Articles with professionsAdjectives with capital letters and no inflectionSuperlative form with “meist”?Adjective ending with -erIndirect and direct confusion with adjective declensionNouns formed from verb stem with -en and -ung endingsReflexive pronouns with adjectivesHow to express Combination of two Adjectives with two Noun (element-wise)?Verbs used with either dative object or prepositional objectplural subject and singular predicate nominative with linking verb seindazu usage with versuchen
Is it possible to eat quietly in Minecraft?
Does a definite integral equal to the Möbius function exist?
How could an engineer advance human civilization by time traveling to the past?
how to add 1 milliseconds on a datetime string?
dos2unix is unable to convert typescript file to unix format
Reference request: mod 2 cohomology of periodic KO theory
How may I shorten this shell script?
In a script how can I signal who's winning the argument?
Is it possible to build or embed the SMILES representation of compounds in 3D?
How can I deal with someone that wants to kill something that isn't supposed to be killed?
Sextortion with actual password not found in leaks
What's the 1 inch size square knob sticking out of wall?
What happens when two cards both modify what I'm allowed to do?
Are glider winch launches rarer in the USA than in the rest of the world? Why?
How could Barty Crouch Jr. have run out of Polyjuice Potion at the end of the Goblet of Fire movie?
What exactly makes a General Products hull nearly indestructible?
What the purpose of the fuel shutoff valve?
Raw curve25519 public key points
What is an Eternal Word™?
What does the Find Familiar spell target?
Inverse Colombian Function
Film where a boy turns into a princess
Invert Some Switches on a Switchboard
The seven story archetypes. Are they truly all of them?
Articles with professions
Adjectives with capital letters and no inflectionSuperlative form with “meist”?Adjective ending with -erIndirect and direct confusion with adjective declensionNouns formed from verb stem with -en and -ung endingsReflexive pronouns with adjectivesHow to express Combination of two Adjectives with two Noun (element-wise)?Verbs used with either dative object or prepositional objectplural subject and singular predicate nominative with linking verb seindazu usage with versuchen
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am working with native speakers who are correcting my German writing. I wrote:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er einen bekannten Anthropologe werden konnte.
And they corrected it to:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er ein bekannter Anthropologe werden konnte.
It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause and therefore the article and adjective should be declined accusatively. But if they are correct I infer that there is a special rule about professions, unqualified they get no article, and qualified with adjectives they get an article and the qualifiers are declined nominatively. Or is this just a reference to the subject and that's why its in the nominative?
adjectives grammar-identification
add a comment |
I am working with native speakers who are correcting my German writing. I wrote:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er einen bekannten Anthropologe werden konnte.
And they corrected it to:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er ein bekannter Anthropologe werden konnte.
It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause and therefore the article and adjective should be declined accusatively. But if they are correct I infer that there is a special rule about professions, unqualified they get no article, and qualified with adjectives they get an article and the qualifiers are declined nominatively. Or is this just a reference to the subject and that's why its in the nominative?
adjectives grammar-identification
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I am working with native speakers who are correcting my German writing. I wrote:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er einen bekannten Anthropologe werden konnte.
And they corrected it to:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er ein bekannter Anthropologe werden konnte.
It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause and therefore the article and adjective should be declined accusatively. But if they are correct I infer that there is a special rule about professions, unqualified they get no article, and qualified with adjectives they get an article and the qualifiers are declined nominatively. Or is this just a reference to the subject and that's why its in the nominative?
adjectives grammar-identification
I am working with native speakers who are correcting my German writing. I wrote:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er einen bekannten Anthropologe werden konnte.
And they corrected it to:
Der Mann war an diesem Punkt sicher, daß er ein bekannter Anthropologe werden konnte.
It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause and therefore the article and adjective should be declined accusatively. But if they are correct I infer that there is a special rule about professions, unqualified they get no article, and qualified with adjectives they get an article and the qualifiers are declined nominatively. Or is this just a reference to the subject and that's why its in the nominative?
adjectives grammar-identification
adjectives grammar-identification
edited 1 hour ago
user unknown
18.2k3 gold badges33 silver badges85 bronze badges
18.2k3 gold badges33 silver badges85 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
MichaelMichael
312 bronze badges
312 bronze badges
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago
add a comment |
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This isn't about professions but special magic of the verb werden. It's a so-called copula, a coupler-verb. You know these already:
Sie ist unsere Lehrerin. (sein)
Es wird Nacht. (werden)
Wir bleiben Freunde. (bleiben)
The coupler connects the subject and a predicative, an item describing the subject. If the predicative has a noun, it's in nominative case, too.
There are some more verbs which are sometimes used as couplers (e.g. heißen, sich erweisen, gelten als) but those three are always couplers if they aren't auxiliaries.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53462%2farticles-with-professions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This isn't about professions but special magic of the verb werden. It's a so-called copula, a coupler-verb. You know these already:
Sie ist unsere Lehrerin. (sein)
Es wird Nacht. (werden)
Wir bleiben Freunde. (bleiben)
The coupler connects the subject and a predicative, an item describing the subject. If the predicative has a noun, it's in nominative case, too.
There are some more verbs which are sometimes used as couplers (e.g. heißen, sich erweisen, gelten als) but those three are always couplers if they aren't auxiliaries.
add a comment |
This isn't about professions but special magic of the verb werden. It's a so-called copula, a coupler-verb. You know these already:
Sie ist unsere Lehrerin. (sein)
Es wird Nacht. (werden)
Wir bleiben Freunde. (bleiben)
The coupler connects the subject and a predicative, an item describing the subject. If the predicative has a noun, it's in nominative case, too.
There are some more verbs which are sometimes used as couplers (e.g. heißen, sich erweisen, gelten als) but those three are always couplers if they aren't auxiliaries.
add a comment |
This isn't about professions but special magic of the verb werden. It's a so-called copula, a coupler-verb. You know these already:
Sie ist unsere Lehrerin. (sein)
Es wird Nacht. (werden)
Wir bleiben Freunde. (bleiben)
The coupler connects the subject and a predicative, an item describing the subject. If the predicative has a noun, it's in nominative case, too.
There are some more verbs which are sometimes used as couplers (e.g. heißen, sich erweisen, gelten als) but those three are always couplers if they aren't auxiliaries.
This isn't about professions but special magic of the verb werden. It's a so-called copula, a coupler-verb. You know these already:
Sie ist unsere Lehrerin. (sein)
Es wird Nacht. (werden)
Wir bleiben Freunde. (bleiben)
The coupler connects the subject and a predicative, an item describing the subject. If the predicative has a noun, it's in nominative case, too.
There are some more verbs which are sometimes used as couplers (e.g. heißen, sich erweisen, gelten als) but those three are always couplers if they aren't auxiliaries.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
JankaJanka
37.8k2 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges
37.8k2 gold badges30 silver badges69 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f53462%2farticles-with-professions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"It seems to me that Anthropologe is the object of the clause" - ist es aber nicht. Werden wird mit Nominativ verwendet.
– Dan
6 hours ago