Hook/Clasp/Latch? (For a necklace)'Haha' over 'lol' -Do natives consider 'hahaha' as an offensive gesture?Ask your crush outWhat are the differences between “You always dress in a black suit” and “You are always dressed in a black suit” in spoken language?Hear the chapter from herHey ! I used the indicator to indicate that I was turning leftThe battery is 34% charged(or is 34% ), the battery decreased by 4%Where did we come out at/end up atTurn the bike/turn the bike aroundCancel mid-seasonTill what grade, till grade
Is an "are" omitted in this sentence
Where can I see modifications made to the PATH environment variable by the Go installer
Is the first page of Novel really that important?
Can an unintentional murderer leave Ir Miklat for Shalosh Regalim?
Why wasn't interlaced CRT scanning done back and forth?
In MTG, was there ever a five-color deck that worked well?
What is Modern Vipassana?
A verb for when some rights are not violated?
Reasons for using monsters as bioweapons
Is this popular optical illusion made of a grey-scale image with coloured lines?
Does a bard know when a character uses their Bardic Inspiration?
Is there any difference between "result in" and "end up with"?
Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?
What does Argus Filch specifically do?
Lower bound for the number of lattice points on high dimensional spheres
Declaring a visitor to the UK as my "girlfriend" - effect on getting a Visitor visa?
Can genetic genealogy identify father of male first cousins with same first name?
Any information about the photo with Army Uniforms
How to call made-up data?
What license to choose for my PhD thesis?
Can I say "Gesundheit" if someone is coughing?
Partial Fractions: Why does this shortcut method work?
Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?
Difference between "jail" and "prison" in German
Hook/Clasp/Latch? (For a necklace)
'Haha' over 'lol' -Do natives consider 'hahaha' as an offensive gesture?Ask your crush outWhat are the differences between “You always dress in a black suit” and “You are always dressed in a black suit” in spoken language?Hear the chapter from herHey ! I used the indicator to indicate that I was turning leftThe battery is 34% charged(or is 34% ), the battery decreased by 4%Where did we come out at/end up atTurn the bike/turn the bike aroundCancel mid-seasonTill what grade, till grade
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:
She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)
She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)
She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)
Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."
And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?
The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.
Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?
word-usage
add a comment |
When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:
She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)
She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)
She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)
Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."
And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?
The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.
Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?
word-usage
1
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
add a comment |
When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:
She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)
She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)
She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)
Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."
And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?
The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.
Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?
word-usage
When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:
She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)
She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)
She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)
Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."
And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?
The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.
Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?
word-usage
word-usage
asked 9 hours ago
It's about EnglishIt's about English
1,3373 silver badges12 bronze badges
1,3373 silver badges12 bronze badges
1
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
1
1
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Keep it simple, even for creative writing:
She fastened her necklace.
or:
She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.
Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.
add a comment |
The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.
For instance:
She clasped her necklace to her chest.
She latched her necklace onto her workbench.
She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.
In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:
She closed the clasp of her necklace.
She fastened the latch of her bracelet.
I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.
If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:
The clasp of your necklace is undone.
The hook of your bracelet is loose.
The latch of your necklace is open.
Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220290%2fhook-clasp-latch-for-a-necklace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Keep it simple, even for creative writing:
She fastened her necklace.
or:
She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.
Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.
add a comment |
Keep it simple, even for creative writing:
She fastened her necklace.
or:
She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.
Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.
add a comment |
Keep it simple, even for creative writing:
She fastened her necklace.
or:
She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.
Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.
Keep it simple, even for creative writing:
She fastened her necklace.
or:
She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.
Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.
answered 8 hours ago
MickMick
6,3141 gold badge13 silver badges31 bronze badges
6,3141 gold badge13 silver badges31 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.
For instance:
She clasped her necklace to her chest.
She latched her necklace onto her workbench.
She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.
In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:
She closed the clasp of her necklace.
She fastened the latch of her bracelet.
I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.
If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:
The clasp of your necklace is undone.
The hook of your bracelet is loose.
The latch of your necklace is open.
Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
add a comment |
The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.
For instance:
She clasped her necklace to her chest.
She latched her necklace onto her workbench.
She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.
In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:
She closed the clasp of her necklace.
She fastened the latch of her bracelet.
I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.
If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:
The clasp of your necklace is undone.
The hook of your bracelet is loose.
The latch of your necklace is open.
Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
add a comment |
The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.
For instance:
She clasped her necklace to her chest.
She latched her necklace onto her workbench.
She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.
In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:
She closed the clasp of her necklace.
She fastened the latch of her bracelet.
I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.
If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:
The clasp of your necklace is undone.
The hook of your bracelet is loose.
The latch of your necklace is open.
Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.
The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.
For instance:
She clasped her necklace to her chest.
She latched her necklace onto her workbench.
She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.
In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:
She closed the clasp of her necklace.
She fastened the latch of her bracelet.
I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.
If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:
The clasp of your necklace is undone.
The hook of your bracelet is loose.
The latch of your necklace is open.
Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.
answered 7 hours ago
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
25k2 gold badges33 silver badges53 bronze badges
25k2 gold badges33 silver badges53 bronze badges
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
1
1
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)
– It's about English
7 hours ago
1
1
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
@It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)
– Jason Bassford
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220290%2fhook-clasp-latch-for-a-necklace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.
– Lambie
7 hours ago
You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.
– Lambie
7 hours ago