When does a function NOT have an antiderivative? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?Does L'Hôpital's work the other way?Finding volumes - when to use double integrals and triple integrals?Why does a function have to be bounded to be integrable?Proof that order of integration does not matter for non-continuous functionswhy we say this function have closed form while the other doesn't?Antiderivative of unbounded function?antiderivative of jump-discontinuous functionWhy is it legal to take the antiderivative of both sides of an equation?why $int sqrt(sin x)^2, mathrmdx = int |sin x| ,mathrmdx$Why does the antiderivative of $frac1x$ have to be $0$ at precisely $x=1$? (when $C = 0$)

Why is a lens darker than other ones when applying the same settings?

Short story about astronauts fertilizing soil with their own bodies

Marquee sign letters

How does TikZ render an arc?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

How do you write "wild blueberries flavored"?

New Order #6: Easter Egg

Does the universe have a fixed centre of mass?

Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?

One-one communication

When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?

How does the body cool itself in a stillsuit?

Is this Half dragon Quaggoth Balanced

How to make triangles with rounded sides and corners? (squircle with 3 sides)

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

Does the transliteration of 'Dravidian' exist in Hindu scripture? Does 'Dravida' refer to a Geographical area or an ethnic group?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

As a dual citizen, my US passport will expire one day after traveling to the US. Will this work?

Vertical ranges of Column Plots in 12

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?



When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?Does L'Hôpital's work the other way?Finding volumes - when to use double integrals and triple integrals?Why does a function have to be bounded to be integrable?Proof that order of integration does not matter for non-continuous functionswhy we say this function have closed form while the other doesn't?Antiderivative of unbounded function?antiderivative of jump-discontinuous functionWhy is it legal to take the antiderivative of both sides of an equation?why $int sqrt(sin x)^2, mathrmdx = int |sin x| ,mathrmdx$Why does the antiderivative of $frac1x$ have to be $0$ at precisely $x=1$? (when $C = 0$)










1












$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^x^2 dx$ as $int e^2x dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    4 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^x^2 dx$ as $int e^2x dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    4 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^x^2 dx$ as $int e^2x dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I know this question may sound naïve but why can't we write $int e^x^2 dx$ as $int e^2x dx$? The former does not have an antiderivative, while the latter has.



In light of this question, what are sufficient conditions for a function NOT to have an antiderivative. That is, do we need careful examination of a function to say it does not have an antiderivative or is there any way that once you see the function, you can right away say it does not have an antiderivative?







integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









RobRob

333110




333110







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    4 hours ago












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
    $endgroup$
    – Rob
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    $(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
    $endgroup$
    – Tartaglia's Stutter
    4 hours ago







6




6




$begingroup$
Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Maybe because $x^2$ isn't the same as $2x$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
$endgroup$
– Rob
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Can't we write $a^b^c$ as $a^bc$?
$endgroup$
– Rob
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
$$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$e^x^2=e^xcdot xneq e^xcdot e^x = e^x+x=e^2x$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
$$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$$$$a^(b^c)neq a^bcdot c$$
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
$(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
$endgroup$
– Tartaglia's Stutter
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
$(e^x)^2$ would be where you use the rule that you're thinking of.
$endgroup$
– Tartaglia's Stutter
4 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



$$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



So what should $a^b^c$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



$$a^b^c = a^left(b^cright)$$



Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



$$a^bc = left(a^bright)^c$$



Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    The exponential expression $a^b^c$ is equal to $a^(b^c)$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
    $$largex_0^x_1^x_2^dots^x_n=x_0^left(x_1^left(x_2^left(dots^(x_n)right)right)right)$$



    For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Foreman
      3 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      3 hours ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      3 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
      $endgroup$
      – MathIsFun
      2 hours ago


















    0












    $begingroup$

    Liouville's theorem:




    In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



    The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^-x^2$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac sin ( x ) x $ and $ x^x $.




    From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196128%2fwhen-does-a-function-not-have-an-antiderivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



      $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



      So what should $a^b^c$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



      $$a^b^c = a^left(b^cright)$$



      Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



      $$a^bc = left(a^bright)^c$$



      Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



        $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



        So what should $a^b^c$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



        $$a^b^c = a^left(b^cright)$$



        Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



        $$a^bc = left(a^bright)^c$$



        Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



          $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



          So what should $a^b^c$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



          $$a^b^c = a^left(b^cright)$$



          Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



          $$a^bc = left(a^bright)^c$$



          Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          As you might have realised, exponentiation is not associative:



          $$left(a^bright)^c ne a^left(b^cright)$$



          So what should $a^b^c$ mean? The convention is that exponentiation is right associative:



          $$a^b^c = a^left(b^cright)$$



          Because the otherwise left-associative exponentiation is just less useful and redundant, as it can be represented by multiplication inside the power (again as you might have realised):



          $$a^bc = left(a^bright)^c$$



          Wikipedia on associativity of exponentiation.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          peterwhypeterwhy

          12.3k21229




          12.3k21229





















              1












              $begingroup$

              The exponential expression $a^b^c$ is equal to $a^(b^c)$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
              $$largex_0^x_1^x_2^dots^x_n=x_0^left(x_1^left(x_2^left(dots^(x_n)right)right)right)$$



              For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                $endgroup$
                – Peter Foreman
                3 hours ago











              • $begingroup$
                I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago















              1












              $begingroup$

              The exponential expression $a^b^c$ is equal to $a^(b^c)$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
              $$largex_0^x_1^x_2^dots^x_n=x_0^left(x_1^left(x_2^left(dots^(x_n)right)right)right)$$



              For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                $endgroup$
                – Peter Foreman
                3 hours ago











              • $begingroup$
                I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago













              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              The exponential expression $a^b^c$ is equal to $a^(b^c)$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
              $$largex_0^x_1^x_2^dots^x_n=x_0^left(x_1^left(x_2^left(dots^(x_n)right)right)right)$$



              For the second part of your question see this duplicate.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The exponential expression $a^b^c$ is equal to $a^(b^c)$. It is not equal to $(a^b)^c=a^bcdot c$ as you seem to think it is. In general an exponential is evaluated from right to left with the highest term evaluated first. That is to say
              $$largex_0^x_1^x_2^dots^x_n=x_0^left(x_1^left(x_2^left(dots^(x_n)right)right)right)$$



              For the second part of your question see this duplicate.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

              8,4971321




              8,4971321











              • $begingroup$
                I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                $endgroup$
                – Peter Foreman
                3 hours ago











              • $begingroup$
                I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
                $endgroup$
                – Peter Foreman
                3 hours ago











              • $begingroup$
                I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I didn't think $a^(b^c) = (a^b)^c$. Once we put parentheses it is all clear. But I think one would not be wrong for interpreting $e^x^2$ as $e^2x$, since without parentheses it can mean both things . Am I correct?
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Foreman
              3 hours ago





              $begingroup$
              NO! Without parentheses the expression $a^b^c$ is always equal to $a^left(b^cright)$. See here - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Identities_and_properties
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Foreman
              3 hours ago













              $begingroup$
              I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              I see! Well, I learnt something new that bothered me for a long time. So $e ^ x^2$ is understood as $e^(x^2)$. Also the link you sent, which I could not find at first, is very interesting but a little advanced for me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                $endgroup$
                – MathIsFun
                2 hours ago















              1












              $begingroup$

              To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                $endgroup$
                – MathIsFun
                2 hours ago













              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              To answer the titular question, there's a result in real analysis that shows that derivatives satisfy have the intermediate value property (just like continuous functions). It follows that a function that skips values cannot be the derivative of anything in the usual sense. This implies that functions with jump discontinuities (like the Heaviside step, for example) cannot be the derivative of anything.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              AllawonderAllawonder

              2,349617




              2,349617











              • $begingroup$
                Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                $endgroup$
                – MathIsFun
                2 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
                $endgroup$
                – Rob
                3 hours ago










              • $begingroup$
                $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
                $endgroup$
                – MathIsFun
                2 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              Correct me if I am wrong, but that does not explain why $e^x^2$ has no antiderivative, right? I understand you are answering the titular question.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              3 hours ago












              $begingroup$
              $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
              $endgroup$
              – MathIsFun
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              $e^x^2$ does have an antiderivative, but it can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions. Having an antiderivative and having an elementary antiderivative are not the same thing.
              $endgroup$
              – MathIsFun
              2 hours ago











              0












              $begingroup$

              Liouville's theorem:




              In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



              The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^-x^2$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac sin ( x ) x $ and $ x^x $.




              From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Liouville's theorem:




                In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^-x^2$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac sin ( x ) x $ and $ x^x $.




                From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Liouville's theorem:




                  In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                  The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^-x^2$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac sin ( x ) x $ and $ x^x $.




                  From wikipedia. See the article for more details.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Liouville's theorem:




                  In mathematics, Liouville's theorem, originally formulated by Joseph Liouville in 1833 to 1841, places an important restriction on antiderivatives that can be expressed as elementary functions.



                  The antiderivatives of certain elementary functions cannot themselves be expressed as elementary functions. A standard example of such a function is $e^-x^2$, whose antiderivative is (with a multiplier of a constant) the error function, familiar from statistics. Other examples include the functions $frac sin ( x ) x $ and $ x^x $.




                  From wikipedia. See the article for more details.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 17 mins ago









                  AccidentalFourierTransformAccidentalFourierTransform

                  1,462828




                  1,462828



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196128%2fwhen-does-a-function-not-have-an-antiderivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480