Wrong corporate name on employment agreementCan a lease contract be voided due to incongruency?Does an illegal clause create liability, or just invalidate the contract?Subcontractor protected by non-disparagement agreement?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?When does a single mistake in a contract invalidate the entire contract?What happens to my employment contract when my employer is acquired?Job offer withdrawal because of non-competeEnglish name for Brazilian 'conduct adjustment agreement'Going to court after agreeing to multiple dispute resolutionsWhat are the implications of an obvious mistake in a signed employment contract?Assignment of Inventions in Employment Contract for Software Development
Can 'leave' mean 'forget'?
Prime parity peregrination
What does Mildred mean by this line in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri?
What could a reptilian race tell by candling their eggs?
Can the passive "être + verbe" sometimes mean the past?
How exactly is a normal force exerted, at the molecular level?
Does Anosov geodesic flow imply asphericity?
One folder two different locations on ubuntu 18.04
Should I report a leak of confidential HR information?
Generate and graph the Recamán Sequence
Should I share with a new service provider a bill from its competitor?
Is it bad to describe a character long after their introduction?
I'm reinstalling my Linux desktop, how do I keep SSH logins working?
Automatically convert a number to use the correct SI unit prefix
Mean Value Theorem: Continuous or Defined?
3D nonogram, beginner's edition
Are there any features that help with the roll to avoid the destruction of a Wand of Fireballs when using the last charge?
Can I ask to speak to my future colleagues before accepting an offer?
Is there reliable evidence that depleted uranium from the 1999 NATO bombing is causing cancer in Serbia?
Why do I need two parameters in an HTTP parameter pollution attack?
What does grep -v "grep" mean and do?
Can a police officer film me on their personal device in my own home?
Miss Toad and her frogs
Why are there so many religions and gods?
Wrong corporate name on employment agreement
Can a lease contract be voided due to incongruency?Does an illegal clause create liability, or just invalidate the contract?Subcontractor protected by non-disparagement agreement?What can I do if I signed an excessively restrictive contract?When does a single mistake in a contract invalidate the entire contract?What happens to my employment contract when my employer is acquired?Job offer withdrawal because of non-competeEnglish name for Brazilian 'conduct adjustment agreement'Going to court after agreeing to multiple dispute resolutionsWhat are the implications of an obvious mistake in a signed employment contract?Assignment of Inventions in Employment Contract for Software Development
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I signed an employment agreement 6 years into a 7 year term. On the 7th year, they decided to not renew our agreement. When reviewing my agreement I noticed the corporate name was incorrect and wasn't the complete name. Does this mistake make the agreement invalid? They are trying to hold me to the non compete in the agreement.
I was also given 10% shares of the company for starting the business for them. We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me. Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
Thanks
contract-law contract
New contributor
add a comment |
I signed an employment agreement 6 years into a 7 year term. On the 7th year, they decided to not renew our agreement. When reviewing my agreement I noticed the corporate name was incorrect and wasn't the complete name. Does this mistake make the agreement invalid? They are trying to hold me to the non compete in the agreement.
I was also given 10% shares of the company for starting the business for them. We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me. Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
Thanks
contract-law contract
New contributor
2
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago
add a comment |
I signed an employment agreement 6 years into a 7 year term. On the 7th year, they decided to not renew our agreement. When reviewing my agreement I noticed the corporate name was incorrect and wasn't the complete name. Does this mistake make the agreement invalid? They are trying to hold me to the non compete in the agreement.
I was also given 10% shares of the company for starting the business for them. We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me. Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
Thanks
contract-law contract
New contributor
I signed an employment agreement 6 years into a 7 year term. On the 7th year, they decided to not renew our agreement. When reviewing my agreement I noticed the corporate name was incorrect and wasn't the complete name. Does this mistake make the agreement invalid? They are trying to hold me to the non compete in the agreement.
I was also given 10% shares of the company for starting the business for them. We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me. Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
Thanks
contract-law contract
contract-law contract
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 10 hours ago
stevesteve
211 bronze badge
211 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
2
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago
add a comment |
2
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago
2
2
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Does this mistake make the agreement invalid?
No. Having worked at that company for six years already, it will be extremely easy for the company to prove that you clearly knew with which entity you were entering the contract. That is what matters in contract law. Thus, the discrepancy of name in te contract is inconsequential. This is similar to what I explained in this other answer.
Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
In the U.S., there is no prohibition to that effect. What matters is that the parties' rights and obligations are stated and accepted with reasonable clarity.
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42378%2fwrong-corporate-name-on-employment-agreement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Does this mistake make the agreement invalid?
No. Having worked at that company for six years already, it will be extremely easy for the company to prove that you clearly knew with which entity you were entering the contract. That is what matters in contract law. Thus, the discrepancy of name in te contract is inconsequential. This is similar to what I explained in this other answer.
Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
In the U.S., there is no prohibition to that effect. What matters is that the parties' rights and obligations are stated and accepted with reasonable clarity.
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Does this mistake make the agreement invalid?
No. Having worked at that company for six years already, it will be extremely easy for the company to prove that you clearly knew with which entity you were entering the contract. That is what matters in contract law. Thus, the discrepancy of name in te contract is inconsequential. This is similar to what I explained in this other answer.
Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
In the U.S., there is no prohibition to that effect. What matters is that the parties' rights and obligations are stated and accepted with reasonable clarity.
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Does this mistake make the agreement invalid?
No. Having worked at that company for six years already, it will be extremely easy for the company to prove that you clearly knew with which entity you were entering the contract. That is what matters in contract law. Thus, the discrepancy of name in te contract is inconsequential. This is similar to what I explained in this other answer.
Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
In the U.S., there is no prohibition to that effect. What matters is that the parties' rights and obligations are stated and accepted with reasonable clarity.
Does this mistake make the agreement invalid?
No. Having worked at that company for six years already, it will be extremely easy for the company to prove that you clearly knew with which entity you were entering the contract. That is what matters in contract law. Thus, the discrepancy of name in te contract is inconsequential. This is similar to what I explained in this other answer.
Are employment agreements for employees valid for share holders and officers of the company or should there have been a different one.
In the U.S., there is no prohibition to that effect. What matters is that the parties' rights and obligations are stated and accepted with reasonable clarity.
answered 8 hours ago
Iñaki ViggersIñaki Viggers
12.6k2 gold badges20 silver badges33 bronze badges
12.6k2 gold badges20 silver badges33 bronze badges
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
Worth noting that while a misidentification of a party when the intent of the parties is clear is unlikely to be a serious problem, that there are many circumstances in which a non-compete is nonetheless unenforceable, although this varies a lot from one jurisdiction to another.
– ohwilleke
5 hours ago
add a comment |
steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42378%2fwrong-corporate-name-on-employment-agreement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
"We did a redemption agreement for a specific amount and they never paid me": in that case, you may be a creditor rather than a shareholder.
– phoog
8 hours ago
You should just approach this from the standpoint of [in]validity of the non-compete. That depends on your jurisdiction, but generally, in many jurisdictions, they can't keep you from working in your area of expertise when they're the ones who chose to end the engagement.
– R..
6 mins ago