CLR Stored Procedure on Azure SQL Managed Instance error on execution: “Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC”Assembly 'system.web, version=4.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a.' was not found in the SQL catalogSQL Server installation errors assembly.NET SQLCLR Assembly not working in SQL Server 2016 (Error msg 10314)Powershell Script Error Connecting To SQL ServerAssembly 'EDCLR' references assembly 'system.servicemodel, version=4.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=b77a5c561934e089 errorError Msg 10314, Level 16, State 11 with SAFE assembly after upgrade to SQL Server 2017Error 0x80131904 failed to load assembly id 65536 / HRESULT: 0x8013150A for microsoft.sqlserver.integrationservices.serverError publishing SQLCLR C# Function using Visual Studio 2017SQL Server Management Studio 18 won't open (only splash screen pops up)
Is this cheap "air conditioner" able to cool a room?
Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic
Sierpinski turtle triangle
Acceptable to cut steak before searing?
Look mom! I made my own (Base 10) numeral system!
Did WWII Japanese soldiers engage in cannibalism of their enemies?
Yajilin minicubes: the Hullabaloo, the Brouhaha, the Bangarang
SQL Minimum Row count
What word can be used to describe a bug in a movie?
Could one become a successful researcher by writing some really good papers while being outside academia?
How to remove something from the slug/url
Why should we care about syntactic proofs if we can show semantically that statements are true?
How to display a duet in lyrics?
How do I calculate the difference in lens reach between a superzoom compact and a DSLR zoom lens?
Does a code snippet compile? Or does it gets compiled?
What is the idiomatic way of saying “he is ticklish under armpits”?
Does two puncture wounds mean venomous snake?
Why should public servants be apolitical?
Team goes to lunch frequently, I do intermittent fasting but still want to socialize
Generator for parity?
CLR Stored Procedure on Azure SQL Managed Instance error on execution: "Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC"
Is it really ~648.69 km/s delta-v to "land" on the surface of the Sun?
Dereferencing a pointer in a for loop initializer creates a seg fault
Do other countries guarantee freedoms that the United States does not have?
CLR Stored Procedure on Azure SQL Managed Instance error on execution: “Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC”
Assembly 'system.web, version=4.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a.' was not found in the SQL catalogSQL Server installation errors assembly.NET SQLCLR Assembly not working in SQL Server 2016 (Error msg 10314)Powershell Script Error Connecting To SQL ServerAssembly 'EDCLR' references assembly 'system.servicemodel, version=4.0.0.0, culture=neutral, publickeytoken=b77a5c561934e089 errorError Msg 10314, Level 16, State 11 with SAFE assembly after upgrade to SQL Server 2017Error 0x80131904 failed to load assembly id 65536 / HRESULT: 0x8013150A for microsoft.sqlserver.integrationservices.serverError publishing SQLCLR C# Function using Visual Studio 2017SQL Server Management Studio 18 won't open (only splash screen pops up)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a CLR stored procedure which executes correctly when deployed to local SQL Server instances from SQL Server 2012 - 2017. I can successfully deploy to an Azure SQL Managed Instance but when I execute the procedure I get the following error:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Net.Http, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies. Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131050).
I have tried playing around with the project references but to no avail - the only version of the System.Net.Http.dll
that can be deployed to the Managed Instance is one that errors on execution.
sql-server sql-clr azure-sql-managed-instance
add a comment |
I have a CLR stored procedure which executes correctly when deployed to local SQL Server instances from SQL Server 2012 - 2017. I can successfully deploy to an Azure SQL Managed Instance but when I execute the procedure I get the following error:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Net.Http, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies. Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131050).
I have tried playing around with the project references but to no avail - the only version of the System.Net.Http.dll
that can be deployed to the Managed Instance is one that errors on execution.
sql-server sql-clr azure-sql-managed-instance
add a comment |
I have a CLR stored procedure which executes correctly when deployed to local SQL Server instances from SQL Server 2012 - 2017. I can successfully deploy to an Azure SQL Managed Instance but when I execute the procedure I get the following error:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Net.Http, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies. Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131050).
I have tried playing around with the project references but to no avail - the only version of the System.Net.Http.dll
that can be deployed to the Managed Instance is one that errors on execution.
sql-server sql-clr azure-sql-managed-instance
I have a CLR stored procedure which executes correctly when deployed to local SQL Server instances from SQL Server 2012 - 2017. I can successfully deploy to an Azure SQL Managed Instance but when I execute the procedure I get the following error:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Net.Http, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' or one of its dependencies. Assembly in host store has a different signature than assembly in GAC. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131050).
I have tried playing around with the project references but to no avail - the only version of the System.Net.Http.dll
that can be deployed to the Managed Instance is one that errors on execution.
sql-server sql-clr azure-sql-managed-instance
sql-server sql-clr azure-sql-managed-instance
asked 9 hours ago
JamesPJamesP
554 bronze badges
554 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
One of the requirements / nuances of working with SQLCLR is that any assembly loaded into both the GAC and SQL Server must be the exact same version (i.e. down to the patch level, not just Major.Minor.*). So, your local instances might all be using 4.7.2 (or whatever), but if the Managed Instance is using 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.8, or anything else, then you will get that error. You would even get this error if one of your local instances was on a server running a different version of the .NET Framework than the one that you grabbed the System.Net.Http.DLL from. Of course, if all of these different instances you mentioned are running on the same physical server, then there is only one OS involved anyway, so of course they all work correctly ;-).
You will need to find out what specific version is being used on the Managed Instance and use that in your Azure install script. You shouldn't need to use the same version locally since the reference to a similar version that has the same signatures should work.
Now, how to find the exact Framework version on Managed Instance? That depends. It might be in a DMV (not the clr_info
one as that only has the CLR version, not the Framework version), and/or might be discoverable via the registry if xp_regread
is usable in a Managed Instance. Is it? I will update in a moment with whether or not the DMV I am thinking of has enough info to get the Framework version from.
P.S. This issue is one of the downsides to using unsupported .NET Framework libraries. They are going to be in the GAC (usually, right?) and if a Windows update (locally, or whatever they do to the host system of the Managed Instances) updates the version then your SQLCLR project stops working. And, if the new unsupported Framework DLL gets converted to a mixed mode assembly (both managed and unmanaged code), then you won't be able to load the new version into SQL Server and will need to re-code your project to not use that unsupported Framework assembly.
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest andHttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) doesxp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
From Azure SQL Database managed instance T-SQL differences from SQL Server:
A managed instance can't access file shares and Windows folders, so the following constraints apply:
Only CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM BINARY is supported. See CREATE ASSEMBLY
FROM BINARY.
CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM FILE isn't supported. See CREATE
ASSEMBLY FROM FILE.
ALTER ASSEMBLY can't reference files. See ALTER ASSEMBLY.
And later:
CLR modules and linked servers sometimes can't reference a local IP address
CLR modules placed in a managed instance and linked servers or distributed queries that reference a current instance sometimes can't resolve the IP of a local instance. This error is a transient issue.
Workaround: Use context connections in a CLR module if possible.
One of these restrictions might be what is blocking you; if not, it would be helpful to add more info to your question about what your CLR procedure does, and how you have confirmed each of these restrictions doesn't apply. A search for +CLR +"Managed Instance"
yields exactly two results, so if nothing here applies, I suggest engaging Microsoft Support.
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f245013%2fclr-stored-procedure-on-azure-sql-managed-instance-error-on-execution-assembly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One of the requirements / nuances of working with SQLCLR is that any assembly loaded into both the GAC and SQL Server must be the exact same version (i.e. down to the patch level, not just Major.Minor.*). So, your local instances might all be using 4.7.2 (or whatever), but if the Managed Instance is using 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.8, or anything else, then you will get that error. You would even get this error if one of your local instances was on a server running a different version of the .NET Framework than the one that you grabbed the System.Net.Http.DLL from. Of course, if all of these different instances you mentioned are running on the same physical server, then there is only one OS involved anyway, so of course they all work correctly ;-).
You will need to find out what specific version is being used on the Managed Instance and use that in your Azure install script. You shouldn't need to use the same version locally since the reference to a similar version that has the same signatures should work.
Now, how to find the exact Framework version on Managed Instance? That depends. It might be in a DMV (not the clr_info
one as that only has the CLR version, not the Framework version), and/or might be discoverable via the registry if xp_regread
is usable in a Managed Instance. Is it? I will update in a moment with whether or not the DMV I am thinking of has enough info to get the Framework version from.
P.S. This issue is one of the downsides to using unsupported .NET Framework libraries. They are going to be in the GAC (usually, right?) and if a Windows update (locally, or whatever they do to the host system of the Managed Instances) updates the version then your SQLCLR project stops working. And, if the new unsupported Framework DLL gets converted to a mixed mode assembly (both managed and unmanaged code), then you won't be able to load the new version into SQL Server and will need to re-code your project to not use that unsupported Framework assembly.
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest andHttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) doesxp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
One of the requirements / nuances of working with SQLCLR is that any assembly loaded into both the GAC and SQL Server must be the exact same version (i.e. down to the patch level, not just Major.Minor.*). So, your local instances might all be using 4.7.2 (or whatever), but if the Managed Instance is using 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.8, or anything else, then you will get that error. You would even get this error if one of your local instances was on a server running a different version of the .NET Framework than the one that you grabbed the System.Net.Http.DLL from. Of course, if all of these different instances you mentioned are running on the same physical server, then there is only one OS involved anyway, so of course they all work correctly ;-).
You will need to find out what specific version is being used on the Managed Instance and use that in your Azure install script. You shouldn't need to use the same version locally since the reference to a similar version that has the same signatures should work.
Now, how to find the exact Framework version on Managed Instance? That depends. It might be in a DMV (not the clr_info
one as that only has the CLR version, not the Framework version), and/or might be discoverable via the registry if xp_regread
is usable in a Managed Instance. Is it? I will update in a moment with whether or not the DMV I am thinking of has enough info to get the Framework version from.
P.S. This issue is one of the downsides to using unsupported .NET Framework libraries. They are going to be in the GAC (usually, right?) and if a Windows update (locally, or whatever they do to the host system of the Managed Instances) updates the version then your SQLCLR project stops working. And, if the new unsupported Framework DLL gets converted to a mixed mode assembly (both managed and unmanaged code), then you won't be able to load the new version into SQL Server and will need to re-code your project to not use that unsupported Framework assembly.
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest andHttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) doesxp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
One of the requirements / nuances of working with SQLCLR is that any assembly loaded into both the GAC and SQL Server must be the exact same version (i.e. down to the patch level, not just Major.Minor.*). So, your local instances might all be using 4.7.2 (or whatever), but if the Managed Instance is using 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.8, or anything else, then you will get that error. You would even get this error if one of your local instances was on a server running a different version of the .NET Framework than the one that you grabbed the System.Net.Http.DLL from. Of course, if all of these different instances you mentioned are running on the same physical server, then there is only one OS involved anyway, so of course they all work correctly ;-).
You will need to find out what specific version is being used on the Managed Instance and use that in your Azure install script. You shouldn't need to use the same version locally since the reference to a similar version that has the same signatures should work.
Now, how to find the exact Framework version on Managed Instance? That depends. It might be in a DMV (not the clr_info
one as that only has the CLR version, not the Framework version), and/or might be discoverable via the registry if xp_regread
is usable in a Managed Instance. Is it? I will update in a moment with whether or not the DMV I am thinking of has enough info to get the Framework version from.
P.S. This issue is one of the downsides to using unsupported .NET Framework libraries. They are going to be in the GAC (usually, right?) and if a Windows update (locally, or whatever they do to the host system of the Managed Instances) updates the version then your SQLCLR project stops working. And, if the new unsupported Framework DLL gets converted to a mixed mode assembly (both managed and unmanaged code), then you won't be able to load the new version into SQL Server and will need to re-code your project to not use that unsupported Framework assembly.
One of the requirements / nuances of working with SQLCLR is that any assembly loaded into both the GAC and SQL Server must be the exact same version (i.e. down to the patch level, not just Major.Minor.*). So, your local instances might all be using 4.7.2 (or whatever), but if the Managed Instance is using 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.8, or anything else, then you will get that error. You would even get this error if one of your local instances was on a server running a different version of the .NET Framework than the one that you grabbed the System.Net.Http.DLL from. Of course, if all of these different instances you mentioned are running on the same physical server, then there is only one OS involved anyway, so of course they all work correctly ;-).
You will need to find out what specific version is being used on the Managed Instance and use that in your Azure install script. You shouldn't need to use the same version locally since the reference to a similar version that has the same signatures should work.
Now, how to find the exact Framework version on Managed Instance? That depends. It might be in a DMV (not the clr_info
one as that only has the CLR version, not the Framework version), and/or might be discoverable via the registry if xp_regread
is usable in a Managed Instance. Is it? I will update in a moment with whether or not the DMV I am thinking of has enough info to get the Framework version from.
P.S. This issue is one of the downsides to using unsupported .NET Framework libraries. They are going to be in the GAC (usually, right?) and if a Windows update (locally, or whatever they do to the host system of the Managed Instances) updates the version then your SQLCLR project stops working. And, if the new unsupported Framework DLL gets converted to a mixed mode assembly (both managed and unmanaged code), then you won't be able to load the new version into SQL Server and will need to re-code your project to not use that unsupported Framework assembly.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Solomon RutzkySolomon Rutzky
51.8k5 gold badges91 silver badges203 bronze badges
51.8k5 gold badges91 silver badges203 bronze badges
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest andHttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) doesxp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest andHttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) doesxp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
Thank you for the thorough response. I have already opened a support call with Microsoft to hopefully find the version of the DLL they have on the Managed Instance. I have also begun looking into rewriting the CLR to just not use System.Net.Http.dll
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest and
HttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP Ok. What are you using System.Net.Http for? If it's for web services stuff, you should just use System.Net.HttpWebRequest and
HttpWebResponse
. You will have to do a little extra coding to construct and parse the XML of the web request, but that library is fully supported.– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
Correct, web services stuff. I'll have a look into the dmvs and try and nail down the DLL version in the Managed Instance, but failing that I think I can get everything done with System.Net.HttpWebRequest
– JamesP
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:
SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) does xp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP Also, two questions. 1) what does this return when executed on the Managed Instance:
SELECT [name], [file_version], [product_version], [language] FROM sys.dm_os_loaded_modules olm WHERE olm.[name] LIKE N'%mscoreei.dll%';
. And 2) does xp_regread
work on a Managed Instance?– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
@JamesP You might want to take a look at [SQL#](sqlsharp.com/?ref=db_245032` (a SQLCLR library that I wrote), as there is a stored procedure that handles this, based on HttpWebRequest...and it handles most (if not all) internally managed HTTP headers, allows for sending userid/password (if necessary), sending post/get data, and even some other stuff that most people usually leave out. Just a thought, though for full disclosure, while there is a Free version, INET_GetWebPages is only in the Full (paid for) version.
– Solomon Rutzky
5 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
From Azure SQL Database managed instance T-SQL differences from SQL Server:
A managed instance can't access file shares and Windows folders, so the following constraints apply:
Only CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM BINARY is supported. See CREATE ASSEMBLY
FROM BINARY.
CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM FILE isn't supported. See CREATE
ASSEMBLY FROM FILE.
ALTER ASSEMBLY can't reference files. See ALTER ASSEMBLY.
And later:
CLR modules and linked servers sometimes can't reference a local IP address
CLR modules placed in a managed instance and linked servers or distributed queries that reference a current instance sometimes can't resolve the IP of a local instance. This error is a transient issue.
Workaround: Use context connections in a CLR module if possible.
One of these restrictions might be what is blocking you; if not, it would be helpful to add more info to your question about what your CLR procedure does, and how you have confirmed each of these restrictions doesn't apply. A search for +CLR +"Managed Instance"
yields exactly two results, so if nothing here applies, I suggest engaging Microsoft Support.
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
From Azure SQL Database managed instance T-SQL differences from SQL Server:
A managed instance can't access file shares and Windows folders, so the following constraints apply:
Only CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM BINARY is supported. See CREATE ASSEMBLY
FROM BINARY.
CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM FILE isn't supported. See CREATE
ASSEMBLY FROM FILE.
ALTER ASSEMBLY can't reference files. See ALTER ASSEMBLY.
And later:
CLR modules and linked servers sometimes can't reference a local IP address
CLR modules placed in a managed instance and linked servers or distributed queries that reference a current instance sometimes can't resolve the IP of a local instance. This error is a transient issue.
Workaround: Use context connections in a CLR module if possible.
One of these restrictions might be what is blocking you; if not, it would be helpful to add more info to your question about what your CLR procedure does, and how you have confirmed each of these restrictions doesn't apply. A search for +CLR +"Managed Instance"
yields exactly two results, so if nothing here applies, I suggest engaging Microsoft Support.
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
From Azure SQL Database managed instance T-SQL differences from SQL Server:
A managed instance can't access file shares and Windows folders, so the following constraints apply:
Only CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM BINARY is supported. See CREATE ASSEMBLY
FROM BINARY.
CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM FILE isn't supported. See CREATE
ASSEMBLY FROM FILE.
ALTER ASSEMBLY can't reference files. See ALTER ASSEMBLY.
And later:
CLR modules and linked servers sometimes can't reference a local IP address
CLR modules placed in a managed instance and linked servers or distributed queries that reference a current instance sometimes can't resolve the IP of a local instance. This error is a transient issue.
Workaround: Use context connections in a CLR module if possible.
One of these restrictions might be what is blocking you; if not, it would be helpful to add more info to your question about what your CLR procedure does, and how you have confirmed each of these restrictions doesn't apply. A search for +CLR +"Managed Instance"
yields exactly two results, so if nothing here applies, I suggest engaging Microsoft Support.
From Azure SQL Database managed instance T-SQL differences from SQL Server:
A managed instance can't access file shares and Windows folders, so the following constraints apply:
Only CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM BINARY is supported. See CREATE ASSEMBLY
FROM BINARY.
CREATE ASSEMBLY FROM FILE isn't supported. See CREATE
ASSEMBLY FROM FILE.
ALTER ASSEMBLY can't reference files. See ALTER ASSEMBLY.
And later:
CLR modules and linked servers sometimes can't reference a local IP address
CLR modules placed in a managed instance and linked servers or distributed queries that reference a current instance sometimes can't resolve the IP of a local instance. This error is a transient issue.
Workaround: Use context connections in a CLR module if possible.
One of these restrictions might be what is blocking you; if not, it would be helpful to add more info to your question about what your CLR procedure does, and how you have confirmed each of these restrictions doesn't apply. A search for +CLR +"Managed Instance"
yields exactly two results, so if nothing here applies, I suggest engaging Microsoft Support.
answered 9 hours ago
Aaron Bertrand♦Aaron Bertrand
159k19 gold badges316 silver badges520 bronze badges
159k19 gold badges316 silver badges520 bronze badges
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
1
1
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
Thanks for the response. I am certain that non of the restrictions you have listed are the cause. The CLR procedure in question posts a message to an Azure storage queue, nothing more. It uses only Microsoft own libraries and works perfectly on a local instance. I have another CLR that uses System.Net.Http.dll which errors in the same way on Azure Managed Instance, so it does seem to be specific to that dll.
– JamesP
8 hours ago
1
1
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
Ok, well, I have no other advice for you other than to contact support at Microsoft.
– Aaron Bertrand♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f245013%2fclr-stored-procedure-on-azure-sql-managed-instance-error-on-execution-assembly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown