:



                                R = E / I
                                R = 5-2 / 0.008
                                R = 3 / 0.008
                                R = 375 Ohms


                                In this case, we'll go with 360 Ohms (it's the closest available).



                                I = E / R
                                I = 5-2 / 360
                                I = 3 / 360
                                I = 0.0083 (or 8.3mA).


                                Now that you know how much current is flowing, and what resistor to use, you can calculate how fat a resistor you need, based on what it's dissipating:



                                Watt's Law is handy here:



                                P = I E
                                P = 0.0083 * 3
                                P = 0.0249 Watts
                                P = 24.9mW


                                Now that you know how much energy is dissipated, you can size the resistor. An 8th Watt (1/8th of a Watt) Resistor will dissipate 250mW. For safety, you want a resistor that can handle twice what your Wattage requirements are. Therefore, 24.9*2 = 49.8mW . That small amount is far less than 250mW, so you can use an 8th-Watt resistor.



                                Hope that helps.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                @Exocytosis



                                Here's what you're missing. Your power supply has a given potentional: 5V. That isn't going away. When you put 5V across a component that can't handle it, you MUST do something with that extra potential or you will unbalance the voltage/current ratio in the circuit-- and the component will be damaged (in this case the LED).



                                The LED is not in and of itself strong-enough to resist the potential applied across it- That is specifically why the datasheet is telling you it can only withstand a potential across it of 2VDC. That's the first thing. The second thing is how much energy you blow through it- in this case, the datasheet apparently says 20mA. Understand that just because a datasheet provides a MAXIMUM current value of 20mA, it does not mean you should actually operate the device at that level (or should you). There will usually be no appreciable difference between 8-10mA and 20mA, depending on color.



                                The resistor you use is doing a couple of things- it is taking up the slack for the voltage the LED can't handle, and it is limiting the current through the LED to what you designate you want to run through it.



                                The heat being dissipated by the resistor is NOT excess or left-over, it's actually only the heat being generated by the amount of current you are limiting the LED to. That's an important point. The resistor cannot dissipate energy that isn't flowing through it. And it certainly is NOT carrying the full current of your power-supply.



                                So, Ohm's Laws says:



                                R = E / I
                                R = 5-2 / 0.008
                                R = 3 / 0.008
                                R = 375 Ohms


                                In this case, we'll go with 360 Ohms (it's the closest available).



                                I = E / R
                                I = 5-2 / 360
                                I = 3 / 360
                                I = 0.0083 (or 8.3mA).


                                Now that you know how much current is flowing, and what resistor to use, you can calculate how fat a resistor you need, based on what it's dissipating:



                                Watt's Law is handy here:



                                P = I E
                                P = 0.0083 * 3
                                P = 0.0249 Watts
                                P = 24.9mW


                                Now that you know how much energy is dissipated, you can size the resistor. An 8th Watt (1/8th of a Watt) Resistor will dissipate 250mW. For safety, you want a resistor that can handle twice what your Wattage requirements are. Therefore, 24.9*2 = 49.8mW . That small amount is far less than 250mW, so you can use an 8th-Watt resistor.



                                Hope that helps.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered 5 hours ago









                                GSLIGSLI

                                662 bronze badges




                                662 bronze badges














                                • $begingroup$
                                  It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – immibis
                                  1 hour ago

















                                • $begingroup$
                                  It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – immibis
                                  1 hour ago
















                                $begingroup$
                                It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                $endgroup$
                                – immibis
                                1 hour ago





                                $begingroup$
                                It's still wasted energy because it's not being turned into useful light.
                                $endgroup$
                                – immibis
                                1 hour ago












                                -1












                                $begingroup$

                                One point I would like to mention is the circuits which are meant to be drive LEDs. The constant current circuitry can come in handy to save power when multiple LEDs are needed to be driven.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$














                                • $begingroup$
                                  That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – GSLI
                                  5 hours ago















                                -1












                                $begingroup$

                                One point I would like to mention is the circuits which are meant to be drive LEDs. The constant current circuitry can come in handy to save power when multiple LEDs are needed to be driven.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$














                                • $begingroup$
                                  That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – GSLI
                                  5 hours ago













                                -1












                                -1








                                -1





                                $begingroup$

                                One point I would like to mention is the circuits which are meant to be drive LEDs. The constant current circuitry can come in handy to save power when multiple LEDs are needed to be driven.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                One point I would like to mention is the circuits which are meant to be drive LEDs. The constant current circuitry can come in handy to save power when multiple LEDs are needed to be driven.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered 7 hours ago









                                UmarUmar

                                3,7373 gold badges12 silver badges31 bronze badges




                                3,7373 gold badges12 silver badges31 bronze badges














                                • $begingroup$
                                  That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – GSLI
                                  5 hours ago
















                                • $begingroup$
                                  That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – GSLI
                                  5 hours ago















                                $begingroup$
                                That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                $endgroup$
                                – GSLI
                                5 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                That's a really valid point. Past a certain number of resistors it becomes more cost effective in terms of PCB space, component cost, and circuit complexity, to use a constant current mechanism, which only requires perhaps 2 BJTs and 2 resistors.
                                $endgroup$
                                – GSLI
                                5 hours ago











                                -2












                                $begingroup$

                                Without the resistor to limit current flow, the LED heats up, draws even more current, and burns out. On high power LEDs, an active circuit to control the current is used instead, acting the same as a switching power supply.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



















                                  -2












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Without the resistor to limit current flow, the LED heats up, draws even more current, and burns out. On high power LEDs, an active circuit to control the current is used instead, acting the same as a switching power supply.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    -2












                                    -2








                                    -2





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Without the resistor to limit current flow, the LED heats up, draws even more current, and burns out. On high power LEDs, an active circuit to control the current is used instead, acting the same as a switching power supply.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    Without the resistor to limit current flow, the LED heats up, draws even more current, and burns out. On high power LEDs, an active circuit to control the current is used instead, acting the same as a switching power supply.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 7 hours ago









                                    CrossRoadsCrossRoads

                                    2,6682 silver badges9 bronze badges




                                    2,6682 silver badges9 bronze badges























                                        Exocytosis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded


















                                        Exocytosis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                        Exocytosis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                        Exocytosis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452813%2fwill-using-a-resistor-in-series-with-a-led-to-control-its-voltage-increase-the-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                                        Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                                        Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її