Hook/Clasp/Latch? (For a necklace)'Haha' over 'lol' -Do natives consider 'hahaha' as an offensive gesture?Ask your crush outWhat are the differences between “You always dress in a black suit” and “You are always dressed in a black suit” in spoken language?Hear the chapter from herHey ! I used the indicator to indicate that I was turning leftThe battery is 34% charged(or is 34% ), the battery decreased by 4%Where did we come out at/end up atTurn the bike/turn the bike aroundCancel mid-seasonTill what grade, till grade

Is an "are" omitted in this sentence

Where can I see modifications made to the PATH environment variable by the Go installer

Is the first page of Novel really that important?

Can an unintentional murderer leave Ir Miklat for Shalosh Regalim?

Why wasn't interlaced CRT scanning done back and forth?

In MTG, was there ever a five-color deck that worked well?

What is Modern Vipassana?

A verb for when some rights are not violated?

Reasons for using monsters as bioweapons

Is this popular optical illusion made of a grey-scale image with coloured lines?

Does a bard know when a character uses their Bardic Inspiration?

Is there any difference between "result in" and "end up with"?

Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?

What does Argus Filch specifically do?

Lower bound for the number of lattice points on high dimensional spheres

Declaring a visitor to the UK as my "girlfriend" - effect on getting a Visitor visa?

Can genetic genealogy identify father of male first cousins with same first name?

Any information about the photo with Army Uniforms

How to call made-up data?

What license to choose for my PhD thesis?

Can I say "Gesundheit" if someone is coughing?

Partial Fractions: Why does this shortcut method work?

Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?

Difference between "jail" and "prison" in German



Hook/Clasp/Latch? (For a necklace)


'Haha' over 'lol' -Do natives consider 'hahaha' as an offensive gesture?Ask your crush outWhat are the differences between “You always dress in a black suit” and “You are always dressed in a black suit” in spoken language?Hear the chapter from herHey ! I used the indicator to indicate that I was turning leftThe battery is 34% charged(or is 34% ), the battery decreased by 4%Where did we come out at/end up atTurn the bike/turn the bike aroundCancel mid-seasonTill what grade, till grade






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:




She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)



She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)



She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)




Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."



And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?




The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.




Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago












  • You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago

















2















When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:




She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)



She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)



She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)




Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."



And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?




The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.




Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago












  • You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago













2












2








2








When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:




She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)



She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)



She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)




Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."



And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?




The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.




Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?










share|improve this question














When someone fastens a "clasp bracelet/necklace", will it be natural to use:




She clasped her necklace/bracelet. (I feel this sounds okay)



She latched her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off.)



She hooked her necklace/bracelet. (Maybe this sounds a bit off too)




Or will it only be: "She fastened her necklace/bracelet."



And when we wear our necklace, sometimes, the clasp starts showing and we have to turn the necklace around. What will be a natural way to express that?




The clasp/hook/latch of your necklace is showing.




Is there a better way to describe it? What sounds the best "clasp" or "hook" or "latch"? I feel that "clasp" sounds the best?







word-usage






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









It's about EnglishIt's about English

1,3373 silver badges12 bronze badges




1,3373 silver badges12 bronze badges










  • 1





    latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago












  • You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago












  • 1





    latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago












  • You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

    – Lambie
    7 hours ago







1




1





latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

– Lambie
7 hours ago






latches are for doors, gates and boxes, etc. not necklaces. And careful, clasp something or someone means to hold. You do not clasp a necklace. You clasp your dog or child or loved one. That said, necklaces have clasps.

– Lambie
7 hours ago














You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

– Lambie
7 hours ago





You fasten a necklace. No need to refer to the clasp.

– Lambie
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Keep it simple, even for creative writing:




She fastened her necklace.




or:




She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.




Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.



    For instance:




    She clasped her necklace to her chest.

    She latched her necklace onto her workbench.

    She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.





    In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:




    She closed the clasp of her necklace.

    She fastened the latch of her bracelet.





    I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.



    If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:




    The clasp of your necklace is undone.

    The hook of your bracelet is loose.

    The latch of your necklace is open.




    Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

      – It's about English
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

      – Jason Bassford
      6 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220290%2fhook-clasp-latch-for-a-necklace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Keep it simple, even for creative writing:




    She fastened her necklace.




    or:




    She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.




    Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      Keep it simple, even for creative writing:




      She fastened her necklace.




      or:




      She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.




      Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        Keep it simple, even for creative writing:




        She fastened her necklace.




        or:




        She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.




        Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.






        share|improve this answer













        Keep it simple, even for creative writing:




        She fastened her necklace.




        or:




        She fastened her necklace, even though the clasp was broken.




        Note that clasp can also mean hold, so she clasped her necklace can convey an unintended meaning.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        MickMick

        6,3141 gold badge13 silver badges31 bronze badges




        6,3141 gold badge13 silver badges31 bronze badges


























            2














            The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.



            For instance:




            She clasped her necklace to her chest.

            She latched her necklace onto her workbench.

            She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.





            In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:




            She closed the clasp of her necklace.

            She fastened the latch of her bracelet.





            I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.



            If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:




            The clasp of your necklace is undone.

            The hook of your bracelet is loose.

            The latch of your necklace is open.




            Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

              – It's about English
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

              – Jason Bassford
              6 hours ago
















            2














            The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.



            For instance:




            She clasped her necklace to her chest.

            She latched her necklace onto her workbench.

            She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.





            In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:




            She closed the clasp of her necklace.

            She fastened the latch of her bracelet.





            I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.



            If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:




            The clasp of your necklace is undone.

            The hook of your bracelet is loose.

            The latch of your necklace is open.




            Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

              – It's about English
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

              – Jason Bassford
              6 hours ago














            2












            2








            2







            The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.



            For instance:




            She clasped her necklace to her chest.

            She latched her necklace onto her workbench.

            She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.





            In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:




            She closed the clasp of her necklace.

            She fastened the latch of her bracelet.





            I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.



            If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:




            The clasp of your necklace is undone.

            The hook of your bracelet is loose.

            The latch of your necklace is open.




            Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.






            share|improve this answer













            The problem is that all three of those sentences can be naturally used to describe something done with the necklace or bracelet as a whole rather than the mechanism itself.



            For instance:




            She clasped her necklace to her chest.

            She latched her necklace onto her workbench.

            She hooked her bracelet on a piece of thread.





            In order to make it clear that it's the mechanism itself that's being discussed, you need to use an article and preposition:




            She closed the clasp of her necklace.

            She fastened the latch of her bracelet.





            I don't know what it means to say that the (clasp / hook / latch) is showing. That's not something that's normally hidden—or at least not specifically hidden.



            If you mean you see that it's come undone, and that the jewellery is at risk of falling off, you might just say:




            The clasp of your necklace is undone.

            The hook of your bracelet is loose.

            The latch of your necklace is open.




            Any of them will do, but it's the showing part in the original that is a little strange.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            Jason BassfordJason Bassford

            25k2 gold badges33 silver badges53 bronze badges




            25k2 gold badges33 silver badges53 bronze badges










            • 1





              It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

              – It's about English
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

              – Jason Bassford
              6 hours ago













            • 1





              It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

              – It's about English
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

              – Jason Bassford
              6 hours ago








            1




            1





            It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

            – It's about English
            7 hours ago





            It's like when the necklace turns around in a way that that the clasp is in the front. Thus, you fix it by turing it around again. This will "showing" work in that case. (Because normally you don't see it because it gets covers by our hair.)

            – It's about English
            7 hours ago




            1




            1





            @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

            – Jason Bassford
            6 hours ago






            @It'saboutEnglish In that situation, nobody would normally refer to the clasp. They would simply say that the necklace or bracelet has turned around or is now backwards. While seeing the clasp would be an indicator of that, it's not something that would be referred to specifically. (But note that many necklaces and bracelets have mechanisms keeping them in place that can be visible no matter what the rotation of the jewellery is.)

            – Jason Bassford
            6 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220290%2fhook-clasp-latch-for-a-necklace%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480