Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?How does jet engine water injection work?Which engines are Jet-A used in?How are off-wing jet engines transported?When were the first jet engines used?Could bypass air be used to cool a rocket engine like in turbofans?Can jet engines be used for VTOL civilian aircraft?Why were rotary vane compressors never used in jet engines?Where does turbine vane and blade cooling air come from?How does jet engine water injection work?Is water a possible fuel for jet engines?How much water is carried for jet engine water injection?
In a topological space if there exists a loop that cannot be contracted to a point does there exist a simple loop that cannot be contracted also?
How do I explain to a team that the project they will work on for six months will 100% fail?
How to mark beverage cans in a cooler for a blind person?
Can an SPI slave start a transmission in full-duplex mode?
Does the United States guarantee any unique freedoms?
Is this cheap "air conditioner" able to cool a room?
Word or idiom defining something barely functional
What is the idiomatic way of saying “he is ticklish under armpits”?
Why couldn't soldiers sight their own weapons without officers' orders?
Why should public servants be apolitical?
Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic
How do we avoid CI-driven development...?
What are good ways to improve as a writer other than writing courses?
In Pokémon Go, why does one of my Pikachu have an option to evolve, but another one doesn't?
Can a character who casts Shapechange and turns into a spellcaster use innate spellcasting to cast spells with a long casting time?
Circle around all points of a layer
Why are physicists so interested in irreps if in their non-block-diagonal form they mix all components of a vector?
Does this Foo machine halt?
During the Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster of 2003, Why Did The Flight Director Say, "Lock the doors."?
Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?
Infeasibility in mathematical optimization models
Is it true that control+alt+delete only became a thing because IBM would not build Bill Gates a computer with a task manager button?
Why did the RAAF procure the F/A-18 despite being purpose-built for carriers?
How to identify the wires on the dimmer to convert it to Conventional on/off switch
Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?
How does jet engine water injection work?Which engines are Jet-A used in?How are off-wing jet engines transported?When were the first jet engines used?Could bypass air be used to cool a rocket engine like in turbofans?Can jet engines be used for VTOL civilian aircraft?Why were rotary vane compressors never used in jet engines?Where does turbine vane and blade cooling air come from?How does jet engine water injection work?Is water a possible fuel for jet engines?How much water is carried for jet engine water injection?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?
If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?
While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.
I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.
jet-engine
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?
If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?
While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.
I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.
jet-engine
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?
If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?
While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.
I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.
jet-engine
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?
If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?
While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.
I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.
jet-engine
jet-engine
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).
If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.
Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.
Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.
It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67521%2fare-any-jet-engines-used-in-combat-aircraft-water-cooled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).
If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.
Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).
If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.
Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).
If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.
Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).
If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.
Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
John KJohn K
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.
Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.
It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.
Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.
It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.
Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.
It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.
Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.
It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
4291 silver badge13 bronze badges
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
$endgroup$
– Sean
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
$endgroup$
– Camille Goudeseune
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 4 hours ago
Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67521%2fare-any-jet-engines-used-in-combat-aircraft-water-cooled%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
