When stealing something do you need to roll stealth and sleight of hand?Can players declare that they are making a specific ability check?Do Sleight of Hand checks cover stealthiness?Can I be a follower of an evil god and not be evil?How does sneaking past hidden enemies work? (and other D&D-5e stealth questions)Can you cast a spell before Initiative has been rolled?Sleep's hp total and (half-) elf targetsIs there always a “designated” person to lead/move the party?In the “Buying Magic Items” downtime activity, can I roll on a more affordable table than my Charisma/Persuasion check would normally indicate?How to deal with a player who refuses to learn the description of their spells and abilities?What happens when you cast Wish while mounted on a Found Steed?My thieves party constantly steal from each other, but when I do they attack me and berate me. (long post)
Why is one of Madera Municipal's runways labelled with only "R" on both sides?
SQL counting distinct over partition
Is it a problem if <h4>, <h5> and <h6> are smaller than regular text?
When stealing something do you need to roll stealth and sleight of hand?
1980s live-action movie where individually-coloured nations on clouds fight
Are there any important biographies of nobodies?
Is mleccha entirely different from Hindu classification?
Do height-balanced binary trees have logarithmic depth?
Preventing Employees from either switching to Competitors or Opening Their Own Business
Are there any instruments that don't produce overtones?
Is counterpoint still used today?
Cycle through MeshStyle directives in ListLinePlot
Confusion around using "des" in sentences
What is the highest possible temporary AC at level 1, without any help from others?
Soft question: Examples where lack of mathematical rigour cause security breaches?
Passing multiple files through stdin (over ssh)
Is open-sourcing the code of a webapp not recommended?
Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?
Overlapping String-Blocks
Fixing obscure 8080 emulator bug?
Thread Pool C++ Implementation
A planet of ice and fire
C++ Arduino IDE receiving garbled `char` from function
How can I tell the difference between unmarked sugar and stevia?
When stealing something do you need to roll stealth and sleight of hand?
Can players declare that they are making a specific ability check?Do Sleight of Hand checks cover stealthiness?Can I be a follower of an evil god and not be evil?How does sneaking past hidden enemies work? (and other D&D-5e stealth questions)Can you cast a spell before Initiative has been rolled?Sleep's hp total and (half-) elf targetsIs there always a “designated” person to lead/move the party?In the “Buying Magic Items” downtime activity, can I roll on a more affordable table than my Charisma/Persuasion check would normally indicate?How to deal with a player who refuses to learn the description of their spells and abilities?What happens when you cast Wish while mounted on a Found Steed?My thieves party constantly steal from each other, but when I do they attack me and berate me. (long post)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Scenario: An arcane trickster casts disguise self as a blind old man.
In a crowded room, his accomplice distracts the target, while the arcane trickster tries to steal his pouch of gold. As a DM, what would you have him roll?
I am trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a DM. He felt like I should roll a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should roll a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
dnd-5e stealth
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Scenario: An arcane trickster casts disguise self as a blind old man.
In a crowded room, his accomplice distracts the target, while the arcane trickster tries to steal his pouch of gold. As a DM, what would you have him roll?
I am trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a DM. He felt like I should roll a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should roll a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
dnd-5e stealth
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Scenario: An arcane trickster casts disguise self as a blind old man.
In a crowded room, his accomplice distracts the target, while the arcane trickster tries to steal his pouch of gold. As a DM, what would you have him roll?
I am trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a DM. He felt like I should roll a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should roll a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
dnd-5e stealth
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Scenario: An arcane trickster casts disguise self as a blind old man.
In a crowded room, his accomplice distracts the target, while the arcane trickster tries to steal his pouch of gold. As a DM, what would you have him roll?
I am trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a DM. He felt like I should roll a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should roll a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
dnd-5e stealth
dnd-5e stealth
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
Mołot
8,38424474
8,38424474
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
SmarticusRexSmarticusRex
211
211
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
SmarticusRex is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's up to the DM
This is a series of events orchestrated by the party that may require one or more ability checks. In this scenario, what happens is described on page 174 of the PHB:
The DM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.
In general, the player will describe their attempted action, and the DM will then call for any roll(s) and what they are.
If your DM felt like it should play it one way, then that's way it plays out.
There were lots of ways this could have played out, but ultimately it's the DM's call as how they're going to adjudicate it.
There could have been:
- 2 rolls. One roll to for the distraction(Deception), one roll to steal (sleight of hand)
- 1 roll. Sleight of Hand (includes the sneaking) with advantage for working together.
- What your DM did may have been that in their mind, you did need to sneak up separately and this required a separate stealth roll. This is also reasonable if they felt the circumstances required it.
- Any other option that the DM felt would tell a good story
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important factor, and one you do not mention in your question, is whether or not you were trying to hide or move sneakily at any point.
Page 177 of the PHB says:
Stealth. Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.
IOW, check stealth when you are trying to either hide or you are trying to move without being noticed.
If you were standing next to the target and the distraction was used to make people look away while you grabbed the pouch and then you just stood there looking nonchalant without trying to leave then I don't see how stealth could apply. You are standing in the open and not trying to sneak so there simply is no stealth involved. As a DM I would roll the checks to see if the mark and anybody close enough to notice the pickpocket were successfully distracted, then have you roll sleight of hand, giving advantage only if everybody was distracted.
But if you were standing away from the target and used the distraction to move close, grab the money, then move back away from the target all without being seen then there is clearly a need for a stealth check to cover your movement to and from the mark. Even if a person does not see you actually taking the money, anybody who sees an old man quickly move up behind somebody then quickly move away is likely to be suspicious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the underlying issue here is a misunderstanding of some very basic rules of 5th edition D&D, namely, there's no such thing as a stealth check or a slight of hand check.
5e, unlike previous editions, has no skill checks. It has Ability Checks. If a skill proficiency applies to the task at hand and the creature doing the task has proficiency with that skill, then they add their proficiency modifier to the Ability Check. Even in that case, it's still an Ability Check, not a skill check. So, understanding that subtle but important difference, the resolution of the situation becomes much clearer.
The situation calls for an Ability Check. Which ability is the correct one for this Ability Check? Clearly Dexterity. The DM asks for a (single) Dexterity Check. But wait, what about my skills? The DM can pick one or more skill proficiencies that apply, and if you have proficiency in any one of the skills that apply, you add your proficiency modifier to the roll.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
SmarticusRex is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149274%2fwhen-stealing-something-do-you-need-to-roll-stealth-and-sleight-of-hand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's up to the DM
This is a series of events orchestrated by the party that may require one or more ability checks. In this scenario, what happens is described on page 174 of the PHB:
The DM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.
In general, the player will describe their attempted action, and the DM will then call for any roll(s) and what they are.
If your DM felt like it should play it one way, then that's way it plays out.
There were lots of ways this could have played out, but ultimately it's the DM's call as how they're going to adjudicate it.
There could have been:
- 2 rolls. One roll to for the distraction(Deception), one roll to steal (sleight of hand)
- 1 roll. Sleight of Hand (includes the sneaking) with advantage for working together.
- What your DM did may have been that in their mind, you did need to sneak up separately and this required a separate stealth roll. This is also reasonable if they felt the circumstances required it.
- Any other option that the DM felt would tell a good story
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's up to the DM
This is a series of events orchestrated by the party that may require one or more ability checks. In this scenario, what happens is described on page 174 of the PHB:
The DM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.
In general, the player will describe their attempted action, and the DM will then call for any roll(s) and what they are.
If your DM felt like it should play it one way, then that's way it plays out.
There were lots of ways this could have played out, but ultimately it's the DM's call as how they're going to adjudicate it.
There could have been:
- 2 rolls. One roll to for the distraction(Deception), one roll to steal (sleight of hand)
- 1 roll. Sleight of Hand (includes the sneaking) with advantage for working together.
- What your DM did may have been that in their mind, you did need to sneak up separately and this required a separate stealth roll. This is also reasonable if they felt the circumstances required it.
- Any other option that the DM felt would tell a good story
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's up to the DM
This is a series of events orchestrated by the party that may require one or more ability checks. In this scenario, what happens is described on page 174 of the PHB:
The DM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.
In general, the player will describe their attempted action, and the DM will then call for any roll(s) and what they are.
If your DM felt like it should play it one way, then that's way it plays out.
There were lots of ways this could have played out, but ultimately it's the DM's call as how they're going to adjudicate it.
There could have been:
- 2 rolls. One roll to for the distraction(Deception), one roll to steal (sleight of hand)
- 1 roll. Sleight of Hand (includes the sneaking) with advantage for working together.
- What your DM did may have been that in their mind, you did need to sneak up separately and this required a separate stealth roll. This is also reasonable if they felt the circumstances required it.
- Any other option that the DM felt would tell a good story
$endgroup$
It's up to the DM
This is a series of events orchestrated by the party that may require one or more ability checks. In this scenario, what happens is described on page 174 of the PHB:
The DM calls for an ability check when a character or monster attempts an action (other than an attack) that has a chance of failure. When the outcome is uncertain, the dice determine the results.
In general, the player will describe their attempted action, and the DM will then call for any roll(s) and what they are.
If your DM felt like it should play it one way, then that's way it plays out.
There were lots of ways this could have played out, but ultimately it's the DM's call as how they're going to adjudicate it.
There could have been:
- 2 rolls. One roll to for the distraction(Deception), one roll to steal (sleight of hand)
- 1 roll. Sleight of Hand (includes the sneaking) with advantage for working together.
- What your DM did may have been that in their mind, you did need to sneak up separately and this required a separate stealth roll. This is also reasonable if they felt the circumstances required it.
- Any other option that the DM felt would tell a good story
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
68.3k11261459
68.3k11261459
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Would the "Working Together" or "Help" rules be apropos?
$endgroup$
– Matt Vincent
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important factor, and one you do not mention in your question, is whether or not you were trying to hide or move sneakily at any point.
Page 177 of the PHB says:
Stealth. Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.
IOW, check stealth when you are trying to either hide or you are trying to move without being noticed.
If you were standing next to the target and the distraction was used to make people look away while you grabbed the pouch and then you just stood there looking nonchalant without trying to leave then I don't see how stealth could apply. You are standing in the open and not trying to sneak so there simply is no stealth involved. As a DM I would roll the checks to see if the mark and anybody close enough to notice the pickpocket were successfully distracted, then have you roll sleight of hand, giving advantage only if everybody was distracted.
But if you were standing away from the target and used the distraction to move close, grab the money, then move back away from the target all without being seen then there is clearly a need for a stealth check to cover your movement to and from the mark. Even if a person does not see you actually taking the money, anybody who sees an old man quickly move up behind somebody then quickly move away is likely to be suspicious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important factor, and one you do not mention in your question, is whether or not you were trying to hide or move sneakily at any point.
Page 177 of the PHB says:
Stealth. Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.
IOW, check stealth when you are trying to either hide or you are trying to move without being noticed.
If you were standing next to the target and the distraction was used to make people look away while you grabbed the pouch and then you just stood there looking nonchalant without trying to leave then I don't see how stealth could apply. You are standing in the open and not trying to sneak so there simply is no stealth involved. As a DM I would roll the checks to see if the mark and anybody close enough to notice the pickpocket were successfully distracted, then have you roll sleight of hand, giving advantage only if everybody was distracted.
But if you were standing away from the target and used the distraction to move close, grab the money, then move back away from the target all without being seen then there is clearly a need for a stealth check to cover your movement to and from the mark. Even if a person does not see you actually taking the money, anybody who sees an old man quickly move up behind somebody then quickly move away is likely to be suspicious.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important factor, and one you do not mention in your question, is whether or not you were trying to hide or move sneakily at any point.
Page 177 of the PHB says:
Stealth. Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.
IOW, check stealth when you are trying to either hide or you are trying to move without being noticed.
If you were standing next to the target and the distraction was used to make people look away while you grabbed the pouch and then you just stood there looking nonchalant without trying to leave then I don't see how stealth could apply. You are standing in the open and not trying to sneak so there simply is no stealth involved. As a DM I would roll the checks to see if the mark and anybody close enough to notice the pickpocket were successfully distracted, then have you roll sleight of hand, giving advantage only if everybody was distracted.
But if you were standing away from the target and used the distraction to move close, grab the money, then move back away from the target all without being seen then there is clearly a need for a stealth check to cover your movement to and from the mark. Even if a person does not see you actually taking the money, anybody who sees an old man quickly move up behind somebody then quickly move away is likely to be suspicious.
$endgroup$
The important factor, and one you do not mention in your question, is whether or not you were trying to hide or move sneakily at any point.
Page 177 of the PHB says:
Stealth. Make a Dexterity (Stealth) check when you attempt to conceal yourself from enemies, slink past guards, slip away without being noticed, or sneak up on someone without being seen or heard.
IOW, check stealth when you are trying to either hide or you are trying to move without being noticed.
If you were standing next to the target and the distraction was used to make people look away while you grabbed the pouch and then you just stood there looking nonchalant without trying to leave then I don't see how stealth could apply. You are standing in the open and not trying to sneak so there simply is no stealth involved. As a DM I would roll the checks to see if the mark and anybody close enough to notice the pickpocket were successfully distracted, then have you roll sleight of hand, giving advantage only if everybody was distracted.
But if you were standing away from the target and used the distraction to move close, grab the money, then move back away from the target all without being seen then there is clearly a need for a stealth check to cover your movement to and from the mark. Even if a person does not see you actually taking the money, anybody who sees an old man quickly move up behind somebody then quickly move away is likely to be suspicious.
answered 5 hours ago
krbkrb
2,132415
2,132415
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the underlying issue here is a misunderstanding of some very basic rules of 5th edition D&D, namely, there's no such thing as a stealth check or a slight of hand check.
5e, unlike previous editions, has no skill checks. It has Ability Checks. If a skill proficiency applies to the task at hand and the creature doing the task has proficiency with that skill, then they add their proficiency modifier to the Ability Check. Even in that case, it's still an Ability Check, not a skill check. So, understanding that subtle but important difference, the resolution of the situation becomes much clearer.
The situation calls for an Ability Check. Which ability is the correct one for this Ability Check? Clearly Dexterity. The DM asks for a (single) Dexterity Check. But wait, what about my skills? The DM can pick one or more skill proficiencies that apply, and if you have proficiency in any one of the skills that apply, you add your proficiency modifier to the roll.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the underlying issue here is a misunderstanding of some very basic rules of 5th edition D&D, namely, there's no such thing as a stealth check or a slight of hand check.
5e, unlike previous editions, has no skill checks. It has Ability Checks. If a skill proficiency applies to the task at hand and the creature doing the task has proficiency with that skill, then they add their proficiency modifier to the Ability Check. Even in that case, it's still an Ability Check, not a skill check. So, understanding that subtle but important difference, the resolution of the situation becomes much clearer.
The situation calls for an Ability Check. Which ability is the correct one for this Ability Check? Clearly Dexterity. The DM asks for a (single) Dexterity Check. But wait, what about my skills? The DM can pick one or more skill proficiencies that apply, and if you have proficiency in any one of the skills that apply, you add your proficiency modifier to the roll.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the underlying issue here is a misunderstanding of some very basic rules of 5th edition D&D, namely, there's no such thing as a stealth check or a slight of hand check.
5e, unlike previous editions, has no skill checks. It has Ability Checks. If a skill proficiency applies to the task at hand and the creature doing the task has proficiency with that skill, then they add their proficiency modifier to the Ability Check. Even in that case, it's still an Ability Check, not a skill check. So, understanding that subtle but important difference, the resolution of the situation becomes much clearer.
The situation calls for an Ability Check. Which ability is the correct one for this Ability Check? Clearly Dexterity. The DM asks for a (single) Dexterity Check. But wait, what about my skills? The DM can pick one or more skill proficiencies that apply, and if you have proficiency in any one of the skills that apply, you add your proficiency modifier to the roll.
$endgroup$
I think the underlying issue here is a misunderstanding of some very basic rules of 5th edition D&D, namely, there's no such thing as a stealth check or a slight of hand check.
5e, unlike previous editions, has no skill checks. It has Ability Checks. If a skill proficiency applies to the task at hand and the creature doing the task has proficiency with that skill, then they add their proficiency modifier to the Ability Check. Even in that case, it's still an Ability Check, not a skill check. So, understanding that subtle but important difference, the resolution of the situation becomes much clearer.
The situation calls for an Ability Check. Which ability is the correct one for this Ability Check? Clearly Dexterity. The DM asks for a (single) Dexterity Check. But wait, what about my skills? The DM can pick one or more skill proficiencies that apply, and if you have proficiency in any one of the skills that apply, you add your proficiency modifier to the roll.
answered 3 hours ago
Derek StuckiDerek Stucki
22.3k772113
22.3k772113
add a comment |
add a comment |
SmarticusRex is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmarticusRex is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmarticusRex is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmarticusRex is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149274%2fwhen-stealing-something-do-you-need-to-roll-stealth-and-sleight-of-hand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hello, SmarticusRex, and welcome to the RPG.stackexchange community! Kindly take the tour. This question, while an interesting one, is not very suitable for our format in its current form --- our Q&A format cannot handle opinion-based questions. You might get better and more diverse answers on an RPG forum. However, feel welcome to ask questions better suited for our format any time you like!
$endgroup$
– kviiri
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome. Please take the tour and see help center, especially "Asking" section. Asking for personal opinions are not allowed. You may ask for the rules that cover specific activity, you may ask how this should be resolved, but don't make it a pool or anything, please.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
I guess trying to solve a minor disagreement between a player (me) and a dm. He felt like I should role a stealth check followed by a sleight of hand check. I thought I should role a sleight of hand check with advantage since I had gone to all the trouble to orchestrate the distraction with a party member and disguise myself.
$endgroup$
– SmarticusRex
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Related on Do sleight of hand checks cover stealthiness?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
8 hours ago