Heyacrazy: CareeningHeyacrazy: CrossesStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's LinesStatue View: TetrominoesStatue View: 2, 3, 5, 7Statue Park: Apollo 11Heyawake: An Introductory PuzzleHeyawacky: Ace of CupsHeyacrazy: CrossesHeyacrazy: ForksHeyacrazy: “LMI”

Is immersion of utensils (tevila) valid before koshering (hagala)?

Algorithms vs LP or MIP

Compelling story with the world as a villain

Disambiguation of "nobis vobis" and "nobis nobis"

Handling Disruptive Student on the Autistic Spectrum

Why do gliders have bungee cords in the control systems and what do they do? Are they on all control surfaces? What about ultralights?

How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?

What to say to a student who has failed?

Why did Khan ask Admiral James T. Kirk about Project Genesis?

Why isn't "I've" a proper response?

How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?

How would one country purchase another?

Heyacrazy: Careening

Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?

How would you identify when an object in a Lissajous orbit needs station keeping?

Are modern clipless shoes and pedals that much better than toe clips and straps?

Prove your innocence

Is a player able to change alignment midway through an adventure?

Is using a hyperlink to close a modal a poor design decision?

How do I get a decreased-by-one x in a foreach loop?

What would be the challenges to taking off and landing a typical passenger jet at FL300?

Ensuring all network services on a device use strong TLS cipher suites

Avoiding racist tropes in fantasy

Dataset human solutions for OR problems



Heyacrazy: Careening


Heyacrazy: CrossesStatue Park: FiveStatue Park: Knight's LinesStatue View: TetrominoesStatue View: 2, 3, 5, 7Statue Park: Apollo 11Heyawake: An Introductory PuzzleHeyawacky: Ace of CupsHeyacrazy: CrossesHeyacrazy: ForksHeyacrazy: “LMI”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


This is a Heyacrazy puzzle, designed at request of testsolvers of previous puzzles who wanted to see how longer diagonals would work.



Rules of Heyacrazy:




  • Shade some cells of the grid.


  • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


  • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$


    This is a Heyacrazy puzzle, designed at request of testsolvers of previous puzzles who wanted to see how longer diagonals would work.



    Rules of Heyacrazy:




    • Shade some cells of the grid.


    • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


    • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


    For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




    enter image description here










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      8












      8








      8





      $begingroup$


      This is a Heyacrazy puzzle, designed at request of testsolvers of previous puzzles who wanted to see how longer diagonals would work.



      Rules of Heyacrazy:




      • Shade some cells of the grid.


      • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


      • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


      For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




      enter image description here










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This is a Heyacrazy puzzle, designed at request of testsolvers of previous puzzles who wanted to see how longer diagonals would work.



      Rules of Heyacrazy:




      • Shade some cells of the grid.


      • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


      • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


      For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




      enter image description here







      logical-deduction grid-deduction






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      DeusoviDeusovi

      73.3k7 gold badges254 silver badges320 bronze badges




      73.3k7 gold badges254 silver badges320 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5













          $begingroup$

          Solution:




          There are lots of quick and easy deductions at the bottom, starting with the two cells that on their own contain two edges and leading to this:
          enter image description here

          One of the two cells on the top edge where two lines meet must be shaded. If we try letting it be the right-hand one, we quickly get to this impossible situation
          enter image description here

          and so instead it must be the left-hand one:
          enter image description here

          One of the two currently-blank cells in column 3 must be shaded. Can it be the lower one? If so, then we have this
          enter image description here

          which is impossible because now lines emanating SE-ish from the third cell on the first row require two adjacent cells to be shaded. So in fact it was the upper of the two cells in column 3 that's shaded:
          enter image description here

          requiring the cell one left and one down from the top right corner to be shaded, which immediately requires all the other cells near it to be unshaded for connectivity
          enter image description here

          leading us rapidly to
          enter image description here

          and then
          enter image description here

          and we're done.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago



















          3













          $begingroup$

          Labelling the rows 1 (top) to 7 (bottom) and the columns A (left) to F (right), our first step is that




          A5 and F6 are clearly shaded, which means A4, A6, B5, F5, F7, E6 are unshaded. Then B6 is also shaded, which means C6 and B7 are unshaded. For connectivity of unshaded squares, now A7, C7, and E7 must be unshaded.

          first steps




          Next target to be shaded is




          E5, with unshaded around it, and then D6, with unshaded around it. For connectivity, now C5 must be unshaded. Then D4 must be shaded, with unshaded around it.

          next steps




          Now we have a few sets of squares of which at least one must be shaded:




          D1 and E1, C1 and C2 and C3, D1 and E2. That means if E1 is shaded, then D1 is not shaded and so E2 is shaded, contradiction. So D1 is shaded, which means C1, E1, and D2 are unshaded, which means exactly one of C2 and C3 is shaded.

          and again




          Trying a similar deduction technique again:




          At least one of C2 and E3 must be shaded. So either C2 is shaded, or C3 and E3 both are. In the latter case, we get the following with no unique solution:

          can't be solved!




          So in fact




          C2 is shaded, which means B2 and C3 are unshaded, and B1 for connectivity. Now E2 must be shaded (I think), and then everything else in the top right corner must be unshaded.

          almost done




          Finally,




          B3 must be shaded, so B4 and A3 are unshaded, and A2 for connectivity. Then A1 must be shaded and we're done:

          final solution







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87336%2fheyacrazy-careening%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5













          $begingroup$

          Solution:




          There are lots of quick and easy deductions at the bottom, starting with the two cells that on their own contain two edges and leading to this:
          enter image description here

          One of the two cells on the top edge where two lines meet must be shaded. If we try letting it be the right-hand one, we quickly get to this impossible situation
          enter image description here

          and so instead it must be the left-hand one:
          enter image description here

          One of the two currently-blank cells in column 3 must be shaded. Can it be the lower one? If so, then we have this
          enter image description here

          which is impossible because now lines emanating SE-ish from the third cell on the first row require two adjacent cells to be shaded. So in fact it was the upper of the two cells in column 3 that's shaded:
          enter image description here

          requiring the cell one left and one down from the top right corner to be shaded, which immediately requires all the other cells near it to be unshaded for connectivity
          enter image description here

          leading us rapidly to
          enter image description here

          and then
          enter image description here

          and we're done.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago
















          5













          $begingroup$

          Solution:




          There are lots of quick and easy deductions at the bottom, starting with the two cells that on their own contain two edges and leading to this:
          enter image description here

          One of the two cells on the top edge where two lines meet must be shaded. If we try letting it be the right-hand one, we quickly get to this impossible situation
          enter image description here

          and so instead it must be the left-hand one:
          enter image description here

          One of the two currently-blank cells in column 3 must be shaded. Can it be the lower one? If so, then we have this
          enter image description here

          which is impossible because now lines emanating SE-ish from the third cell on the first row require two adjacent cells to be shaded. So in fact it was the upper of the two cells in column 3 that's shaded:
          enter image description here

          requiring the cell one left and one down from the top right corner to be shaded, which immediately requires all the other cells near it to be unshaded for connectivity
          enter image description here

          leading us rapidly to
          enter image description here

          and then
          enter image description here

          and we're done.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago














          5














          5










          5







          $begingroup$

          Solution:




          There are lots of quick and easy deductions at the bottom, starting with the two cells that on their own contain two edges and leading to this:
          enter image description here

          One of the two cells on the top edge where two lines meet must be shaded. If we try letting it be the right-hand one, we quickly get to this impossible situation
          enter image description here

          and so instead it must be the left-hand one:
          enter image description here

          One of the two currently-blank cells in column 3 must be shaded. Can it be the lower one? If so, then we have this
          enter image description here

          which is impossible because now lines emanating SE-ish from the third cell on the first row require two adjacent cells to be shaded. So in fact it was the upper of the two cells in column 3 that's shaded:
          enter image description here

          requiring the cell one left and one down from the top right corner to be shaded, which immediately requires all the other cells near it to be unshaded for connectivity
          enter image description here

          leading us rapidly to
          enter image description here

          and then
          enter image description here

          and we're done.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Solution:




          There are lots of quick and easy deductions at the bottom, starting with the two cells that on their own contain two edges and leading to this:
          enter image description here

          One of the two cells on the top edge where two lines meet must be shaded. If we try letting it be the right-hand one, we quickly get to this impossible situation
          enter image description here

          and so instead it must be the left-hand one:
          enter image description here

          One of the two currently-blank cells in column 3 must be shaded. Can it be the lower one? If so, then we have this
          enter image description here

          which is impossible because now lines emanating SE-ish from the third cell on the first row require two adjacent cells to be shaded. So in fact it was the upper of the two cells in column 3 that's shaded:
          enter image description here

          requiring the cell one left and one down from the top right corner to be shaded, which immediately requires all the other cells near it to be unshaded for connectivity
          enter image description here

          leading us rapidly to
          enter image description here

          and then
          enter image description here

          and we're done.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

          79.6k3 gold badges202 silver badges307 bronze badges




          79.6k3 gold badges202 silver badges307 bronze badges










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Beaten by half an hour? Dang.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Maybe I just saw it half an hour before you did. Or maybe I'm quicker :-).
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Probably the latter. It's my first go at this type of puzzle.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          That's correct, and exactly the intended path - nicely done! (Well, you can use more advanced logic to get rid of the hypotheticals, but it's roughly the same thing anyway.)
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago














          3













          $begingroup$

          Labelling the rows 1 (top) to 7 (bottom) and the columns A (left) to F (right), our first step is that




          A5 and F6 are clearly shaded, which means A4, A6, B5, F5, F7, E6 are unshaded. Then B6 is also shaded, which means C6 and B7 are unshaded. For connectivity of unshaded squares, now A7, C7, and E7 must be unshaded.

          first steps




          Next target to be shaded is




          E5, with unshaded around it, and then D6, with unshaded around it. For connectivity, now C5 must be unshaded. Then D4 must be shaded, with unshaded around it.

          next steps




          Now we have a few sets of squares of which at least one must be shaded:




          D1 and E1, C1 and C2 and C3, D1 and E2. That means if E1 is shaded, then D1 is not shaded and so E2 is shaded, contradiction. So D1 is shaded, which means C1, E1, and D2 are unshaded, which means exactly one of C2 and C3 is shaded.

          and again




          Trying a similar deduction technique again:




          At least one of C2 and E3 must be shaded. So either C2 is shaded, or C3 and E3 both are. In the latter case, we get the following with no unique solution:

          can't be solved!




          So in fact




          C2 is shaded, which means B2 and C3 are unshaded, and B1 for connectivity. Now E2 must be shaded (I think), and then everything else in the top right corner must be unshaded.

          almost done




          Finally,




          B3 must be shaded, so B4 and A3 are unshaded, and A2 for connectivity. Then A1 must be shaded and we're done:

          final solution







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago















          3













          $begingroup$

          Labelling the rows 1 (top) to 7 (bottom) and the columns A (left) to F (right), our first step is that




          A5 and F6 are clearly shaded, which means A4, A6, B5, F5, F7, E6 are unshaded. Then B6 is also shaded, which means C6 and B7 are unshaded. For connectivity of unshaded squares, now A7, C7, and E7 must be unshaded.

          first steps




          Next target to be shaded is




          E5, with unshaded around it, and then D6, with unshaded around it. For connectivity, now C5 must be unshaded. Then D4 must be shaded, with unshaded around it.

          next steps




          Now we have a few sets of squares of which at least one must be shaded:




          D1 and E1, C1 and C2 and C3, D1 and E2. That means if E1 is shaded, then D1 is not shaded and so E2 is shaded, contradiction. So D1 is shaded, which means C1, E1, and D2 are unshaded, which means exactly one of C2 and C3 is shaded.

          and again




          Trying a similar deduction technique again:




          At least one of C2 and E3 must be shaded. So either C2 is shaded, or C3 and E3 both are. In the latter case, we get the following with no unique solution:

          can't be solved!




          So in fact




          C2 is shaded, which means B2 and C3 are unshaded, and B1 for connectivity. Now E2 must be shaded (I think), and then everything else in the top right corner must be unshaded.

          almost done




          Finally,




          B3 must be shaded, so B4 and A3 are unshaded, and A2 for connectivity. Then A1 must be shaded and we're done:

          final solution







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago













          3














          3










          3







          $begingroup$

          Labelling the rows 1 (top) to 7 (bottom) and the columns A (left) to F (right), our first step is that




          A5 and F6 are clearly shaded, which means A4, A6, B5, F5, F7, E6 are unshaded. Then B6 is also shaded, which means C6 and B7 are unshaded. For connectivity of unshaded squares, now A7, C7, and E7 must be unshaded.

          first steps




          Next target to be shaded is




          E5, with unshaded around it, and then D6, with unshaded around it. For connectivity, now C5 must be unshaded. Then D4 must be shaded, with unshaded around it.

          next steps




          Now we have a few sets of squares of which at least one must be shaded:




          D1 and E1, C1 and C2 and C3, D1 and E2. That means if E1 is shaded, then D1 is not shaded and so E2 is shaded, contradiction. So D1 is shaded, which means C1, E1, and D2 are unshaded, which means exactly one of C2 and C3 is shaded.

          and again




          Trying a similar deduction technique again:




          At least one of C2 and E3 must be shaded. So either C2 is shaded, or C3 and E3 both are. In the latter case, we get the following with no unique solution:

          can't be solved!




          So in fact




          C2 is shaded, which means B2 and C3 are unshaded, and B1 for connectivity. Now E2 must be shaded (I think), and then everything else in the top right corner must be unshaded.

          almost done




          Finally,




          B3 must be shaded, so B4 and A3 are unshaded, and A2 for connectivity. Then A1 must be shaded and we're done:

          final solution







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Labelling the rows 1 (top) to 7 (bottom) and the columns A (left) to F (right), our first step is that




          A5 and F6 are clearly shaded, which means A4, A6, B5, F5, F7, E6 are unshaded. Then B6 is also shaded, which means C6 and B7 are unshaded. For connectivity of unshaded squares, now A7, C7, and E7 must be unshaded.

          first steps




          Next target to be shaded is




          E5, with unshaded around it, and then D6, with unshaded around it. For connectivity, now C5 must be unshaded. Then D4 must be shaded, with unshaded around it.

          next steps




          Now we have a few sets of squares of which at least one must be shaded:




          D1 and E1, C1 and C2 and C3, D1 and E2. That means if E1 is shaded, then D1 is not shaded and so E2 is shaded, contradiction. So D1 is shaded, which means C1, E1, and D2 are unshaded, which means exactly one of C2 and C3 is shaded.

          and again




          Trying a similar deduction technique again:




          At least one of C2 and E3 must be shaded. So either C2 is shaded, or C3 and E3 both are. In the latter case, we get the following with no unique solution:

          can't be solved!




          So in fact




          C2 is shaded, which means B2 and C3 are unshaded, and B1 for connectivity. Now E2 must be shaded (I think), and then everything else in the top right corner must be unshaded.

          almost done




          Finally,




          B3 must be shaded, so B4 and A3 are unshaded, and A2 for connectivity. Then A1 must be shaded and we're done:

          final solution








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Rand al'ThorRand al'Thor

          74.8k15 gold badges248 silver badges496 bronze badges




          74.8k15 gold badges248 silver badges496 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
            $endgroup$
            – Gareth McCaughan
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
            $endgroup$
            – Rand al'Thor
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
            $endgroup$
            – Deusovi
            7 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Your configuration with "no unique solution" has in fact no solution because it already has a line (roughly horizontal, near the top) crossing two diagonals and no shaded squares.
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          (This doesn't make your answer wrong, of course. In fact it makes it righter :-).)
          $endgroup$
          – Gareth McCaughan
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Gareth Are you sure? I found this one, but that seems to pass through a square corner, and adjusting it in any direction would make it pass through a shaded square.
          $endgroup$
          – Rand al'Thor
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @GarethMcCaughan True, but if it did happen to be nonunique there, that isn't license to say it must be the other possibility! The deduction "either A or B; A leads to multiple solutions, so it must be B" is definitely invalid, because if the puzzle has multiple solutions you can't just pick one arbitrarily. (A different split might have led to a different 'unique' solution!)
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Randal'Thor The top edge there is the top left, not R1C3.
          $endgroup$
          – Deusovi
          7 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87336%2fheyacrazy-careening%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單