Do Reform Jews believe in a theistic God?Do Jewish people believe in God?Theology on evolution from khan academyIs Reconstructionist Judaism essentially atheistic?Am I yotzei in my davening if I believe that God communicated with Mohammad?What God must gentiles believe in?Why is being religious a duty if God chose to not have a proof to his existence in this world?Questions about Conversion to Reform JudaismIs doctrinal unity enforced in Judaism and if so, How?How does Judaism relate to miracle claims by other religions?
How to remove ambiguity: "... lives in the city of H, the capital of the province of NS, WHERE the unemployment rate is ..."?
Does Nightpack Ambusher's second ability trigger if I cast spells during the end step?
If "more guns less crime", how do gun advocates explain that the EU has less crime than the US?
How to find directories containing only specific files
Why is the Lucas test not recommended to differentiate higher alcohols?
What is the difference between 王 and 皇?
Can renaming a method preserve encapsulation?
Is it possible to grow new organs through exposure to radioactivity?
Can I enter the USA with an E-2 visa and a one way flight ticket?
A torrent of foreign terms
Do Reform Jews believe in a theistic God?
crippling fear of hellfire &, damnation, please help?
Using hearing aids on the sabbath?
Modeling the uncertainty of the input parameters
What can Amex do if I cancel their card after using the sign up bonus miles?
Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255
Telephone number in spoken words
Update Office without opening an Office application
Markov-chain sentence generator in Python
Software for validating answers from students
Boss asked a co-worker to assault me
Why is statically linking glibc discouraged?
Running code generated in realtime in JavaScript with eval()
Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journal
Do Reform Jews believe in a theistic God?
Do Jewish people believe in God?Theology on evolution from khan academyIs Reconstructionist Judaism essentially atheistic?Am I yotzei in my davening if I believe that God communicated with Mohammad?What God must gentiles believe in?Why is being religious a duty if God chose to not have a proof to his existence in this world?Questions about Conversion to Reform JudaismIs doctrinal unity enforced in Judaism and if so, How?How does Judaism relate to miracle claims by other religions?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
By "theistic God", I mean a God who is omnipotent and omnibenevolent and expressed himself through the Tanakh, or at least as powerful as say, Apollo was believed to be in ancient Greek religion.
Different sources seem to be saying different things. Wikipedia says yes, while ReformJudaism.org says not really:
Wikipedia: "In regard to God, while some voices among the spiritual leadership approached religious and even secular humanism – a tendency that grew increasingly from the mid-20th century, both among clergy and constituents, leading to broader, dimmer definitions of the concept – the movement had always officially maintained a theistic stance, affirming the belief in a personal God."
https://reformjudaism.org/blog/2018/01/19/do-you-have-believe-god-be-jew: "When people tell me that they don’t believe in God – either because they have seen no empirical evidence that God exists or because they can’t rationally accept the God of the Bible and of the medieval rabbis – I understand completely. I don’t believe in that God either. [...] God is the mystery within us – inside every soul, in the love that inspires generosity and compassion."
https://reformjudaism.org/practice/ask-rabbi/can-reform-jew-believe-torah-word-god: "In fact, I know of one Reform Rabbi who believes that Torah was revealed at Sinai [...] but that doesn't disqualify him as a Reform Rabbi! We're a big-tent religion, and everyone agreeing on everything isn't the point, and it's never going to happen, anyway. [...] Many Reform Jews have a deep belief in a God that is not literal or theistic, but rather is more mystical or spiritual."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-things-to-know-about-reform-jews/: "About 29 percent of Reform Jews say they believe in God with absolute certainty, compared to 41 percent of Conservatives and 89 percent of Orthodox."- Note that the article doesn't say how the respondents define God.
By contrast, Reconstructionist Judaism is quite clear that it does not believe in a theistic God.
I'd like recent official statements from organizations representing Reform Judaism, even if it's just that Reform Judaism has no official position on this, and/or a survey of Reform Jews that allows for nuanced perspectives of what God means to them.
Do Jewish people believe in God? is a related question but does not specify Reform Judaism (and I think by default questions on this site are assumed to be about the Orthodox perspective).
theology reform-judaism
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 3 more comments
By "theistic God", I mean a God who is omnipotent and omnibenevolent and expressed himself through the Tanakh, or at least as powerful as say, Apollo was believed to be in ancient Greek religion.
Different sources seem to be saying different things. Wikipedia says yes, while ReformJudaism.org says not really:
Wikipedia: "In regard to God, while some voices among the spiritual leadership approached religious and even secular humanism – a tendency that grew increasingly from the mid-20th century, both among clergy and constituents, leading to broader, dimmer definitions of the concept – the movement had always officially maintained a theistic stance, affirming the belief in a personal God."
https://reformjudaism.org/blog/2018/01/19/do-you-have-believe-god-be-jew: "When people tell me that they don’t believe in God – either because they have seen no empirical evidence that God exists or because they can’t rationally accept the God of the Bible and of the medieval rabbis – I understand completely. I don’t believe in that God either. [...] God is the mystery within us – inside every soul, in the love that inspires generosity and compassion."
https://reformjudaism.org/practice/ask-rabbi/can-reform-jew-believe-torah-word-god: "In fact, I know of one Reform Rabbi who believes that Torah was revealed at Sinai [...] but that doesn't disqualify him as a Reform Rabbi! We're a big-tent religion, and everyone agreeing on everything isn't the point, and it's never going to happen, anyway. [...] Many Reform Jews have a deep belief in a God that is not literal or theistic, but rather is more mystical or spiritual."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-things-to-know-about-reform-jews/: "About 29 percent of Reform Jews say they believe in God with absolute certainty, compared to 41 percent of Conservatives and 89 percent of Orthodox."- Note that the article doesn't say how the respondents define God.
By contrast, Reconstructionist Judaism is quite clear that it does not believe in a theistic God.
I'd like recent official statements from organizations representing Reform Judaism, even if it's just that Reform Judaism has no official position on this, and/or a survey of Reform Jews that allows for nuanced perspectives of what God means to them.
Do Jewish people believe in God? is a related question but does not specify Reform Judaism (and I think by default questions on this site are assumed to be about the Orthodox perspective).
theology reform-judaism
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
1
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
2
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
1
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
1
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
By "theistic God", I mean a God who is omnipotent and omnibenevolent and expressed himself through the Tanakh, or at least as powerful as say, Apollo was believed to be in ancient Greek religion.
Different sources seem to be saying different things. Wikipedia says yes, while ReformJudaism.org says not really:
Wikipedia: "In regard to God, while some voices among the spiritual leadership approached religious and even secular humanism – a tendency that grew increasingly from the mid-20th century, both among clergy and constituents, leading to broader, dimmer definitions of the concept – the movement had always officially maintained a theistic stance, affirming the belief in a personal God."
https://reformjudaism.org/blog/2018/01/19/do-you-have-believe-god-be-jew: "When people tell me that they don’t believe in God – either because they have seen no empirical evidence that God exists or because they can’t rationally accept the God of the Bible and of the medieval rabbis – I understand completely. I don’t believe in that God either. [...] God is the mystery within us – inside every soul, in the love that inspires generosity and compassion."
https://reformjudaism.org/practice/ask-rabbi/can-reform-jew-believe-torah-word-god: "In fact, I know of one Reform Rabbi who believes that Torah was revealed at Sinai [...] but that doesn't disqualify him as a Reform Rabbi! We're a big-tent religion, and everyone agreeing on everything isn't the point, and it's never going to happen, anyway. [...] Many Reform Jews have a deep belief in a God that is not literal or theistic, but rather is more mystical or spiritual."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-things-to-know-about-reform-jews/: "About 29 percent of Reform Jews say they believe in God with absolute certainty, compared to 41 percent of Conservatives and 89 percent of Orthodox."- Note that the article doesn't say how the respondents define God.
By contrast, Reconstructionist Judaism is quite clear that it does not believe in a theistic God.
I'd like recent official statements from organizations representing Reform Judaism, even if it's just that Reform Judaism has no official position on this, and/or a survey of Reform Jews that allows for nuanced perspectives of what God means to them.
Do Jewish people believe in God? is a related question but does not specify Reform Judaism (and I think by default questions on this site are assumed to be about the Orthodox perspective).
theology reform-judaism
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
By "theistic God", I mean a God who is omnipotent and omnibenevolent and expressed himself through the Tanakh, or at least as powerful as say, Apollo was believed to be in ancient Greek religion.
Different sources seem to be saying different things. Wikipedia says yes, while ReformJudaism.org says not really:
Wikipedia: "In regard to God, while some voices among the spiritual leadership approached religious and even secular humanism – a tendency that grew increasingly from the mid-20th century, both among clergy and constituents, leading to broader, dimmer definitions of the concept – the movement had always officially maintained a theistic stance, affirming the belief in a personal God."
https://reformjudaism.org/blog/2018/01/19/do-you-have-believe-god-be-jew: "When people tell me that they don’t believe in God – either because they have seen no empirical evidence that God exists or because they can’t rationally accept the God of the Bible and of the medieval rabbis – I understand completely. I don’t believe in that God either. [...] God is the mystery within us – inside every soul, in the love that inspires generosity and compassion."
https://reformjudaism.org/practice/ask-rabbi/can-reform-jew-believe-torah-word-god: "In fact, I know of one Reform Rabbi who believes that Torah was revealed at Sinai [...] but that doesn't disqualify him as a Reform Rabbi! We're a big-tent religion, and everyone agreeing on everything isn't the point, and it's never going to happen, anyway. [...] Many Reform Jews have a deep belief in a God that is not literal or theistic, but rather is more mystical or spiritual."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-things-to-know-about-reform-jews/: "About 29 percent of Reform Jews say they believe in God with absolute certainty, compared to 41 percent of Conservatives and 89 percent of Orthodox."- Note that the article doesn't say how the respondents define God.
By contrast, Reconstructionist Judaism is quite clear that it does not believe in a theistic God.
I'd like recent official statements from organizations representing Reform Judaism, even if it's just that Reform Judaism has no official position on this, and/or a survey of Reform Jews that allows for nuanced perspectives of what God means to them.
Do Jewish people believe in God? is a related question but does not specify Reform Judaism (and I think by default questions on this site are assumed to be about the Orthodox perspective).
theology reform-judaism
theology reform-judaism
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
micmic
1212 bronze badges
1212 bronze badges
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
mic is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
1
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
2
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
1
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
1
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
1
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
1
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
2
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
1
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
1
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago
1
1
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
1
1
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
2
2
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
1
1
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
1
1
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
As in any group of Jews, there is variation in what people believe. The blog posts (which are not official positions of the Reform movement) bear this out, as do the survey results you reported.
The Reform movement rejected a membership application from a congregation that billed itself as "secular humanist". At the individual level, a responsum addressing atheist and agnostic conversion candidates concludes that an atheist cannot be accepted as a convert, though for an agnostic there is room for further evaluation:
The most recent CCAR rabbinic manual, published in 1988, maintains the tradition of questioning the prospective convert’s belief in God. The first question asked is: “Do you choose to enter the eternal covenant between God and the people Israel and to become a Jew of your own free will?”10 The implication is clear. To become a Jew, Reform Judaism demands that the convert affirm belief in God and the unique bond between God and the Jewish people.
It must be emphasized that the declaration of faith does not demand that the ger /gitoret adhere to a particular God concept, but simply that he/she be able to affirm the reality of God in our religious experience. [...]
Consequently, if, in the opinion of the attending rabbis, she is an atheist, then the position of the Responsa Committee is well known. She is not to be accepted. However, if she is, as an agnostic, simply unsure or confused, then she should be carefully instructed and introduced to the diverse theological teachings that enrich our faith. Let her be taught that we are not so arrogant as to claim to know all about God, but neither is our faith so unsure that we can fathom life without God.
The responsum acknowledges that atheist Reform Jews exist, and seems to be saying that there's not much we can do about that. (However, standards for conversion are higher.) In general, the Reform movement focuses more on what you do than what you believe, at the personal level. A known atheist would not be welcome to lead the community in prayer, for example, but in my experience, nobody investigates the private beliefs of the people who show up for minyan.
add a comment |
The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) is the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization. They came up with a number of "platforms" that are "documents capturing the state of Reform Jewish thought at different key moments in our history".
In general they don't affirm a specific perspective on God, His omnipotence and benevolence and seem to accept different views, just as you have documented.
Specifically they stated in 1937 (here)
The heart of Judaism and its chief contribution to religion is the
doctrine of the One, living God, who rules the world through law and
love. In Him all existence has its creative source and mankind its
ideal of conduct. Though transcending time and space, He is the
indwelling Presence of the world. We worship Him as the Lord of the
universe and as our merciful Father.
Their 1976 statement on the topic reads
The affirmation of God has always been essential to our people’s will
to survive. In our struggle through the centuries to preserve our
faith we have experienced and conceived of God in many ways. The
trials of our own time and the challenges of modern culture have made
steady belief and clear understanding difficult for some.
Nevertheless, we ground our lives, personally and communally, on God’s
reality and remain open to new experiences and conceptions of the
Divine. Amid the mystery we call life, we affirm that human beings,
created in God’s image, share in God’s eternality despite the mystery
we call death.
The "Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism" adopted in Pittsburgh in 1999 mentions
We affirm the reality and oneness of God, even as we may differ in our
understanding of the Divine presence.
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As in any group of Jews, there is variation in what people believe. The blog posts (which are not official positions of the Reform movement) bear this out, as do the survey results you reported.
The Reform movement rejected a membership application from a congregation that billed itself as "secular humanist". At the individual level, a responsum addressing atheist and agnostic conversion candidates concludes that an atheist cannot be accepted as a convert, though for an agnostic there is room for further evaluation:
The most recent CCAR rabbinic manual, published in 1988, maintains the tradition of questioning the prospective convert’s belief in God. The first question asked is: “Do you choose to enter the eternal covenant between God and the people Israel and to become a Jew of your own free will?”10 The implication is clear. To become a Jew, Reform Judaism demands that the convert affirm belief in God and the unique bond between God and the Jewish people.
It must be emphasized that the declaration of faith does not demand that the ger /gitoret adhere to a particular God concept, but simply that he/she be able to affirm the reality of God in our religious experience. [...]
Consequently, if, in the opinion of the attending rabbis, she is an atheist, then the position of the Responsa Committee is well known. She is not to be accepted. However, if she is, as an agnostic, simply unsure or confused, then she should be carefully instructed and introduced to the diverse theological teachings that enrich our faith. Let her be taught that we are not so arrogant as to claim to know all about God, but neither is our faith so unsure that we can fathom life without God.
The responsum acknowledges that atheist Reform Jews exist, and seems to be saying that there's not much we can do about that. (However, standards for conversion are higher.) In general, the Reform movement focuses more on what you do than what you believe, at the personal level. A known atheist would not be welcome to lead the community in prayer, for example, but in my experience, nobody investigates the private beliefs of the people who show up for minyan.
add a comment |
As in any group of Jews, there is variation in what people believe. The blog posts (which are not official positions of the Reform movement) bear this out, as do the survey results you reported.
The Reform movement rejected a membership application from a congregation that billed itself as "secular humanist". At the individual level, a responsum addressing atheist and agnostic conversion candidates concludes that an atheist cannot be accepted as a convert, though for an agnostic there is room for further evaluation:
The most recent CCAR rabbinic manual, published in 1988, maintains the tradition of questioning the prospective convert’s belief in God. The first question asked is: “Do you choose to enter the eternal covenant between God and the people Israel and to become a Jew of your own free will?”10 The implication is clear. To become a Jew, Reform Judaism demands that the convert affirm belief in God and the unique bond between God and the Jewish people.
It must be emphasized that the declaration of faith does not demand that the ger /gitoret adhere to a particular God concept, but simply that he/she be able to affirm the reality of God in our religious experience. [...]
Consequently, if, in the opinion of the attending rabbis, she is an atheist, then the position of the Responsa Committee is well known. She is not to be accepted. However, if she is, as an agnostic, simply unsure or confused, then she should be carefully instructed and introduced to the diverse theological teachings that enrich our faith. Let her be taught that we are not so arrogant as to claim to know all about God, but neither is our faith so unsure that we can fathom life without God.
The responsum acknowledges that atheist Reform Jews exist, and seems to be saying that there's not much we can do about that. (However, standards for conversion are higher.) In general, the Reform movement focuses more on what you do than what you believe, at the personal level. A known atheist would not be welcome to lead the community in prayer, for example, but in my experience, nobody investigates the private beliefs of the people who show up for minyan.
add a comment |
As in any group of Jews, there is variation in what people believe. The blog posts (which are not official positions of the Reform movement) bear this out, as do the survey results you reported.
The Reform movement rejected a membership application from a congregation that billed itself as "secular humanist". At the individual level, a responsum addressing atheist and agnostic conversion candidates concludes that an atheist cannot be accepted as a convert, though for an agnostic there is room for further evaluation:
The most recent CCAR rabbinic manual, published in 1988, maintains the tradition of questioning the prospective convert’s belief in God. The first question asked is: “Do you choose to enter the eternal covenant between God and the people Israel and to become a Jew of your own free will?”10 The implication is clear. To become a Jew, Reform Judaism demands that the convert affirm belief in God and the unique bond between God and the Jewish people.
It must be emphasized that the declaration of faith does not demand that the ger /gitoret adhere to a particular God concept, but simply that he/she be able to affirm the reality of God in our religious experience. [...]
Consequently, if, in the opinion of the attending rabbis, she is an atheist, then the position of the Responsa Committee is well known. She is not to be accepted. However, if she is, as an agnostic, simply unsure or confused, then she should be carefully instructed and introduced to the diverse theological teachings that enrich our faith. Let her be taught that we are not so arrogant as to claim to know all about God, but neither is our faith so unsure that we can fathom life without God.
The responsum acknowledges that atheist Reform Jews exist, and seems to be saying that there's not much we can do about that. (However, standards for conversion are higher.) In general, the Reform movement focuses more on what you do than what you believe, at the personal level. A known atheist would not be welcome to lead the community in prayer, for example, but in my experience, nobody investigates the private beliefs of the people who show up for minyan.
As in any group of Jews, there is variation in what people believe. The blog posts (which are not official positions of the Reform movement) bear this out, as do the survey results you reported.
The Reform movement rejected a membership application from a congregation that billed itself as "secular humanist". At the individual level, a responsum addressing atheist and agnostic conversion candidates concludes that an atheist cannot be accepted as a convert, though for an agnostic there is room for further evaluation:
The most recent CCAR rabbinic manual, published in 1988, maintains the tradition of questioning the prospective convert’s belief in God. The first question asked is: “Do you choose to enter the eternal covenant between God and the people Israel and to become a Jew of your own free will?”10 The implication is clear. To become a Jew, Reform Judaism demands that the convert affirm belief in God and the unique bond between God and the Jewish people.
It must be emphasized that the declaration of faith does not demand that the ger /gitoret adhere to a particular God concept, but simply that he/she be able to affirm the reality of God in our religious experience. [...]
Consequently, if, in the opinion of the attending rabbis, she is an atheist, then the position of the Responsa Committee is well known. She is not to be accepted. However, if she is, as an agnostic, simply unsure or confused, then she should be carefully instructed and introduced to the diverse theological teachings that enrich our faith. Let her be taught that we are not so arrogant as to claim to know all about God, but neither is our faith so unsure that we can fathom life without God.
The responsum acknowledges that atheist Reform Jews exist, and seems to be saying that there's not much we can do about that. (However, standards for conversion are higher.) In general, the Reform movement focuses more on what you do than what you believe, at the personal level. A known atheist would not be welcome to lead the community in prayer, for example, but in my experience, nobody investigates the private beliefs of the people who show up for minyan.
answered 7 hours ago
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
39.6k7 gold badges86 silver badges281 bronze badges
39.6k7 gold badges86 silver badges281 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) is the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization. They came up with a number of "platforms" that are "documents capturing the state of Reform Jewish thought at different key moments in our history".
In general they don't affirm a specific perspective on God, His omnipotence and benevolence and seem to accept different views, just as you have documented.
Specifically they stated in 1937 (here)
The heart of Judaism and its chief contribution to religion is the
doctrine of the One, living God, who rules the world through law and
love. In Him all existence has its creative source and mankind its
ideal of conduct. Though transcending time and space, He is the
indwelling Presence of the world. We worship Him as the Lord of the
universe and as our merciful Father.
Their 1976 statement on the topic reads
The affirmation of God has always been essential to our people’s will
to survive. In our struggle through the centuries to preserve our
faith we have experienced and conceived of God in many ways. The
trials of our own time and the challenges of modern culture have made
steady belief and clear understanding difficult for some.
Nevertheless, we ground our lives, personally and communally, on God’s
reality and remain open to new experiences and conceptions of the
Divine. Amid the mystery we call life, we affirm that human beings,
created in God’s image, share in God’s eternality despite the mystery
we call death.
The "Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism" adopted in Pittsburgh in 1999 mentions
We affirm the reality and oneness of God, even as we may differ in our
understanding of the Divine presence.
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) is the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization. They came up with a number of "platforms" that are "documents capturing the state of Reform Jewish thought at different key moments in our history".
In general they don't affirm a specific perspective on God, His omnipotence and benevolence and seem to accept different views, just as you have documented.
Specifically they stated in 1937 (here)
The heart of Judaism and its chief contribution to religion is the
doctrine of the One, living God, who rules the world through law and
love. In Him all existence has its creative source and mankind its
ideal of conduct. Though transcending time and space, He is the
indwelling Presence of the world. We worship Him as the Lord of the
universe and as our merciful Father.
Their 1976 statement on the topic reads
The affirmation of God has always been essential to our people’s will
to survive. In our struggle through the centuries to preserve our
faith we have experienced and conceived of God in many ways. The
trials of our own time and the challenges of modern culture have made
steady belief and clear understanding difficult for some.
Nevertheless, we ground our lives, personally and communally, on God’s
reality and remain open to new experiences and conceptions of the
Divine. Amid the mystery we call life, we affirm that human beings,
created in God’s image, share in God’s eternality despite the mystery
we call death.
The "Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism" adopted in Pittsburgh in 1999 mentions
We affirm the reality and oneness of God, even as we may differ in our
understanding of the Divine presence.
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) is the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization. They came up with a number of "platforms" that are "documents capturing the state of Reform Jewish thought at different key moments in our history".
In general they don't affirm a specific perspective on God, His omnipotence and benevolence and seem to accept different views, just as you have documented.
Specifically they stated in 1937 (here)
The heart of Judaism and its chief contribution to religion is the
doctrine of the One, living God, who rules the world through law and
love. In Him all existence has its creative source and mankind its
ideal of conduct. Though transcending time and space, He is the
indwelling Presence of the world. We worship Him as the Lord of the
universe and as our merciful Father.
Their 1976 statement on the topic reads
The affirmation of God has always been essential to our people’s will
to survive. In our struggle through the centuries to preserve our
faith we have experienced and conceived of God in many ways. The
trials of our own time and the challenges of modern culture have made
steady belief and clear understanding difficult for some.
Nevertheless, we ground our lives, personally and communally, on God’s
reality and remain open to new experiences and conceptions of the
Divine. Amid the mystery we call life, we affirm that human beings,
created in God’s image, share in God’s eternality despite the mystery
we call death.
The "Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism" adopted in Pittsburgh in 1999 mentions
We affirm the reality and oneness of God, even as we may differ in our
understanding of the Divine presence.
The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) is the Reform Rabbinic leadership organization. They came up with a number of "platforms" that are "documents capturing the state of Reform Jewish thought at different key moments in our history".
In general they don't affirm a specific perspective on God, His omnipotence and benevolence and seem to accept different views, just as you have documented.
Specifically they stated in 1937 (here)
The heart of Judaism and its chief contribution to religion is the
doctrine of the One, living God, who rules the world through law and
love. In Him all existence has its creative source and mankind its
ideal of conduct. Though transcending time and space, He is the
indwelling Presence of the world. We worship Him as the Lord of the
universe and as our merciful Father.
Their 1976 statement on the topic reads
The affirmation of God has always been essential to our people’s will
to survive. In our struggle through the centuries to preserve our
faith we have experienced and conceived of God in many ways. The
trials of our own time and the challenges of modern culture have made
steady belief and clear understanding difficult for some.
Nevertheless, we ground our lives, personally and communally, on God’s
reality and remain open to new experiences and conceptions of the
Divine. Amid the mystery we call life, we affirm that human beings,
created in God’s image, share in God’s eternality despite the mystery
we call death.
The "Statement of Principles for Reform Judaism" adopted in Pittsburgh in 1999 mentions
We affirm the reality and oneness of God, even as we may differ in our
understanding of the Divine presence.
answered 7 hours ago
mblochmbloch
30.8k5 gold badges51 silver badges146 bronze badges
30.8k5 gold badges51 silver badges146 bronze badges
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
add a comment |
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
I was reading something the other day on the growth of Reform Judaism in America in the mid-20th century and its ties to McCarthyist fear of unaffiliated families (eg. membership in a religious institution to prove that one wasn't a g-dless commy)
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to Mi Yodeya! This seems to be a duplicate of the question you’ve linked; while answers tend to come from an orthodox perspective, there is no rule against a reform answer, a policy you can read more about here.
– DonielF
8 hours ago
1
@DonielF, I don't agree. In general, a more specific form of a question which precludes the answers to the extant dupe is not a dupe, at least IMO
– Noach MiFrankfurt
7 hours ago
2
@Noach I don't believe that's the current policy. A theoretical complete answer to that question should answer this one; that doesn't necessarily mean that extant answers do, though ideally they should. judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3507
– DonielF
7 hours ago
1
@DonielF While there isn't a rule against a non-orthodox, the answers to the meta post you linked to are either lukewarm about or unwelcoming of non-Rabbinical answers to questions that aren't specifically non-Rabbinical. Reform Judaism is a branch of Rabbinical Judaism, unlike Karaite Judaism, but I can't help but think they mean non-orthodox.
– mic
6 hours ago
1
I don't think it's a duplicate. The other question asks in generalities and I don't think a "theoretically complete" answer would go into the details of every group and address the range of individual beliefs. This question arises from stuff about a specific group that seems to run counter to the general expectation; I think calling that out in a separate question is appropriate. This is the "sukkah on a boat" case from the meta answer.
– Monica Cellio♦
6 hours ago