Does a proton have a binding energy?The “binding energy” of bonded particles adds mass?Tritium decay is spontaneous even if the binding energy of tritium is higher than the binding energy of 3He. Why?Negative or positive binding energy?Calculating binding energy of a moleculeWhy is there a difference in measured binding energy vs formula for binding energy?Binding energy of the daughter nucleusDefect mass and Binding energyIf a nucleus is radioactive, will another nucleus with lesser binding energy be necessarily radioactive?For which kind of nuclear reactions is the nuclear binding energy per nucleon appropriate?$E = mc^2$ and Binding Energy Confusion

Has a life raft ever been successfully deployed on a modern commercial flight?

Find All Possible Unique Combinations of Letters in a Word

Explain why a line can never intersect a plane in exactly two points.

Why don't we have a weaning party like Avraham did?

Drawing a second weapon as part of an attack?

How much steel armor can you wear and still be able to swim?

Is there a difference between an NFC and RFID chip?

How did the Vostok ejection seat safely eject an astronaut from a sealed space capsule?

What are the current battlegrounds for people’s “rights” in the UK?

Is it illegal to withhold someone's passport and green card in California?

How to work with PETG? Settings, caveats, etc

What is the "ls" directory in my home directory?

Second 100 amp breaker inside existing 200 amp residential panel for new detached garage

Covering index used despite missing column

What are Elsa's reasons for selecting the Holy Grail on behalf of Donovan?

Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?

"Correct me if I'm wrong"

What mathematical theory is required for high frequency trading?

Why is it easier to balance a non-moving bike standing up than sitting down?

King or Queen-Which piece is which?

Designing a magic-compatible polearm

Too early in the morning to have SODA?

Definition of 'vrit'

Why does Linux list NVMe drives as /dev/nvme0 instead of /dev/sda?



Does a proton have a binding energy?


The “binding energy” of bonded particles adds mass?Tritium decay is spontaneous even if the binding energy of tritium is higher than the binding energy of 3He. Why?Negative or positive binding energy?Calculating binding energy of a moleculeWhy is there a difference in measured binding energy vs formula for binding energy?Binding energy of the daughter nucleusDefect mass and Binding energyIf a nucleus is radioactive, will another nucleus with lesser binding energy be necessarily radioactive?For which kind of nuclear reactions is the nuclear binding energy per nucleon appropriate?$E = mc^2$ and Binding Energy Confusion






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:



$$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$



The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.



Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:



    $$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$



    The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.



    Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:



      $$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$



      The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.



      Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      When calculating the $Q$-value, $Q = Delta M cdot c^2$, of this reaction:



      $$ ^6Li (alpha, p) ^9Be quad iff quad alpha + ^6Li longrightarrow ^9Be + p $$



      The $Q$-value can also be written in terms of binding energies $BE$.



      Should I consider the binding energy of the proton $p$ $ $ ~$1ucdot c^2$ or $0$?







      nuclear-physics physical-chemistry nuclear-engineering protons binding-energy






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      Ben Crowell

      57.1k6172331




      57.1k6172331










      asked 8 hours ago









      João BravoJoão Bravo

      28718




      28718




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor



          Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                $endgroup$
                – João Bravo
                6 hours ago











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "151"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486634%2fdoes-a-proton-have-a-binding-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor



              Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              $endgroup$

















                4












                $begingroup$

                Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor



                Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$



                  Note that binding energy is relative, like the gravitational potential energy in certain respects. That said, the binding energy of the proton could be considered non-zero if its sub-particles, i.e. quarks, are studied. However, since in the energy region of your mentioned reaction these sub-particles play no direct role (except for perhaps the underlying physics), it is more reasonable if you consider the binding energy of the nucleons, i.e. protons and neutrons, as zero. Note that if you consider the binding energy to be non-zero for both sides of the reaction, similar final results would be obtained.







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor



                  Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor



                  Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Seyed Mohsen AyyoubzadehSeyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh

                  1511




                  1511




                  New contributor



                  Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  Seyed Mohsen Ayyoubzadeh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          No, a proton doesn't have a well-defined binding energy. That would be the energy required in order to separate it into three quarks, but free quarks don't exist.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 5 hours ago









                          Ben CrowellBen Crowell

                          57.1k6172331




                          57.1k6172331





















                              0












                              $begingroup$

                              Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$








                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                                $endgroup$
                                – João Bravo
                                6 hours ago















                              0












                              $begingroup$

                              Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$








                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                                $endgroup$
                                – João Bravo
                                6 hours ago













                              0












                              0








                              0





                              $begingroup$

                              Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Yes, protons have binding energy when they combine with neutrons to form a nucleus. In the fusion process where nucleons combine to form helium, they require less mass within the nucleus than they did as free particles. This surplus mass is emitted as binding energy, which is where the sun gets its power. When a nucleon leaves the nucleus,it follows that this binding energy must be re-supplied to it before it can become a free particle.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered 6 hours ago









                              Michael WalsbyMichael Walsby

                              46216




                              46216







                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                                $endgroup$
                                – João Bravo
                                6 hours ago












                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                                $endgroup$
                                – João Bravo
                                6 hours ago







                              1




                              1




                              $begingroup$
                              I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                              $endgroup$
                              – João Bravo
                              6 hours ago




                              $begingroup$
                              I understand that, but I was just asking from the point of view of the formation of a proton
                              $endgroup$
                              – João Bravo
                              6 hours ago

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f486634%2fdoes-a-proton-have-a-binding-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                              Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                              Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її