What spells could a Bard identify from a Pact of the Tome Warlock's Book of Shadows?How do you identify what spell is on a spell scroll?Is it possible to use a spell scroll with a spell that requires a bonus action to cast?What exactly are the sources from which you can copy spells into a Book of Shadows?Can you pick Book of Shadows cantrips from different spell lists?What creatures can cast spells from spell scrolls?Can Innate Spellcasters cast spells from scrolls?Can a Warlock with the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation add unintelligible spell scrolls to their book?What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?Are cantrips gained from Pact of the Tome considered warlock spells?Does having both Magic Initiate and Ritual Caster combine to let you use spell scrolls?Can Divine Soul Sorcerer transfer spells to a Warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets?

How did researchers use to find articles before the Internet and the computer era?

How can my story take place on Earth without referring to our existing cities and countries?

Getting geometries of hurricane's 'cone of uncertainty' using shapely?

What spells could a Bard identify from a Pact of the Tome Warlock's Book of Shadows?

How would an order of Monks that renounce their names communicate effectively?

Spicket or spigot?

Who gets an Apparition licence?

Symbol for "not absolutely continuous" in Latex

Sum of Parts of An Array - JavaScript

Skipping over failed imports until they are needed (if ever)

Miss Toad and her frogs

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?

Where can I get macOS Catalina Beta version?

What is "oversubscription" in Networking?

How hard is it to sell a home which is currently mortgaged?

The Confused Alien

Can I ask to speak to my future colleagues before accepting an offer?

What's the safest way to inform a new user of their password on my web site?

Golf the smallest circle!

Procedurally generate regions on island

What could a reptilian race tell by candling their eggs?

How is this practical and ancient scene shot?

Is there a nice way to assign std::minmax(a, b) to std::tie(a, b)?

Generate and graph the Recamán Sequence



What spells could a Bard identify from a Pact of the Tome Warlock's Book of Shadows?


How do you identify what spell is on a spell scroll?Is it possible to use a spell scroll with a spell that requires a bonus action to cast?What exactly are the sources from which you can copy spells into a Book of Shadows?Can you pick Book of Shadows cantrips from different spell lists?What creatures can cast spells from spell scrolls?Can Innate Spellcasters cast spells from scrolls?Can a Warlock with the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation add unintelligible spell scrolls to their book?What would a Warlock understand from written spells outside of their class, via Eyes of the Rune Keeper?Are cantrips gained from Pact of the Tome considered warlock spells?Does having both Magic Initiate and Ritual Caster combine to let you use spell scrolls?Can Divine Soul Sorcerer transfer spells to a Warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9












$begingroup$


A Bard in my group has expressed an interest in attempting to read a Warlock party member's Book of Shadows, and I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, they can get from it. I figure they can't actually cast anything with it, since it's not made of spell scrolls, but they might be able to identify some of the specific spells in it.



I know some related RAW rulings, but I'm not sure if they apply to this case. For example, this related answer says that a caster can make sense of a spell scroll if the spell is on their class's spell list, but as previously stated, this isn't a spell scroll.



So, my guess is that one of these is the case, but I don't know which one: the Bard reading the Book of Shadows



  • cannot read it at all

  • can identify that it contains magic spells but no more

  • can identify those cantrips and spells that are on the Bard spell list

  • can identify any spell in the book, perhaps with a successful Arcana check

Which is the case? Or is it something different?



(I assume the answer would be equally applicable to any other spellcasting class except possibly Wizards.)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    9












    $begingroup$


    A Bard in my group has expressed an interest in attempting to read a Warlock party member's Book of Shadows, and I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, they can get from it. I figure they can't actually cast anything with it, since it's not made of spell scrolls, but they might be able to identify some of the specific spells in it.



    I know some related RAW rulings, but I'm not sure if they apply to this case. For example, this related answer says that a caster can make sense of a spell scroll if the spell is on their class's spell list, but as previously stated, this isn't a spell scroll.



    So, my guess is that one of these is the case, but I don't know which one: the Bard reading the Book of Shadows



    • cannot read it at all

    • can identify that it contains magic spells but no more

    • can identify those cantrips and spells that are on the Bard spell list

    • can identify any spell in the book, perhaps with a successful Arcana check

    Which is the case? Or is it something different?



    (I assume the answer would be equally applicable to any other spellcasting class except possibly Wizards.)










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      9












      9








      9


      1



      $begingroup$


      A Bard in my group has expressed an interest in attempting to read a Warlock party member's Book of Shadows, and I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, they can get from it. I figure they can't actually cast anything with it, since it's not made of spell scrolls, but they might be able to identify some of the specific spells in it.



      I know some related RAW rulings, but I'm not sure if they apply to this case. For example, this related answer says that a caster can make sense of a spell scroll if the spell is on their class's spell list, but as previously stated, this isn't a spell scroll.



      So, my guess is that one of these is the case, but I don't know which one: the Bard reading the Book of Shadows



      • cannot read it at all

      • can identify that it contains magic spells but no more

      • can identify those cantrips and spells that are on the Bard spell list

      • can identify any spell in the book, perhaps with a successful Arcana check

      Which is the case? Or is it something different?



      (I assume the answer would be equally applicable to any other spellcasting class except possibly Wizards.)










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A Bard in my group has expressed an interest in attempting to read a Warlock party member's Book of Shadows, and I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, they can get from it. I figure they can't actually cast anything with it, since it's not made of spell scrolls, but they might be able to identify some of the specific spells in it.



      I know some related RAW rulings, but I'm not sure if they apply to this case. For example, this related answer says that a caster can make sense of a spell scroll if the spell is on their class's spell list, but as previously stated, this isn't a spell scroll.



      So, my guess is that one of these is the case, but I don't know which one: the Bard reading the Book of Shadows



      • cannot read it at all

      • can identify that it contains magic spells but no more

      • can identify those cantrips and spells that are on the Bard spell list

      • can identify any spell in the book, perhaps with a successful Arcana check

      Which is the case? Or is it something different?



      (I assume the answer would be equally applicable to any other spellcasting class except possibly Wizards.)







      dnd-5e spells warlock bard






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      Louis Wasserman

















      asked 8 hours ago









      Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

      1,6214 silver badges22 bronze badges




      1,6214 silver badges22 bronze badges




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Legally, the book is useless to the Bard. How that manifests lore-wise is up to the DM



          A Book of Shadow only contains cantrips:




          Your patron gives you a grimoire called a Book of Shadows. When you gain this feature, choose three cantrips from any class's spell list.




          If that Warlock also has the Book of Ancient Secrets Invocation, they may also add Rituals to the book:




          You can now inscribe magical rituals in your Book of Shadows. Choose two 1st-level spells that have the ritual tag from any class's spell list (the two needn't be from the same list).




          Given the fact that a class may only read spells from scrolls, etc that are in their class list, this would mean that a Bard, at best, could only read rituals and cantrips which area already on the Bard spell list.



          However, the bard would not be able to make use of any Bard spells in the book because a Bard is limited in the number of cantrips and spells they know (as are several other spellcasting classes).



          On the other hand, A DM might treat the grimoire as a spell scroll and allow the Bard to cast the book's contents while it was on her person. But this would then mean the Warlock could not then cast those spells because the pact also says:




          While the book is on your person, you can cast those cantrips at will.



          And the Invocation: With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals. You can't cast the spells except as rituals, unless you've learned them by some other means.




          This means that, without the book, those spells are not castable. Once the Bard handed the grimoire back to the Warlock, the Bard would then lose access to those spells. The net number of cantrips & rituals known in the party would remain constant either way (unless the Warlock knew any of the book's ritual spells innately.



          How the DM decides to handle the mechanics from a lore standpoint is their choice. The Bard can identify the type of magic for each spell (this is in keeping with the rules of Detect Magic spell) but that's of no real value. The PHB offers this lore explanation:




          Or [your Book of Shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast.




          But maybe the Bard is unable to read the book's writing at all because the text appears as swirling, formless shadows, etc, so the nature of the magic is all she can glean.



          There are lots of options for how to explain this limitation.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            7 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
            $endgroup$
            – c0ldspark
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            5 hours ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          The Bard gains inspiration



          “What, if anything, they can get from it”
          is, at minimum, a point of inspiration.




          plundered magical knowledge from a wide spectrum of disciplines




          ...taken straight out of the description for Magical Secrets, is an indicator that the type of curiousity displayed by the Bard in your party is good roleplaying, and it should be rewarded.




          Additionally, if you have Inspiration, you can reward another player
          for good Roleplaying, clever thinking, or simply doing something
          exciting in the game. When another player character does something
          that really contributes to the story in a fun and interesting way, you
          can give up your Inspiration to give that character Inspiration.




          I would not rule that the Book of Shadows functions the same as a spell scroll, because if a Book of Shadows could be used as a scroll, why not a wizard’s spellbook? Spell scrolls are not merely instructions for casting a spell. They are the embodiment of a spell. The fact that they crumble to ash after use speaks to this.



          But given that digging for magical secrets is within a bard’s purview, and we are talking about a literal Book of Ancient Secrets, a DM might choose to let a Bard read and identify spells contained in a Book of Secrets with an intelligence (Arcana) check, similar to how a spell scrolls are deciphered.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150464%2fwhat-spells-could-a-bard-identify-from-a-pact-of-the-tome-warlocks-book-of-shad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            Legally, the book is useless to the Bard. How that manifests lore-wise is up to the DM



            A Book of Shadow only contains cantrips:




            Your patron gives you a grimoire called a Book of Shadows. When you gain this feature, choose three cantrips from any class's spell list.




            If that Warlock also has the Book of Ancient Secrets Invocation, they may also add Rituals to the book:




            You can now inscribe magical rituals in your Book of Shadows. Choose two 1st-level spells that have the ritual tag from any class's spell list (the two needn't be from the same list).




            Given the fact that a class may only read spells from scrolls, etc that are in their class list, this would mean that a Bard, at best, could only read rituals and cantrips which area already on the Bard spell list.



            However, the bard would not be able to make use of any Bard spells in the book because a Bard is limited in the number of cantrips and spells they know (as are several other spellcasting classes).



            On the other hand, A DM might treat the grimoire as a spell scroll and allow the Bard to cast the book's contents while it was on her person. But this would then mean the Warlock could not then cast those spells because the pact also says:




            While the book is on your person, you can cast those cantrips at will.



            And the Invocation: With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals. You can't cast the spells except as rituals, unless you've learned them by some other means.




            This means that, without the book, those spells are not castable. Once the Bard handed the grimoire back to the Warlock, the Bard would then lose access to those spells. The net number of cantrips & rituals known in the party would remain constant either way (unless the Warlock knew any of the book's ritual spells innately.



            How the DM decides to handle the mechanics from a lore standpoint is their choice. The Bard can identify the type of magic for each spell (this is in keeping with the rules of Detect Magic spell) but that's of no real value. The PHB offers this lore explanation:




            Or [your Book of Shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast.




            But maybe the Bard is unable to read the book's writing at all because the text appears as swirling, formless shadows, etc, so the nature of the magic is all she can glean.



            There are lots of options for how to explain this limitation.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
              $endgroup$
              – c0ldspark
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              5 hours ago
















            5












            $begingroup$

            Legally, the book is useless to the Bard. How that manifests lore-wise is up to the DM



            A Book of Shadow only contains cantrips:




            Your patron gives you a grimoire called a Book of Shadows. When you gain this feature, choose three cantrips from any class's spell list.




            If that Warlock also has the Book of Ancient Secrets Invocation, they may also add Rituals to the book:




            You can now inscribe magical rituals in your Book of Shadows. Choose two 1st-level spells that have the ritual tag from any class's spell list (the two needn't be from the same list).




            Given the fact that a class may only read spells from scrolls, etc that are in their class list, this would mean that a Bard, at best, could only read rituals and cantrips which area already on the Bard spell list.



            However, the bard would not be able to make use of any Bard spells in the book because a Bard is limited in the number of cantrips and spells they know (as are several other spellcasting classes).



            On the other hand, A DM might treat the grimoire as a spell scroll and allow the Bard to cast the book's contents while it was on her person. But this would then mean the Warlock could not then cast those spells because the pact also says:




            While the book is on your person, you can cast those cantrips at will.



            And the Invocation: With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals. You can't cast the spells except as rituals, unless you've learned them by some other means.




            This means that, without the book, those spells are not castable. Once the Bard handed the grimoire back to the Warlock, the Bard would then lose access to those spells. The net number of cantrips & rituals known in the party would remain constant either way (unless the Warlock knew any of the book's ritual spells innately.



            How the DM decides to handle the mechanics from a lore standpoint is their choice. The Bard can identify the type of magic for each spell (this is in keeping with the rules of Detect Magic spell) but that's of no real value. The PHB offers this lore explanation:




            Or [your Book of Shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast.




            But maybe the Bard is unable to read the book's writing at all because the text appears as swirling, formless shadows, etc, so the nature of the magic is all she can glean.



            There are lots of options for how to explain this limitation.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
              $endgroup$
              – c0ldspark
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              5 hours ago














            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            Legally, the book is useless to the Bard. How that manifests lore-wise is up to the DM



            A Book of Shadow only contains cantrips:




            Your patron gives you a grimoire called a Book of Shadows. When you gain this feature, choose three cantrips from any class's spell list.




            If that Warlock also has the Book of Ancient Secrets Invocation, they may also add Rituals to the book:




            You can now inscribe magical rituals in your Book of Shadows. Choose two 1st-level spells that have the ritual tag from any class's spell list (the two needn't be from the same list).




            Given the fact that a class may only read spells from scrolls, etc that are in their class list, this would mean that a Bard, at best, could only read rituals and cantrips which area already on the Bard spell list.



            However, the bard would not be able to make use of any Bard spells in the book because a Bard is limited in the number of cantrips and spells they know (as are several other spellcasting classes).



            On the other hand, A DM might treat the grimoire as a spell scroll and allow the Bard to cast the book's contents while it was on her person. But this would then mean the Warlock could not then cast those spells because the pact also says:




            While the book is on your person, you can cast those cantrips at will.



            And the Invocation: With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals. You can't cast the spells except as rituals, unless you've learned them by some other means.




            This means that, without the book, those spells are not castable. Once the Bard handed the grimoire back to the Warlock, the Bard would then lose access to those spells. The net number of cantrips & rituals known in the party would remain constant either way (unless the Warlock knew any of the book's ritual spells innately.



            How the DM decides to handle the mechanics from a lore standpoint is their choice. The Bard can identify the type of magic for each spell (this is in keeping with the rules of Detect Magic spell) but that's of no real value. The PHB offers this lore explanation:




            Or [your Book of Shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast.




            But maybe the Bard is unable to read the book's writing at all because the text appears as swirling, formless shadows, etc, so the nature of the magic is all she can glean.



            There are lots of options for how to explain this limitation.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Legally, the book is useless to the Bard. How that manifests lore-wise is up to the DM



            A Book of Shadow only contains cantrips:




            Your patron gives you a grimoire called a Book of Shadows. When you gain this feature, choose three cantrips from any class's spell list.




            If that Warlock also has the Book of Ancient Secrets Invocation, they may also add Rituals to the book:




            You can now inscribe magical rituals in your Book of Shadows. Choose two 1st-level spells that have the ritual tag from any class's spell list (the two needn't be from the same list).




            Given the fact that a class may only read spells from scrolls, etc that are in their class list, this would mean that a Bard, at best, could only read rituals and cantrips which area already on the Bard spell list.



            However, the bard would not be able to make use of any Bard spells in the book because a Bard is limited in the number of cantrips and spells they know (as are several other spellcasting classes).



            On the other hand, A DM might treat the grimoire as a spell scroll and allow the Bard to cast the book's contents while it was on her person. But this would then mean the Warlock could not then cast those spells because the pact also says:




            While the book is on your person, you can cast those cantrips at will.



            And the Invocation: With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals. You can't cast the spells except as rituals, unless you've learned them by some other means.




            This means that, without the book, those spells are not castable. Once the Bard handed the grimoire back to the Warlock, the Bard would then lose access to those spells. The net number of cantrips & rituals known in the party would remain constant either way (unless the Warlock knew any of the book's ritual spells innately.



            How the DM decides to handle the mechanics from a lore standpoint is their choice. The Bard can identify the type of magic for each spell (this is in keeping with the rules of Detect Magic spell) but that's of no real value. The PHB offers this lore explanation:




            Or [your Book of Shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast.




            But maybe the Bard is unable to read the book's writing at all because the text appears as swirling, formless shadows, etc, so the nature of the magic is all she can glean.



            There are lots of options for how to explain this limitation.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 7 hours ago









            RykaraRykara

            8,93130 silver badges70 bronze badges




            8,93130 silver badges70 bronze badges











            • $begingroup$
              FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
              $endgroup$
              – c0ldspark
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              5 hours ago

















            • $begingroup$
              FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
              $endgroup$
              – c0ldspark
              7 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
              $endgroup$
              – Szega
              5 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            7 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            FWIW, the Warlock has the Book of Ancient Secrets invocation, which lets them inscribe ritual spells into the Book of Shadows. So it's not just cantrips.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            7 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
            $endgroup$
            – c0ldspark
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Not all spellcasting classes are restricted in the number of spells they know. Clerics and Druids (as an example) know every spell on their list, but can only prepare some subset of those to be cast each long rest.
            $endgroup$
            – c0ldspark
            7 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            5 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            Relevant quote from the PHB: "Or it [your book of shadows] could be the tattered diary of a lunatic driven mad by contact with the Great Old One, holding scraps of spells that only your own burgeoning insanity allows you to understand and cast."
            $endgroup$
            – Szega
            5 hours ago














            0












            $begingroup$

            The Bard gains inspiration



            “What, if anything, they can get from it”
            is, at minimum, a point of inspiration.




            plundered magical knowledge from a wide spectrum of disciplines




            ...taken straight out of the description for Magical Secrets, is an indicator that the type of curiousity displayed by the Bard in your party is good roleplaying, and it should be rewarded.




            Additionally, if you have Inspiration, you can reward another player
            for good Roleplaying, clever thinking, or simply doing something
            exciting in the game. When another player character does something
            that really contributes to the story in a fun and interesting way, you
            can give up your Inspiration to give that character Inspiration.




            I would not rule that the Book of Shadows functions the same as a spell scroll, because if a Book of Shadows could be used as a scroll, why not a wizard’s spellbook? Spell scrolls are not merely instructions for casting a spell. They are the embodiment of a spell. The fact that they crumble to ash after use speaks to this.



            But given that digging for magical secrets is within a bard’s purview, and we are talking about a literal Book of Ancient Secrets, a DM might choose to let a Bard read and identify spells contained in a Book of Secrets with an intelligence (Arcana) check, similar to how a spell scrolls are deciphered.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              The Bard gains inspiration



              “What, if anything, they can get from it”
              is, at minimum, a point of inspiration.




              plundered magical knowledge from a wide spectrum of disciplines




              ...taken straight out of the description for Magical Secrets, is an indicator that the type of curiousity displayed by the Bard in your party is good roleplaying, and it should be rewarded.




              Additionally, if you have Inspiration, you can reward another player
              for good Roleplaying, clever thinking, or simply doing something
              exciting in the game. When another player character does something
              that really contributes to the story in a fun and interesting way, you
              can give up your Inspiration to give that character Inspiration.




              I would not rule that the Book of Shadows functions the same as a spell scroll, because if a Book of Shadows could be used as a scroll, why not a wizard’s spellbook? Spell scrolls are not merely instructions for casting a spell. They are the embodiment of a spell. The fact that they crumble to ash after use speaks to this.



              But given that digging for magical secrets is within a bard’s purview, and we are talking about a literal Book of Ancient Secrets, a DM might choose to let a Bard read and identify spells contained in a Book of Secrets with an intelligence (Arcana) check, similar to how a spell scrolls are deciphered.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The Bard gains inspiration



                “What, if anything, they can get from it”
                is, at minimum, a point of inspiration.




                plundered magical knowledge from a wide spectrum of disciplines




                ...taken straight out of the description for Magical Secrets, is an indicator that the type of curiousity displayed by the Bard in your party is good roleplaying, and it should be rewarded.




                Additionally, if you have Inspiration, you can reward another player
                for good Roleplaying, clever thinking, or simply doing something
                exciting in the game. When another player character does something
                that really contributes to the story in a fun and interesting way, you
                can give up your Inspiration to give that character Inspiration.




                I would not rule that the Book of Shadows functions the same as a spell scroll, because if a Book of Shadows could be used as a scroll, why not a wizard’s spellbook? Spell scrolls are not merely instructions for casting a spell. They are the embodiment of a spell. The fact that they crumble to ash after use speaks to this.



                But given that digging for magical secrets is within a bard’s purview, and we are talking about a literal Book of Ancient Secrets, a DM might choose to let a Bard read and identify spells contained in a Book of Secrets with an intelligence (Arcana) check, similar to how a spell scrolls are deciphered.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The Bard gains inspiration



                “What, if anything, they can get from it”
                is, at minimum, a point of inspiration.




                plundered magical knowledge from a wide spectrum of disciplines




                ...taken straight out of the description for Magical Secrets, is an indicator that the type of curiousity displayed by the Bard in your party is good roleplaying, and it should be rewarded.




                Additionally, if you have Inspiration, you can reward another player
                for good Roleplaying, clever thinking, or simply doing something
                exciting in the game. When another player character does something
                that really contributes to the story in a fun and interesting way, you
                can give up your Inspiration to give that character Inspiration.




                I would not rule that the Book of Shadows functions the same as a spell scroll, because if a Book of Shadows could be used as a scroll, why not a wizard’s spellbook? Spell scrolls are not merely instructions for casting a spell. They are the embodiment of a spell. The fact that they crumble to ash after use speaks to this.



                But given that digging for magical secrets is within a bard’s purview, and we are talking about a literal Book of Ancient Secrets, a DM might choose to let a Bard read and identify spells contained in a Book of Secrets with an intelligence (Arcana) check, similar to how a spell scrolls are deciphered.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 14 mins ago









                LumenbeingLumenbeing

                8685 silver badges12 bronze badges




                8685 silver badges12 bronze badges



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150464%2fwhat-spells-could-a-bard-identify-from-a-pact-of-the-tome-warlocks-book-of-shad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її