Does a proton have a binding energy?The “binding energy” of bonded particles adds mass?Tritium decay is spontaneous even if the binding energy of tritium is higher than the binding energy of 3He. Why?Negative or positive binding energy?Calculating binding energy of a moleculeWhy is there a difference in measured binding energy vs formula for binding energy?Binding energy of the daughter nucleusDefect mass and Binding energyIf a nucleus is radioactive, will another nucleus with lesser binding energy be necessarily radioactive?For which kind of nuclear reactions is the nuclear binding energy per nucleon appropriate?$E = mc^2$ and Binding Energy Confusion
Has a life raft ever been successfully deployed on a modern commercial flight?
Find All Possible Unique Combinations of Letters in a Word
Explain why a line can never intersect a plane in exactly two points.
Why don't we have a weaning party like Avraham did?
Drawing a second weapon as part of an attack?
How much steel armor can you wear and still be able to swim?
Is there a difference between an NFC and RFID chip?
How did the Vostok ejection seat safely eject an astronaut from a sealed space capsule?
What are the current battlegrounds for people’s “rights” in the UK?
Is it illegal to withhold someone's passport and green card in California?
How to work with PETG? Settings, caveats, etc
What is the "ls" directory in my home directory?
Second 100 amp breaker inside existing 200 amp residential panel for new detached garage
Covering index used despite missing column
What are Elsa's reasons for selecting the Holy Grail on behalf of Donovan?
Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?
"Correct me if I'm wrong"
What mathematical theory is required for high frequency trading?
Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?
King or Queen-Which piece is which?
Designing a magic-compatible polearm
Too early in the morning to have SODA?
Definition of 'vrit'
Why does Linux list NVMe drives as /dev/nvme0 instead of /dev/sda?
Does a proton have a binding energy?
The “binding energy” of bonded particles adds mass?Tritium decay is spontaneous even if the binding energy of tritium is higher than the binding energy of 3He. Why?Negative or positive binding energy?Calculating binding energy of a moleculeWhy is there a difference in measured binding energy vs formula for binding energy?Binding energy of the daughter nucleusDefect mass and Binding energyIf a nucleus is radioactive, will another nucleus with lesser binding energy be necessarily radioactive?For which kind of nuclear reactions is the nuclear binding energy per nucleon appropriate?$E = mc^2$ and Binding Energy Confusion
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:
$$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$
The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.
Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?
nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:
$$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$
The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.
Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?
nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:
$$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$
The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.
Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?
nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy
$endgroup$
When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:
$$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$
The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.
Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?
nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy
nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy
edited 5 hours ago
Ben Crowell
57.1k6172331
57.1k6172331
asked 8 hours ago
João BravoJoão Bravo
28718
28718
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486634%2fdoes-a-proton-have-a-binding-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
Seyed Mohsen AyyoubzadehSeyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh
1511
1511
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.
$endgroup$
No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.
answered 5 hours ago
Ben CrowellBen Crowell
57.1k6172331
57.1k6172331
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.
$endgroup$
Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.
answered 6 hours ago
Michael WalsbyMichael Walsby
46216
46216
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
$endgroup$
– João Bravo
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486634%2fdoes-a-proton-have-a-binding-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown