Anatomically Correct Whomping WillowAnatomically Correct Boar TrollAnatomically Correct BorrowerHow do we create an Anemone Tree?Anatomically Correct Siren?Anatomically correct sharknado sharkAnatomically Correct HumbabaAnatomically Correct HuldraAnatomically Correct Giant SpiderAnatomically Correct - (ONI) HatchAnatomically Correct Slinky Worm
Is “I am getting married with my sister” ambiguous?
Why do gliders have bungee cords in the control systems and what do they do? Are they on all control surfaces? What about ultralights?
Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?
Round towards zero
Ensuring all network services on a device use strong TLS cipher suites
Is there any method of inflicting the incapacitated condition and no other condition?
find the path of a data extension for a SQL Query
What is this symbol: semicircles facing each other?
Did a flight controller ever answer Flight with a no-go?
Is there any music source code for sound chips?
How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?
Can a Rogue PC teach an NPC to perform Sneak Attack?
Dealing with an extrovert co-worker
How is the idea of "two people having a heated argument" idiomatically expressed in German?
Anatomically Correct Whomping Willow
How to find multiple values on the same line in any permutation using Notepad++?
Why doesn't 'd /= d' throw a division by zero exception?
Avoiding racist tropes in fantasy
If the first law of thermodynamics ensures conservation of energy, why does it allow systems to lose energy?
Who was president of the USA?
Handling Disruptive Student on the Autistic Spectrum
State-of-the-art algorithms for solving linear programming problems
What is the difference between Major and Minor Bug?
French abbreviation for comparing two items ("vs")
Anatomically Correct Whomping Willow
Anatomically Correct Boar TrollAnatomically Correct BorrowerHow do we create an Anemone Tree?Anatomically Correct Siren?Anatomically correct sharknado sharkAnatomically Correct HumbabaAnatomically Correct HuldraAnatomically Correct Giant SpiderAnatomically Correct - (ONI) HatchAnatomically Correct Slinky Worm
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The whomping willow is a fictional tree from the Harry Potter series of books. It is a magic willow that can move its branches to punch people who come close to it.

Small animals such as cats and rats can approach without much worry; Anything human-sized or larger gets whacked. As for how strongly it can punch, one of the books has this quote in it:
"People used to play a game, trying to get near enough to touch the trunk. In the end, a boy called Davey Gudgeon nearly lost an eye, and we were forbidden to go near it."
—Remus Lupin
It also has a small knot near the base. Pressing it causes the tree to become immobilised, at least for a few moments, so it is safe to stay close to it. I don't think the books ever mention how long that lasts.
What I would like to know is the closest thing to that we could have, in a fictional world, without magic (hence the science-based tag). Doesn't have to be a plant per se: it can be a fungus or anemone. It just needs to be a living, sessile thing.
science-based creature-design
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The whomping willow is a fictional tree from the Harry Potter series of books. It is a magic willow that can move its branches to punch people who come close to it.

Small animals such as cats and rats can approach without much worry; Anything human-sized or larger gets whacked. As for how strongly it can punch, one of the books has this quote in it:
"People used to play a game, trying to get near enough to touch the trunk. In the end, a boy called Davey Gudgeon nearly lost an eye, and we were forbidden to go near it."
—Remus Lupin
It also has a small knot near the base. Pressing it causes the tree to become immobilised, at least for a few moments, so it is safe to stay close to it. I don't think the books ever mention how long that lasts.
What I would like to know is the closest thing to that we could have, in a fictional world, without magic (hence the science-based tag). Doesn't have to be a plant per se: it can be a fungus or anemone. It just needs to be a living, sessile thing.
science-based creature-design
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The whomping willow is a fictional tree from the Harry Potter series of books. It is a magic willow that can move its branches to punch people who come close to it.

Small animals such as cats and rats can approach without much worry; Anything human-sized or larger gets whacked. As for how strongly it can punch, one of the books has this quote in it:
"People used to play a game, trying to get near enough to touch the trunk. In the end, a boy called Davey Gudgeon nearly lost an eye, and we were forbidden to go near it."
—Remus Lupin
It also has a small knot near the base. Pressing it causes the tree to become immobilised, at least for a few moments, so it is safe to stay close to it. I don't think the books ever mention how long that lasts.
What I would like to know is the closest thing to that we could have, in a fictional world, without magic (hence the science-based tag). Doesn't have to be a plant per se: it can be a fungus or anemone. It just needs to be a living, sessile thing.
science-based creature-design
$endgroup$
The whomping willow is a fictional tree from the Harry Potter series of books. It is a magic willow that can move its branches to punch people who come close to it.

Small animals such as cats and rats can approach without much worry; Anything human-sized or larger gets whacked. As for how strongly it can punch, one of the books has this quote in it:
"People used to play a game, trying to get near enough to touch the trunk. In the end, a boy called Davey Gudgeon nearly lost an eye, and we were forbidden to go near it."
—Remus Lupin
It also has a small knot near the base. Pressing it causes the tree to become immobilised, at least for a few moments, so it is safe to stay close to it. I don't think the books ever mention how long that lasts.
What I would like to know is the closest thing to that we could have, in a fictional world, without magic (hence the science-based tag). Doesn't have to be a plant per se: it can be a fungus or anemone. It just needs to be a living, sessile thing.
science-based creature-design
science-based creature-design
edited 2 hours ago
Renan
asked 9 hours ago
RenanRenan
65.7k20 gold badges154 silver badges321 bronze badges
65.7k20 gold badges154 silver badges321 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Supersized land anemones
Meet the swimming sea anemone:

It's desperately avoiding the grasp of a nearby sea star, which is interesting but not what we're interested in. Rather, notice how it bends its ring of tentacles nearly all the way to the ground.
What if this wasn't a defensive mechanism, but rather an offensive one? Our supersized land anemones would remain quietly waiting until they detect prey pesky teenagers, either by touch or through the network of symbionts surrounding them. Once triggered, the entire crown of the tree, full of tentacles and the anemone's nematocysts, would smash down upon the prey.
Considerations
It'll take a some handwaving to make this happen, but that's mainly to do with the transition of the anemone from sea to land. Anemones are supported by water pressure, so our land versions would only be found in the dampest areas such as swamps.
It's quite possible to imagine an anemone that ends up looking like a tree, especially if it's a strong evolutionary pressure. The stalk of the anemone might become tough, leathery and brown simply by drying out, giving a very bark-like texture. On land, zooxanthellae can be much more helpful given the higher intensity of sunlight, so they'd proliferate wildly. However, these symbionts are brown algae, so the tree canopy would remain a brownish golden color all year long
As for the prey size requirements, the anemone is unlikely to notice small organisms relative to tree height, and would therefore only trigger once a certain size threshold is exceeded. That just happens to be the size difference between small animals and humans.
Supersized heliozoans
Heliozoans are a class of aquatic predators that look like underwater spikeballs:

They act almost like underwater spiders, as they use those long, thin spines to catch prey, which are nearly invisible underwater. They're coated in a sticky substance that may have some paralyzing effects. They sit and wait for a prey item pesky teenagers to bump into a spine, at which point the spines actually retract with incredible speed- up to 2 body lengths per second. Prey Teenagers are then brought near to the cell body and digested.
Fortunately for us, some species already come with trunks!

Considerations
Again, these are aquatic creatures that don't like being suspended in the air. Fortunately, they also have a sporelike function that they'll use when food is scarce or the streams dry up. It's possible that such a heliozoan, once left in a dry streambed for long enough, will nonetheless try to feed. Realizing the vast amounts of food available, they'll be selected for size and eventually (with a tiny bit of handwaving) become the size of trees!
The same size-requirements apply here. The tree wouldn't worry about small things touching its bark or leaves, but instead would use its energy to deter larger creatures that might actually threaten it. The spines would be set on a large-size trigger where a certain length must be touched, or perhaps multiple spines in a short time window, akin to the Venus flytrap triggers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimosa pudica is well known for its peculiar feature of wrapping close its leaves when they are touched.
Expand this to branches, not only to leaves, and you have the moving ability: from the opened state they get retracted and can look like the return phase of a punch.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would combine aspects of two existing plants that are related to each other as closely as the Caryophyllales order.
Carnegiea gigantea (saguaro cactus) + Drosera regia (king sundew)
The Saguaro already grows to 'tree-size', without any modification at all. Though well short of what most willow species are capable of achieving, if left to grow naturally, the saguaro can easily reach sizes rivaling the GIF you used in your question, due to the pollarding done to the willow (pollarding is the repeated pruning of branches at the same place, to start new branch growth from that same area)
The king sundew provides the mobility, as it has leaves that can reach more than 2 feet long (giving it more than a 4 foot radius overall) which can coil and twist. It also provides (unexpectedly, considering its mobility) the woody aspect to the step of the overall organism. In an unmodified king sundew, this woody material is in it's stem which is generally entirely below surface level.
Combine the woody stem from the sundew, with the size of the cactus, and you have a woody trunk that is tree size. Add the mobility of the sundew's leaves to the 'arms' or 'branches' of the cactus, and you get the ability to swing in, effectively, any direction, with the woody material limiting movement progressively as you move from the tips of the leaves toward the branches and then to the trunk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153662%2fanatomically-correct-whomping-willow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Supersized land anemones
Meet the swimming sea anemone:

It's desperately avoiding the grasp of a nearby sea star, which is interesting but not what we're interested in. Rather, notice how it bends its ring of tentacles nearly all the way to the ground.
What if this wasn't a defensive mechanism, but rather an offensive one? Our supersized land anemones would remain quietly waiting until they detect prey pesky teenagers, either by touch or through the network of symbionts surrounding them. Once triggered, the entire crown of the tree, full of tentacles and the anemone's nematocysts, would smash down upon the prey.
Considerations
It'll take a some handwaving to make this happen, but that's mainly to do with the transition of the anemone from sea to land. Anemones are supported by water pressure, so our land versions would only be found in the dampest areas such as swamps.
It's quite possible to imagine an anemone that ends up looking like a tree, especially if it's a strong evolutionary pressure. The stalk of the anemone might become tough, leathery and brown simply by drying out, giving a very bark-like texture. On land, zooxanthellae can be much more helpful given the higher intensity of sunlight, so they'd proliferate wildly. However, these symbionts are brown algae, so the tree canopy would remain a brownish golden color all year long
As for the prey size requirements, the anemone is unlikely to notice small organisms relative to tree height, and would therefore only trigger once a certain size threshold is exceeded. That just happens to be the size difference between small animals and humans.
Supersized heliozoans
Heliozoans are a class of aquatic predators that look like underwater spikeballs:

They act almost like underwater spiders, as they use those long, thin spines to catch prey, which are nearly invisible underwater. They're coated in a sticky substance that may have some paralyzing effects. They sit and wait for a prey item pesky teenagers to bump into a spine, at which point the spines actually retract with incredible speed- up to 2 body lengths per second. Prey Teenagers are then brought near to the cell body and digested.
Fortunately for us, some species already come with trunks!

Considerations
Again, these are aquatic creatures that don't like being suspended in the air. Fortunately, they also have a sporelike function that they'll use when food is scarce or the streams dry up. It's possible that such a heliozoan, once left in a dry streambed for long enough, will nonetheless try to feed. Realizing the vast amounts of food available, they'll be selected for size and eventually (with a tiny bit of handwaving) become the size of trees!
The same size-requirements apply here. The tree wouldn't worry about small things touching its bark or leaves, but instead would use its energy to deter larger creatures that might actually threaten it. The spines would be set on a large-size trigger where a certain length must be touched, or perhaps multiple spines in a short time window, akin to the Venus flytrap triggers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Supersized land anemones
Meet the swimming sea anemone:

It's desperately avoiding the grasp of a nearby sea star, which is interesting but not what we're interested in. Rather, notice how it bends its ring of tentacles nearly all the way to the ground.
What if this wasn't a defensive mechanism, but rather an offensive one? Our supersized land anemones would remain quietly waiting until they detect prey pesky teenagers, either by touch or through the network of symbionts surrounding them. Once triggered, the entire crown of the tree, full of tentacles and the anemone's nematocysts, would smash down upon the prey.
Considerations
It'll take a some handwaving to make this happen, but that's mainly to do with the transition of the anemone from sea to land. Anemones are supported by water pressure, so our land versions would only be found in the dampest areas such as swamps.
It's quite possible to imagine an anemone that ends up looking like a tree, especially if it's a strong evolutionary pressure. The stalk of the anemone might become tough, leathery and brown simply by drying out, giving a very bark-like texture. On land, zooxanthellae can be much more helpful given the higher intensity of sunlight, so they'd proliferate wildly. However, these symbionts are brown algae, so the tree canopy would remain a brownish golden color all year long
As for the prey size requirements, the anemone is unlikely to notice small organisms relative to tree height, and would therefore only trigger once a certain size threshold is exceeded. That just happens to be the size difference between small animals and humans.
Supersized heliozoans
Heliozoans are a class of aquatic predators that look like underwater spikeballs:

They act almost like underwater spiders, as they use those long, thin spines to catch prey, which are nearly invisible underwater. They're coated in a sticky substance that may have some paralyzing effects. They sit and wait for a prey item pesky teenagers to bump into a spine, at which point the spines actually retract with incredible speed- up to 2 body lengths per second. Prey Teenagers are then brought near to the cell body and digested.
Fortunately for us, some species already come with trunks!

Considerations
Again, these are aquatic creatures that don't like being suspended in the air. Fortunately, they also have a sporelike function that they'll use when food is scarce or the streams dry up. It's possible that such a heliozoan, once left in a dry streambed for long enough, will nonetheless try to feed. Realizing the vast amounts of food available, they'll be selected for size and eventually (with a tiny bit of handwaving) become the size of trees!
The same size-requirements apply here. The tree wouldn't worry about small things touching its bark or leaves, but instead would use its energy to deter larger creatures that might actually threaten it. The spines would be set on a large-size trigger where a certain length must be touched, or perhaps multiple spines in a short time window, akin to the Venus flytrap triggers.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Supersized land anemones
Meet the swimming sea anemone:

It's desperately avoiding the grasp of a nearby sea star, which is interesting but not what we're interested in. Rather, notice how it bends its ring of tentacles nearly all the way to the ground.
What if this wasn't a defensive mechanism, but rather an offensive one? Our supersized land anemones would remain quietly waiting until they detect prey pesky teenagers, either by touch or through the network of symbionts surrounding them. Once triggered, the entire crown of the tree, full of tentacles and the anemone's nematocysts, would smash down upon the prey.
Considerations
It'll take a some handwaving to make this happen, but that's mainly to do with the transition of the anemone from sea to land. Anemones are supported by water pressure, so our land versions would only be found in the dampest areas such as swamps.
It's quite possible to imagine an anemone that ends up looking like a tree, especially if it's a strong evolutionary pressure. The stalk of the anemone might become tough, leathery and brown simply by drying out, giving a very bark-like texture. On land, zooxanthellae can be much more helpful given the higher intensity of sunlight, so they'd proliferate wildly. However, these symbionts are brown algae, so the tree canopy would remain a brownish golden color all year long
As for the prey size requirements, the anemone is unlikely to notice small organisms relative to tree height, and would therefore only trigger once a certain size threshold is exceeded. That just happens to be the size difference between small animals and humans.
Supersized heliozoans
Heliozoans are a class of aquatic predators that look like underwater spikeballs:

They act almost like underwater spiders, as they use those long, thin spines to catch prey, which are nearly invisible underwater. They're coated in a sticky substance that may have some paralyzing effects. They sit and wait for a prey item pesky teenagers to bump into a spine, at which point the spines actually retract with incredible speed- up to 2 body lengths per second. Prey Teenagers are then brought near to the cell body and digested.
Fortunately for us, some species already come with trunks!

Considerations
Again, these are aquatic creatures that don't like being suspended in the air. Fortunately, they also have a sporelike function that they'll use when food is scarce or the streams dry up. It's possible that such a heliozoan, once left in a dry streambed for long enough, will nonetheless try to feed. Realizing the vast amounts of food available, they'll be selected for size and eventually (with a tiny bit of handwaving) become the size of trees!
The same size-requirements apply here. The tree wouldn't worry about small things touching its bark or leaves, but instead would use its energy to deter larger creatures that might actually threaten it. The spines would be set on a large-size trigger where a certain length must be touched, or perhaps multiple spines in a short time window, akin to the Venus flytrap triggers.
$endgroup$
Supersized land anemones
Meet the swimming sea anemone:

It's desperately avoiding the grasp of a nearby sea star, which is interesting but not what we're interested in. Rather, notice how it bends its ring of tentacles nearly all the way to the ground.
What if this wasn't a defensive mechanism, but rather an offensive one? Our supersized land anemones would remain quietly waiting until they detect prey pesky teenagers, either by touch or through the network of symbionts surrounding them. Once triggered, the entire crown of the tree, full of tentacles and the anemone's nematocysts, would smash down upon the prey.
Considerations
It'll take a some handwaving to make this happen, but that's mainly to do with the transition of the anemone from sea to land. Anemones are supported by water pressure, so our land versions would only be found in the dampest areas such as swamps.
It's quite possible to imagine an anemone that ends up looking like a tree, especially if it's a strong evolutionary pressure. The stalk of the anemone might become tough, leathery and brown simply by drying out, giving a very bark-like texture. On land, zooxanthellae can be much more helpful given the higher intensity of sunlight, so they'd proliferate wildly. However, these symbionts are brown algae, so the tree canopy would remain a brownish golden color all year long
As for the prey size requirements, the anemone is unlikely to notice small organisms relative to tree height, and would therefore only trigger once a certain size threshold is exceeded. That just happens to be the size difference between small animals and humans.
Supersized heliozoans
Heliozoans are a class of aquatic predators that look like underwater spikeballs:

They act almost like underwater spiders, as they use those long, thin spines to catch prey, which are nearly invisible underwater. They're coated in a sticky substance that may have some paralyzing effects. They sit and wait for a prey item pesky teenagers to bump into a spine, at which point the spines actually retract with incredible speed- up to 2 body lengths per second. Prey Teenagers are then brought near to the cell body and digested.
Fortunately for us, some species already come with trunks!

Considerations
Again, these are aquatic creatures that don't like being suspended in the air. Fortunately, they also have a sporelike function that they'll use when food is scarce or the streams dry up. It's possible that such a heliozoan, once left in a dry streambed for long enough, will nonetheless try to feed. Realizing the vast amounts of food available, they'll be selected for size and eventually (with a tiny bit of handwaving) become the size of trees!
The same size-requirements apply here. The tree wouldn't worry about small things touching its bark or leaves, but instead would use its energy to deter larger creatures that might actually threaten it. The spines would be set on a large-size trigger where a certain length must be touched, or perhaps multiple spines in a short time window, akin to the Venus flytrap triggers.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
DubukayDubukay
9,4444 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges
9,4444 gold badges29 silver badges69 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimosa pudica is well known for its peculiar feature of wrapping close its leaves when they are touched.
Expand this to branches, not only to leaves, and you have the moving ability: from the opened state they get retracted and can look like the return phase of a punch.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimosa pudica is well known for its peculiar feature of wrapping close its leaves when they are touched.
Expand this to branches, not only to leaves, and you have the moving ability: from the opened state they get retracted and can look like the return phase of a punch.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimosa pudica is well known for its peculiar feature of wrapping close its leaves when they are touched.
Expand this to branches, not only to leaves, and you have the moving ability: from the opened state they get retracted and can look like the return phase of a punch.
$endgroup$
Mimosa pudica is well known for its peculiar feature of wrapping close its leaves when they are touched.
Expand this to branches, not only to leaves, and you have the moving ability: from the opened state they get retracted and can look like the return phase of a punch.
answered 8 hours ago
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
109k33 gold badges256 silver badges525 bronze badges
109k33 gold badges256 silver badges525 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
This, or some kind of fly-trap like plant that moves in response to touch. This tree has a mechanism that sufficient pressure on roots causes it to swing. It evolved as a defence against deer who eat leaves, or warthogs who dig roots. The link from roots to branches to is chemical. The "safety knob" is a chemical injector that counters tree's own chemicals.
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
some examples of plants responding to physical trauma: earthsky.org/earth/plant-leaves-communicate-bug-attack-video, io9.gizmodo.com/…
$endgroup$
– Bald Bear
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BaldBesr I laughed out loud imagining a deer approaching a plant and taking a sucker punch to the face.
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would combine aspects of two existing plants that are related to each other as closely as the Caryophyllales order.
Carnegiea gigantea (saguaro cactus) + Drosera regia (king sundew)
The Saguaro already grows to 'tree-size', without any modification at all. Though well short of what most willow species are capable of achieving, if left to grow naturally, the saguaro can easily reach sizes rivaling the GIF you used in your question, due to the pollarding done to the willow (pollarding is the repeated pruning of branches at the same place, to start new branch growth from that same area)
The king sundew provides the mobility, as it has leaves that can reach more than 2 feet long (giving it more than a 4 foot radius overall) which can coil and twist. It also provides (unexpectedly, considering its mobility) the woody aspect to the step of the overall organism. In an unmodified king sundew, this woody material is in it's stem which is generally entirely below surface level.
Combine the woody stem from the sundew, with the size of the cactus, and you have a woody trunk that is tree size. Add the mobility of the sundew's leaves to the 'arms' or 'branches' of the cactus, and you get the ability to swing in, effectively, any direction, with the woody material limiting movement progressively as you move from the tips of the leaves toward the branches and then to the trunk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would combine aspects of two existing plants that are related to each other as closely as the Caryophyllales order.
Carnegiea gigantea (saguaro cactus) + Drosera regia (king sundew)
The Saguaro already grows to 'tree-size', without any modification at all. Though well short of what most willow species are capable of achieving, if left to grow naturally, the saguaro can easily reach sizes rivaling the GIF you used in your question, due to the pollarding done to the willow (pollarding is the repeated pruning of branches at the same place, to start new branch growth from that same area)
The king sundew provides the mobility, as it has leaves that can reach more than 2 feet long (giving it more than a 4 foot radius overall) which can coil and twist. It also provides (unexpectedly, considering its mobility) the woody aspect to the step of the overall organism. In an unmodified king sundew, this woody material is in it's stem which is generally entirely below surface level.
Combine the woody stem from the sundew, with the size of the cactus, and you have a woody trunk that is tree size. Add the mobility of the sundew's leaves to the 'arms' or 'branches' of the cactus, and you get the ability to swing in, effectively, any direction, with the woody material limiting movement progressively as you move from the tips of the leaves toward the branches and then to the trunk.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would combine aspects of two existing plants that are related to each other as closely as the Caryophyllales order.
Carnegiea gigantea (saguaro cactus) + Drosera regia (king sundew)
The Saguaro already grows to 'tree-size', without any modification at all. Though well short of what most willow species are capable of achieving, if left to grow naturally, the saguaro can easily reach sizes rivaling the GIF you used in your question, due to the pollarding done to the willow (pollarding is the repeated pruning of branches at the same place, to start new branch growth from that same area)
The king sundew provides the mobility, as it has leaves that can reach more than 2 feet long (giving it more than a 4 foot radius overall) which can coil and twist. It also provides (unexpectedly, considering its mobility) the woody aspect to the step of the overall organism. In an unmodified king sundew, this woody material is in it's stem which is generally entirely below surface level.
Combine the woody stem from the sundew, with the size of the cactus, and you have a woody trunk that is tree size. Add the mobility of the sundew's leaves to the 'arms' or 'branches' of the cactus, and you get the ability to swing in, effectively, any direction, with the woody material limiting movement progressively as you move from the tips of the leaves toward the branches and then to the trunk.
$endgroup$
I would combine aspects of two existing plants that are related to each other as closely as the Caryophyllales order.
Carnegiea gigantea (saguaro cactus) + Drosera regia (king sundew)
The Saguaro already grows to 'tree-size', without any modification at all. Though well short of what most willow species are capable of achieving, if left to grow naturally, the saguaro can easily reach sizes rivaling the GIF you used in your question, due to the pollarding done to the willow (pollarding is the repeated pruning of branches at the same place, to start new branch growth from that same area)
The king sundew provides the mobility, as it has leaves that can reach more than 2 feet long (giving it more than a 4 foot radius overall) which can coil and twist. It also provides (unexpectedly, considering its mobility) the woody aspect to the step of the overall organism. In an unmodified king sundew, this woody material is in it's stem which is generally entirely below surface level.
Combine the woody stem from the sundew, with the size of the cactus, and you have a woody trunk that is tree size. Add the mobility of the sundew's leaves to the 'arms' or 'branches' of the cactus, and you get the ability to swing in, effectively, any direction, with the woody material limiting movement progressively as you move from the tips of the leaves toward the branches and then to the trunk.
answered 1 hour ago
DalilaDalila
1,4684 silver badges25 bronze badges
1,4684 silver badges25 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153662%2fanatomically-correct-whomping-willow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
@elemtilas not requiring a plant means some fungis or anemone will fit. I also want a living creature so that it can be found in nature.
$endgroup$
– Renan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
That’s more an opinion based question as anything biological that develops such kind of apparatus to move would fulfill your requirements to some degree. It might help to give more clear boundaries?
$endgroup$
– World Peace
8 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I think the game was played when the tree was young and smaller... we know it is well capable of thrashing a broomstick or a car. And with the option to slam its entire weight, which for the Height of a Womping willow I guesstimate at 4 tons or 8800 pounds based on this:google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://… the tree is a lot more lethal at grown heights
$endgroup$
– Demigan
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@WorldPeace the point is being a tree-ish being. The less deviations, the better
$endgroup$
– Renan
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Renant I understand your point but not so much what you are asking for. In a fictional world plants could have something similar to muscles (mimosa or some sea plant live e.g.) ..so hypothetically it’s possible to have a whomping willow...as long as it serves some evolutionary advantage. But the latter is up to your fiction you set up. But we know nothing about your world...
$endgroup$
– World Peace
7 hours ago