Mfcttrf

How to transform a function from f[#1] to f[x]

Lower bound for the number of lattice points on high dimensional spheres

Partial Fractions: Why does this shortcut method work?

Gödel's paradox: Why is "a proof that some universal statement is unprovable" not a valid proof that this statement is true?

How to handle many times series?

What license to choose for my PhD thesis?

Confused over role of 「自分が」in this particular passage

Do moonless nights cause dim light to become darkness, and bright light (e.g. from torches) to become dim light?

Is it uncompelling to continue the story with lower stakes?

How long should I wait to plug in my refrigerator after unplugging it?

Why is the Vasa Museum in Stockholm so Popular?

Difference between "jail" and "prison" in German

What is the reason behind water not falling from a bucket at the top of loop?

Different answers of calculations in LuaLaTeX on local computer, lua compiler and on overleaf

Why adjustbox needs a tweak of raise=-0.3ex with enumitem?

Can an unintentional murderer leave Ir Miklat for Shalosh Regalim?

Subtle ways to render a planet uninhabitable

Can you shove a friendly creature?

Why does the friction act on the inward direction when a car makes a turn on a level road?

(7 of 11: Fillomino) What is Pyramid Cult's Favorite Shape?

Reasons for using monsters as bioweapons

What printing process is this?

How to avoid a lengthy conversation with someone from the neighborhood I don't share interests with

Approximating an expression for a potential

Empty proof as standalone

Change only the ending with renewenvironmentStandalone with beginfigure gives errorEmpty space in standalone document with textopoHow to make table floats work with preview/standalone environment?Multiple errors when compiling standalone documentUsing standalone to combine multiple .tex into a single fileProblem with proof enviromentStandalone tikz figure in landscape modeamsthm - Missing number errorProblem with proof environment

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

2

I've made an empty proof as a joke (the worst kind of visual proof). It works fine when I use the article document class,

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

but I want to get rid of page numbers and other article-like behavior.
When I try to compile it as a standalone using

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

in the preamble, it gives me the error:

! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing item.

How can I make an empty proof as a standalone document, preferably using the proof environment from amsthm?

amsthm standalone proof-package

share|improve this question

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

2

I've made an empty proof as a joke (the worst kind of visual proof). It works fine when I use the article document class,

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

but I want to get rid of page numbers and other article-like behavior.
When I try to compile it as a standalone using

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

in the preamble, it gives me the error:

! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing item.

How can I make an empty proof as a standalone document, preferably using the proof environment from amsthm?

amsthm standalone proof-package

share|improve this question

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

I've made an empty proof as a joke (the worst kind of visual proof). It works fine when I use the article document class,

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

but I want to get rid of page numbers and other article-like behavior.
When I try to compile it as a standalone using

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

in the preamble, it gives me the error:

! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing item.

How can I make an empty proof as a standalone document, preferably using the proof environment from amsthm?

amsthm standalone proof-package

share|improve this question

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

documentclassarticle
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

! LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing item.

share|improve this question

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

edited 7 hours ago

Mensch

47k1010 gold badges5252 silver badges178178 bronze badges

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

New contributor

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 8 hours ago

anonymous_pigeonanonymous_pigeon

5544 bronze badges

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

You should add the preview-option.

documentclass[preview]standalone
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

This will give you the following result:

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Why is needed the package standalone? Your MWE works without it too :-)
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko You're right, I just copied it from OP. I will edit.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko thank you for pointing this out. I will remove it from my question.
  
  – anonymous_pigeon
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I also would add in preamble usepackagelipsum and than wrote beginproof lipsum[1] endproof and show the result in answer. With this OP will get better filling about obtained result.
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko Thank you for your suggestion, I added it.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

Embedding the proof inside a minipage works:

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

begindocument

beginminipage5cm
beginproof
endproof
endminipage

enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

anonymous_pigeon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f502823%2fempty-proof-as-standalone%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

You should add the preview-option.

documentclass[preview]standalone
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

This will give you the following result:

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Why is needed the package standalone? Your MWE works without it too :-)
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko You're right, I just copied it from OP. I will edit.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko thank you for pointing this out. I will remove it from my question.
  
  – anonymous_pigeon
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I also would add in preamble usepackagelipsum and than wrote beginproof lipsum[1] endproof and show the result in answer. With this OP will get better filling about obtained result.
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko Thank you for your suggestion, I added it.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

You should add the preview-option.

documentclass[preview]standalone
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

This will give you the following result:

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Why is needed the package standalone? Your MWE works without it too :-)
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko You're right, I just copied it from OP. I will edit.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko thank you for pointing this out. I will remove it from my question.
  
  – anonymous_pigeon
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I also would add in preamble usepackagelipsum and than wrote beginproof lipsum[1] endproof and show the result in answer. With this OP will get better filling about obtained result.
  
  – Zarko
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Zarko Thank you for your suggestion, I added it.
  
  – Jan
  8 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

You should add the preview-option.

documentclass[preview]standalone
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

This will give you the following result:

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

documentclass[preview]standalone
usepackageamsthm
begindocument
beginproof
endproof
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 8 hours ago

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

answered 8 hours ago

JanJan

24711 silver badge1010 bronze badges

2

Embedding the proof inside a minipage works:

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

begindocument

beginminipage5cm
beginproof
endproof
endminipage

enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

add a comment | 

2

Embedding the proof inside a minipage works:

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

begindocument

beginminipage5cm
beginproof
endproof
endminipage

enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

add a comment | 

Embedding the proof inside a minipage works:

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

begindocument

beginminipage5cm
beginproof
endproof
endminipage

enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

documentclassstandalone
usepackageamsthm

begindocument

beginminipage5cm
beginproof
endproof
endminipage

enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges

answered 8 hours ago

frougonfrougon

6,78011 gold badge1313 silver badges2222 bronze badges