How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?Could JWST stay at L2 “forever”?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)
Is there any music source code for sound chips?
Why do all fields in a QFT transform like *irreducible* representations of some group?
“T” in subscript in formulas
Justifying the use of directed energy weapons
Architectural feasibility of a tiered circular stone keep
What is the difference between Major and Minor Bug?
Who was president of the USA?
Dataset human solutions for OR problems
How to respectfully refuse to assist co-workers with IT issues?
How to find out the average duration of the peer-review process for a given journal?
Do they have Supervillain(s)?
Are there any elected officials in the U.S. who are not legislators, judges, or constitutional officers?
Why did this happen to Thanos's ships at the end of "Avengers: Endgame"?
Are the players on the same team as the DM?
Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?
How do I get toddlers to stop asking for food every hour?
Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?
What is the difference between "Grippe" and "Männergrippe"?
Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?
Was it ever possible to target a zone?
Ensuring all network services on a device use strong TLS cipher suites
Is gzip atomic?
How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?
Pythagorean triple with hypotenuse a power of 2
How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?
Could JWST stay at L2 “forever”?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:
It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?
halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:
It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?
halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:
It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?
halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit
$endgroup$
Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:
It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?
halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit
halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit
edited 8 hours ago
Magic Octopus Urn
asked 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
4,4101 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges
4,4101 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.
In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.
They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.
If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.
But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.
Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.
Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!
All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.
For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:
- Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?
- Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?
The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.
In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.
They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.
If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.
But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.
Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.
Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!
All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.
For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:
- Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?
- Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?
The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.
In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.
They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.
If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.
But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.
Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.
Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!
All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.
For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:
- Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?
- Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?
The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.
In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.
They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.
If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.
But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.
Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.
Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!
All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.
For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:
- Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?
- Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?
The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission
$endgroup$
Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.
In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.
They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.
If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.
But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.
Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.
Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!
All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.
For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:
- Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?
- Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?
The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission
answered 8 hours ago
uhohuhoh
50.6k23 gold badges199 silver badges654 bronze badges
50.6k23 gold badges199 silver badges654 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown