Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?How does jet engine water injection work?Which engines are Jet-A used in?How are off-wing jet engines transported?When were the first jet engines used?Could bypass air be used to cool a rocket engine like in turbofans?Can jet engines be used for VTOL civilian aircraft?Why were rotary vane compressors never used in jet engines?Where does turbine vane and blade cooling air come from?How does jet engine water injection work?Is water a possible fuel for jet engines?How much water is carried for jet engine water injection?

In a topological space if there exists a loop that cannot be contracted to a point does there exist a simple loop that cannot be contracted also?

How do I explain to a team that the project they will work on for six months will 100% fail?

How to mark beverage cans in a cooler for a blind person?

Can an SPI slave start a transmission in full-duplex mode?

Does the United States guarantee any unique freedoms?

Is this cheap "air conditioner" able to cool a room?

Word or idiom defining something barely functional

What is the idiomatic way of saying “he is ticklish under armpits”?

Why couldn't soldiers sight their own weapons without officers' orders?

Why should public servants be apolitical?

Plausibility of Ice Eaters in the Arctic

How do we avoid CI-driven development...?

What are good ways to improve as a writer other than writing courses?

In Pokémon Go, why does one of my Pikachu have an option to evolve, but another one doesn't?

Can a character who casts Shapechange and turns into a spellcaster use innate spellcasting to cast spells with a long casting time?

Circle around all points of a layer

Why are physicists so interested in irreps if in their non-block-diagonal form they mix all components of a vector?

Does this Foo machine halt?

During the Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster of 2003, Why Did The Flight Director Say, "Lock the doors."?

Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?

Infeasibility in mathematical optimization models

Is it true that control+alt+delete only became a thing because IBM would not build Bill Gates a computer with a task manager button?

Why did the RAAF procure the F/A-18 despite being purpose-built for carriers?

How to identify the wires on the dimmer to convert it to Conventional on/off switch



Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?


How does jet engine water injection work?Which engines are Jet-A used in?How are off-wing jet engines transported?When were the first jet engines used?Could bypass air be used to cool a rocket engine like in turbofans?Can jet engines be used for VTOL civilian aircraft?Why were rotary vane compressors never used in jet engines?Where does turbine vane and blade cooling air come from?How does jet engine water injection work?Is water a possible fuel for jet engines?How much water is carried for jet engine water injection?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?



If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?



While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.



I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$


    Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?



    If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?



    While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.



    I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?



      If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?



      While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.



      I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Are any jet engines used in combat aircraft water cooled?



      If they are not, and instead are air cooled, how can the engine ensure consistent cooling? Wouldn't the airflow passing through whatever radiator implementation it has be greatly affected by the airspeed? Consider low subsonic numbers with heavy maneuvering in a dogfight, vs. mach 2 sustained flight?



      While I can imagine that variable air inlet for the radiator would change the airflow, I really have no idea how this would work.



      I'm also aware that certain rocket engines, e.g. the F-1 allow the fuel itself to circle around the thrust chamber to cool it. Perhaps a similar system is used in jet engines.







      jet-engine






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      AlphaCentauriAlphaCentauri

      8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges




      8441 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).



          If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.



          Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$






















            2












            $begingroup$

            The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.



            Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.



            It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
              $endgroup$
              – Sean
              4 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
              $endgroup$
              – Camille Goudeseune
              4 hours ago



















            1












            $begingroup$

            The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "528"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67521%2fare-any-jet-engines-used-in-combat-aircraft-water-cooled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              6












              $begingroup$

              Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).



              If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.



              Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                6












                $begingroup$

                Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).



                If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.



                Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).



                  If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.



                  Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Jet engines are cooled and temperature managed by the mass air flow itself which is used to surround and limit the boundaries of the flame, keeping it away from the burner can walls, and dilute the heat of the flame as it passes to the turbine (only a minority of the mass airflow's oxygen is actually burned - which is why afterburners work; there's lots of leftover oxygen to work with).



                  If you're talking about using a closed liquid cooling system with heat exchangers taking heat from the burner can and turbine somehow, well, I've never heard of a water jacketed burner can, and how you could use liquid in a closed system to cool a turbine, who knows.



                  Liquid cooling was used in the past as supplemental cooling to increase available power by spraying water directly into the mass flow as mentioned here, but in that case the water is a consumable.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  John KJohn K

                  37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges




                  37.3k1 gold badge65 silver badges124 bronze badges


























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.



                      Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.



                      It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Sean
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Camille Goudeseune
                        4 hours ago
















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.



                      Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.



                      It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Sean
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Camille Goudeseune
                        4 hours ago














                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.



                      Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.



                      It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      The closest I could find for closed-cyle fluid cooling was a 1975 NASA study for supersonic aircraft, but this used no radiators, and wasn't for the engine. Instead, circulating refrigerant moved heat from the wing and fuselage to the fuel tank containing liquid hydrogen, in the hope that titanium skins could be replaced with cheaper aluminum. The conclusion was that this would help only at airspeeds much greater than Mach 3.



                      Even for piston-powered aircraft (and NASCAR automobiles for that matter), the drag due to airflow through a radiator is enormous. Some 1930's racing aircraft used radiators inset flush to the wings for this reason.



                      It may just be that the jet engine's mass airflow suffices, so there's no justification for the extra complexity and weight of a dedicated heat exchanger.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 7 hours ago









                      Camille GoudeseuneCamille Goudeseune

                      4291 silver badge13 bronze badges




                      4291 silver badge13 bronze badges














                      • $begingroup$
                        A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Sean
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Camille Goudeseune
                        4 hours ago

















                      • $begingroup$
                        A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Sean
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Camille Goudeseune
                        4 hours ago
















                      $begingroup$
                      A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Sean
                      4 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      A radiator doesn't have to produce a large drag penalty, or even any drag penalty at all - in fact, a properly-designed radiator can actually produce net thrust, by using the air it heats as reaction mass.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Sean
                      4 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Camille Goudeseune
                      4 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Neato! ...it looks like the Meredith Effect has been tried in Formula 1 cars, but not in jet aircraft. Answered another way, because a turbine's combustion isn't blanketed in an enclosed cylinder head, maybe the nonmoving metal parts don't heat up enough to warrant liquid cooling - the airflow is enough. (Sending coolant through the turbine blades seems ghastly complicated.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Camille Goudeseune
                      4 hours ago












                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The thing most in need of cooling inside a jet engine is usually the high pressure turbine blades. The air entering the first stage of the turbine is in the neighborhood of 2500F (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbine_blade). This is often higher than the melting temperature of the blades themselves. These blades are cooled using air bled off from the high pressure compressor, which is typically at a "cool" temperature of 1000F or so. Water would not be much help in cooling here, as it would instantly vaporize.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 4 hours ago









                          Daniel KiracofeDaniel Kiracofe

                          3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges




                          3,6377 silver badges23 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f67521%2fare-any-jet-engines-used-in-combat-aircraft-water-cooled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單