How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?Could JWST stay at L2 “forever”?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)

Is there any music source code for sound chips?

Why do all fields in a QFT transform like *irreducible* representations of some group?

“T” in subscript in formulas

Justifying the use of directed energy weapons

Architectural feasibility of a tiered circular stone keep

What is the difference between Major and Minor Bug?

Who was president of the USA?

Dataset human solutions for OR problems

How to respectfully refuse to assist co-workers with IT issues?

How to find out the average duration of the peer-review process for a given journal?

Do they have Supervillain(s)?

Are there any elected officials in the U.S. who are not legislators, judges, or constitutional officers?

Why did this happen to Thanos's ships at the end of "Avengers: Endgame"?

Are the players on the same team as the DM?

Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?

How do I get toddlers to stop asking for food every hour?

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

What is the difference between "Grippe" and "Männergrippe"?

Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?

Was it ever possible to target a zone?

Ensuring all network services on a device use strong TLS cipher suites

Is gzip atomic?

How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?

Pythagorean triple with hypotenuse a power of 2



How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?


Could JWST stay at L2 “forever”?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?Is this what station keeping maneuvers look like, or just glitches in data? (SOHO via Horizons)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



Orbit of DSCOVR...



It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$


    Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



    Orbit of DSCOVR...



    It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



      Orbit of DSCOVR...



      It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Obviously, with the international space station you need to do some station keeping when you're falling into the atmosphere. However, I saw the following image showing the Halo orbit that the Deep Space Climate Observatory is in:



      Orbit of DSCOVR...



      It seems like once it hits its stable exponentially unstable halo orbit, that the speed is between 0.15km/s and 0.05km/s. At what point would there be a red flag? Is there an easily calculable escape velocity for an orbit around a Lagrangian? What would scientists be looking for to alert them that they need to do corrections for such an orbit?







      halo-orbit dscovr lissajous-orbit






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      Magic Octopus Urn

















      asked 9 hours ago









      Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn

      4,4101 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges




      4,4101 gold badge19 silver badges61 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:



          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?

          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "508"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:



          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?

          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago
















          8













          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:



          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?

          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago














          8














          8










          8







          $begingroup$

          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:



          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?

          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Halo orbits and their cousins Lissajous orbits (like the one DSCOVR is in) around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 have periods of about a half-year. They are not generally stable and they want to "unwind" along what's called an unstable manifold.



          In this question I link to Roberts 2002, The SOHO Mission L1 Halo Orbit Recovery
          From the Attitude Control Anomalies of 1998. Section II describes the station keeping routine for SOHO, which is DSCOVR's neighbor.



          They keep SOHO orbiting very slightly towards Earth, a fraction of a kilometer away from its ideal orbit. Over weeks it moves farther from the halo and towards us. The exponential doubling time for the error is about two weeks.



          If they did nothing, it would spiral towards the Earth and then go off on a big orbit around the Sun.



          But SOHO and DSCOVR and the JWST (in the future) and all of these Halo orbiting spacecraft carry transponders. Earth beams a signal to the satellite and it shift the frequency in a special, coherent way, and turns it around and sends it right back to Earth live.



          Earth can measure the speed and distance in this direction, and detect even millimeters per second errors in the velocity, as you can see by reading that section. Earth then calculates the required station-keeping burn and initiates it for the satellite. These are typically delta-v's of centimeters per second, and done every few weeks.



          Since the error grows exponentially (these orbits are said to be exponentially unstable) the more frequently you can do this, the less delta-v per year you need. In this answer I mention that the JWST's station-keeping budget is about 2.4 m/sec per year. That's really small!



          All of this is possible only because of the precise delay-doppler measurements made using the Deep Space Network dish antennas and a coherent transponder on the spacecraft.



          For more about DSOVR's orbit, see:



          • Did DSCOVR travel “along the stable manifold of it's future SE L1 Halo orbit” to get there?

          • Why is DSCOVR in a Lissajous orbit? Wouldn't a halo orbit completely avoid the Sun exclusion zone?

          The second one links to Lissajous Orbit Control for the Deep Space Climate Observatory Sun-Earth L1 Libration Point Mission







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          uhohuhoh

          50.6k23 gold badges199 silver badges654 bronze badges




          50.6k23 gold badges199 silver badges654 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
            $endgroup$
            – Magic Octopus Urn
            8 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            2 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
          $endgroup$
          – Magic Octopus Urn
          8 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Usually I don't accept immediately, but this I will. I'll need to reread this when I actually get home and read some of those sources. I want to understand more about how that transponder functions.
          $endgroup$
          – Magic Octopus Urn
          8 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          2 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          @MagicOctopusUrn it's not a simple concept. Thanks but I'd recommend that you un-accept and wait for me to find some appropriate image(s) that show this clearly, and possibly one or two more sources, and until you have a chance to read through. We don't want other users to get the idea that it's okay to accept answers that look and sound good. We should only accept when we are completely satisfied and the post has answered our question to our satisfaction. Accepting quickly can also dis-incentivize other and potentially better answers/
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38337%2fhow-would-you-identify-when-an-object-in-a-lissajous-orbit-needs-station-keeping%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її